iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Chevron Leaving Coal Mining Industry, Selling Mines In Wyoming, New Mexico & Alabama

MEAD GRUVER   01/28/11 05:57 PM ET   AP

Earns Chevron

CHEYENNE, Wyo. — Petroleum giant Chevron Corp. said Friday it plans to get out of the coal industry by the end of the year.

The decision came after the company determined that new coal technologies were developing too slowly to make staying in the industry a good strategy, Chevron Mining Inc. spokeswoman Margaret Lejuste said.

One of the technologies is known as coal-to-liquids, in which coal is processed into diesel, gasoline or other fuels.

"Those technologies are so far into the future, 10 to 15 years in the future, they made the strategic decision to focus on other operations other than mining," she said of the company.

Chevron intends to sell off three coal mines in Wyoming, New Mexico and Alabama. The sites include the company's open pit mine outside Kemmerer in western Wyoming, which has been on the market for about a week.

"It's my understanding there are a number of interested parties who are looking at the mine," Lejuste said.

The company also is closing a deal with Tampa, Fla.-based Walter Energy to sell its North River underground mine in western Alabama. A tentative agreement with Walter Energy was announced last year.

San Ramon, Calif.-based Chevron also may sell reclaimed land from a surface coal mine in northwestern New Mexico that has been closed since 2009.

The three mines together produced nearly 10 million tons of coal in 2009.

Chevron also intends to sell its 50 percent stake in a proposed coal mine outside Sheridan in northern Wyoming.

The Kemmerer mine, which employs about 300 people and produces around 5 million tons of coal a year, is one of the world's largest open pit coal mines. Even so, it's a small producer compared with the strip mines of northeast Wyoming, which can yield upward of 100 million tons of coal a year.

Wyoming produces 40 percent of the nation's coal, more than any other state, and has invested heavily in coal technologies.

Coal-to-liquids should be viable at today's oil prices, said Mark Northam, director of the University of Wyoming School of Energy Resources.

But questions remain about the performance and long-term viability of coal-to-liquids plants, Northam said.

"Some folks can stomach that uncertainty and some can't," he said.

A company such as Chevron has other business besides coal to fall back on, he said, whereas a company such as St. Louis-based Arch Coal is all about coal.

Arch Coal has invested in a planned $2.7 billion coal-to-liquids plant tentatively set to open in southeast Wyoming in 2014.

"If you were looking at it from the point of view of Arch Coal, where coal is your product and you're looking to expand the market and protect its position, you would have a different view," Northam said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

CHEYENNE, Wyo. — Petroleum giant Chevron Corp. said Friday it plans to get out of the coal industry by the end of the year. The decision came after the company determined that new coal technolo...
CHEYENNE, Wyo. — Petroleum giant Chevron Corp. said Friday it plans to get out of the coal industry by the end of the year. The decision came after the company determined that new coal technolo...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 94
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SaveWillowpark
12:42 PM on 02/07/2011
This is very inspiring to me. More and more I am seeing big players re-focusing on new greener technologies. They just might earn my business yet!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patches12
01:34 PM on 02/02/2011
THANKS OBAMA ADMINISTRATION .... JUST WHAT WE NEED.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SaveWillowpark
12:49 PM on 02/07/2011
Since when did Obama become the CEO of Chevron? Chevron did a profit loss analysis...you know, return on investment...that sort of thing. We are running out of oil. It is not the future, it is the past. Just last year the former VP of Chevron stated that gas prices would be nearing $5.00 a gallon just in time for the 2012 elections. All the hype about Obama is a big corporate hoax to make the right wingers think Obama is bad just so that they can hopefully make a power grab in 2012, put one of their oil men back in office, then, keep soaking us for cash until every last drop of oil has been sold. Never mind the fact that it will break the middle class and leave vulnerable and defenseless the working poor who cannot afford alternative powered vehicles in the process. How will you get around or to work if you can't afford gas? Are you really willing to fork over the equivalent of a mortgage payment between your car note, gas and car insurance payment?

Think smart, think green! It is our future.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Forester
Overeducated woods worker.
10:59 PM on 02/01/2011
It hurts to say this, but at least in California, Chevron has been on board for a lot of environmental programs. They went on record as being against repealing our GHG reduction laws, and in the process managed to expel some pretty dirty Texas competitors.
09:55 PM on 02/01/2011
Good ! ----- Now they need to diversify into the clean, safe alternative energy
of the future. Wind, solar, wave energy, geothermal and second generation biofuels
all need to ramp up and move us into more sustainable future.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Egalitare
10:59 AM on 02/01/2011
They are getting out of coal to focus on natural gas.
10:39 AM on 02/01/2011
They must have gotten tired of being part of the "clean coal" lie.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlonzoQuijana
10:31 AM on 02/01/2011
No surprise here. Chevron is basically an oil and gas company. Coal is not their core competency. Other companies, like Marathon, are divesting refining and just focusing on E and P. Connoco/Phillips may do this soon.
09:47 AM on 02/01/2011
Anyone who still believes that the oil industry is anything but profit driven is delusional. It's time to nationalize our fuel programs - oil, gas, an coal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlonzoQuijana
10:26 AM on 02/01/2011
Yes then all decisions would be political and not based on sound economics. Like corn-based biofuels, which are creating food inflation worldwide? It's bad now, but you'll get even more corn and wheat land taken out of food production. (Remember the Iowa caucuses?) You want the U.S. congress to control the energy industry? Brilliant.
11:34 AM on 02/01/2011
The only reason there is a conflict of interest is because of the outside money. If there were no "outside money" from a non-existent energy company, the problem you describe would not exist.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
margoharris
I used to be Snow White but I drifted.
03:20 PM on 02/01/2011
Food inflation is being caused by GREED. The demand and supply of food is just about e qual but the Greedy Hedge Funds are manipulating the supply to drive up prices to line their own pockets causing food prices to rise here, by a small margin, but the effect overseas is devistating. Capitalism is to blame. "Facsim is the decay of Capitalism."-- Lenin was right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SaveWillowpark
12:53 PM on 02/07/2011
Why not just switch over to alternative fuels like industrial Hemp Oil? It's clean, it grows fast, we can use it for paper and wood as well as fuel for our cars. I think that if we are nationalizing our oil it should be in a focused effort to build a new, clean, sustainable infrastructure for our country while we still have affordable gas to fuel the construction equipment and logistic vehicles etc. It will be so much more expensive for us to do if we wait until later to do this. Look at what the war is costing us. One of the budget issues there is the fact that due to logistics gas cost $400.00 per gallon to supply troops and contractor personnel.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeffp26
09:46 AM on 02/01/2011
This is good news in hiding. When a greedy corporation like Chevron realizes that coal is a dying fuel, one we cannot continue burning if we want to stay on this planet, it is very good news. Except for the dopes who buy their interests.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VashS5
09:39 AM on 02/01/2011
One would hope that they would get into clean energy but I'm sure from a business standpoint, there is no profit in saving the world.
08:53 AM on 02/01/2011
100 million tons of coal equals 400 million tons of carbon dioxie in the atmosphere.
07:15 AM on 02/01/2011
socialize the energy industry and divest in fossil fuels NOW
photo
helioszephyr
What do you mean by "micro"?!
07:09 AM on 02/01/2011
It would be great if Chevron bucked the system and invested heavily into renewable/solar/clean energies and power systems... it's an investment into their future and ours.
08:47 AM on 02/01/2011
You mean like when Atlanic Richfield did in the 1980s when it bought into solar panels and shut them down?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SaveWillowpark
12:58 PM on 02/07/2011
It is just like computers. We are sold the technology bit by bit to the end that the companies get the most profit out of their investment in developing the technology. They are going to sell us oil until it runs out. They will squeeze every penny out of us possible. Carter put solar panels on the white house. I don't know what gas cost back then but I know it cost me $.89 per gallon in 1993. Now I am paying $3.17. Don't you see? Look how much money they have made holding off that technology for this long. Try to remember, although companies now have the rights of a person they do not have the conscience of a person. It is all about dollars and cents!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
P Markham72
06:48 AM on 02/01/2011
Why mess with coal when you can make billion dollar profits ripping people off on their gasoline
photo
abbienormal
What hump?
06:26 AM on 02/01/2011
Now Chevron just has to clean up Equador and compensate its residents for the horrible damage done to their land and water sources.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SaveWillowpark
01:01 PM on 02/07/2011
Do they really? I agree with you they should. It's been like 20 years already hasn't it? I remember watching a movie on Netflix about that. They have been fighting for years. But then you have villagers fighting a big company like Chevron... Meanwhile, people have been sick and dying. Very sad.