iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Middle Class Children Increasingly Relying On Public Programs, Report Finds

Children

First Posted: 02/01/11 03:25 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:30 PM ET

Since the income gap between middle-class and wealthy families in the United States has grown by more than 50 percent since 1985, middle-class parents are increasingly relying on government-provided health and education programs to support their children, according to a new study by the Foundation for Child Development.

The FCD report finds that even prior to the recession that began in 2007, the gap in real family income separating a middle-class family -- one with an annual income between $22,758 and $110,000 -- from a high-income one expanded from $59,800 in 1985 to $93,100 by 2008. Between 2000 and 2008, middle-class families experienced a drop in real family income of more than $4,000, compared to a dip of just $139 for the top 20 percent of earners.

Despite a decrease in the median family income and a rise in the proportion of single-parent households and childhood obesity among middle-class families, health insurance coverage and prekindergarten enrollment have steadily risen in that demographic, suggesting that public health and education initiatives have played an increasingly important role in the welfare of middle-class children.

Donald Hernandez, senior adviser to the Foundation for Child Development and author of the report, said his findings show that middle class is clearly not what it used to be.

"It makes me ask the question, 'What is the middle class?'" he told HuffPost. "We used to think of it as having the capacity to pay for a lot of basic needs and services, and that's less and less the case from the point of view of children and the increasing need they have to depend on government programs to get basic early education and health care."

For U.S. children, things may seem dire: The nation's child poverty rate rose to 20.7 percent in 2009 from 19 percent in 2008, making it the highest of any age group. The welfare of middle-class children has also been declining over the past quarter-century in more areas than income and basic needs, according to the FCD study. The growing proportion of single-parent households and households without a securely-employed parent, as well as a decline in residential mobility, suggest that social relationships deteriorated for middle-class children between 1985 and 2008, and likely worsened during the recession.

Hernandez said he is concerned that the proposed budget cuts across federal, state and local levels will slash the safety net of middle- and working-class children at a time when they need it the most.

"Even today, one in 10 middle-class children are not covered by health insurance, and about half of young children in the middle class are not enrolled in pre-K programs," he said. "There's still a long way to go, and my fear is that big budget cuts in the coming months and year or two, or however long these economic issues continue, will really have a very negative and devastating effect on these children."

As President Barack Obama's Feb. 14 budget announcement approaches, Hernandez said he hopes Congress will keep the consider the needs of children while debating the merits of these government-funded programs against other budget priorities.

"If we don't invest in our children, and particularly the young children, the next generation will not be able to do what it needs to do to provide for itself or the Baby Boomers," Hernandez said. "We can't afford to write off those children. If budget cuts to programs that are key to these children are made at state and local levels, that generation will suffer, and so will American productivity and America's position in the world."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST IMPACT

Since the income gap between middle-class and wealthy families in the United States has grown by more than 50 percent since 1985, middle-class parents are increasingly relying on government-provided h...
Since the income gap between middle-class and wealthy families in the United States has grown by more than 50 percent since 1985, middle-class parents are increasingly relying on government-provided h...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 646
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
paulwl
10:23 AM on 02/05/2011
But nooo, we have so much money to spend on WAR...thanks to old white republican men! "We The People" NEED to vote this fools out of office( duh, you dummies who did not vote, NEED TOO!)
It is only a matter of time before we are SECOND WORLD(like European communities)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
builderman55
Featherless Biped
01:53 PM on 02/04/2011
A recent study was done, asking people from all economic classes how much money they would need to feel secure, content. All of the lower classes gave a figure, like, an extra $10,000, or an extra $40,000 etc. The wealthiest answered, without exception that they would need double what they had. Think about that for a minute and see if it doesn't perhaps illustrate what is wrong with our current system. Because if the person worth 1 billion needs another billion to be happy, then when they have $2 billion, they will need $4 billion. Think for a moment of the woman who's deceased husband had reaped enormous rewards from Madoff gave $7 BILLION back to the government. WTF is good about people sitting on so much money that they can write checks for $7 billion and still not suffer any diminution of their lifestyle...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
builderman55
Featherless Biped
01:37 PM on 02/04/2011
I wonder, for those who scream Socialism every time the government redistributes income, at what point do we call the income imbalance too much? 2% of the population now own 49% of the nation's wealth and middle class families are starting to rely on government assistance. Is it when 1% own 50/60/70%? Or do we just let the wealthy amass as much wealth as they can and be thankful when they let some of it trickle down? In El Salvador in the 80's, most of the nation's wealth was owned by 13 families. We are a long way from that, but income inequality causes strife and discontent, and anyone with their eyes open knows that our economic system is rigged. Remember that Goldman Sachs, when thriving on taxpayer bailout money demanded bonuses and were even indignant when it was suggested that they be limited.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:53 PM on 02/02/2011
The irony of entitlement in America: If you're a billionaire and don't pay taxes, you're entitled to it because you're an entrepreneur (read gangster) who provides jobs - to the Chinese. If you're a citizen whose "class" has taken it on the chin and in the kidneys and the top of the head, in the eye once or twice. Right, if you need assistance to help when it is no fault of your own (how can anyone blame children for their circumstances then judge them, as we have always done the poor, and especially parents/) it is just tough love and lots of homeless shelters, crime, drugs, forced prostitution.

Yes, sir, America, love it or leave it . . .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
T4
Entreprenuer and financial consultant
05:41 PM on 02/02/2011
and the children of the megabankers had you tax dollars pay off with $3 trillion so far are living in luxury. One GS energy trader got a$90 million bonus from your tax dollars! Give a thanks to Obama
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nmaddog7
01:40 AM on 02/02/2011
This is why we sheeple vote for horrible, gibberish spewing, war mongers like Barack Obama--it's because the other war the govt has going on, the one that no one wants to talk about, is the war against the middle class, of which the Republicans are the far right hawks of.
The choice is: vote for the man with the most generic bland platitudes and who is pressing on the right buttons/slash playing the right cards(ppssssssttttt.. The race one-his folksy Black American accent is just as appropriated as N.Englander GWB's Big Texan accent, ask any educated Black men if they believe the accident to be genuine). Or you can vote for the party that literally plans to make it easier for corporations to poison your baby with bad milk, toxic water and air, and wants to help increase the price of illicit drugs thus helping to reap giant profits for their secret friend.
In other words, vote for a Democrat you damn Yankee, or we will f u six ways from Sunday, and have our uneducated Mob full of vicious horrible people cheering for their water to be more toxic too, all in the name of freedom b/c every vicious horrible person knows that stopping a corooration from giving horrible life destroying birth defects to milllions of children through polluting the very air they have will halt the wheels of progress and before you know it we will be living like Soviet slaves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
builderman55
Featherless Biped
01:39 PM on 02/04/2011
I detect a hint of anger here...
12:16 AM on 02/02/2011
let's get rid of income taxes and corporate taxes and institute a 30% flat tax on consumption. Don't you think that would even the playing field a bit?
09:29 AM on 02/02/2011
No, poor people would pay proportionally more, because they spend all their income. It would be an effective tax of almost 30% for them, while the people who earn more spend smaller percent of their money, they invest the rest. Let's say somebody makes $20million, and spends 10% of it, it would be a 3% effective tax.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ramal
One's only real life is the life one never leads.
11:06 PM on 02/01/2011
Then they aren't middle class.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marvelle
digital strategist, marketing/communications
12:01 AM on 02/02/2011
I think that's what the article is hinting at. Disappearing "middle" class.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ramal
One's only real life is the life one never leads.
06:53 PM on 02/02/2011
I think you are right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mortifyd
09:18 AM on 02/02/2011
Have you noticed how everyone in America except the super rich believes themselves to be part of this mysterious "middle class" ?
09:30 AM on 02/02/2011
yes..it is a myth..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ramal
One's only real life is the life one never leads.
06:53 PM on 02/02/2011
Quite so. The only thing that is more amazing is the number of poor and lower class who support tax cut for the rich because they expect that they, themselves, will be "rich" someday.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
IsotelusMaximus
Appalachian American
11:04 PM on 02/01/2011
According to the FCD, a family is considered middle class starting at $22,758... Anyone else think that figure seems extremely low? I would consider that working poor. Is using this low number an attempt to skew numbers or to simply make people feel good about themselves?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marvelle
digital strategist, marketing/communications
12:02 AM on 02/02/2011
Shifting baselines... it does seem low but I guess that's how it is now.
09:34 AM on 02/02/2011
It is way to low for middle class, though it is a huge difference where they live.
I think you are right, if everybody considers himself middle class it is easier to convince them to oppose social programs. Never though of it..but it makes a lot of sense..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PeterNPaul
Giants only fear slingshots.
11:02 PM on 02/01/2011
The State Department is proposing spending an additional $20B on Iraq, Afghanistan,and Pakistan (this is non-defense spending, including 10.7B to help them shift from military to civilian programs ). The total budget for the Dept of Education is $46B. With one stroke of the pen, we drop $20B there, while our kids do without here. Its not right.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
IsotelusMaximus
Appalachian American
11:08 PM on 02/01/2011
Does the Department of Education really deserve that $46B? I'd say, nope. They have not made any progress in helping the advance our kids. Education is a local, not a federal issue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PeterNPaul
Giants only fear slingshots.
11:29 PM on 02/01/2011
Im not sure who deserves it, but I know Afghanistan, Pakistan,and Iraq do not.
11:33 PM on 02/01/2011
It's a civic issue that should concern all American citizens.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
conservicide
I don't play nice.
10:36 PM on 02/01/2011
A democracy is defined by a middle class.

We have become a S.American country where there are rich exploiters and a poverty stricken 99%.
10:24 PM on 02/01/2011
The thing that disgusts me the most is that Head Start in California is preschool for families of low income, but you don't have to be a US citizen to enroll. California and the US governments are completely in debt. Middle class families are losing or have lost their homes. Yet we are providing education to children and families that don't even pay taxes????? How does that make any sense?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mortifyd
09:21 AM on 02/02/2011
If those kids were born here - they're AMERICANS and deserve an education. If they are not - they still deserve an education - because uneducated people are not good for any society.
10:21 AM on 02/02/2011
Just because they are not citizens doesn't necessarily mean that they don't pay taxes. If they are here legally and employed then they are paying taxes. The answer to the problem you are bringing up is to make legal residency available which would eliminate much of the illegal alien issue. However, it still doesn't boost our middle class numbers unfortunately.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matthew Minard
09:52 PM on 02/01/2011
YEAH!!!! BLAME OBAMA!!! and BUSH!!! Why don't we all shut up and work on FIXING the PROBLEM. We got too much damn debt, we are dependent on oil from BAD dictators, and WORST OF ALL.... WE CAN"T EVEN SIT DOWN AND NOT BLAME THE OTHER GUY FOR ALL THE WORLDS WOES!!! Sheesh people, I'm 30 years old. I blame ALL OF YOU OLD PEOPLE!!! I know that sounded bad... but I'll try to explain.

If you had to choose between your medicare/medicaid and social security OR instead we give all that money to "military spending"...what would you pick??? Go google how much the United States spends on military spending every year,

"Defense-related expenditures outside of the Department of Defense constitute between $319 billion and $654 billion in additional spending, bringing the total for defense spending to between $1.01 and $1.35 trillion in fiscal year 2010".

OVER A TRILLION BUCKS ALL RELATED "DEFENSE"...not to mention the 900 Billion the US has spent in Iraq and Afghanistan. So... if we took all, that cash and divided it 308,745,538 (that's the 2010 census count for the US) it would look like

1,900,000,000,000 divided by 308,745,538=6153.94 cents That's pretty close to how much every single American (the total population) have paid for defense spending since the start of the war in Afghanistan.
11:37 PM on 02/01/2011
Thanks, young 'un. Stay on that bandwagon and this ol' gal will be glad to join you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
phantom power
my patronus is an x-wing
01:31 PM on 02/03/2011
great arguement!
DIdaho
Born in the Air Force (Texas), moved to Idaho in 1
09:48 PM on 02/01/2011
Because of word limits, a follow:

We do have class warfare, because our tax system institutionalizes it. Investment income is taxed lower. It's exempt from payroll taxes, the true social welfare financing system. We actually institutionalize a system that asks those who have the most to pay the least. And at the same time, maybe as some kind of fob, we exempt half the country from the right, and the duty, to pay their fair share - and I think it's to make them feel better that those who can afford it are exempt from paying their fair share. It's a bribe, nothing less, in the guise of a benefit.

And for the 100th time, taxes do not restrict investment and employment. Those are deductible. I've been in business for 30 years, I know how it works. If I buy equipment, buildings, inventory - if I hire people, buy supplies - I deduct those. It's only when I don't invest and don't hire that I pay taxes.

If we can all finally agree on anything, please let us agree on this. Liberals, compromise on the progressive tax and agree to equally tax all income. Conservatives, agree that no income shall be privileged. Every penny, whether from wage or foreign investment, shall contribute to the common good.

Only then can we have an honest discussion of what that good is.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kamact
Market Observer
09:48 PM on 02/01/2011
I am sure our banksters would provide support, if these kids just asked,...right
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
conservicide
I don't play nice.
10:37 PM on 02/01/2011
You mean by hiring the law firm of Smith and Wesson?