iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Tom Coburn To Pentagon: Get Finances In Order Or Face Deep Cuts


First Posted: 02/01/11 02:20 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:30 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- Although many Republicans are still arguing that the Defense Department should be exempt from the belt-tightening the rest of the country is facing, Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) pressed the Joint Chiefs of Staff on Monday to get its financial activities in order.

In June, Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Michael Mullen argued that America's national debt is also its biggest national-security threat. Starting from that premise, Coburn pointed out that the Pentagon is one of the least-accountable federal agencies, unable to even produce auditable financial statements that are required by law. From his letter (emphasis added):

I will continue to push for a budget-freeze of all base budget non-military personnel accounts at the Defense Department until it complies with the law regarding auditable financial statements.

For decades, the mission of the Department of Defense to comply with basic financial standards has been viewed as a waste of scarce resources, even more so during a time of war. However, this is not supported by the actual experiences of Department of Defense agencies. As you know, the Marine Corps is already seeing impressive returns on their meager investments in the pursuit of financial improvement and audit readiness. The Defense Information Systems Agency has also identified tens of millions in net savings by improving their financial operations.

In light of these savings and the upcoming budget challenges,I ask you to aggressively pursue financial improvement and audit readiness in order to preserve the military's ability to take care of our troops today and to invest in the needed modernization of our weapon systems for the future. If done properly, this effort to improve your financial management will yield savings and prevent cuts to military personnel and programs which could occur otherwise.

Coburn has been an outspoken advocate of cuts to defense spending. "It's not hard to cut the defense budget and keep our defense exactly where it is," the senator said in November. "That's how much waste is over there. Nothing is sacrosanct, it can't be. As a matter of fact, the way the Defense Department is run now, we're actually getting less bang for the buck. If we trim it down, we'll get more bang for the buck."

In July, as a leading Republican on President Barack Obama's deficit commission, Coburn endorsed a full audit of the Pentagon.

The issue of whether to cut Pentagon spending -- and by how much -- is increasingly dividing Republicans. At a recent House Armed Services Committee hearing, Chairman Buck McKeon (R-Calif.) made clear that he will oppose any Obama administration plans to chop the Defense Department's budget, while others -- including many Tea Party-backed freshmen -- have said that the Pentagon should not be immune from the pain.

Last week, Rep. Randy Forbes (R-Va.), like Coburn, sharply criticized the Pentagon for failing to comply with the law requiring auditable financial statements from 2007 through last year.

"If the Department of Defense does not know where our defense dollars are going, how then are they qualified to talk about efficiencies?" Forbes said in a statement. "Furthermore, if the Department of Defense does not even have mechanisms in place to perform the audits, how are they able to comply with the law? Finally, if all agencies are required to perform regular audits, how is the Department of Defense able to skirt this compliance? If we want to get serious about efficiencies, we need to first make it clear that the Department of Defense is not above the law, and, second, demand to know where our defense dollars are going."

In a recent interview with CNN, Gen. Colin Powell, who served as secretary of state and chairman of the Joint Chiefs, also said that he believed the Defense Department's budget should be on the table for cuts.

"As we draw down from Iraq and as over the next several years as we draw down from Afghanistan, I see no reason why the military shouldn't be looked at," he said. "When the Cold War ended 20 years ago, when I was chairman and Mr. Cheney was secretary of Defense, we cut the defense budget by 25 percent. And we reduced the force by 500,000 active-duty soldiers, so it can be done. Now, how fast you can do it and what you have to cut out remains to be seen, but I don't think the defense budget can be made, you know, sacrosanct and it can't be touched."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Although many Republicans are still arguing that the Defense Department should be exempt from the belt-tightening the rest of the country is facing, Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) pressed the...
WASHINGTON -- Although many Republicans are still arguing that the Defense Department should be exempt from the belt-tightening the rest of the country is facing, Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) pressed the...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 308
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Oldchef
Former Executive Chef, tr0ll watcher
02:36 PM on 02/02/2011
OMG! A Republican politician willing to cut "defense" spending?
photo
Morgantheaxe
Eisenhower Republicans don't drink tea!!
12:44 PM on 02/02/2011
Suspend EPA regulations for one single purpose of allowing us to scrap the ships in the navys mothball fleet floating off the coast of California. You will cut 50% out of the navys maintenance budget. That's right people HALF the navy's maintenance budget goes to maintain lead, mercury and asbestos filled ships that will never ever be used again or anything. They are sitting there leaching polutants in to the ocean and eating money.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
pfz
My micro bio is empty but not without feelings.
01:05 PM on 02/02/2011
That is a huge problem (i didn't know it cost 50% of the budget) that needs to be resolved.
photo
Morgantheaxe
Eisenhower Republicans don't drink tea!!
02:29 AM on 02/04/2011
Annual "maintenance" budget. Not their overall budget. Just clarifying for accuracy sake.
11:52 AM on 02/02/2011
How do these guys keep a straight face? How many weapons systems did the Pentagon say they did not need or want, only to be overridden by Congress People wanting to keep jobs in their district or doing the bidding for military/industrial complex companies and lobbyists?
photo
Buckeye54
...the One your mom warned you about!
08:59 AM on 02/02/2011
Financial audits, controls and fines/prison time for military contractors who are caught abusing the system is definitely needed if we're to bring the defense budget under control.

Also: Close most of our foreign bases. We have over 800. Bring the troops home from Iraq and Afghanistan. Mothball five of our nuclear-carriers (that way we won't be tempted to project power where it's not wanted). Eliminate all military contracts that are performing a function that used to be done by the military. Our military can do it better, cheaper and professionally.

All of this can be done without reducing or tampering with current military/veterans benefits and pensions. It does not have to be done on the backs of our military.

I honestly believe if the above steps were initiated we could cut our defense budget in half.
05:39 AM on 02/02/2011
F-22 raptor costs us 150 million dollars each! we have 168 of them. this would pay for a lot of school lunches.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jasongrundy
Integrity is how you behave when no one is looking
11:34 PM on 02/01/2011
As long as their is a (R) by the name, I think it's nothing more than theatrics.
photo
Morgantheaxe
Eisenhower Republicans don't drink tea!!
12:41 PM on 02/02/2011
Unfortunately you are definetely correct.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kamact
Market Observer
10:55 PM on 02/01/2011
Cut $300 billion annually from our defense budget,...starting tonight
10:49 PM on 02/01/2011
Cut the defense budget by 2/3...bring our troops home to protect our soil...close all overseas bases and bring those civilians back home to work on our infrastructure...We spend more than all other countries combined...Why?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PAbodysurfer
10:43 PM on 02/01/2011
Coburn getting tough with the Pentagon...really????!! Nice theatrics mister how much do you guys need?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Branson Huggins
10:11 PM on 02/01/2011
The Cold War is over, we came out the "victor" there is no need to continue advancing our arms. If you have a problem with people joining up, well maybe it's because no one wants to fight a wars they don't believe in, maybe it's because they don't want to be away from there families for years on end, maybe it's because they don't want to put there lives on the line for pennies on the dollar. I don't know. I come from a long family of military men and women, and the one thing my father, a former drill instructor told me was, don't join. It's a good cause, and he would never go back and do it differently, but he knew that where we were going was not the place that we needed to be. It's about time we cut the funding. We don't need to spend that much on defense, yes we got attacked, but guess what, out of all the other countries in the world, we have dealt with the least amount of violence caused by foreign parties. There's a reason for this, and it's not just because we spend trillions on military funding.
photo
elbeas
Pragmatista sinistra
08:30 PM on 02/02/2011
I'm not sure if we can claim victor in that struggle. In case you haven't noticed we owe a large amount of money to a country run by a communist party. Our former worthy adversary is financially in the black and run by a former KGB officer.
The remainder of your post is spot on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NWBrunette
Blessed Girl
09:25 PM on 02/01/2011
We spend more on "defense" than the next 17 countries on the planet combined and all he wants are "auditable financial statements?" Oh brother. Cut the military budget to 10% of what it is today - there'd still be enough cash in the pipeline to last them another 20 years.
IMOPINIONH8D
because I want it empty...
09:25 PM on 02/01/2011
A repub wanting to defund ourr soliders during a time of war. Is this the bill that will have some teapub job creation?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
LeftLeanWing
Ah.. I said..Ah Said I said... Proceed Guv'nah
09:09 PM on 02/01/2011
Coburn warned In 2003:
"The gay community has infiltrated the very centers of power in every area across this country, and they wield extreme power ... That agenda is the greatest threat to our freedom that we face today. Why do you think we see the rationalization for abortion and multiple sexual partners?

That's a gay agenda."
In 1997, Coburn proposed a bill that would have ended anonymous testing for HIV/AIDS and required reporting the names of those who tested positive to public health authorities, among other draconian measures -- including withholding Medicaid funding from states that failed to comply.
08:53 PM on 02/01/2011
Wow! Finally, a republican position I agree with.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
pfz
My micro bio is empty but not without feelings.
01:09 PM on 02/02/2011
No kidding I just wonder what he is really up to. (?)
photo
elbeas
Pragmatista sinistra
08:32 PM on 02/02/2011
Oklahoma is extremely conservative, fiscally as well as socially. Perhaps he just needed some fresh headlines before he goes fund raising.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zutroy
08:05 PM on 02/01/2011
About goddamn time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NWBrunette
Blessed Girl
09:20 PM on 02/01/2011
Don't hold your breath. It'll go nowhere.
photo
elbeas
Pragmatista sinistra
08:32 PM on 02/02/2011
Going somewhere was probably not his intent.