NYR More

Black History Month 2011: 'Are Whites Entitled To Write Black History?' (VIDEO)

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 02/04/11 06:09 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:30 PM ET

Open Road Media recently released William Styron's "Confessions of Nat Turner" as an eBook, hoping to "reach a new generation of readers."

The 1967 Pulitzer Prize winning book details the 1831 Virginia slave revolt led by Nat Turner, during which 56 white people, and many more black people, were killed.

Over the years, Styron's novel has caused much controversy. Some African-American intellectuals and authors were outraged that a white man would dare to write a book about black history. After all, African-Americans had to struggle to maintain a strong identity. Countless books, such as "Autobiography of Malcolm X" and Toni Morrison's "The Bluest Eye," were written by African-American authors about the difficulties of maintaining a black identity in the midst of white culture.

In Alan Kurtz's article "Are Whites Entitled To Write Black History," he declared that race should not dictate what an author can or cannot write about. He wrote, "Ultimately, history is no one's property. It belongs to all of us; it's our collective experience."

Henry Louis Gates, Jr., a Harvard professor, agreed in his video interview with Open Road Media.

He read Styron's novel shortly after it was published. Admittedly, he understood the question that many African-Americans were asking: "How could a white man have the authority, the authenticity, the moral claim, to write responsibly about an event in African-American history?"

However, Gates noted that any White racist person could make the same argument about Gates writing a book about a prominent white person. One of his final statements summed up his opinion on the matter: "Anyone has the right to write about any subject available to be written about."

WATCH:




FOLLOW HUFFPOST BOOKS

Open Road Media recently released William Styron's "Confessions of Nat Turner" as an eBook, hoping to "reach a new generation of readers." The 1967 Pulitzer Prize winning book details the 1831 Virgi...
Open Road Media recently released William Styron's "Confessions of Nat Turner" as an eBook, hoping to "reach a new generation of readers." The 1967 Pulitzer Prize winning book details the 1831 Virgi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 727
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
12:04 AM on 02/22/2011
In most societies, the dominant/majority group often has the "power" to define history. Consequently, that group often possesses the power to shape history as well. Even though I believe that anyone has the right to write on any topic, I also believe that as individuals dedicated to the truth, we must seek to learn from a variety of sources. We as humans are imperfect and biased. One person's account or opinion of historical facts should always be questioned and investigated. Problems arise and truths are hidden when dominant groups in society are the sole authors of history. A few topics for consideration: In America we are taught that Columbus "discovered" America. How do you discover a land that is filled with native inhabitants? The "New World" wasn't new to the indigenous population. The systematic eradication of the Native American population through murder, intimidation, forceful encampment, and land seizures is rarely talked about in elementary school texts. The Founding Fathers of this nation are often referred to by many as some of the greatest men that ever lived. The fact that many of those men owned other human beings, and wrote into law a clause that categorized African-Americans as three-fifths of a person is repeatedly ignored. This is due to us understanding historical facts through the eyes of a select few. In order to fully understand historical events, we need to gather accounts from all sides that were affected. Anyone, regardless of race, can and should get involved.
10:48 PM on 02/15/2011
A part of black history is the story of Toussaint L’Ouverture from Haiti who fought against the French oppressors and the slave trade. A dramatized clip of his last moments in prison is found here: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2468184/ This is from the film ā€œThe Last Days of Toussaint L’Ouverture.ā€
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zell
01:35 PM on 02/10/2011
The color of the person writing about someone is insignificant. What is important is that the writer is knowledgeable about the subject matter and does a good job writing on the subject matter. There are many scholars of different races that write about subjects that are not of his or her race. That is alright and is just fine in a diverse America.
photo
SF TKF
Cthulhu thinks you'd make a nice sandwich.
03:28 PM on 02/08/2011
***Gates noted that any White racist person could make the same argument about Gates writing a book about a prominent white person.***

Can men write about women? Can women write about men? Can Europeans write about Asians? Can Asians write about Europeans? Can current writers write authoritatively about historical figures?

Where does it end? You are certainly free to attack the actual work, but attacking the race of the author is ridiculous.
photo
Bryan Boru
Engineer, Libertarian
12:47 AM on 02/08/2011
Maybe we should just burn all the history books unless we get a color match of historian to historical subject. Herodotus, you're first.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Michael Henry Adams
PRESERVATIONIST, HISTORIAN, COMMUNITY ACTIVIST!
02:47 PM on 02/07/2011
Without white scholars, so much African American history would remain forgotten and demeaned as insignificant. Biographers as diverse as Jean Strouse and Kathryn Talalay have added immeasurably to understanding about black history in a truly transcendent way. With the less skilled, sometimes, with rather humorous results, the special understanding imbued by kinship is absent.

Then fiction is another realm from history altogether. William Styron's perceived offense in his "Confessions of Nat Turner", was not being white, but daring to envision the defiant hero of macho black nationalist, as someone emotionally attracted to whites, who, far worse, has homoerotic experiences and yearnings. Apparently based purely on imagination, meant merely, as dramatizing plot devices, this vision so at odds with conventional views of what it is to be a ā€˜stand up’ brother, has been denounced by some as the vilest sort of debasing, trivializing revisionism.
06:55 PM on 02/08/2011
There are a number of AA scholars who kept the history. They wrote books and passed the history down to us. You can hear about our contribution to this country once a year during Negro History month, unless the history books are now inclusive of every ethnic group that contributed to this country.
01:23 PM on 02/07/2011
too many people still see in colors
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Howard53545
07:29 AM on 02/07/2011
How about Philip Foner?
06:15 AM on 02/07/2011
What a strange system. I tried repeatedly to post Part 3 of 3, but each time it was rejected for violating guidelines. That makes no sense, since my comment consisted entirely of material previously published on this thread, which I copied and pasted verbatim. Oh, well, you can't fight City Hall.
04:22 AM on 02/07/2011
JCCross (08:24 AM) Whites have written as much Black History as I'd like to see written by them. How about we let black people write their own history for a change!
MacManLB (08:55 AM) When whites have the unmitigated gall to write about black history they inevitably find a way to venerate themselves, no matter how undeserving. Their white racial frame makes it necessary. We have nearly 300 years of leaving white folks to their own devices regarding the writing of American history and we have nothing but a one-sided lie.
Sassie (09:27 AM) One cannot possibly write the history of a people who were here on earth hundreds of thousands year before they were. We are tired of your lies about history.
tapley (10:03 AM) If you want a true white-wash of history, let the average white american write about black contributions to society.
kamana2 (10:05 AM) The bible demonstrates that the white man has a long history of written lies.
gtalkspolitics (10:25 AM) Are Whites Entitled To Write Black History? NO, they are not!!!!
American Air (10:31 AM) No, whites are not entitled to write black history.
tyger (11:22 AM) Whites have misquoted, outright lied about Black history. I prefer the offspring of the people tell the story.
NOV42008 (11:41 AM) Any book written by whites on black history should always be followed by someone black who writes a book to correct the author, thus teaching whites what they don't understand.
04:30 AM on 02/07/2011
This comment is intended as #2 of 3. I apologize for the single spacing. In preview mode, it looked fine. But once posted, it's regrettably hard to read.
04:22 AM on 02/07/2011
I'm impressed that so many have commented here on the question posed by my article "Are Whites Entitled to Write Black History?"
http://technorati.com/politics/article/are-whites-entitled-to-write-black/
While the answer is not always clear from individual comments, there are enough explicitly affirmative or negative responses to report a preliminary tally of 4 to 1 in favor (83 Yes; 21 No).
I also note the many attacks against the question itself, calling it "a non-issue … a question that does not need be asked … a wasted story … absurd … weak … crap … drivel … dumb … dumb beyond words … irrelevant … insane … nonsensical … ridiculous … silly … stupid … really stupid … most stupid question ever … somewhat offensive … blatantly racist … racist and really ignorant … this is why racism is alive and well."
And those, bear in mind, are reactions only to the seven-word question, not to the content of my article, which mercifully few Huffington posters bothered to read. (God forbid anyone should actually inform himself before commenting. Where's the fun in that?)
As for those posters denying the existence of African Americans today who reject a white author's claim to write black history, consider the following examples from this very thread. Except where otherwise indicated, all were posted on 2/04/2011. I break the list into multiple parts to accommodate this site's word limit.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
11:32 PM on 02/06/2011
Black history is a significant part of American history. So any reasonably objective historian can write about it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gemini68
10:25 AM on 02/08/2011
Any "reasonable objective historian" are the key words. As long as that is the case then I would agree with you.
Tara Hunkoff
I could have been Sheila Noyeau
08:48 PM on 02/06/2011
Whites should stick to writing about yachting.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spiritcosmo
10:28 AM on 02/08/2011
screw you
Tara Hunkoff
I could have been Sheila Noyeau
11:01 PM on 02/08/2011
Is that a quote from James Baldwin?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stuoverit
"What year did Jesus think it was?"-GC
03:01 PM on 02/08/2011
Haha. Have you ever heard George Carlin's bit about white people playing the blues?

"What do white people have to be blue about!? Banana Republic ran out of khakis!?"
Tara Hunkoff
I could have been Sheila Noyeau
10:57 PM on 02/08/2011
Never heard that bit...funny stuff...khaki is indeed white...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spiritcosmo
03:54 PM on 02/09/2011
george carlin? how old are you? that guy hasnt been funny for 30 years. is you mind still back in the 80's? the good ole days, huh?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tresco
Sistagirl Laughin' Thingy Award Winner!
07:23 PM on 02/06/2011
Sure, why not? It's not like we can stop them. Besides these days it's pretty hard to tell who's supposed to be "white" from who's supposed to be "black".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jackbutler5555
04:54 PM on 02/06/2011
What this is really about, I think, is the dumbing down of history -- and, unfortunately historians --  Historians are skilled professionals.  Or, at least, they are supposed to be.  They use an historian's version of the scientific method -- data gathering, analysis, etc.  They approach their subjects with their biases and preexisting attitudes in check.  They are not trying to solve today's problems by means of their analysis of yesterday's events. 
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
diversityreport
Editor American Diversity Report
06:54 PM on 02/06/2011
What historians are you talking about?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jackbutler5555
08:29 PM on 02/06/2011
Are you saying there are no historians who fulfill that description?  If so, how did you reach that conclusion?