iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Rand Paul In 2012? Senator Would Run For President 'If Nominated' (VIDEO)

The Huffington Post    
First Posted: 02/04/11 04:29 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:30 PM ET

Freshman Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said Friday that it was premature for him to consider running for president, but that he would would be willing to take on the task "if nominated."

"Come back and ask me in a few months," Paul said in a wide-ranging interview with ABC News, adding that he was "very much interested in trying to shape the debate" by advocating deep, across-the-board spending cuts.

During the sitdown with ABC, Paul also claimed that his "true believer" commitment to fiscal conservatism led him to identify himself as a deficit hawk first and a Republican second.

"There are always problems in our nation's capital that are more important than party affiliation and I will always believe that," Paul said when asked which mantle meant more to him. "It's not necessarily Tea Party versus Republican Party, but I would say that if you ask me what's more important, tackling our nation's deficit, our nation's debt problems or being a Republican, I would say tackling the debt."

Paul's pronouncement came in the wake of a GOP proposal passed down by House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), who on Thursday announced plans to cut $32 billion from current spending levels for this fiscal year. That number fell far short of the $100-billion figure that Republicans had made in their "Pledge to America" and even shorter of the $500-billion package of cuts that Paul himself put forward last month.

"It's really not going to touch the problem," Paul said of Ryan's plan. "There's a disconnect between Republicans who want a balanced budget but aren't maybe yet brave enough to talk about the cuts to come."

Paul has consistently argued that Republicans need to be more principled and demanding in their stated shift toward stern fiscal austerity.

Earlier this week, Paul delivered his maiden Senate floor speech, in which he compared himself to the uncompromising abolitionist Cassius Clay, cousin of former Kentucky Sen. and House Speaker Henry Clay, of whom Paul said he was not the biggest fan. Paul suggested in that address, and again on Friday, that he would combat spending with the same kind of ardent passion with which people like Cassius Clay fought to end slavery.

"I am fascinated and enthralled by great heroes, people who are true believers, and true believers don't occur in politics very often," Paul told ABC on Friday. "I ran on what I believed in and didn't say I'd come up here to compromise, I said I'd come up here to cut federal spending, to balance the budget and to make government a constitutional body again."

With that in mind, Paul said, he would be willing to cut all foreign aid, including to Israel. Paul drew some fire earlier Friday for referring to U.S. financial support of Israel as "welfare."

WATCH the entire interview below:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Freshman Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said Friday that it was premature for him to consider running for president, but that he would would be willing to take on the task "if nominated." "Come back and as...
Freshman Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said Friday that it was premature for him to consider running for president, but that he would would be willing to take on the task "if nominated." "Come back and as...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,635
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (50 total)
10:47 PM on 02/13/2011
I like the idea of Rand Paul running as the Republican or Tea Bag movement /party nominee. I think that would be great. He should run and not sit around waiting for an "anointing" as the nominee. Show more interest Rand!

My next choice is Christine O'Donnell. That would be awesome as well. Of course, my first choice is Sarah (Trademark) Palin. If she became president, no sidewalk vendor will make a cent on cheap dolls of her without providing a cut or getting her approval. That women understand business. She is also extremely entertaining. Just ask Tracy Morgan.

See HP link if you don't believe me.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/27/tracy-morgan-sarah-palin-_n_815222.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GuyCybershy
01:22 PM on 02/07/2011
A Modest $500 Billion Proposal

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703956604576110431794539522.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ObamAtomic
07:23 PM on 02/06/2011
ABQ-Mike 34 minutes ago (6:45 PM)
184 Fans
Become a fan
Unfan
Is that even English?
----------------------------------------------------
Check it out!

There is not Tea Party,it's TeaBagers,­you can't expect validation from Americans that know the real mean of the Tea Party -The Boston Tea Party, 1773.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
pollie-graff
Who Knows What The Future Holds. Forward
03:32 PM on 02/06/2011
So, the gop still has nothing.
10:29 AM on 02/06/2011
Rand Paul for President in 2012, get ready head stompers that's gonna be your shining moment, to hit critics with your best stomps.

Prepare to meet Aqua Buddha"s anointed one, the Kentucky Colonels Tea party, Mint Julep's drinkers new Messiah. Rand Paul is a joke who looks like a joke sounds like a joke, and I apologized to jokesters every where.
09:58 AM on 02/06/2011
Why is Huffington Post not running the piece on Rand Paul’s proposed cuts to Israeli Aid? I am a Democrat and do not like the Tea Party but, this proposal I agree with. Not only Israel, but the rest of the world. We DO NOT HAVE THE MONEY!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GuyCybershy
11:57 AM on 02/06/2011
All they want to talk about is his hair. The media simply will not allow a debate about aid to Israel. Why don't we simplify things and just have China send them the money?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
montestruc
War is the health of the state--Randolph Bourne
01:54 PM on 02/06/2011
Because Huffington Post is a mouthpiece for the establishment Democratic Party. Don't you know that? I thought it obvious to everyone.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
grovestand12
E Pluribus Unum...O, 2012!
09:50 AM on 02/06/2011
now, THAT'S entertainment!
09:14 AM on 02/06/2011
From the comments, it seems that liberals are all heated up about Rand Paul's hair style. Then again, insofar as they have nothing much under their own hair, hair style would be of great interest to them.
10:34 AM on 02/06/2011
A good laugh at a joke is always appreciated, and one thing liberals have is a good laugh at what the other side is showing us.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:43 AM on 02/06/2011
Yeah. They don't have much to say that is of substance so they attack his physical appearance. How pathetic is that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ObamAtomic
11:27 AM on 02/06/2011
Teabagers are hypocrites!

Carly Fiorina made opprobrious remarks about Barbara Boxer's hair!

Remember that!
02:23 AM on 02/06/2011
This thread is officially dead. I'm outta here.
01:59 AM on 02/06/2011
The train is going nowhere...just back and forth... sort of like mental masturbation?
Ron's Runt is the same... a fool's tool!
01:52 AM on 02/06/2011
I was always under the impression that liberals hated conservatives but had some respect for libertarians. Boy was I wrong! Going by the posts on this thread, liberals hate libertarians even more.
Rand Paul is technically not a libertarian, though, as he opposes legalizing pot and gay marriage.
02:34 AM on 02/06/2011
I'm going to have to disagree with you on that one. I have respect for Rand Paul even though i'd say I disagree with 90 percent of what he says. But, as you said, if he was a true libertarian then I think many other liberals would have much more respect for him.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:46 AM on 02/06/2011
Liberals have a problem with personal freedom and personal responsibility and they have a huge problem with small government so no, I think that Liberals and Libertarians are pretty much diametrically opposed. At least, that's how this Libertarian sees it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ObamAtomic
11:35 AM on 02/06/2011
Do you know Aryan Paul is only a libertarian in disguise,his real "boss' is Mitch,
a republican leader.
photo
talkmedown
End the insanity - PoliticalFinanceReform.org
12:53 AM on 02/06/2011
Ahhhh c'mon......... I will not accept a president with a cheap rug on his head

nuff said
02:04 AM on 02/06/2011
He should get a hair transplant. I'm sure that he has enough money.
02:39 AM on 02/06/2011
Traficant 2012!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Robert Galyean
Do I Wake or Do I Sleep?
12:48 AM on 02/06/2011
Somebody grab the weed whacker, Sen. Paul needs a hair cut.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
PresidentRobertBooth
12:34 AM on 02/06/2011
Not sure why Republicans keep babbling on about reducing debt, since Republican presidents have a poor track record of it.
 
Anyway, hopefully Bland Paul will run, thus ensuring an Obama landslide victory.
photo
talkmedown
End the insanity - PoliticalFinanceReform.org
12:54 AM on 02/06/2011
No one's gonna beat Obama... he's giving in too much to lose
01:55 AM on 02/06/2011
Giving in is a sign of weakness, talkmedown. Clinton never gave in on anything. Please don't compare what Obama is doing to Clinton's triangulation. Obama is just de-energizing his base, who won't show up in big numbers next time.
01:54 AM on 02/06/2011
Paul will obviously not be the GOP nominee.

As far as past GOP Presidents go, the past is the past. The present is what's important, and the GOP is talking more about reducing the debt than the Dems.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
PresidentRobertBooth
02:24 AM on 02/06/2011
***As far as past GOP Presidents go, the past is the past***

What is past is merely prologue.
 
***The present is what's important, and the GOP is talking more about reducing the debt than the Dems***

No they aren't. They are talking more nonsense about reducing debt that the Dems.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David VeLar
12:06 AM on 02/06/2011
How extreme is freshman Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, the libertarian darling of the Tea Party? On Thursday, Feb. 3, he was the only Senator to oppose a proposed amendment making it a federal crime to aim a laser pointer at an airplane, taking a lonely stand with the idiots who try to distract pilots 35,000 ft. (10,000 m) up in the sky. After the 96-1 vote, Paul said the problem could be "adequately handled and prosecuted at the state level."

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,2046475,00.html#ixzz1D9V6zzwz

How Rand?

How can it "adequately" be handled. Please do tell
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GuyCybershy
01:16 AM on 02/06/2011
You obviously didn't read the article, did you?
01:57 AM on 02/06/2011
He said that it should be a state crime. Regardless of whether you agree or disagree with him, he didn't say that it should be legal.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David VeLar
08:24 PM on 02/06/2011
So what.

States rights are code for "making what is immoral, legal" States rights is a way to allow rampant exploitation and weaken the common everyday American from having a legal standing against it.

You want the federal government to be so weak that one day it will be unable to protect the disadvantaged (code for minority code for black) from state and corporate provisions that marginalize, slowly kill, and push them out of our country.

If these racial consequences were not part of the equation... no I go one step futher, if it were the other way around. If states rights and corporate deregulation allowed poor peeople and black people a leg up, YOU ALL WOULD BE FED ALL THE WAY.