More

Omar Suleiman 'Demonized' Muslim Brotherhood: WikiLeaks

Omar Suleiman

First Posted: 02/06/11 08:17 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:30 PM ET

Egypt's new vice president, Omar Suleiman, has long sought to demonize the opposition Muslim Brotherhood in his contacts with skeptical U.S. officials, leaked diplomatic cables show, raising questions whether he can act as an honest broker in the country's political crisis.

U.S. Embassy messages from the anti-secrecy WikiLeaks cache of 250,000 State Department documents, which Reuters independently reviewed, also report that the former intelligence chief accused the Brotherhood of spawning armed extremists and warned in 2008 that if Iran ever backed the banned Islamist group, Tehran would become "our enemy."

The disclosure came as Suleiman met on Sunday with opposition groups, including the officially banned Brotherhood, to explore ways to end Egypt's worst political crisis decades.

Washington has been exploring options for speeding up President Hosni Mubarak's resignation, including a scenario that calls for turning over power to a transition government headed by Suleiman and backed by the military.

Mubarak, who had done without a vice president for 30 years, hurriedly appointed the 74-year-old Suleiman as his deputy on January 29 as protesters demanded the autocratic ruler's ouster.

Suleiman privately voicing disdain for the Brotherhood will not surprise Egyptians, used to the Mubarak government's anti-Islamist stance. The comments could stoke suspicions, though, as he seeks to draw the long-banned movement into a broad dialogue on reform in response to mass protests.

The clear implication in the cache of State Department cables was that U.S. officials were skeptical of Suleiman's effort to depict the Brotherhood as "the bogey man."

Mubarak's government had long cited the Islamist threat to justify its years of authoritarian rule. A more pressing concern for Washington and its ally Israel, however, is what happens to the 1979 peace treaty between Egypt and the Jewish state if the Brotherhood gains political clout in the post-Mubarak era.

"We decline to comment on any individual classified cable," U.S. State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley said when asked about the documents seen by Reuters.

ACCUSATIONS OF EXTREMISM

In a cable dated February 15, 2006, then-ambassador Francis Ricciardone reported that Suleiman had "asserted that the MB (Muslim Brotherhood) had spawned '11 different Islamist extremist organizations,' most notably the Egyptian Islamic Jihad and the Gama'a Islamiya (Islamic Group)."

Egyptian security forces crushed groups that targeted tourists, Christians, government ministers and other officials in a 1990s campaign for a purist Islamic state, and has kept a tight lid on them since.

The Brotherhood once had a secret paramilitary section, but it now says it is committed to promoting its policies through peaceful, democratic means. The government has been unable to prove any serious act of violence orchestrated by the movement's leadership for more than 50 years.

Mubarak, in an ABC interview on Thursday, blamed the Brotherhood for violence that erupted on Wednesday during protests in Cairo's central Tahrir Square. [ID:nLDE71029E]Independent witnesses said Mubarak supporters launched the attacks.

Suleiman, then Mubarak's top spymaster, was speaking to FBI Director Robert Mueller, who was visiting Cairo in February 2006, the 2006 cable says.

The cable, which uses the spelling Soliman, said he had told Mueller that the Brotherhood was "neither a religious organization, nor a social organization, nor a political party, but a combination of all three."

The cable went on: "The principal danger, in Soliman's view, was the group's exploitation of religion to influence and mobilize the public."

"Soliman termed the MB's recent success in the parliamentary elections as 'unfortunate', adding his view that although the group was technically illegal, existing Egyptian laws were insufficient to keep the MB in check."

The cable was referring to parliamentary elections in November and December of 2005 in which the Brotherhood made strong gains, although Mubarak's National Democratic Party kept a big majority.

IRANIAN "THREAT"

In a cable dated January 2, 2008, Ricciardone reported Suleiman as saying that Iran remained "a significant threat to Egypt".

Successive U.S. administrations have seen Mubarak's government as a bulwark against Iran's influence in the Arab world, a perception the Egyptian leader has used to his benefit in securing billions of dollars in military aid.

"Iran is supporting Jihad and spoiling peace, and has supported extremists in Egypt previously. If they were to support the Muslim Brotherhood this would make them "our enemy," the ambassador reported Suleiman as saying.

In a cable dated October 25, 2007, Ricciardone said Suleiman "takes an especially hard line on Tehran" and frequently refers to the Iranians as "devils."

The cables suggest U.S. officials have consistently responded skeptically to the Egyptian government's dire warnings about the Brotherhood.

In a November 29, 2005, cable to Mueller before his visit, Ricciardone said Egyptian authorities "have a long history of threatening us with the MB bogeyman."

"Your counterparts may try to suggest that (then President George W. Bush's) insistence on greater democracy in Egypt is somehow responsible for the MB's electoral success," he wrote. "You should push back that, on the contrary, the MB's rise signals the need for greater democracy and transparency in government."

"The images of intimidation and fraud that have emerged from the recent elections favor the extremists both we and the Egyptian government oppose. The best way to counter narrow-minded Islamist politics is to open the system."

In a follow up cable on January 29, 2006, Ricciardone seemed to foreshadow the current unrest when he wrote to Mueller: "We do not accept the proposition that Egypt's only choices are a slow-to-reform authoritarian regime or an Islamist extremist one; nor do we see greater democracy in Egypt as leading necessarily to a government under the MB."

(Writing by Matt Spetalnick and William Maclean; Editing by Stella Dawson and Sandra Maler)

Copyright 2010 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

Egypt's new vice president, Omar Suleiman, has long sought to demonize the opposition Muslim Brotherhood in his contacts with skeptical U.S. officials, leaked diplomatic cables show, raising question...
Egypt's new vice president, Omar Suleiman, has long sought to demonize the opposition Muslim Brotherhood in his contacts with skeptical U.S. officials, leaked diplomatic cables show, raising question...
Filed by Cara Parks  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 93
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
01:05 PM on 02/08/2011
Mubarak and his government are mind S L A V E S to S A T A N, money and hungry for power... Egypt would be far better off with a non-Muslim leader than a hypocrite

This man is disgusting on so many levels...How can one lower the self-worth and standard to this level simply amazes me...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Longtimeliberal
06:42 PM on 02/07/2011
Truth will set you free.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:39 PM on 02/07/2011
And just how are militant Islamic groups worse than militant Jewish/Settler or Christian/KKK groups? Why all the sanctimony? Killing people is bad. As is authoritarian repression of free speech and dissent.

Why broad-brush the many with the taint of a few crazies who cross the line by taking up arms rather thanprotesting in a public square.

Perhaps, it is the repression of dissent that actually pushes smothered political voices over the edge into violent means. And,perhaps, those that repress--like Mubarak and Suleiman--are inadvertently instigating violence and "terror" and more virulent forms of political activity by tagging as "Bogeyman" anyone who shows strong opposition to established military junta.
imho

JPOST: "...settler leader refuses to cooperate with Police investigation into endorsement of controversial book Torat HaMelech.... Police are in the midst of a wide range investigation into the book, authored by Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira, which states that non-Jews can be killed in certain situations ....." Given that he advocates killing of innocents for political/religious cause, Is this Rabbi a "terrorist"?
photo
ReMarker
Facts and reason FTW!
02:39 PM on 02/07/2011
Ahh, I see Suleiman has taken a page from the Republican "win at all costs" campaign playbook.

It's to bad being a world class statesman doesn't trump petty politics.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:07 PM on 02/07/2011
"Maha Azzam, a fellow at Chatham House, a London-based international affairs research institute, said “the Israelis are happy with Omar Suleiman, he has been pivotal in the peace process, he’s someone they know and someone they can deal with.” Avigdor Lieberman, the Deputy Prime Minister of Israel, has expressed “his respect and appreciation for Egypt’s leading role in the region and his personal respect for Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and Minister Suleiman."

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/02/05/meet-omar-suleiman-diplomat-torturer-renditionist-and-manager-of-the-billion-dollar-enterprise-known-as-egypt-inc/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ergon
Man From Atlan
12:51 PM on 02/07/2011
Wikileaks also revealed how Mubarak called for an attack on Iran. Definitely NOT in our interest.
photo
Vlady
Better Late
01:45 PM on 02/07/2011
>>Definitely NOT in our interest.

If you mean Iran
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ergon
Man From Atlan
02:05 PM on 02/07/2011
Like the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan worked out so well for AMERICA.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:38 PM on 02/07/2011
That's correct, attacking Iran, is not in our interest in is in Israel's.

"Now, Netanyahu has several options in his effort to foil Palestinia­n independen­ce, but all are terrible. It is too late to present a diplomatic program that could convince anyone in the world while still enjoying the support of his right-wing coalition.

He could strike Iran, or call early elections. In both cases, the risks are enormous and the problem would only be delayed. He could undermine Abbas' rule with retaliator­y moves, first and foremost a deal that would free kidnapped soldier Gilad Shalit in exchange for releasing Hamas operatives to the West Bank. That would hurt the PA, but would also endanger Israel. Or he could recognize a Palestinia­n state in the existing borders, separate from it as much as possible and offer to negotiate. "

http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/israel-can-t-stop-palestinian-independence-1.337880
photo
INDIVIDUALTERRY
Occupy this!
12:24 PM on 02/07/2011
So , this is the same thing the democrats did to the TEA Party.
Whats the big deal ,Suleiman has no more credability than the democrats!
12:19 PM on 02/07/2011
He's a torturer, but he's OUR torturer, although even US officials were skeptical of his BS, unlike the news media in the US which has been right there along with Suleiman in demonizing the Muslim Brotherhood and making them out to be in control of the protests, when they have been pretty marginal.

Did the US refrain from supporting Eastern Europe's revolutions in fear of the fact that ultra-nationalists would gain support in the post-Soviet period? No, I don't think.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftLeaner
Solution: Public Financing
12:06 PM on 02/07/2011
This is like us having Bernanke Fix our financial crisis.
11:19 AM on 02/07/2011
This is akin to asking the fox to guard the hen house.
photo
Theatrixnyc
Remember John Lennon:Power To The People!
11:36 AM on 02/07/2011
What does it mean when our leaders, here, in the U.S. support Dictators who keep $70 Billion for themselves, and the people the Dictator represents, gets $2.00 a day? Could you clarify a little bit better, what it is you meant?
02:41 PM on 02/07/2011
Placing Suleiman in charge of the is akin to having the fox guard the hen house. Same party, same mind set.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tee McDonald
11:15 AM on 02/07/2011
I would like the govt to comment on Suleiman's qualifications to lead a reform process. From what Ive read about him he is a cia-trained intelliigence officer and expert in renditions and torture. He is strictly status quo and pro Mubarak. He is in charge of the secret police who kidnapped/detained journalists and protesters. Why should the Egyptian people trust him to implement reforms transition?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftLeaner
Solution: Public Financing
12:07 PM on 02/07/2011
Yes, just like we had voted to pub Bernanke is charge of fixing the financial crisis, when he was one of the architects of its outcome.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ergon
Man From Atlan
12:53 PM on 02/07/2011
I'm not fanning you, I'm fanning yer Angela Davis avatar!
10:48 AM on 02/07/2011
I don't like Suleiman or the current Egyptian government, but the Muslim Brotherhood definitely deserved to be demonized for being a violent, fundamentalist and reactionary group.
photo
Theatrixnyc
Remember John Lennon:Power To The People!
11:14 AM on 02/07/2011
Yes, yes. And the people that lied to take us to War, expanding to three countries now? The innocents killed in the crossfire, trillions of dollars wasted....what type of people were at the helm of that operation? What kind of group would you call them?
11:59 AM on 02/07/2011
I agree with you.  The Bush administration deserves to be demonized as much as the Muslim Brotherhood, if not more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omobob
left coast, usa
10:41 AM on 02/07/2011
> Suleiman privately voicing disdain for the Brotherhood will not surprise Egyptians, used to the Mubarak government's anti-Islamist stance.  The clear implication in the cache of State Department cables was that U.S. officials were skeptical of Suleiman's effort to depict the Brotherhood as "the bogey man."

Holding dictatorial power for thirty years requires a villain to demonize. In Egypt it is the Brotherhood for the Mubarak regime to demonize and keep their grip on liberty and freedom in Egypt. In order to dehumanize the enemy it is important to set about a campaign of fear within the population to keep them focused on what the Governments one hand is doing while maintain repression with the other.
01:51 PM on 02/07/2011
I agree. It is imperative that a dictator must create fear in people to keep control. He has positioned himself as the "protector" of the people from the MB.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talossa
Not all liberals are silly.
09:54 AM on 02/07/2011
How can you demonize the Devil?
08:32 AM on 02/07/2011
Negotiating with Suleiman? Impossible. He is not to be trusted. He is seriously bad.
photo
uniquindividual
I'm unique and so are you
09:14 AM on 02/07/2011
And the brotherhood?

Do you have a mother?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nina-burleigh/egypt-and-the-universal-r_b_819178.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jugglergal
10:00 AM on 02/07/2011
I read your article and it sounds like Egypt is on the for front of fighting for the rights, compared to groups we see in Pakistan. I love the rhetoric of this article quoting things that here happening in the 1700's? What exactly was happening in the Christian world during this time..any one smell some smoke from a fire? I am a woman and we are still fighting for respect in the Western world, It was only this century we were "aloud" to vote. Please do not inflame more rhetoric of the Muslim world by promoting articles that have two instances of modern day women's suppression in it, I can give you 10 a day in Oklahoma alone. Women will continue to fight our own fight, we don't need more inflaming by men who use it to continue to create mistrust and fear as this article does with little actual facts backing it up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talossa
Not all liberals are silly.
09:55 AM on 02/07/2011
He has the army's support and right now the army is the only game in town.