iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama's Faith-Based Advisers: Round Two

Katherine Jefferts Schori

First Posted: 02/07/11 07:38 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:30 PM ET

By Adelle M. Banks
Religion News Service

WASHINGTON -- President Obama has named top U.S. church leaders to an advisory council on faith-based programs, but the list of appointments is also drawing questions about a lack of diversity from minority faiths.

The 12 names released late Friday (Feb. 4) include top officials of prominent organizations -- from the Episcopal Church to the National Association of Evangelicals to the United Way.

The list included no prominent Muslim or Hindu leaders; the White House says the list will be expanded later with 13 additional names.

The Rev. Welton Gaddy, president of the Washington-based Interfaith Alliance said he was "shocked" the initial names for the panel did not include known leaders outside the Christian and Jewish faiths.

"I would think that it would have been a priority to have had a Muslim leader on there and at least one representative from the non-Abrahamic traditions," he said.

The White House would not comment on the diversity of the panel but said more names are to come.

"We look forward to announcing the additional members at a later date, at which point the 25 members will begin the process of producing recommendations to improve the government's partnerships with faith-based and other nonprofit organizations," said White House spokesman Shin Inouye.

The new panel members include four denominational heads -- Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori of the Episcopal Church; Presiding Bishop Mark Hanson of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America; Greek Orthodox Archbishop Demetrios; and the Rev. Nancy Wilson, moderator of the predominantly gay Metropolitan Community Churches.

Evangelical leaders include Leith Anderson, president of the National Association of Evangelicals and Lynne Hybels, co-founder with her husband Bill of Willow Creek Community Church, a suburban Chicago megachurch.

Jewish officials include Rabbi Julie Schonfeld, executive vice president of the Rabbinical Assembly of Conservative rabbis, and Susan Stern, special adviser on government affairs to the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee.

Other appointees include: Andrea Bazan, president of Triangle Community Foundation in North Carolina; Angela Glover Blackwell, founder of PolicyLink, a California-based nonprofit that seeks economic equity; Brian Gallagher; president of the United Way Worldwide; and Sister Marlene Weisenbeck, an officer of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious.

The first panel of 25 members completed its work last March and was expected to soon be succeeded by another group. Vetting of the next group has taken longer than expected, but Obama signed an executive order in November that reflects some of the first group's recommendations for reforming the White House Office of Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships.

Sofian Abdelaziz Zakkout, director of the Miami-based American Muslim Association of North America, hopes the complete list will include Muslims.

"We need to work together," said Zakkout, who said his educational organization counters Islamophobia and terrorist threats. "If we are not going to work together we are not going to have a stronger America."

Gaddy, who served on a task force on reforming the office, said he was disappointed that thus far the panel does not include any outspoken leaders who have wanted to see the office improve transparency and accountability, such as placing more information online about rules concerning religious federal grant recipients.

"Those things are not going to happen accidentally," he said. "It's going to take great intentionality."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

By Adelle M. Banks Religion News Service WASHINGTON -- President Obama has named top U.S. church leaders to an advisory council on faith-based programs, but the list of appointments is also drawing q...
By Adelle M. Banks Religion News Service WASHINGTON -- President Obama has named top U.S. church leaders to an advisory council on faith-based programs, but the list of appointments is also drawing q...
Filed by Bryan Maygers  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 124
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:38 AM on 02/26/2011
I don't get a good feeling about this. Religion and politics is like pouring oil onto fire.
Religion must never be part of politics. The USA doesn't need spiritual advisers. What it needs
is a down to earth pragmatic approach to problem solving and less puerile politics.

If all the elected honorable ladies and gentlemen put their wise heads together without malice or narrow agendas, much can change in this great country.

Alas, politicians - the juveniles of reason play truant.
02:40 AM on 02/15/2011
Very simply, church and government never mix very well. A religious organization is based on the tenets of the faith which may be in direct conflict with the public mission of the community. The Catholic Church bands abortions for any reason in their hospitals but takes public money with both hands for services to the "public". Is a hospital a public or private organization
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Wood
A.T.C.G...(sigh)
07:06 PM on 02/12/2011
There should be no such thing as faith based programs. That's a good place to cut the budget. I know it's peanuts in the scheme of things...but tax payer money doesn't belong there. If churches want to run programs on their own nickle...have at it. Not only should the churches pay their own way...they should be not be tax exempt...(sigh)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:12 PM on 02/12/2011
Only religion could make a virtue out of believing in something without a shred of evidence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Wood
A.T.C.G...(sigh)
07:39 PM on 02/12/2011
Do make one wonder...don't it...(sigh)
photo
LightShadow62
The answers are not found in the extremes
05:38 PM on 02/12/2011
Let's be real about this. If the president was to have a representative of every faith on his Faith advisory board the group would fill all of the seats of congress and spill out onto the Capitol Mall.

Here is the best advice concerning faith and government; KEEP RELIGION OUT OF GOVERNMENT, PERIOD!!!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iwinagin
10:43 PM on 02/11/2011
Poor Mr. Obama. He's still deluded into thinking that he can please the right.

If Jesus Christ and Adam Smith came down and declared unequivocable support for President Obama the republican party and the far right would still accuse him of being a socialist muslim.

I certainly hope The President realizes the importance of doing the right thing over doing the popular thing soon. Pandering to conservative christians is useless and most unbecoming of The Office of the President.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bbertaud
Je ne regrette rien, rien de rien
01:06 PM on 02/10/2011
Still...no Rastafarians
02:23 PM on 02/14/2011
...and still no Pastafarians.
Mark from atlanta
Unity through Diversity.
01:07 AM on 02/10/2011
What these organizations are doing with our tax dollars should be thoroughly investigated. I am particularly concerned about their "mentoring" programs for troubled youth.
02:06 PM on 02/10/2011
I agree. The last thing one would need is to see Tax $ being spent on undercover proselyting of the vulnerable sections of the society...especially during the time of their deepest troubles.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kenhamlett
08:48 PM on 02/09/2011
The best way to deal with this issue is to abolish the Office of Faith-based Initiatives. When former President George W. Bush created the office, we Democrats were opposed and even scandalized by its existence -- flying in the face as it does of separation of church and state. The President is free to believe whatever he believes, as are all Americans. We are also free not to believe. Those beliefs should always be private. This office crosses the line in establishing the legitimacy of religion as a part of our government, something our much wiser forefathers specifically prohibited. Rather than worry about whether one religion or another is included or excluded, I worry that a Democratic administration believes this office is worth retaining.
07:03 PM on 02/10/2011
Groups like the salvation army feed the poor more efficiently than the government ever could.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kenhamlett
08:10 PM on 02/10/2011
The Salvation Army also openly discriminates against some citizens, refusing them employment and benefits. Sorry, others can do the job without the overlay of religion. I respect your opinion, but we disagree.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
detroitblkmale30
Wise Men Still Seek Him
07:58 PM on 02/10/2011
I disagree as a Democrat, I welcomed the creation of the office in the Bush years as long overdue. The office is NOT about faith or religion but desperately needed social service partnerships between these kinds of organizations and government at all levels, particularly in challenging urban areas. Issues of which groups are included are relevant, but miss the main point of the office which is social and economic assistance and not faith.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kenhamlett
08:08 PM on 02/10/2011
The office gives religious leaders a role in the government, which is prohibited, and it passes government fund allocations through religious organizations -- which often discriminate in their dispersal of the funds. We disagree.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kenhamlett
11:25 AM on 02/14/2011
Once again, I am answering you this way, and I know that you will understand. I am also a Christian, and it is significant to me that God felt so strongly about homosexuality that he did not include it as a sin when he wrote the Ten Commandments with his own hand. Jesus Christ felt so strongly about it that in the thousands of things he is quoted as saying in the Bible, he never once mentions it. The only mention of homosexuality in the Bible is in the Old Testament and it relates to a local law at the time. Those same laws -- in those same passages -- also forbid eating shellfish and wearing more than one type of fabric at the same time. So, it seems clear that neither God not Jesus Christ is behind the teachings about homosexuality that have shaped much of our lives. Instead, it is the teachings and prejudices of men. That is why I do not want people with these prejudices -- despite my own Christianity -- involved in shaping government policy or programs. Discrimination is discrimination, and it should not be acceptable in any form or in any situation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
detroitblkmale30
Wise Men Still Seek Him
12:05 PM on 02/09/2011
apparently he missed the African-American Church community as well...sigh
09:54 AM on 02/09/2011
ohhh, missed the scientologists too...

also as an apostle of the flying spaghetti monster, I'm dismayed at the lack of my faith's representation on the panel. May his noodley appendage reach out and dunk their heads in boiling water for 10 to 12 minutes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
detroitblkmale30
Wise Men Still Seek Him
08:18 PM on 02/10/2011
except for the fact that your atheistic critique usage of the common spaghetti monster misses the point. Your spaghetti monster has no organizations around the country through which to provide tangible services to their communities ..Scientologists have been included previously.
08:51 PM on 02/10/2011
hogwash, I hang out with a group of 30 atheists that all who would be glad to fly under the banner of the FSM and are constantly providing tangible services to the community. We do regular blood drives, and help stock food banks (you're from detroit, so you know about gleaners). Smaller groups of us went down to New Orleans after katrina to help gut damaged houses. Another summer a group of us went to haiti and helped pave roads. Come again, and come harder.
02:15 AM on 02/09/2011
Separtaion of church and state. How hard is this concept to grasp?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
detroitblkmale30
Wise Men Still Seek Him
12:09 PM on 02/09/2011
separation of church and state does NOT mean that they cannot talk to each other and figure out approaches to homelessness, poverty, education, etc etc etc. The harder concept to grasp apparently is the fact that there has ALWAYS been a partnership between government and the faith community
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:40 PM on 02/09/2011
They don't have to have an interfaith discussion using government monies and time...it's more grandstanding and behind-the-doors support for a semi theocracy. Personally I think it's wrong if they want to do a religious panel by excluding non-christian or jewish groups. That does nothing to solve any problems. They need to invite Hindus, Muslims, and Buddhists as well as others that I can't say off the top of my head.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Boehringer
Dona nobis pacem
08:30 PM on 02/09/2011
There is no wall of separation as you define it. The constitution states that the government "shall make no law regarding the establishment of religion." The original intent on the part of the founders was to prevent the government from taxing churches (since the power to tax is the power to kill), and from establishment of a state church. Both good concepts. But the establishment clause was not intended to silence religious organizations or prevent dialogue. Interestingly, during the civil rights movement of the 1960's a good many churches led the way in supporting equality. Historically, it was when the Catholic Church as well as the evangelicals opposed abortion that many people started talking about "separation of church and state." The discussion continues to evolve.
12:41 AM on 02/09/2011
They have no business getting the government into "faith-based" anything diverse or not. The whole idea is - if I may say so - an abomination.
07:12 AM on 02/09/2011
nice use of words! fanned!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SrAN
1st time proud pagan mom since May 16
05:29 PM on 02/08/2011
I am Pagan and this is honestly just a bad idea. Seperation of church and state should be upheld and this is the beginning of ending that. Religion and politics should not have anything to do with each other. When they do that is when complications arise. I say, seperate them and keep them seperate.
photo
HerrMonk
Fighter, Trainer, Nat.Sec.Consultant, Libertine
03:40 PM on 02/08/2011
Why does Obama need faith-based advisers in the first place?

The problem isn't that he didn't meet the PC Police quota... it's that these positions exist at all...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
detroitblkmale30
Wise Men Still Seek Him
12:07 PM on 02/09/2011
Not really. They are NOT advising him on issues of religion. They are advising him on issues of community development and social services funded by government programs which they also operate and offer to members of all faiths or no faith at all. That's what they are utilized for.
photo
HerrMonk
Fighter, Trainer, Nat.Sec.Consultant, Libertine
12:15 PM on 02/09/2011
The government, especially the federal government, shouldn't be in the social engeneering buisness in the first place.

If these kinds of programs are going to exist, they should be run at the state and local level.

And if they are not advising him on issues of religion, and their religious organizations are not being utilized as part of the machinery here, why use them at all, and establish them in the context of religious leaders?
02:54 PM on 02/10/2011
"offer to members of all faiths or no faith at all."

Then why are there never any members of the "no faith at all" group?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sweendoggedly
Science. It works.
03:07 PM on 02/08/2011
No FSM representation either. Sad day for pirate believers.