More

For-Profit College Recruiters Taught To Use 'Pain,' 'Fear,' Internal Documents Show


First Posted: 02/08/11 04:23 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:30 PM ET

Newly-released internal training documents from several for-profit colleges illustrate a culture that encourages recruiters to increase enrollment by focusing on emotions such as "pain" and "fear" to attract low-income students who are struggling with adverse personal and financial circumstances.

The documents, obtained by a Senate oversight committee, shed light on the high-pressure recruiting tactics employed by some for-profit schools to increase enrollment numbers and the profits that come from federal student-aid dollars.

"Remind them of what things will be like if they don't continue forward and earn their degrees," reads one document obtained from ITT Technical Institute, a for-profit school with more than 100 campuses across the country. "Poke the pain a bit and remind them who else is depending on them and their commitment to a better future."

The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee has conducted a series of hearings probing the for-profit education sector during the past year. Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), who chairs the committee, referenced the documents in a Monday-evening speech on the Senate floor.

For-profit colleges are facing increased scrutiny and new regulations amid growing evidence of aggressive and deceptive recruiting tactics and a disproportionate number of students defaulting on federal loans. Critics of the industry have pointed to the tremendous amounts of money such schools spend on marketing and recruiting in order to get more students -- and their federal aid funds -- in the door.

Harkin's committee has requested a series of internal training documents from numerous for-profit schools. Among the more eye-opening materials turned over to the committee were training guides from ITT and Kaplan University, which is owned by The Washington Post Co. (Read our look at Kaplan's questionable tactics here.)

The ITT training documents laid out a "Pain Funnel and Pain Puzzle" that describes a series of questions recruiters should ask prospective students in order to "poke the pain" and convince them to sign up for classes. "Level 1 Pain" questions focus on telling the story of a student's performance in high school or in getting a GED.

The recruiter is then instructed to continue probing, asking questions such as "What has not having a college education cost you?" and "What are you willing to change now, or have you given up trying to deal with the problem?"

A similar document from Kaplan University encourages recruiters to "Keep digging until you uncover their pain, fears and dreams" and to "Get to their emotions and you will create the urgency!"

The internal training guides shed light on recruitment methods that have long been criticized by student-advocacy groups as preying on uninformed, uneducated students who may have little chance of success once admitted to the schools.

A Kaplan spokeswoman said the company discontinued the recruiting guide mentioning "pain" and "fear" last year. She pointed to a new company policy that allows students to withdraw free of charge within four or five weeks if they are not satisfied with the program

"When students are enrolled through deception or fear, they are less prepared to meet the challenges of college," Harkin said Monday evening on the Senate floor. "Rather than offering students a better life, these types of strong-arm, emotionally abusive tactics are all too typical of schools that have little or no interest in providing students the academic help and support they need for the students to succeed."

A Senate report released last year found extremely high turnover rates for students in the for-profit sector: 57 percent of students had withdrawn within a year, according to an analysis of students at 16 large for-profit schools between July 2008 and June 2009.

A document obtained from a privately owned for-profit school, Vatterott Educational Centers Inc. noted that, "We deal with people that live in the moment and for the moment. Their decision to start, stay in school or quit school is based more on emotion than logic. Pain is the greater motivator in the short term."

Another Vatterott document described the target market for recruiters: "We serve the UN-DER world, Unemployed, Underpaid, Unsatisfied, Unskilled, Unprepared, Unsupported, Unmotivated, Unhappy, Underserved!"

Officials at ITT and Vatterott did not respond to requests for comment Tuesday afternoon.

Students at for-profit schools represent less than 15 percent of college enrollments nationwide, but take in a quarter of federal student-aid dollars and account for nearly half of all student loan defaults, according to data released last week by the Department of Education. A quarter of all students enrolled at for-profit schools defaulted on student loans within three years -- more than twice the rate of students at public nonprofit colleges.

Numerous corporations that own for-profit colleges -- including the Apollo Group, which owns University of Phoenix, and Corinthian Colleges Inc., which runs the Everest College chain -- derive more than 85 percent of their revenue from federal student aid.

Read the "Pain Funnel" page from an ITT Tech training manual and read the full documents from the floor speech below:


Below, the "Kaplan document":


And the Vatterrott College document, detailing sales targets:

Read the full documents from the floor speech:


Recruiting documents -
FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Newly-released internal training documents from several for-profit colleges illustrate a culture that encourages recruiters to increase enrollment by focusing on emotions such as "pain" and "fear" to ...
Newly-released internal training documents from several for-profit colleges illustrate a culture that encourages recruiters to increase enrollment by focusing on emotions such as "pain" and "fear" to ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 638
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
04:06 AM on 02/10/2011
I know most some people who attended these types of colleges. Most of these people are delusional. I had to talk a coworker out of enrolling in these types of colleges. She apparently thought she could become a nurse with only two yrs of schooling. A nurse!!! Are you joking me??
07:27 PM on 03/02/2011
two years is the traditional length of programs for nursing, both ASN (Associate Science - Nursing) and certain LPN program (Licensed Practical Nurse)
09:20 PM on 02/09/2011
Trying to place focus in our children's lives on education is hard enough with out having them influenced by rumors of deception, greed and lack of quality educators. The point at which we place more value on the $ versus validly educating our children on the value of a solid education and the benefit not only for them but for our country as a whole is another day which our country takes another giant step backwards and many other countries take a step forward. These tactics are dispicable and the leaders of thes programs ought to be ashamed. www.zimmerableassociates.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SequimBob2
07:00 PM on 02/09/2011
For-Profit College Recruiters Taught To Use 'Pain,' 'Fear,' -- right out of the GOP playbook.

The US Defense industry rakes in about $665B per year. Canada's brings in only $21B. Our elected representatives work very hard to make us fear the boogeyman dujour. Fear works. Fear sells. Remember Government Takeover of Healthcare? And Death Panels, remember those fear tactics?

Why wouldn't the for-profit colleges want to emulate a proven sales tactic? (Retorical question.) And now the same elected reps who have honed their own fear tactics to a fine edge are going to call the for-profit colleges to task. No hypocrisy here folks. Move along.
04:28 PM on 02/09/2011
To be truthful, not all of these schools are for scoundrels. Having worked in traditional education, let me tell you that many "real" schools get away with MURDER as far as playing politics in terms of funding from the state, giving students a feeling that they are just numbers, and in some cases, providing an education or training that is grossly behind the times due to tenured professors who long ago stopped working in the industry or furthering professional development. There is a design school in New York that focuses on positive reinforcement towards working with industry leaders and concentrated career assistance. The rate of student employment is quite commendable. And most importantly, students enjoy school for the first time in their careers in some cases. After seeing 13 yrs of students getting a diploma that translates into more struggling in an age of economic uncertainty, some fo these for profit schools deliver the goods, if only because they'd be out of business if they didn't.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
p c r
Compassionate and Conservative are polar opposites
03:42 PM on 02/09/2011
These "educational institutions" are part of the reason that student loans get a bad reputation. A community college offers online classes at a fraction of the cost and provide assistance with student loans. The difference is up to $800 per college credit hour. University of Phoenix charges obscene amounts of money per credit hour, and I was almost scammed into their slick marketing trap.
I am currently taking college courses from a local college at $100 per credit hour, and am receiving a good education.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
montn2
02:42 PM on 02/09/2011
These scam operations are well known to be nothing but snake oil salesmen. They prey on the un-educated, because they it is a money making machine. Most of their student body belong in trade schools or in community colleges. Either one would be a better choice for them and they are not blood suckers, but legitimate institutions. The for profits have strong lobbyists and that is the only reason they have been able to stay in business. Hopefully this investigation will result in their demise.
03:51 PM on 02/09/2011
Hear, hear!
11:55 AM on 02/10/2011
Do you agree a traditional 4-year University/College is not for everyone? Some people just can't stand the thought of sitting in a class room for hours, they are more hands-on individuals. Yes, some of the tactics are questionable, but to deny people a right to choose where they obtain their education is ludicrous!! I have done both: I received a degree from a traditional college and I've also served in the military (same hands-on training as the for-profit schools you are bashing), so I can safely say I have a pretty good handle on how they both operate. And you want to talk about pressure tactics? Look no further than our government recruiting for the military. However, this is the same government providing funding most Universities and Colleges across the U.S. Point being, trade schools are not solely out for the underprivileged's money, but more of an alternative to traditional schooling. Their tactics are in question, not the school.
photo
wowme
Fail to prepare, prepare to fail
02:15 PM on 02/09/2011
They must've learned that from bush's administration
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
p c r
Compassionate and Conservative are polar opposites
03:43 PM on 02/09/2011
"Is our children learning?"
02:00 PM on 02/09/2011
Sounds pretty much like the marketing of the "war on terror" to me.
photo
Ed Baker
Militant Moderate
01:50 PM on 02/09/2011
I don't support these BS schools - they are for losers who can't get into a real school.

That said - the techniques used here are standard sales techniques used by everyone in a sales position at any firm - and especially by politicians.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Said One
01:59 PM on 02/09/2011
I think if for-profit colleges were cheaper and regulated - it would actually be  a good idea to provide entrance into certain fields.

I think a degree in pharma technology is not a bad thing - it just shouldn't cost an arm and a leg and it has more real world application than a degree from a rated university in sociology or philosophy for example
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joemac1114
02:07 PM on 02/09/2011
They are not cheaper than non-profits as to have a for profit school you have to include a profit for the owners in your fees.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
TeeLolly
02:16 PM on 02/09/2011
Some community colleges teach the same subject matter for a reasonable price, and have connections with local businesses likely to hire people with the skills they teach.
photo
blessedfrog
save habeas corpus
01:47 PM on 02/09/2011
I am a fan of education - be it technical or classical liberal arts etc.

Learning expands and enhances life.

But the astronomical costs only debilitate and ensare people.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Bellanova
I'm nobody. Who are you?
01:25 PM on 02/09/2011
Another example of the many joys of unbridled capitalism. We should nationalize higher ed already, along with health care.
07:17 PM on 02/09/2011
I am afraid the Estates may have too much of the wealth and power , also America is polarized maybe beyond repair , conversation is nothing more than talking over and insulting the other party , as far as listening and compromise it may not be in the cultural psyche anymore .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joemac1114
01:24 PM on 02/09/2011
As a college professor I get the product of these for profit schools and in my anecdotal experience can tell you that the students get to me unprepared. There is little rigor in their programs as retention is key to continuing to get funds from the government to finance their educations. This is a serious problem and one that needs our attention at the level of funding decisions.
photo
Ed Baker
Militant Moderate
01:52 PM on 02/09/2011
They should make the student funding more comprehensive and examine the student's past performance before handing money out. Right now, the government just writes a check to anyone who enrolls in school. ALL institutions need a good audit for RESULTS as well. I'd support black listing schools based on the repayment of funds by graduated students as well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Said One
01:55 PM on 02/09/2011
Nonsense - that leads to tons of easy A's qualifying for an abundance of funding.

Sorry the degree one chose should also be rewarded. Working one's behind off and getting a D in Chemical engineering is harder than getting straight A's for philosophy or sociology.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Natalie Willoughby
High-heeled feminist
02:17 PM on 02/09/2011
What's wrong with the government allowing anyone to go to school? That's what a democratic society should provide to its people - good education for all at a low cost. You say they should examine a student's past performance? What about those who had a troubled life, turned things around and now want to go to school? What about first generation students growing up in poverty that need that opportunity to get out?

What needs to be done is a complete education overhaul so that no one feels the need to attend a for-profit school because they make it seem "easier" than a community college or university. EVERYONE in this country should have the opportunity to have a decent education, and the government needs to make that happen for us.
07:39 PM on 03/02/2011
You should probably provide better definition to your terms. Voc-Ed for-profit teaches traditionaly the students from the lowest rungs of the economic ladder, those who have had the worst experiences imaginable traversing the primary and secondary levels of their schooling. What you receive from them, is light-years from what they received before you, and your burden is eased greatly by their work. If you are speaking of for-profit publicly traded diploma mills like UofPhoenix, I have no solid ground to stand upon while arguing against you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joemac1114
10:45 PM on 03/02/2011
I have audited for profit colleges as a CPA, and can tell you there are interested in the profits the students produce not the student. I can also say with confidence that a community college is equipped to deal with those from the lowest rungs of society. I started my education at a community college coming from the lowest rung of society. I know what they did for me, and how hard I had to work to make the moves that were necessary for me to lead a successful life. It has to be a team effort between the student and the college, if your only is interest is the profit you make from the student, how much interest can you have in their success.

After obtaining CPA and Law licenses, I thought so much of Community Colleges, I turned more money down in the private sector to go back and work in one. I hope everyday that I have touched someone's life the way mine was touched. I work hard everyday to make sure that I do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joemac1114
10:46 PM on 03/02/2011
Forgive my typos, I get typing so fast sometimes I miss them. I do know they difference between, there, their and they're.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Said One
01:15 PM on 02/09/2011
A lot of rated universities also cheat kids - how many get tricked into sociology, philosophy etc on the basis of - oh you'll learn to think critically - and then end up unemployed in the real world afterwards since a lot of people worldwide Africa etc sit with these Easy A degrees - department bloated from fees, and the person comes out with a dime a dozen degree and no real skills.

Every sector in the tertiary world should be regulated.
photo
Ed Baker
Militant Moderate
01:52 PM on 02/09/2011
ALL the education providers need greater scrutiny for RESULTS.
02:22 PM on 02/09/2011
Just because those subjects don't require the same skills as something like engineering doesn't mean they're "easy A" degrees. Maybe at a not-so-good university, but as someone who majored in something similar, I worked my ass off for four years to make good grades. And no, it isn't at all useless as I am now working in a job that actually utilizes my undergraduate degree, and I think my skills overall are to be credited to the work I did as an undergrad. I wouldn't have gotten anywhere in life without them.

Think of all the things we wouldn't know or have without the study of philosophy, english, art, or history.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Spike5
Let's go forward, not back to an imaginary past
07:08 PM on 02/09/2011
Me too. I have an English lit undergrad degree and a technical master's and that was the best of both worlds. My BA taught me how to read, write, and think critically. It was the best possible foundation for working in IT and business and health care for the past 30 years. It turns out that the skills you develop in literature classes carry over to reading and writing and communicating to clients and coworkers no matter what field.
01:09 PM on 02/09/2011
if someone wants to learn a trade do they have to go to a for profit school? i know community college dosn't have courses in carpentry , plumbing etc so is for profit the only option for people wanting to learn a trade?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MG Metiva
For Great Justice, I shall post.
01:17 PM on 02/09/2011
Some Community Colleges do have the trades offered but they seem to be only in areas that have demand and a large industrial base.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joemac1114
02:01 PM on 02/09/2011
I think you should look at your community college a little more closely. The one I work at offers a range of construction technology, automotive repair, machine shop and other areas that local industry has asked us to provide.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Left on Red
Micro Bio 201 T-Th 1 - 2:30 Lab W 1-5 Dr. Price
01:06 PM on 02/09/2011
Sounds like a stump speech for a lot of the GOP politicians.