iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Michelle Obama's Obesity Campaign 'Let's Move' Turns 1: Is It Working?

AP/The Huffington Post   First Posted: 02/08/11 11:23 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:30 PM ET

Michelle Obama Obesity

WASHINGTON -- Michelle Obama had doubts about making a campaign against childhood obesity one of her signature issues.

"I wondered to myself whether we could really make a difference, because when you take on a problem this big and this complicated, at times it can be a little overwhelming," she said in a recent speech.

The anti-obesity campaign Mrs. Obama calls "Let's Move!" celebrates its first anniversary Wednesday. Is it making a difference?

In some ways, yes. In others, it's much too soon to tell.

Advocates who have worked on the issue for a long time say the first lady's involvement is raising awareness about the potential future of the U.S. as a nation of fat, unhealthy people unless the trend is reversed, and Mrs. Obama has been doing it in ways that they can't. "She has been a spark plug," said Nancy Brown, chief executive of the American Heart Association.

Mrs. Obama has addressed governors, mayors, school groups, food makers and other constituencies, urging them to build more bike paths and playgrounds, to serve healthier school lunches and to make and sell more food that's better for you.

She has visited schools across the country to see what changes they are making, from planting fruit and vegetable gardens modeled after her own celebrated White House plot to opening salad bars in their lunchrooms. And she's worked herself into a sweat at exercise clinics with kids, including on the White House South Lawn.

Her year of effort has led to promises of change from beverage makers, food manufacturers and most recently, and perhaps notably, Walmart, the country's largest retailer, to cut the levels of salt, fat and sugar in their products.

Lasting change will take years of effort, though, and some doubt it will happen at all.

"I've been through so many of these enormous announcements by food companies about how they're going to profoundly change the way they're doing business and they don't,' said food expert and New York University nutrition professor Marion Nestle. "So it remains to be seen."

Mrs. Obama said when she launched the campaign that it will benefit future generations by helping children born today become adults at a healthy weight. The issue is picking up momentum, she said.

"We are seeing a fundamental shift in our national conversation about how we make and sell food," the first lady said at an appearance in Washington with Walmart executives for their announcement last month. "That's something that wasn't happening just a year ago."

Walmart promised to reformulate thousands of its store-brand products to reduce sodium, sugar and fat, and push its suppliers to do the same. The company also pledged to cut fresh fruit and vegetable prices, build stores in areas without grocers and develop a logo for products that meet its health criteria. Walmart's grocery business accounts for about 15 percent of the U.S. grocery industry.

"All this will take some time," Leslie Dach, an executive vice president at Walmart, said in an interview. He said Walmart worked with Mrs. Obama's office for about a year to win her approval.

A new child nutrition law aims to make all school food more nutritious by letting Washington decide what kinds of foods may be sold on school grounds, including in vending machines and at fundraisers. The law also increases by 6 cents the amount of money the government reimburses schools for providing free lunches, but some advocates say that's hardly enough.

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack recently unveiled guidelines for putting the changes into place. In the case of sodium, the amount in meals would be gradually reduced over 10 years, with an eventual goal of cutting levels by more than half.

Mrs. Obama called for "clear, consistent" nutrition labels on the front of packaged foods to help harried shoppers make informed choices. The Grocery Manufacturers Association, which represents large food and beverage companies, is working on a label it hopes to begin rolling out later this year.

The beverage industry has started putting labels with calorie counts on the front of its bottles, cans and packages of soft drinks, juices, teas and waters. The goal is to have a label on all non-alcoholic drinks by the end of 2012, said Kevin Keane, a senior vice president of the American Beverage Association. The group is following up on the commitment it made when Mrs. Obama launched "Let's Move!" last February.

Keane did not say how much companies are spending on the program, except that it's a "great deal."

The new health care law also requires restaurants with 20 or more locations operating under the same name to list nutrition and calorie information on their menus or menu boards. FDA guidance on that is due soon, said Sue Hensley, a spokeswoman for the National Restaurant Association.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

WASHINGTON -- Michelle Obama had doubts about making a campaign against childhood obesity one of her signature issues. "I wondered to myself whether we could really make a difference, because when ...
WASHINGTON -- Michelle Obama had doubts about making a campaign against childhood obesity one of her signature issues. "I wondered to myself whether we could really make a difference, because when ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 190
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
01:21 PM on 02/11/2011
I think that its a great campaign BUT other tactics should be used.

When it comes to appealing to people my age, 20, and younger, play on vanity. To be honest I've shifted to a diet that consists of fruits, lots of vegetables, whole grains and occasional small portions of lean meat (and a glass of skimmed milk every now and then). I essentially only drink water (I admit I slip up a bit hear because of alcohol when I go out). And I run for 30 minutes every day and three times a week do light strength building exercises. All in all, am proud of my new lifestyle, and hope that because of it I'll be fit and healthy well into my 60s, 70s and beyond. BUT my point is that the main trigger for all of this was vanity.

Get some celebs that appeal to teens and let them know that the best way to look good is to be healthy. That'll be more affective then telling them that in a few years time they might get diabetes.
09:30 PM on 02/10/2011
I'm all for a health conscious country, all long as the government doesn't start passing laws mandating it.
01:46 AM on 02/13/2011
When it comes to school lunches, the government already mandates the nutrition profile of meals served to kids, and has done so for decades. So this isn't some seismic shift in how government works, just a move in a better direction.

The government also "mandates", in a sense, people's dietary choices by deciding which foods are going to be subsidized, and therefore affordable for poor people, and which ones aren't. The fact that you can buy a 10-piece order of McNuggets for less than a head of broccoli is no accident. When a chicken is fed government-subsidized corn, its meat is ground up and mixed with more corn, and then fried in corn oil, of course it's going to be cheap.

The government isn't exactly "mandating" that poor people eat fast food and junk food, but with their subsidy policies, they might as well be.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
02:56 PM on 02/10/2011
I don't know if it's related specifically to her campaign, but I definitely see a lot more calorie information posted prominently (not just on a small sheet in the corner) at restaurants, even fast food places. I hear people in line actually talking about, which leads me to believe it might actually be affecting a decision or two. That's a significant start, an awareness that out bodies are not bottomless garbage dumps. We're not going to convince everyone to avoid sugar and salt or go vegan or to drastically change their diets in a short period time, but we can certainly start showing them an example of what a reasonable amount of food for the day looks like.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fisher65
10:26 AM on 02/10/2011
yes it is . down 20 lbs.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CintiBlue
04:19 PM on 02/10/2011
YEA, fisher65!!
01:12 PM on 02/11/2011
Good for you! :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fuddgate
Some assembly required
07:03 AM on 02/10/2011
You can lead a horse to water.......but the ~120 million Americans consuming 4000+ calories/day hear only...........blah blah blah...rabbit food...blah blah...food police.........

It's a noble effort. Fight the good fight despite the collective inertia of the masses.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MyResponsibility
Action over hope
10:52 PM on 02/09/2011
I wonder why Michelle hasn't teamed up with Jamie Oliver (Jaimie Oliver's Food Revolution) to get the public school's RIDICULOUSLY pathetic lunch program fixed.  He's got pull, and an audience.  It would be a good pairing.
10:18 PM on 02/09/2011
The First Lady brings attention to the biggest medical epidemic that doesn't get as much emphasis as perhaps needed. There is almost no one who could be a better spokesperson for a nation where 66% are either obese or overweight. The First Lady unifies the different discilpines of fitness, nutrition and the different disciplines under one banner. Now, a program can be recognized that genuinely tries to look at regular fitness, nutritional support, behavior modification and motivation, prevention education along with personal responsibility. The first lady does what no other individual or health organization can do, give weight control the legitimacy it reqires as a real issue. What weight loss companies, dietary supplements, weight loss medicines or exercise machines have been longing to do can be done by the presence of someone with such notariety and celebrity. Being a parent, a gardner, advocate of healthier school lunches and now a pro-healthy foods in groceries, the First Lady becomes a symbol for health much like John F. Kennedy's call to fitness in the 60s.It will take a First Lady's recognition to place preventon at the center of health and to build a "culture of wellness".
Finally and congratualtions.
photo
alongst
too often denied to speak
09:50 PM on 02/09/2011
"Michelle Obama's Obesity campaign- is it working?"
I don't know- her backside looks as big as ever !
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:14 PM on 02/10/2011
Why don't you post "your backside" so we can compare.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sistahfriend
09:28 PM on 02/10/2011
Baby Got Back!!!!!!!

Curves are in.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
T4
Entreprenuer and financial consultant
03:21 PM on 02/09/2011
she campaigns against obesity while her husband gives billions ot taxpayers funded bailouts to McDs. Practial question - which program is working?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zengaman
Seeker of profundity in all its guises
05:26 PM on 02/09/2011
Bailouts to Micky D's.... really?? Post a link.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MyResponsibility
Action over hope
10:55 PM on 02/09/2011
Yes. But not billions. Many millions, though.   http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-01/fed-crisis-borrowers-ranged-from-bank-of-america-to-mcdonald-s.html
11:56 AM on 02/09/2011
Mrs. Obama is planting seeds that may flourish in generations to come; a noble cause.
photo
HerrMonk
Fighter, Trainer, Nat.Sec.Consultant, Libertine
11:39 AM on 02/09/2011
A big problem with her campaign is it's filled with bad (old nutritional orthodoxy) information.

You can't get people eating healthier if they don't understand what healthy is. The fixation on sodium and dietary fat while promoting "whole grain" consumption en masse for example is counterproductive to the goal of leaning the population out.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Dosadi
Political agnostic
05:22 PM on 02/09/2011
Good point.  But as she opens up this 'doorway' so to speak, those that do have useful information will start to feel free to speak up.  In today's climate anyone with intelligence is ridiculed and verbally castrated whenever they tell people things they didn't already know.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DrP
10:14 PM on 02/10/2011
My opinion exactly.
photo
HerrMonk
Fighter, Trainer, Nat.Sec.Consultant, Libertine
11:37 AM on 02/09/2011
Oh good... they're reducing sodium in cafeteria food... that will solve it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:19 PM on 02/10/2011
Evidently you don't realize just how much salt is in cafeteria food.

We've got to start somewhere. Lowering salt intake, soda(diet or regular), and processed food will move students a giant step forward to good health. Salt is an addiction, like sugar so it has to be eliminated.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DrP
10:15 PM on 02/10/2011
Salt is not the cause of any health condition. Focusing on salt distracts people from the real villains, sugar, starch, and grains.
photo
clearthinker2008
we need to respect each other
10:22 AM on 02/09/2011
When the Obama's leave office, there will still be fat kids. Even if they move more. Look, years ago the government told us to cut fat and we as a nation did, obesity skyrocketed. This type of stuff never works I don't care how good her intentions are. Look up Good Calories Bad Calories or reader friendly "Why we get fat" both by Gary Taubes. Atkins had it right, and as long as we are worried about cutting fat, protein, and exercising until we pass our (which makes folks hungry) nothing is going to change in this Country. I won't even get into monsanto and all the crap in our food supply. I like the first lady, but if she gets kids outside and moving and more organic vegetables and meat into the hands of the poor I'll consider this a success but a bunch of skinny kids? Not gonna happen.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zengaman
Seeker of profundity in all its guises
05:24 PM on 02/09/2011
You may not be thinking clearly. Reminds me of the folks who say "I'll never be rich like Oprah" ...so they don't even try.

Don't you think that we have to start somewhere?? And maybe I'm wrong, but raising awareness to proper health, exercise and nutrition by starting with the kids, will in turn reverberate through many generations. Those kids will now become aware adults who possess the tools to influence their own children's nutritional habits and desire for physical activities.

To affect a change at Monsanto starts with a change in consumer demand. She's showing the grocery associations that they're missing a huge profit opportunity by being slow to act on a clear trend by consumers towards, and for, healthy foods. And If I'm getting you correctly... you're saying not to even exercise as it may make you hungry. ??

Your cynicism only breeds stagnation. Her optimism however, breeds change.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
awa611
She's a snarl-toothed seether.....
05:45 PM on 02/10/2011
Atkins had it wrong and it's been proven over and over again that he had it wrong. High caloric consumption and low activity are why we are a fat nation. It is that simple and all the gimmicky stuff continues to be proven wrong and unhealthy. Understanding what happens to food once it's being digested is the key. We all need protein, fat and carbohydrates. There are NO valid researches that prove Atkins was right. Reducing any one of the three by a large amount will cause the body to lose weight. That has been proven.
There will always be fat people. But, continuing to make excuses for over consumption and under-activity is helping no one.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DrP
10:17 PM on 02/10/2011
You are ignoring the very significant role that insulin plays in human metabolism.
I suggest you read Taubes. He has written two books that show the science that proves that Atkins was right. The only good research supports carbohydrate reduction. The research that says otherwise can all be proven for the poor science that it was.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
awa611
She's a snarl-toothed seether.....
07:31 AM on 02/09/2011
Walmart's involvement cracks me up. Next time you're in a Walmart, take a good look at what is in their shoppers' carts. They aren't too worried about the ingredients in the foods they're buying.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:21 PM on 02/10/2011
Many people already depend on Walmart's store brand for their family's nutrition. If Walmart reduces the salt content of these processed foods, many people will automatically reduce their salt intake.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
awa611
She's a snarl-toothed seether.....
05:40 PM on 02/10/2011
Which is true. But, again, look at what they're eating because those are the foods that are usually on sale or specially priced: all the processed, low nutritional value, frozen, boxed foods and junk food. I have to go to many Walmarts for my job and I see what is in their carts all the time. Reducing the salt and fat content isn't going to help that much on foods that are poor choices in the first place. Like when McDonalds at one point decided to stop salting their fries so they weren't as bad for you. Uh......yeah, that really helped. :\
06:56 AM on 02/09/2011
Actually, things are working. People are so quick to dismiss campaigns like this if they are not immediately successful. We change at the rate that our systems can handle. I work as a coordinate school health organizer in two school and I am already seeing awareness building.
http://loudfartnoremorse.blogspot.com/
photo
HerrMonk
Fighter, Trainer, Nat.Sec.Consultant, Libertine
11:44 AM on 02/09/2011
Awareness of what though?