More

Top House Republicans Caught Off Guard As Tea Party Flexes Muscle

Boehner Blindsided

CHARLES BABINGTON and LAURIE KELLMAN   02/ 9/11 06:13 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — The clout of tea party advocates and other hard-line conservatives in Congress has caught top Republicans by surprise, raising questions about whether GOP leaders can impose enough discipline in their House majority to pass tough measures, such as raising the debt ceiling.

Within 24 hours this week, House Speaker John Boehner's team had to pull a trade bill from the chamber floor, suffered an embarrassing setback on a USA Patriot Act vote, and failed to recoup money paid to the United Nations.

And in electoral politics, the tea party's threat to Republican incumbents came more into focus. Three GOP senators up for re-election in 2012 could be looking at challenges for their party nominations. One of them, five-term Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, crossed town Tuesday to tell the tea party's national town hall that he has supported its budget-balancing, smaller-government agenda for decades.

Democrats and Republicans said the events show that GOP leaders have yet to gauge the full extent of libertarianism and independence in their newly swollen ranks. Republicans gained control of the House thanks to sweeping victories last fall, many involving tea party loyalists.

"If they're divided on an issue like the Patriot Act, it's a bad omen for things to come regarding unity on their side," said Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md. "It's only going to get tougher for them when it comes to budget issues."

Many congressional Republicans want to slash spending beyond levels their party leaders support. GOP leaders say Congress must raise the federal debt ceiling this spring to avoid dire economic problems. Judging from the week's events, it may be a tough sell.

All three House setbacks can be reversed. The Patriot Act and U.N. votes needed super majorities under expedited House rules, and Republican leaders probably can pass them later with simple majorities. Likewise they can try to build enough support for the trade measure.

House Republican leaders Wednesday shrugged off suggestions that they've lost control of their caucus.

"We're not going to be perfect every day," Boehner told reporters. He noted that Tuesday's effort to extend provisions of the Patriot Act failed partly because it was opposed by three dozen Democrats who previously had supported them.

The Patriot Act vote would have extended the life of three surveillance tools central to the nation's post-Sept. 11 anti-terror law. The 277-148 vote fell short of the two-thirds majority required under the expedited rules.

Voting nay were 26 Republicans, many of whom have libertarian leanings and are wary of government intrusion in private lives. Joining them were 122 Democrats.

A similar vote occurred Wednesday on a bill to force the U.N. to return $179 million the United States paid into the U.N. tax equalization fund. The 259-169 vote was short of the two-thirds threshold.

Some lawmakers said GOP leaders had failed to give colleagues enough details about the trade and Patriot Act bills, and therefore they overestimated the level of support. Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, a tea party favorite, said freshmen lawmakers didn't have "adequate time to digest" the contents of the Patriot Act bill.

"I hope it makes us get sharper," said King, who supported the act's extension.

Boehner said the Patriot Act provisions will be extended under a simple-majority vote soon.

When asked why the bill was brought up under the two-thirds majority rule, Boehner glared at the reporter and said, simply, "It was."

Another Republican leader Wednesday tried to cool the cost-cutting fever of tea partiers. House Appropriations Committee Chairman Hal Rogers, R-Ky., proposed ending more than 60 government programs and cutting $35 billion in spending.

Cutting more deeply at this point, Rogers told colleagues, could lead to furloughs of federal workers at the FBI and the Drug Enforcement Agency, or politically wrenching cuts to health research, special education grants to local school districts, or college Pell Grants.

There were other signs in Washington this week that Republicans are still grappling with the influence, or threat, wielded by fiscally conservative, libertarian-leaning members. Not all are associated with the tea party, but the tea party movement has boosted their numbers and clout.

Besides Hatch, veteran Republican Sens. Dick Lugar of Indiana and Olympia Snowe of Maine could face re-election challenges from tea party candidates in two years. Neither attended the town hall Tuesday evening.

Hatch's remarks at the tea party "town hall" were carried or commented on by C-SPAN, Facebook, Twitter and other outlets.

His appeal reflected the belief that tea party activists could oust him next year in the GOP nominating process. That's what happened to his colleague Bob Bennett, the veteran conservative senator who critics accused of being too willing to compromise with Democrats on some issues.

Hatch saluted the tea party for waking up the electorate, and ticked off a list of policy positions he shares with the movement: support for a constitutional amendment requiring a balanced budget; repeal of President Barack Obama's health care overhaul; a general distrust of big government; and a zeal for cutting spending.

"I for one want to thank the tea party for what they've done," Hatch said.

___

Associated Press writer Stephen Ohlemacher contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — The clout of tea party advocates and other hard-line conservatives in Congress has caught top Republicans by surprise, raising questions about whether GOP leaders can impose enough ...
WASHINGTON — The clout of tea party advocates and other hard-line conservatives in Congress has caught top Republicans by surprise, raising questions about whether GOP leaders can impose enough ...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,152
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (69 total)
  1 of 11  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
rascalcat 03:55 PM on 02/10/2011
Colorado Republican Party Chairman Dick Wadhams dropped his reelection bid on Monday, and fired some parting shots at the Tea Party and the hard-line conservatives he thinks are hurting the party's electoral success.
 
"I have tired of those who are obsessed with seeing conspiracies around every corner and who have terribly misguided notions  Read More... obtained by The Denver Post.
 
The Tea Party is definitely losing it's shine with conservatives not willing to plunge off the right wing cliff.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
wassilij
shamanlight
08:32 AM on 02/19/2011
RUSH LIMBAUGH........DOING WHAT JIM JONES ONLY DREAMED OF.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
2garen
07:16 PM on 02/12/2011
This will probably get deleted

Orrin Hatch is playing "see I really am like you game" so the teaparty won't attack him or run someone against him..
I really don't think it is going to work..
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
10:04 AM on 02/11/2011
Hatch has been taking tips from McCain in pandering to get votes.
Sandmanj
Tread gently. Mother nature is pregnant.
08:59 AM on 02/11/2011
The most conservative Republican politician of his day, Barry Goldwater lost big to LBJ in the '64 election in part because he made such reckless warmongering pledges that he would "bomb Hanoi back to the stone age" and "turn Hanoi into a parking lot".

Today the teabuggers would call him a Marxist.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jjkmack
08:24 AM on 02/11/2011
The oligarchs who really run the Republican party have been keeping these people in the dark and feeding them all sorts of crap to split the American public for years, and now they're surprised these people really believe the baloney they've been fed...they didn't get the message that it was all a scam to further enrich the overprivileged! :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gus Adaire
Challenging libs with truth.
09:24 AM on 02/11/2011
The starting with "The oligarchs", means that anything you say afterward is jaded by your stereotypical non-thought.
07:32 PM on 02/12/2011
Called me old fashioned. But when I'm too lazy to read a post; I just ignore it and move on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jjkmack
10:09 AM on 02/19/2011
Thanks for the "thoughtful", "reasoned" and fact based comments...you do fit the stereotype :)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
myth buster
01:03 PM on 02/11/2011
If it was a scam, we don't care, because we elected them to do something, and we expect them to do it.
07:27 AM on 02/11/2011
It is businesses that want to survive (Tea party Koch bots) versus businesses that don't care about tomorrow (GOP).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
willdabeast831
Liberal is not a dirty word.
06:37 AM on 02/11/2011
Where are the jobs?
03:07 AM on 02/11/2011
BS
02:38 AM on 02/11/2011
Now that there are a multitude of "freshman" senators came in the Senate, particularly in the Republican party, I believe that it is to be expected that many of them do not fall under typical party lines. The main reason that these people got elected into office is because they were not the typical politicians with full party line beliefs. The Republican party is going to have to work with these new, more independent congressmen and women in order to get important bills passed, because the vast majority of the new senate is opposed to any extra spending, as promises of decreasing the deficit was what got them elected. If they do work with the new senators their bills will be successful, but if they do not they should be aware that the new Republicans could very well flip to side with the Democrats.
11:24 AM on 02/11/2011
Victoria - you need to get out more politically, really. By observable definition politicians lie from day 1. Those that lie the quickest, the most and the best are the ones that get elected in both so-called political parties. They only have one belief theme in their political ideology - if I lie fast and convincing enough, say what you want to hear often enough, take credit for everything that you like and deny all wrong doing whether responsible for it or not, and don't get caught in bed with someone beside my wife - you'll vote for me. The ones that get elected continue to refine that basic skill set into a multi-decade career. Actually, in the real world freshman senators rarely get important assignments in committees and unless they have lots of money behind them - have zip influence, no political favor "chips" and consequently little or no real power. No one "has to work with them."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim303
02:14 AM on 02/11/2011
You gotta dance with thems that brung ya, or something.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kamact
Market Observer
12:50 AM on 02/11/2011
Welcome to reality,...fool
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ronnie Avatar Dixon
Legislation is the art of compromise.
12:19 AM on 02/11/2011
If the multiple schisms in the Republican Party continue to widen, it should prove good for the Democrats in the 2012 elections.
12:19 AM on 02/11/2011
Elected Tea Party reps remind me of the flying monkeys in the "Wizard of Oz."
11:27 AM on 02/11/2011
Voters - Republicans and Democrats that don't see that they are played against each other for the political system and the ones who own its' gain - would seem to be the monkeys.
photo
CanadjunBeef
Remember Jesus, the radical liberal
12:12 AM on 02/11/2011
See if you recognize any current political movement when you read these definitions of fascism:
"A radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology" - check;
"The will and ability to commit violence and wage war in order to keep the nation strong." - check;
"Fascists present their ideology as that of an economically trans-class movement that promotes ending economic class conflict to secure national solidarity." Uh-huh;
"Promotion of racism and hostility to homosexuals" Yep;
"The Fascist government in Italy banned literature on birth control and increased penalties for abortion in 1926."