More

Freshman Republicans Revolt For More Spending Cuts

First Posted: 02/10/11 08:58 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:30 PM ET

Republicans State Of

WASHINGTON -- House Republicans announced on Thursday that they would seek to cut $100 billion from President Obama's proposed fiscal year 2011 budget in an upcoming bill to extend government funding-- a jump from the $74 billion figure originally announced by GOP leadership.

The actual cuts will be closer to $60 billion, because the $100 billion figure is based off of a 2011 budget that was never approved. Still, cuts in a bill to be released tomorrow will be substantially deeper than the trim the House leadership originally said they would make, putting hundreds of government programs and discretionary funds in jeopardy.

Republicans arrived at a final agreement for the continuing resolution at a caucus meeting on Thursday evening, where members debated exactly how much to ax from spending after pressure from some of the 87 freshmen. The GOP promised $100 billion in cuts--a return to 2008 spending levels--in its Pledge to America in September, but backed away from the figure when it came time to lay out plans for funding the remainder of the fiscal year. Budget Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) announced on February 3 that the party would push for $74 billion in cuts from the 2011 budget proposal (amounting to about $32 billion in actual spending cuts) to the dismay of some newer members of the caucus, who said the cuts should go farther.

Republican leadership met with freshman members on Thursday and found a minor revolt on their hands. Conservative members said the $74 billion figure was not enough to live up to the Pledge to America, despite leadership arguments that a lower figure was necessary because the fiscal year is almost halfway over.

Conservative members won the argument: The bill will include higher pay cuts that would amount to $100 billion less than Obama's 2011 budget proposal. "What we heard here was a commitment to the $100 billion reduction number," Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) said after the caucus meeting. "The freshmen want to make sure that this is a congress that can earn the respect of the people who sent them here and deliver on their promises."

GOP leaders said after the caucus meeting the spending cuts would go further than promised under the Pledge. "We will be cutting $100 billion plus--not just in the next year, but in the next seven months," Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) said. "Not only does it fulfill the Pledge, it goes beyond the Pledge."

The bill could be taken up as early as Tuesday under a rule that will allow members to introduce additional amendments to cut more funds, Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Texas) told reporters outside of the caucus meeting. "I think people recognize that if you want to take it further you better go work it and talk to people and give them a reason why," he said.

The bill also must make it to a 218-vote majority in the House. Not an easy task, given the political difficulty of spending cuts and potential future revolts from members whose proposed cuts are passed over. Still, Republicans said they were confident they could meet the promise in their Pledge.

"Watch us," Sessions said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- House Republicans announced on Thursday that they would seek to cut $100 billion from President Obama's proposed fiscal year 2011 budget in an upcoming bill to extend government funding-...
WASHINGTON -- House Republicans announced on Thursday that they would seek to cut $100 billion from President Obama's proposed fiscal year 2011 budget in an upcoming bill to extend government funding-...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,473
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (24 total)
  1 of 3  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
swift goat pet for truth 11:31 AM on 02/11/2011
Peter007:
"The government can not create jobs."

Oh?
What do you call TSA?

Besides that, private business does not create jobs.
The NEVER did.
Businesses simply respond to demand.  Society wants goods and services, so businesses open up to serve the society.

If private businesses creates jobs, where did the jobs go after the GOPers took over in 2000?
Unemployment was  Read More...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:56 AM on 02/27/2011
This is how they handle cuts in Germany.
Germany's train drivers' union announced a second short strike for Friday to press pay demands.

The GDL union said on Thursday drivers would stop work across the country from 8.30 a.m. to 11.30 a.m. local time on Friday. They had held a two-hour stoppage on Tuesday at peak commuting time as well.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:49 AM on 02/27/2011
Start by cutting your pay and health care benefits like you want the what's left of the middle class to do.
photo
LeFlaneur
does nuance.
04:47 PM on 02/14/2011
Call me when you're willing to look at the Pentagon. Until then I reserve the right to think you're a fraud.
11:35 AM on 02/13/2011
Never, ever, ever, even think about cutting back on our Defense Department. After all, there will always be something, someone, somewhere, that we might have to "defend" ourselves against -- yes, even if we have to create a new "enemy" to give our Defense Department something to do. A sure-fire way is to continue doing what we have been doing, which is to sprinkle our military bases all over other nations. Wouldn't we feel a bit angry at any foreign nation that would set up and run military bases in our country? Youbetchem.
10:21 AM on 02/13/2011
Cutting government services and social services certainly is a trophy that will look nice on the fireplace mantle of the Republicans, but jobs are lost whenever services are cut. Jobs Lost = Unemployed Workers....Unemployed Workers = Unemployment Insurance. Unemployment Insurance = Government payouts. And the circle goes round and round.
conservo
Tea Partier, Atheist, Libertarian, Objectivist
09:20 PM on 02/11/2011
I seem to recall many, many Lib posters here on this site trying to tell me that when these Tea Party backed candidates get into office they are going going to be co-opted by the Repubs and are not going to do anything about cutting spending. Well, now you seem appalled that they are doing exactly what they said they are going to do. Imagine that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andy Williams 1
Liberals! 21st century kooky!
12:22 AM on 02/12/2011
Lol, right on target! Fanned!

They are most upset that the tea party hasn't sold out like their own representatives.
conservo
Tea Partier, Atheist, Libertarian, Objectivist
02:47 PM on 02/12/2011
True that. They have been so immersed in the sceming, conniving and politically expedient ways of their party that they have no idea that honesty and integrity are possible.
I just found out that a Dem Congresswoman wants to make it illegal for Congress people to sleep in their offices (under the premise that, in doing so, they are avoiding paying taxes). Many of the Freshmen Republican Congresspeople have been sleeping in their offices in order to save the taxpayers the costs of hotel rooms. The Dems want to even stand in the way of that. Imagine that.
Fanned back at cha'.
photo
ranchero42
Taunt him with the licence of ink...
12:28 AM on 02/12/2011
They have made no move to demand reversing the tax cuts. No surprise since they've flipped around 180 degrees on who the bad guys are - this is how they've signaled they're perfectly okay with 'too big to fail' and Cheney's admonition that 'deficits don't matter'.

Politics/Business as usual. Last stop - 'Wink And A Nod' City.
conservo
Tea Partier, Atheist, Libertarian, Objectivist
02:56 PM on 02/12/2011
Why would we make a move to reverse the tax cuts? We know that tax cuts COUPLED with spending cuts have ALWAYS boosted the economy EVERYTIME it has been tried.
And you have no idea what you are talking about when you say that the Tea Party is OK with "too big to fail" or believe that deficits don't matter. If you've ever been to a Tea Party you would know that we are completly AGAINST any and all bailouts and have railed Bush and the Repubs for their spending almost as much as Obama and the Dems spending.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
hypnotoad72
Real democracy = living wages.
07:45 PM on 02/11/2011
Cut corporate welfare. Encourage businesses to hire here with fair wages instead of giving them tax subsidies to offshore jobs. Cut excessive military spending. Is it really so difficult?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andy Williams 1
Liberals! 21st century kooky!
12:23 AM on 02/12/2011
Mostly because a fair wage doesn't exist. Cut all welfare, corporate and otherwise.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vegan Girl
Compassion for all
12:34 AM on 02/12/2011
You know what could have boosted business hiring? A single payer system.
07:33 PM on 02/11/2011
Roadmap Ryan you call yourself a fiscal conservative ? Rroadmap Ryan you just borrowed 1000 billion dollars for a two yr. tax cut?

Roadmap Ryan you do know that 1000billion borrowed.. Was for a extension of the 10yr. bush failed tax cuts? 7trillion all borrowed? Plus interest.

Roadmap Ryan in these tax cuts you RAISED TAX on a family of 5 making 48,500? You gave grama a cut to S.S. 2percent 120billion dollar cut?

Cut liheap 2 1/2 billion cut foodstamps ect.ect.. Roadmap Ryan do you think in these terrible times in a depression . Maybe if you juas cut those tax cuts just ley the sunset law expire them?


Look roadmap Ryan I just helped you save America 1000 billions dollar? Roadmap you map not know this ?

But 1000 billion dollars all borrowed is 1trillion..... Hows that cut fer ya Roadmap Ryan??
08:06 PM on 02/11/2011
O, yea in those failed tax cut you RAISED TAX on 30million homes an the working poor.


1000 billion all borrowed =1trillion for 2yrs.of a tax cut? roadmap maybe just maybe you an the gang could do something about NAFTA that alone has put 17million family in the poorhouse?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andy Williams 1
Liberals! 21st century kooky!
12:24 AM on 02/12/2011
Are you talking about the dems passing the extensions?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
07:11 PM on 02/11/2011
"The freshmen want to make sure that this is a congress that can earn the respect of the people who sent them here and deliver on their promises."

The "promise" that got you all re-elected somehow was Jobs!! Not take apart whats left of the middle class saftey nets while giving a 700 billion dollar tax cut to 2% of the richest people in America....who just happen to be you're biggest donors.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andy Williams 1
Liberals! 21st century kooky!
12:25 AM on 02/12/2011
No, it was to take apart obamacare and get spending and taxes under control.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
06:34 AM on 02/12/2011
Ahhh so the way to fiscal prosperity is to deny 60 million people healthcare and give 700 billion dollars in tax cuts to 2% of the wealthiest people in the nation while cutting soc sec, medicare and other social safety nets?
Oh except of course the golden parachutes for wall Street execs and billions in bailouts for too big to fail.
When Republicans are in control of the government: ""Reagan proved deficits don't matter," Vice President Cheney said in 2002 when pushing for a fresh round of tax cuts. "

And When democrats are in control of government: "
But Bowles warned that inaction was not an option: "The deficit and debt is like a cancer," he said on Nov. 30. "And it's going to destroy our country from within."

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,2034358,00.html#ixzz1Dk9q2XCp

All a matter of who's Ax is being gored eh?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HistoryGuru
06:26 PM on 02/11/2011
The principle of the founding is that government power is evil. It is necessary, but a necessary evil. The Constitution was designed to limit government power through enumerating what the government could do and building in checks and balances to control the use of government power.

The modern Democrat wants to use the government to do "good." they are willing to increase the power government has over the individual to more intrusive levels in order to do "good" without acknowledging the risk of centralizing so much power in government.

Historically, the greatest risk to the individual comes from government power which is expressed in totalitarianism, fascism, and tyranny.

The difference between a conservative American and a liberal American isn't compassion, or in levels of desire to help others, but in the means that help is expressed. A conservative wants to help the less fortunate without growing the power of government. A conservative recognizes the danger of growing the power of government.
heckmepitus
Truth, justice and the American way
06:13 PM on 02/11/2011
And Liberals spent the last two years trying to convince us there is no difference between the Democrats and Republicans. Turns out they are different.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kdallas999
Entrepreneur, patriot and liberal
04:51 PM on 02/11/2011
So should we call the new homeless tent cities GOP-villes, teaparty-villes or Cantorvilles?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andy Williams 1
Liberals! 21st century kooky!
12:32 AM on 02/12/2011
Anything you want as long as those folks keep 'em clean.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
04:04 PM on 02/11/2011
I have not heard Republicans say a word about cutting corporate welfare to big oil and corporations that send our jobs to China and India. But all seem to agree that soc sec, medicare and unemployment benefits that help the middle class have to go, even as they held out for 700 billion in tax cuts for 2% of the richest people.....there should be no questions as to who these people represent to any rational thinking person.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andy Williams 1
Liberals! 21st century kooky!
12:41 AM on 02/12/2011
Except that you are not thinking rationally. Corporate welfare is a dodge intended to rally the troops, but equally vile as welfare programs in general. Provide one example of corporate welfare for sending jobs overseas.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
06:14 AM on 02/12/2011
There are thousands more examples, just google corporate welfare. This is the payoff politicians give the corporations that put them in office. Meanwhile the same right wing Republicans want to cut Grandma's soc sec that she paid for.

"{President Obama took aim at Republicans in his weekly radio address Saturday, accusing the party of favoring corporate tax loopholes that encourage companies to create jobs overseas"
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/124513-obama-gop-favors-tax-loopholes-that-send-jobs-overseas

"Senate Republicans beat back an effort by Democrats Tuesday to end tax breaks for companies who send jobs offshore only to import products back into the United States."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/28/gop-chamber-of-commerce_n_741970.html


"Republicans block ending offshore jobs tax breaks"
http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/09/28/us-usa-democrats-offshore-idUSTRE68R40I20100928

OIL Company welfare:

"Big Oil’s Corporate Welfare: Doing The Numbers "
http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/05/06/big-oil-welfare/

"Republicans Demand Corporate Welfare for Oil Companies"
http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2010/05/19/bailouts-unlimited-republicans-demand-corporate-welfare-for-oil-companies/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
proudtohaveserved
03:31 PM on 02/11/2011
I want all moneys going to thde midle east cut off completly. that should save us at least 500 billions
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
04:06 PM on 02/11/2011
I would not be surprized to find that 500 billion is just what we give Isreal.
I hate to agree with a Anarchist like Rand Paul but he is right when he says we should stop all foriegn aide and take care of our own.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:48 PM on 02/11/2011
"I hate to agree with a Anarchist like Rand Paul"

I thought he was conservative/libertarian. Isn't he?