More

Pay Czar's Rules Had Few Lasting Effects, Watchdog Says

Pay Czar

DANIEL WAGNER   02/10/11 03:46 AM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — The government's restrictions on pay at bailed-out banks had little lasting impact because officials soft-pedaled some issues and did much of their work out of the public's view, a congressional panel says.

Obama administration pay czar Kenneth Feinberg used "black-box" processes that provide few lessons for the private sector, according to a report Thursday from the Congressional Oversight Panel that monitors the $700 billion financial bailout fund. The report faults Feinberg for deciding not to seek the return of $1.7 billion in banker pay that he deemed "ill-advised."

An office with far broader oversight than Feinberg's failed to produce a single public document that could help Wall Street and its regulators improve bankers' incentives to make future crises less likely, the report says.

"There's a transparency problem with all of this," said panel chairman Ted Kaufman, a former Democratic senator from Delaware. "I don't know if they should have done more, because we don't have a real good idea of what they were doing."

The report says Feinberg's office successfully reduced overall pay by 55 percent between 2008 and 2009 for top executives at the seven companies that got the biggest bailouts. Their cash compensation was cut even more sharply, by 90 percent, Treasury has said.

Reducing cash pay shifted a larger portion of the executives' compensation into company stock. Increasing stock-based compensation helps tie pay more closely to executives' performance. If the company's fortunes rise, the stock is worth more.

However, the panel said stock grants by Feinberg's office were spread over too short a time to hold bankers accountable for their decisions. Awarding the stock over many years discourages risky bets that might create short-term profits.

Treasury officials said the department did everything Congress demanded in the law on executive compensation.

"Our first rulings cut total pay in half and slashed cash compensation by 90 percent," said Acting Assistant Secretary for Financial Stability Tim Massad in a statement. "A key goal of Treasury's actions was to make sure taxpayers were repaid in a timely manner, which is happening faster than anyone expected."

The panel said Feinberg's actions sometimes lacked teeth, such as during a "look-back review" of early payments to bailed-out bankers. Feinberg had to decide if any of the payments ran counter to the public interest. If they did, the law authorized him to seek repayment on behalf of taxpayers.

Feinberg could not force the banks to repay the money, but he was adept at using the bully pulpit to pressure bankers publicly.

Feinberg deemed $1.7 billion in payments to be "questionable" and potentially inappropriate. But he stopped short of using the language "contrary to the public interest," which would have triggered a public negotiation.

"This is a distinction only a lawyer could love," Kaufman said.

Treasury officials say the point of the review was to recapture taxpayer money that was used to line executives' pockets. Most of the questionable payments were from banks that already had repaid their bailouts, so there was no reason to go after them, Treasury officials say.

The report points to major failures of transparency at an office that was separate from Feinberg's, known as the Office of Internal Review. The office was responsible for making sure all of the companies that received bailout funds followed basic disclosure rules and otherwise complied with guidelines intended to protect taxpayers. The office produced no public documents.

Treasury officials say it played a deterrent role by forcing top executives to swear that they were following the rules.

The companies originally overseen by Feinberg's office were: Citigroup Inc., based in New York; Bank of America Corp., based in Charlotte, N.C.; American International Group Inc., based in New York; Chrysler Group LLC; Chrysler Financial LLC; General Motors Co., based in Detroit; and Ally Financial Inc., formerly GMAC Inc., also based in Detroit.

Feinberg is a lawyer best known for determining payouts to the families of victims of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. He currently is the administrator of a fund set up to compensate victims of last summer's Gulf oil spill.

The oversight panel was created as part of the $700 billion financial bailout law. It will release its final report next month.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 158
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cadawa
10:00 PM on 02/14/2011
If he hadn't bothered to come into work, the net result would be the same. Wall Street 10 Taxpayers 0.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:11 PM on 02/12/2011
The bail out of troubled financial institutions we did in the past two to three years is not capitalisim, it is favorism to encourage of the greed and reword for the mismanagement. We should let all of them fail like Lehman Brothers -- that's how the capitalism works.
02:22 PM on 02/12/2011
The pay czar was just hilarious. If you needed any proof that the US has lost any sense of free markets it was the bailouts, pay czars, and work visas.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joe kim
11:00 AM on 02/12/2011
I'm sure he got a brown bag for his efforts.
06:55 PM on 02/11/2011
Regulating pay for bankers may seem like an attractive idea but it is largely unworkable, simply because the institutions that did not receive federal money would have a great advantage in drawing talent away from the banks that did take federal money. The simplest solution is one that is difficult to pull off; the political parties depend upon contributions from corporate donors to an even greater degree now than they did during the 2008 election cycle. Still, if the political courage could be mustered, raise the top marginal tax rates to a level that would serve as a disincentive for pay to accumulate at the top. Thus, if the big banks, hedge funds and brokerage houses rewarded their upper level management with million dollar bonuses, more money would flow into federal coffers, helping ease the federal deficit. And if companies wanted to remain competitive, some of that money would flow to mid-level and production managers, bolstering the middle class in ways that have not been seen since the tax-cutting frenzy of the Reagan years.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
07:05 PM on 02/11/2011
It's unworkable because they have the ears of every politician in Washington.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
06:32 PM on 02/11/2011
Business as usual. Because Wall Street runs this country.
09:27 AM on 02/11/2011
With more than 300 million Americans, why do the Feds throw all the huge projects to this guy just because he helped the 9/11 victims? He's obviously overworked.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
legalgirl
Just a legal girl on a mission for the truth
01:10 AM on 02/11/2011
Walk Like An E---jip-shunn . . . SING IT! da-da dada da da da . . .
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kamact
Market Observer
12:19 AM on 02/11/2011
This man should be in jail,...and it is truly insulting to the American people that Obama appointed him for this exercise in politics,...Look at his clients,..he is so bloody conflicted,...Perhaps he should have lost his job, home, and savings,...and then he woud understand what happened and makes sense,...and then I would be interested in his opinion
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
07:06 PM on 02/11/2011
Pack him in there with Greenspan and all his cronies.
09:52 PM on 02/10/2011
what a farce. this guy tries to pass himself as the moral center -- he's not. he's just a New Yorker trying to make a buck
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:27 PM on 02/10/2011
---- In2007, then-Freddie Mac CEO Richard F. Syron had a base salary of $1.2 million and total compensation of $18.3 million, according to SEC filings. In the same year, Daniel Mudd, the chief executive of Fannie Mae, had a base salary of $987,000 and total compensation of $11.7 million

Those were the days, when, in a single year, be made wealthy for destroying a company and causing scores of billions of dollars of losses to the taxpayers. The largest 14 institutions understood, to a large degree, what they and their firms were doing, and they kept at it up to the last minute – and in some cases beyond – because of the incentives they faced.

Yet no sign financial sector kingpins making decisions at our largest banks – and supposedly acting in the interests of shareholders, are at all interested in being compensated in a fashion that would better protect shareholder value. They want to cash out at every opportunity. Boards of directors comply; the breakdown in corporate governance is complete.

The only fools here are the shareholders and the rest of society that buys into these foolhardy schemes.
Executive incentive compensation should only consist of restricted stock and restricted stock options – restricted in the sense that the executive cannot sell the shares or exercise the options for two to four years after their last day in office...but you'll never hear things that make sense any longer in the new America.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
06:56 PM on 02/11/2011
I guess it takes a lot of money to run an estate in Greenwich.
photo
Hunter3203
Beer is proof God loves us and wants us to b happy
03:21 PM on 02/10/2011
I'm not sure why this guy keeps signing up to be a human pinata but I sure hope one day he gets the accolades he is due. There is literally no way to make everyone or even most people happy in the 3 different thankless jobs he's agreed to do. That type of service is rare today and I for one salute him for it.
03:23 PM on 02/10/2011
He did make the Wall Street executives happy, that's the important thing.
photo
Hunter3203
Beer is proof God loves us and wants us to b happy
03:36 PM on 02/10/2011
Doubt it. "The report says Feinberg's office successfully reduced overall pay by 55 percent between 2008 and 2009 for top executives at the seven companies that got the biggest bailouts. Their cash compensation was cut even more sharply, by 90 percent, Treasury has said."
03:17 PM on 02/10/2011
Wow, I never would have seent this coming. I mean, its shocking that the 'measures' implemented to check the big commercial banks proved to be ineffective..its almost like they had thousands of paid advocates waving enormous amounts of money at our elected officials to induce them to act in a certain way..but that's impossible as it would be basically illegal, right?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:27 PM on 02/10/2011
outstanding take...you mean to tell me the people haven't any real representation any longer. Well imagine that. Hmm, I am beginning to understand just who benefits in banking-owned corporate-welfare state. I'm thinkin this may not be a good thing for real democracy. I need to find myself a corporate kingpin (or his political plant) to slavishly render myself as a personnel buttclown, so i am able access some of their run-off.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:01 PM on 02/10/2011
This failed.

Ending too big to fail, failed.

Stopping the Wall Street casino built on derivatives, failed.

Foreclosure relief failed.

His promise to amend or repeal the Patriot Act, failed.

His promise to amend or repeal NAFTA, failed (in fact we now have NAFTA like agreements with Korea that result in more lost jobs for Americans)

The list of failures on the two most important things to American--our economy and jobs, and our Constitutional rights, continues to grow.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ross Schuman
Eye of the Storm
02:50 PM on 02/10/2011
When will the time come, that we stop ignoring the problem and even letting it keep getting worse?

http://livinglies.wordpress.com/2011/02/10/take-the-money-and-then-take-the-house-too-what-a-deal/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
06:59 PM on 02/11/2011
When the people who run the country find their bottom line in jeopardy