More

Jobless Should 'Be Really Careful' With Staffing Agencies, Says Legal Expert

First Posted: 02/10/11 01:57 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:30 PM ET

Jobless

WASHINGTON -- Since demand for temporary workers has been on the rise since the recession, staffing agencies have played an increasingly important role in helping jobless Americans find work. Some worker advocates say job-seekers should be wary.

The number of temporary workers in the United States on any given day jumped to an average of 2.6 million in the third quarter of 2010, about 25 percent higher than the same period a year earlier, according to the American Staffing Association, the trade group representing such firms. The Department of Labor reported last week that staffing firms have added about 25,000 jobs to the economy in each of the past 12 months.

In an uncertain economy, employers are more likely to hire temporary and contract workers because it's easier to let those workers go when they can no longer afford them. But George Wentworth, a senior staff attorney for the National Employment Law Project, a worker-advocacy nonprofit, said job applicants should be careful when using staffing firms and temp agencies.

"A huge portion of the job growth in the last year has been in the temporary help sector, because employers are using the temporary industry as a device for trying out workers," Wentworth said. "The bottom line is that you have to be really careful with these kinds of firms. There's a growing detachment between job applicants and the ultimate employer that will be hiring you, so when there are headhunters or firms that are acting as an intermediary and taking some sort of cut, workers just need to be absolutely certain they're getting assurance from an employer and not just an entity that isn't going to have a long-term investment in the workers future."

Wentworth said staffing firms that promise full-time work after a certain period can often stretch those terms without recourse, as their unemployed clients are too desperate for work to speak up.

"There are abuses in many of these industries where employers try to keep somebody on a, quote, 'temporary' for periods of time far longer than you'd expect for a temp job, but in this economy, workers are less likely to complain," he said. "And the temp agencies are pretty much unregulated, so workers are on their own having to bring contract action."

One Colorado man, however, is not only speaking up but is suing Aerotek, a major international employment firm. Robert Koehler, 46, alleges that the company interviewed him for and later offered him a full-time position, told him to immediately quit his current temporary job and then failed to deliver the position he was promised.

Koehler said he has been working temporary manufacturing jobs on and off since he was laid off in June 2008. In July 2010, he responded to a Craigslist ad for a temp-to-hire job as a pharmaceutical production technician that would have paid him more than twice what he was currently making.

"I thought, maybe this is it, maybe I finally found a job after applying constantly everywhere, I won't have to get by on $10 an hour with no benefits anymore," he told HuffPost.

Koehler said a recruiter for Aerotek called him immediately and sent him out to interview with the client, a pharmaceutical company in Broomfield, Colo., after which he was almost immediately offered the job.

"Aerotek called me the same day and said I was hired and that they wanted me to start as soon as possible," he said. "I had to come in the very next day and do all the paperwork, give blood, do a physical drug test, a seven-year criminal background check. They said it was a sure thing."

According to Koehler, an Aerotek recruiter then told him he needed to quit his current job by July 23 so he could start his new position the following Monday. But immediately after putting in his two weeks' notice, Koehler says, the Aerotek recruitment agent entirely stopped responding to him about the position. He says his start date came and went, and it wasn't until about a week later that an Aerotek recruiter finally called him back and told him that there was no longer a job for him.

Unfortunately, by quitting his temporary job, Koehler lost his eligibility for unemployment benefits. He said he has not been able to land a job since, despite constantly applying, and his $105-a-week emergency benefits ran out this week.

"I'm so far behind, it's horrible," he said. "They've destroyed my life. I can't pay my bills, I can't do anything now. I maxed out our credit cards, used up our savings, borrowed money from one of my sisters, donate plasma twice a week for money and am using the remainder of our federal tax return to survive."

Aerotek said in a statement that it didn't do anything wrong in Koehler's case.

"Our policy is that at no time do we offer a position until the screening and/or testing process is complete. While we understand that Mr. Koehler has some issues regarding his interaction with our Denver, Colorado, office, we are comfortable that we handled the situation properly," an Aerotek spokesperson said.

Koehler isn't alone, however. Job-seekers have logged a plethora of complaints about Aerotek on websites such as www.pissedconsumer.com, a review site for products and services. One man claims Aerotek hired him, allowed him to work in a position for four months and then fired him without explanation a day before he would have been eligible for unemployment benefits.

"Thanks Aerotek, hope that little bit of money you're getting is worth taking the food off my kids' plates!" he wrote.

Richard Wahlquist, president and CEO of the American Staffing Association, told HuffPost
he is skeptical of these kinds of complaints because it is in the staffing firm's financial interest to place all of its clients.

"Staffing firms only are able to get income from their clients if they make placements, so they have a powerful incentive to put everybody to work," he said. "Of course, if you've got 10 million people coming through your doors every year, there's are gonna be some with grievances, but Allegis [Aerotek's parent company] is actually the largest staffing firm in America. They provide employment across a lot of different sectors, they've got a really strong track record, and they're proud of what they do."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Since demand for temporary workers has been on the rise since the recession, staffing agencies have played an increasingly important role in helping jobless Americans find work. Some wor...
WASHINGTON -- Since demand for temporary workers has been on the rise since the recession, staffing agencies have played an increasingly important role in helping jobless Americans find work. Some wor...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 570
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
05:05 PM on 03/01/2011
HuffPost takes aim at the staffing industry: http://staffingtalk.com/2011/03/huffpost-takes-aim-at-the-staffing-industry/
11:46 AM on 02/25/2011
WOW, this is a seriously irresponsible article. First of all, Wentworth is pro-union and been an advocate of unionizing the temp industry for years (which would put it out of business). He is LYING THROUGH HIS TEETH in this article. Conversion terms to hire temps by companies are always agreed upon up front. The vast majority of temp agencies are highly reputable. The fact that companies have found a way to increase their workforce without adding directly to their payroll has helped put a lot of money into people's pockets who would have otherwise been unemployed since companies have been told they can't hire people! I'm disappointed that someone with a hidden agenda has found a medium like HuffPo (which I normally respect completely) to slander an entire industry that has been so instrumental in keeping people employed. Bad form. People - if you are unemployed and need some work until things improve a little more, do not hesitate to go to a temp agency. They should NEVER charge you a dime and they NEVER take a "cut" of your pay. The companies pay them a fee on top of what they bill for your wage. If anyone tells you otherwise, they are probably a union rep. Easy rule of thumb: if you ever go to an agency and they ask you money or ask you to sign anything that makes you financial liable in any way, they are a scam. This is so rare that it's barely worth mentioning.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hswanson2
Could you work if farmers didn't
10:10 PM on 02/17/2011
In the 90's (while I was in college) I got a lot of good work through temp agencies. While I was registered with at least 5 only one sent me reliable, well paid, reasonable work. I was their employee and they treated me that way - I hit it off with the manager of the office, she only sent me to the best work, and if I said it, she believed it. When she left the office (she was way too big for the job) I never got good work from them again. The other temp companies sent me jobs that were terrible and in some cases clearly an attempt to divert liability from the contracting company to the temp company (one that comes to mind is as a cartoon character in a suit in a mall - dangerous especially with no liability).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
padrushka
question authority
03:33 AM on 02/14/2011
Companies created a climate for hiring what used to be "contractors". Hire the experts but not for longer than the project. Process now reduced to a lower common denominator. Not paying benefits was the plan, cheaper to hire by the day. With no manufacturing, no unions, no jobs,now we have a new middle man between working poor and fewer jobs, meanwhile, ceos ammasing fortunes. How many hits before the little guy is gone? You know, our tax base? If they are trying to eliminate the entire group, the rich and powerful have a good start.
07:16 PM on 02/13/2011
Temp agencies are a blight on the american employment scene. Low wages and almost no recourse are some of the biggest blights upon this industry. Definitely poverty pimps and exploiters of desperately poor. A huge blight upon the american workplace.
01:43 PM on 02/13/2011
Don't forget my all time favourite temp/business scam , telling you they will hire you after 30 days of good service then after 3weeks telling you aren't needed .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
flyingonclippedwings
01:01 PM on 02/14/2011
Yes, Wal-mart did that to me. One of the managers later admitted, after they terminated me and had me blackballed in their computers for temping for them too many times, that they never intended to keep me in the first place.

I will never, ever forget it.
12:10 PM on 02/25/2011
A company can't guarantee employment. If they opted not to hire you permanently it was probably because 1) you weren't doing a very good job, or 2) you had excessive attendance/tardiness issues, or 3) poor personal hygiene, appearance, or 4) bad interpersonal skills. Companies change their minds sometimes and have to retract offers. It's not unusual. It's often why they use temp agencies before making a full-time commitment. It's "try before you buy".
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mik McAllister
02:23 PM on 02/12/2011
It *is* in the temp agency's best interest to have a lot of people on their list. The more prospective employees they have waiting, the better it looks for prospective client-businesses.

The trick is to lure as many people as possible to apply through your temp agency. And to keep those people on your lists as long as possible.

I dislike temp agencies. You do not know if you have a job from day to day. You have to call them constantly to see if they have openings. And they reinforce the idea that workers are disposable and interchangeable.

I suppose it could be worse. We could have Pinkerton and the National Guard shooting at us every time we try to leave the factory after less than a twelve hour shift.
11:52 AM on 02/25/2011
Completely untrue. COMPLETELY. Recruiters are measured on percentage of placements per people interviewed. They are only motivated to interview people they can actually place. The temp agencies will cut the recruiter loose if they are interviewing people and never sending them out on jobs because that would mean they are taking up a salary for themselves without generating revenue. There is ZERO advantage to "keeping people on your list". In fact they actively scrub the lists to reduce them only to the most placeable people.
01:38 AM on 02/12/2011
I noticed there are staffing agency advertisements on this pages and staffing links. No wonder the story is so pro-big business staffing.
11:50 PM on 02/11/2011
when you go to the store and buy a loaf of bread, your looking for the best loaf of bread for your money. i know that i can almost always find a good loaf of bread for $2, although they often try to charge $3.50 or more. i almost never pay more than $2. i can be very finicky, almost flaky about making my choice. when you talk to a prospective employer, remember that they are the consumer. your job is to be the best loaf of bread! not happy with that? become a social leader! leave the employers alone unless they break the law. they are consumers in a very competitive capitalist world, and guess what, they play the same games as all consumers do, including all of us.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bobzmcishl
04:02 PM on 02/13/2011
Human beings are not loaves of bread.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
padrushka
question authority
03:34 AM on 02/14/2011
Wanna bet? Forget the bread part, more like beasts of burden to the slave owners.
01:06 PM on 02/25/2011
...or are they?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Wiggin
02:35 PM on 02/11/2011
Oh, I forgot to mention. I'm not saying it doesn't happen, but I have yet to see a contract worker receive a raise or a bonus.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bobzmcishl
04:06 PM on 02/13/2011
And you probably never will. That is the beauty of hiring temps from the employer point of view. At my previous company, we had very strict rules on using temps - 90 days max. If they were good temps they usually got a permanent job offer. Employers now have become more slimy under the guise of globalism or whatever other excuse they can dream up, but the bottom line is greed. They can get away with it because the societal norms have changed. That's what Ayn Rand type conservatism brings.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
flyingonclippedwings
01:02 PM on 02/14/2011
I wonder if that's where Rand Paul got his name.
12:14 PM on 02/25/2011
Actually that's not the case. There are these new tricky things called "Co-employment laws". If a company keeps a temp for a long time (usually a year or more) and the temp is doing exactly the job of permanent colleagues but not being offered the same salary or benefits, they can sue and the company will be liable, not the agency. Because of this, it has caused some paranoid policies where companies have to switch temps out after a specified period (usually 90 days or 6 months, sometimes a year) or hire the temporary permanently, depending on the long-term viability of the position itself.
11:56 AM on 02/25/2011
Happens ALL THE TIME. If you've never seen this you are 1) not a recruiter for a firm and never have been, 2) not exposed to the higher skill level contractors who are not only guaranteed raises after a period of time, but also receive sign-on and completion bonuses. Staffing is not a one size fits all industry and there are many different types temporary workers. A receptionist filling in for a week probably won't get a raise. A Java programmer doing development for a major implementation for a bank and the project has been extended by 6 months, probably will.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Wiggin
02:34 PM on 02/11/2011
Having worked at several companies through temporary agencies, I am convinced that there are a lot of companies that simply prefer not to have employees. In some of the workplaces I have been in, the contract workers outnumber the employees to a huge extent. Some of the contract workers have been at the company for years. Contract workers give companies all the upside of employees (they are required to follow company manuals and policies, not to mention any command from a superior) and none of the downsides. They company provides no benefits and no promises of a future. Should the company decide it does not like the contract worker, they send an email or text message or leave a phone message and the contract worker magically disappears. No warnings, no exit interviews, none of the discomfort of having to look someone in the eye and tell them they are fired. If there isn't enough work for the entire week, just send the worker home. And I'm betting that suits for age, race and sex discrimination (surprise--such things still take place in the workplace) are way down with contract workers. It's a buyer's market for labor in this country, with so many jobs shipped overseas, and I predict millions will never work a full time job again.
11:26 AM on 02/11/2011
here is a group of companies and a new situation that needs to be addressed with regulation.
08:12 PM on 02/12/2011
Absolutely agree. They have no vested interest in contract or temp employees.
10:50 AM on 02/11/2011
This is a very important warning for job seekers! The problem is, a lot of companies, particularly larger ones, are increasingly relying on staffing agencies and using a contractor model to meet their needs. It is their way of hedging against economic unknowns. It puts the job seeker in a tough spot because in many cases it's the only way to get into a company. Extreme caution, including talking with current and former clients, is the only way to protect yourself. That being said, temp work CAN be a very good way to get into a company, if you're working with a reputable agency, or directly with the company. Here is my blog on making the most of temporary opportunities. http://blog.jobfully.com/2010/08/making-the-most-of-the-temp-trend/ Count on temp work to continue to be a key part of the employment scene in the year ahead, and proceed with caution.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
10:38 AM on 02/11/2011
I wonder if there was a problem with Mr. Koehler's background or credit check. This would be excuse, of course, for treating Mr. Koehler as they did.

A friend of mine was hired for a professional job early last year. She was told she had the job, she was given a start date, she came down and filled out all of the paperwork for the credit check/background check/drug check. She gave her old employer notice.

The Friday before she was to start, she received a call from the new employer telling her that she wasn't yet cleared to start because her background check into had not come back. As in Mr. Koehler's case, she had already quit her prior job.

She waited over a week in a state of great stress waiting for the background check to be completed. It was completed a week later and she did start the new job about ten days after she thought she was going to be starting the job. But if anything in her background check had been amiss, she would have been stuck.

All companies, whether a staffing agency or a regular employer, should not set up start dates until the background check has been completed.

And there needs to be serious restrictions on the use of credit checks to disqualify candidates.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KDMac
It's called sarcasm, Genius.
10:42 AM on 02/11/2011
I always tell applicants that they have a "tentative job offer pending the results of their criminal check and drug test."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
11:09 AM on 02/11/2011
My friend, an educated person, was given a solid start date. She did not remember anybody saying anything about her starting "pending". It had been quite a while since she had last switched jobs, so it is possible it was said to her and she just overlooked it.

But how can you expect someone to set a start date until they have a solid job offer? That's the big issue. Both Mr. Koehler and my friend had to give their former employers notice as they were told they needed to set a start date.

What's the best way to handle this? "I will be happy to set a start date with your company when my background checks come back and the offer is firm."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
10:43 AM on 02/11/2011
Argh... meant to say: "This would be NO excuse for treating Mr. Koehler as they did."