iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama's New Budget Increases Education Spending Amid Nationwide Cuts

Obama Education Budget

CHRISTINE ARMARIO   02/15/11 04:55 PM ET   AP

President Barack Obama's budget request for increased spending in education is likely to face a tough fight against Republicans – and even if ends up being approved, the extra money wouldn't stave off another round of layoffs and classroom cuts expected this year as federal aid dries up and states struggle to recover from the recession.

The 4.35 percent increase that Obama proposed on Monday would go toward expanding the highlights of his education agenda: A third round of Race to the Top, the competition that awarded $4.35 billion to 11 states and the District of Columbia last year for pursuing ambitious education reforms; a 10 percent increase in grants to turn around the nation's lowest performing school; and $4.3 billion for teacher and principal development.

Additional money would maintain an increase in the maximum Pell grant awards to $5,500 by cutting $100 billion through reductions in graduate and professional student loan subsidies, as well as the eliminating the "year-round Pell" that allowed students to collect two grants in a calendar year.

House Education and Labor Committee chairman John Kline, a Republican from Minnesota, derided the proposal, saying increases in education spending over the last 45 years have not yielded improvements in student achievement, and that the Democratic-led Congress overreached in expanding the Pell Grant program.

"Throwing more money at our nation's broken education system ignores reality and does a disservice to students and taxpayers," Kline said in a statement. "It is time we asked why increasing the federal government's role in education has failed to improve student achievement."

Meanwhile, appropriations from the 2011 fiscal year have still not been approved, and a Republican bill introduced Friday would cut $4.9 billion in education from the 2010 budget.

All of that makes increasing education spending a difficult sell.

"It's going to be really hard to work out a compromise," said Joel Packer, executive director of the Committee for Education Funding, a nonprofit organization that advocates for increased federal education spending. "We're worried we're going to end up with a government shutdown."

Packer and others said districts are facing a triple blow to their education budgets: The end of stimulus money from the Recovery Act, which provided an unprecedented $100 billion for education; ongoing budget cuts at the state and local level; and, depending on Congress, potential federal cuts.

Federal money represents about 10.5 percent of most education budgets, but the huge influx of stimulus and emergency teacher jobs funding over the last two years helped soften cuts to the classroom. Now as that money dries up, districts are expected to slash from already bare-bone budgets.

Some examples of cuts state legislators are weighing:

_ In Colorado, Gov. John Hickenlooper has proposed cutting $375 million from education spending on public schools, or about $500 per student. Legislative economists have said the state could face a shortfall of at least $1 billion due to loss of federal money, higher demand for services like Medicaid and inflation.

_ In New York, Gov. Andrew Cuomo's budget request proposes a historic 7.3 percent cut to school aid. Advocates say it will lead to thousands of teacher layoffs and larger class sizes.

_ In Iowa, legislators are considering cutting the state's preschool program spending from $70 million annually to $43 million. The program currently provides early education in 90 percent of the state's school districts. The state is facing a budget shortfall of up to $700 million for the upcoming fiscal year.

Analysts say a modest increase in education spending at the federal level would be dwarfed by state cuts.

"It doesn't match the magnitude of what's really happening on the ground out there," said Michael Petrilli, vice president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, an education think tank, said of the president's budget request. "That we're seeing the biggest decreases in education spending since the Great Depression."

Education Secretary Arne Duncan acknowledged it would be a difficult year.

"There's no question these are some of the toughest budget times we've seen in decades," Duncan said. "We've called this the new normal. What we're asking them to do as much as possible is see a very tough time as an opportunity."

The proposed budget includes $900 million for a Race to the Top competition for districts and rural communities. Education officials credit the first two rounds of the competition with a wave of education reforms throughout the nation, including adopting common academic standards, changing teacher evaluations so that instructors are held accountable for student achievement, and allowing for more charter schools.

Duncan said the new Race to the Top would allow these efforts to continue at the district level. Republicans have already said they would oppose another round of the competition.

Also included in the budget is $350 million for a similar competitive grant program aimed at early education.

Jacqueline Jones, senior adviser for early learning at the Department of Education, said the nation lacks a coordinated system of early care and education, instead relying on a number of different funding sources that she said results in significant variations in quality.

The competition would reward those who have taken a lead in reforming early education.

Other programs the Obama administration has introduced, including Promise Neighborhoods, which would provide family and cradle to career support services for distressed schools and communities, would be continued.

"What they're trying to do is spur innovation, replicate success," Charles Barone, director of federal policy for the Democrats for Education Reform. "That's where federal government is able to make the most impact."

Obama's budget would also set aside $80 million to prepare 100,000 new math and science teachers over the next decade.

Petrilli questioned the focus on these teachers now.

"It just feels kind of random right now, at a time when all kinds of teachers are being laid off," he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

President Barack Obama's budget request for increased spending in education is likely to face a tough fight against Republicans – and even if ends up being approved, the extra money wouldn't sta...
President Barack Obama's budget request for increased spending in education is likely to face a tough fight against Republicans – and even if ends up being approved, the extra money wouldn't sta...
Filed by Carly Gillis  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 48
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Halter
11:50 PM on 02/17/2011
From a teacher suffering from Obama's friendly fire:
http://cft.org/index.php/cft-stories/643-dear-president-obama.html
10:30 AM on 02/17/2011
I am for privitization of public schools if it is trully privitazation.
I am not for corporations using our tax dollars to turn a profit for themselves.
We have privitized a lot of the military-this has only caused the taxpayer to pay more money.
09:39 AM on 02/17/2011
This money is a complete farce to distract us from the ultimate goal, privatizing education to establish a meritocracy. We never see this money on the school level since most of it is chewed up by "consultants" with little or no knowledge about what occurs in a real classroom. It's all about making little corporate stooges out of our students rather than free thinkers that will challenge the status quo. I'm a teacher in GA and we've seen the lengths that the sycophants are willing to traverse to get their piece of the pie. Stop wasting our time and give us what we need for our students, proper support and training to ensure all teachers are competent. The teachers that struggle in the classroom suffered through an idealistic-based program in college that could never prepare them for the real challenges of our children. Technology will not provide a solution since it can never replace the three keys to success: parenting, teaching, and the willingness to learn.
10:29 PM on 02/16/2011
The fact that they are standing in a classroom with a chalk blackboard says it all. Any school trying bring these children along in this new century should have whiteboard /computer screen and enough laptops for students.
09:17 AM on 02/17/2011
Apparently you have no concept of the realities facing many if not most public schools.
09:39 AM on 02/17/2011
If you think technology leads to better teaching, then you obviously no little about education.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
katieandtom
04:52 PM on 02/16/2011
what a flippin joke obama. our school district is cutting 100million from the budget, 1500 teacher positions, schools closing, busing discontinued. - get real. whos gonna fund your robin hood programs?
02:42 PM on 02/16/2011
But wait yesterday the AOLHP narrative was how Obama was cutting education.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
glpur1
reluctant revolutionary
02:36 PM on 02/16/2011
I think to most Americans are pragmatic people. Educational funding has become a cost-benefit issue. We've watched for decades as Americas have paid more to support education than any country in the world yet our achievement levels have dropped every year. In math and science we rank below many poor countries...and it keeps getting worse. And the only solution we hear is "give more money to education". More money has so far apparently been an impediment to improved education since the more we pay the worse it gets. Remember the definition of insanity of "doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result". Well I'm not ready to keep throwing money at an institution that won't change. The same applies to our healthcare system, our banking system, our foreign policy and our immigration policies. Washington is broke! The only highly effective cost-benefit program coming out of Washington these days is buying a congressman. You do that and you'll win...the American people will lose...but the buyer will be rewarded with riches beyond belief!
03:29 PM on 02/16/2011
And whom may be the buyer be? Because it surely isn't the middle class who keeps on paying and not getting any reward. It seems to me that you want money out of politics? Sounds like it would be nice that our money stays out of the hands of our poltitions.

Yeah, wishful thinking. But you never know, who would thought that Egypt would become democratic?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VA Magoo
02:01 PM on 02/16/2011
Anyone who doubts that the trend toward socialism is pushing America toward ruin should examine the historical tables President Obama published Monday along with his $3.7 trillion budget.

In fiscal 2011, according to these tables, the Department of Health and Human Services will spend $909.7 billion. In fiscal 1965, the entire federal government spent $118.228 billion.

What about inflation? According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics' inflation calculator, $118.228 billion in 1965 dollars equals $822.6 billion in 2010 dollars. In real terms, the $909.7 billion HHS is spending this year is about $87.1 billion more than the entire federal government spent in 1965.

1965 was a key year in the advancement of socialism in the United States.

From 1776 until 1965, Americans generally did not rely on the federal government for health care unless they served in the military or worked in some other capacity for the federal government.

http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/article/jeffrey-socialisms-trajectory-obamas-hhs
02:07 PM on 02/16/2011
Oh, I am so sick of people who try to provoke fear by labeling things "fascist," "corporatist," and "socialist." Boring, boring, boring.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VA Magoo
03:11 PM on 02/16/2011
I know, the destruction of our Republican form of government can be so taxing to someone so enlightened as you......
Perhaps you should go see who is on Oprah today!
02:46 PM on 02/16/2011
Yeah but except for the fact that Medicare and Medicaid are not socialist. The providers are private. The only socialized system we in any measure is VA care.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VA Magoo
03:09 PM on 02/16/2011
oh no no no... not so fast there skippy (you didnt read the article did you)

But in 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson and a Democratic Congress enacted two massive federal entitlement programs -- Medicare and Medicaid -- that fundamentally altered the relationship between Americans and the federal government by making tens of millions dependent on the government for health care.

Prior to 1937, the Supreme Court correctly understood the Constitution to deny the federal government any power to create and operate social-welfare programs. The Constitution held no such enumerated power, and the 10th Amendment left powers not enumerated to the states and the people.
01:54 PM on 02/16/2011
First I think it is important to note that the increased role of the federal government in education began with George W. Bush's NCLB. This was a policy that Republican's touted as the end-all to saving our educational system that "no child (is) left behind".

Unfortunately, the Obama administration lead by Arne Duncan has done nothing to significantly change or reform this policy. Now they just call by a new name: "Race to the Top;" yet another way to push the competitive model on a historically democratic education system that is supposed to teach ALL children in the country.

The fact that the federal government enforces schools to meet nationally approved standards by scoring well on a test that is based on a normative curve is a joke. Anyone who knows statistics knows that it is impossible for all children to succeed (or score in the highest percentile) on a normative test. 50% of the students have to score below the mean on the curve and 50% have to score above. So even teaching to the tests won't ensure that everyone scores well and finishes first in the big Race to the Top.

Let's get real. I don't agree that money should be cut, laying off teachers while needing to hire new ones is counterproductive. However, there does need to be a substantive conversation about how our federal money should be used--Race to the Top is no solution to Obama's Sputnik moment in education.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VA Magoo
03:16 PM on 02/16/2011
I grant you that the NCLB was an massive increase instituted under GW, however......
if you dig just a little deeper I think you will find the roots of the great Department of Education lie at the feet of the Carter administration in the 70's.......

Teachers simply teach to the test..... thus the students learn the answers to the test and never have to learn how to think for themselves.....(and just one of the great failures of the Government trying to "control" something.)
05:00 PM on 02/16/2011
My biggest fear is that state and federal officials will decide that standardized testing needs to be required at the college level as well. I can see a future scenario where accreditation is tied to test scores and curriculum is standardized. Government leaders are already complaining that colleges need to "be more accountable." That is government speak for, "We want to know what is being taught and we want to tell professors what to teach."
01:45 PM on 02/16/2011
The GOP does not like Education, they understand that poor education is the only reason they still have voters.
02:27 PM on 02/16/2011
I'm actually with the GOP on stopping this agenda. I probably don't agree with their solution, but Obama's plan is just NCLB on steroids. The poor are still not being educated correctly. The only difference now is they will bring down high performing schools.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VA Magoo
03:21 PM on 02/16/2011
We have spent BILLIONS AND BILLIONS over the last 35-40 years to "improve education" (just look at every Presidential candidate since Carter) and all it has done is drop the USA from being the #1 in education in the world to what 23rd? No one is against education, we are against the "government" trying to fix things! The Government solution to any problem is "Create an Agency" and "throw money at it". (also know as TAX and SPEND) Let us try and find a way to get a decent return on our "investments" and not just spend ourselves to oblivion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lynn Brown
06:15 PM on 02/16/2011
When exactly were we number one? Based on what? We have a long history of mediocre results in education in this country. Its as American as ...(fill in the blank).

This world view that we have somehow lost a golden age of Eden like proportions is a little more nostalgia than fact. It doesn't apply to education any more than it applies to anything else spouted by anti government revisionists.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lynn Brown
06:57 PM on 02/16/2011
Found the link I was after...

http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/curriculum/2011/02/report_aims_to_debunk_myth_abo.html
From the article:

"The United States never led the world," the report says. "It was never number one and has never been close to number one on international math tests. Or on science tests, for that matter."...

To illustrate, the report examines the First International Math Study (FIMS), conducted in 1964. The United States ranked 11 out of the 12 participating countries, which included Australia, England, Finland, Germany, and Japan. Only Sweden scored lower. (The ranking is based on comparing the average scores of a sample of 13-year-olds who participated in each nation.)

"We haven't fallen, we just haven't," Loveless told me. "We once were terrible and now we're mediocre. I think that's a more accurate description, but we've never had scores that we should be proud of."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
lj9283
Why is "Carried Interest" not taxed as Income?
01:30 PM on 02/16/2011
GOPers celebrate ignorance.

Why would they support funding a campaign to eliminate it?
01:07 PM on 02/16/2011
Baby boomers got to take advantage of all these programs and higher education, and now that they’re retiring and don’t take advantage of them anymore they just cut everything and bulk up their social security and medicare so they can remain in luxury forever. Everyone suffers for them. Greatest generation.. or greediest generation? Usually you save a few seeds from your harvest to plant in the spring, but the baby boomers have become so short-sighted and so gluttonous that they’d rather eat and eat and eat until there’s nothing left, leaving nothing but barren fields for the next generation.

I’m really tired of all these defeatist trying to convince me that we have to give something up, that we have to roll back everything we’ve worked for, just so they can not only maintain but grow the level of luxury that they have. They’ve created a slash-and-burn policy on everything that keeps society progressing and instead replaced it by dumping excess wealth into keeping their generation in luxury. People saw Egypt and I wonder if that could be the US in 15 years. What happens to our generation, unemployment above 20%, jobs that pay nothing and an obligation to accrue debt just to have a chance to work? What happens in the future when that despair turns to rage?
cookcar
...talk to me so you can see whats going on...
02:02 PM on 02/16/2011
If things don't turn around soon, I think we will be there in less that 15 years. It is already horrible. Unemployment rate is higher than 20% for young African Americans already. Everything bad in America gets us first. Just like in the 80's when Reagan began the process of urban decay by shipping jobs out of urban areas and moving the crack cocaine in. Nobody said nothing because it was Black people suffering. Now everybody is all freaked out that the "disease" has spread to all working/middle class people in America. All I have to say is welcome to it...we have been here for the past 30 years.
05:05 PM on 02/16/2011
I am still waiting for one politician to call for tax breaks for American companies as an incentive to open factories in inner struggling inner city areas, instead of giving corporations tax loopholes, while they ship jobs overseas.
03:06 PM on 02/16/2011
Boomers and politicians are different things. Most of the Boomers have worked all their lives and the rich politicians want to take our "entitlements" away. They are paid for by us and owed to us. I have worked since I was 13 and retrained several times to keep up with the job market. You need to get off your box, retrain, and go to work.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whatsthat1
10:52 AM on 02/16/2011
The department of education under Arne Duncan is a joke. He has one agenda and it's not the kids. There are many, probably too many, employees in the DOE because of legacy programs that no longer exist or no longer work. Rather than trimming the fat and putting it towards the kids, he want's more. Anybody that needs more money to do his job, does not know their job because the first reason for their failure is lack of budget. The problems with education today is with administrators and school committees that think like Duncan, "just keep shoving money at it and it should work or we can blame the teachers and parents." Get somebody in their that actually cares about the kids. http://www.ri-specialeducation.com/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AcademicFreedom
Often banned; always factual
08:12 AM on 02/16/2011
How much of that money will go to new medical schools. We have an acute shortage of MDs, yet Arnie will probably spend it churning out more gender studies graduates
02:28 PM on 02/16/2011
Maybe so…but the shortage of MDs is due to the crap they have to deal with set forth by both insurance companies and the government.
researcher
researcher
03:21 AM on 02/16/2011
its borrowed money so dont fret it.

who says we have to pay back china or japan or the kings.
some latin american nations just said no way and went bankrupt.

if you dont think we are heading for latin america third world status you have let patroitism and nationalism overwhelm your rational mind.