More

Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer Blocks Yellowstone Bison Slaughter

MATTHEW BROWN   02/15/11 08:17 PM ET   AP

Yellowstone Bison Slaughter

BILLINGS, Mont. — Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer blocked the impending slaughter of hundreds of Yellowstone National Park bison on Tuesday, in a surprise move intended to spark an overhaul of how the federal government deals with the iconic but disease-plagued animals.

Schweitzer signed an executive order to prohibit the importation of park bison into Montana for 90 days. That effectively blocks all potential routes out of the park to slaughter plants in Montana and neighboring states.

The Democratic governor told The Associated Press that he was worried the shipments could spread brucellosis to Montana livestock. And he said he was sending a message to federal officials in Washington, D.C. to rein in a diseased bison population that regularly spills out of the park and into Montana.

In the interim, Schweitzer suggested the park bring in loads of hay to feed 525 bison captured so far this winter after trying to migrate out of the snow-packed park in search of food at lower elevations.

"More than anything else, this is a direct signal to the Department of Interior in Washington, D.C. to get their hat screwed on right and manage this bison population," Schweitzer said. "Their plan is, when there gets to be a lot of snow, buffalo will go into Montana and then somebody else will have to deal with it."

Caught off guard by the governor's action, park administrators scrambled Tuesday to craft a response.

Yellowstone spokesman Al Nash noted that the slaughter plan was agreed to last month by the Montana Departments of Livestock and Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks. He said past bison shipments did not lead to brucellosis infections in cattle.

"I don't know what the governor was trying to address," Nash said.

The disease causes pregnant cattle, bison and elk to prematurely abort their young. It has been confined largely to Yellowstone's wildlife after a decades-long eradication effort by the cattle industry, although periodic transmissions occur between elk and cattle.

No bison-to-cattle transmissions have been recorded.

More than 200 of the recently captured bison have tested positive for exposure to the disease. They are being held in corrals just inside the Yellowstone's northern border. The slaughter shipments were slated to begin two weeks ago but were put on after wildlife advocates asked a court to intervene.

For years such shipments have been carried outs with state backing. That includes three years ago when more than 1,400 bison were rounded up by park workers and state livestock agents and subsequently sent to slaughter. Before the slaughters began last decade, Montana livestock agents had shot bison leaving the park.

In halting this year's shipments, Schweitzer is treading a fine political line. On one side are wildlife advocates and conservation groups vehemently opposed to slaughter. On the other, a ranching industry anxious to protect its cattle from disease.

For years the two sides have deadlocked over the park's estimated 3,700 bison.

Tom Woodbury with the Western Watersheds Project – which has a pending request for a court order to stop the slaughter before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals – said Tuesday's executive order puts the burden on federal officials to break that impasse.

But John Youngberg with the Montana Farm Bureau said the governor was taking away the only method of population control available to the park. He said the governor was "throwing the baby out with the bathwater" by eliminating the only effective means to reduce bison numbers.

"The one way they had to do that was when they come out of the park, they get slaughtered and removed," Youngberg said.

The initial request by Woodbury's group and others to halt the slaughter. was denied on Monday by U.S. District Judge Charles Lovell, who characterized the slaughter program as a distasteful but ultimately necessary way to manage the animals.

Lovell also weighed in against feeding the animals as Schweitzer is proposing: "Promoting population expansion by supplemental feedings would likely lead to more problems for the herd," the judge wrote.

Feeding Yellowstone bison was a common practice for much of the last century.

After hunting by early European settlers reduced the total number of bison in the park to just 25 in 1901, park officials began to closely manage the species to bolster their population. From the 1920s through the late 1960s, that included supplemental feeding, periodic culling and the exporting of "excess" bison to other parts of the country.

The practice was dropped when the park adopted a policy of "natural regulation" – allowing wildlife populations to rise and fall according to climate conditions or food supplies.

But by the early 1980s, the bison herds had expanded to more than 2,300 animals and were increasingly pushing beyond the park's boundaries. To guard Montana livestock, more than 3,100 bison that crossed outside the park's northern or western boundaries over the next two decades were killed, many of them shot.

An agreement signed by five state and federal agencies in 2000 was designed to pursue alternatives to killing, but wildlife advocates and members of Congress have been critical of the little progress made to date.

That has left Yellowstone's bison mired in a vicious cycle: the population outgrows the park's capacity, large numbers of bison are slaughtered attempting to leave, and then within a year or two the population starts to increase yet again.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

BILLINGS, Mont. — Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer blocked the impending slaughter of hundreds of Yellowstone National Park bison on Tuesday, in a surprise move intended to spark an overhaul of how...
BILLINGS, Mont. — Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer blocked the impending slaughter of hundreds of Yellowstone National Park bison on Tuesday, in a surprise move intended to spark an overhaul of how...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 126
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SweetJudith
10:54 AM on 02/23/2011
It's about time he did something right!!!!!!!!!!!!But I will never trust this guy!!!!!
photo
snowballinhell
Humans have a 100% chance of extinction
04:50 PM on 02/18/2011
I object to this wording in the article:

'the impending slaughter of hundreds of Yellowstone National Park bison on Tuesday, in a surprise move intended to spark an overhaul of how the federal government deals with the iconic but disease-plagued animals.'

Why do I object? Because the problem is one mainly of elk, not Bison. This article even includes this comment without realization of what the true dimensions of the issue involve:

'It has been confined largely to Yellowstone's wildlife after a decades-long eradication effort by the cattle industry, although periodic transmissions occur between elk and cattle.'

Too bad reporters can't report the actions of the Montana government truthfully.
07:26 AM on 02/18/2011
Okay..........so this Brian Schweitzer, Montana gov. is going to block the Bisson slaughter ONLY because he wants to slaughter the Wolves first..........I knew it was too good to be true. Heaven forbid someone with a core value with respect for life?
photo
snowballinhell
Humans have a 100% chance of extinction
04:51 PM on 02/18/2011
Or with respect for planet earth. What Aldo Leopold called the land ethic.
photo
snowballinhell
Humans have a 100% chance of extinction
04:41 AM on 02/18/2011
I have a question for the governor. Is the land in Montana where the Buffalo roam private land or public land? If private, we need to buy it, and if public you need to butt the f&XK out. It is time to get the cattle out of Buffalo land and not the other way around. Respectfully yours.
09:51 PM on 02/17/2011
@japrz have you ever been to Yellowstone? That is not even remotely possible. Even if it were, they would only head back looking for food. It's a bad situation.
02:49 PM on 02/17/2011
The news story says the park workers and state livestock agents rounded up 1400 bison for slaughter. Why can't they (either state or Fed govt) just truck the 525 bison back to other side of Yellowstone instead of killing them?
01:34 PM on 02/17/2011
ranchers are conservationalists, not much of conversationalists. HAHA. sorry...
01:33 PM on 02/17/2011
A comment on the wolves: I too like seeing a healthy wolf population, but they have to be controlled. They are absolutly destroying the elk and mule deer populations up here. The mule deer, so much so, that they may replace the wolf on the endangered list in a couple years. Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation has been lobbying for wolf management and controlled hunts, because they are decimating the elk populations so rapidly (not just the weak). The elk are so stressed out by the time spring comes that they aren't mating and they are being scattered from their migration. I'm seriously afraid that my son may never hear an elk buggle in his lifetime. Scary thought...
01:27 PM on 02/17/2011
As a son of a cattle rancher and reading some of these comments, I feel obligated to respectfully shed some perspective on some of the issues being discussed. First of all, most Montana cattle ranchers are conversationalists. We have to be. Without a healthy ecosystem (that includes a biological balance), there isn't a way of life for us. Growing up working on the ranch, I spent countless hours pulling noxious weeds and moving cattle to prevent overgrazing. This is standard practice for many cattle ranchers that gets overlooked. Instead, people focus on the 2% of ranchers that act irresponsibly. I invite all of you to come and visit a real working Montana cattle ranch and see first hand the things that ranchers do to protect the environment and our way of life.
09:53 PM on 02/17/2011
I was out there and saw two instances of people coming to the fields to shoot prairie dogs for fun. One guy was in a landrover, high powered weapon and dressed for combat- he wasn't a rancher. The other fellas were either ranchers directly or related- they were locals.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edy Williams
01:23 AM on 02/17/2011
A NEW HERO GOVENOR THAT BOTHERED TO SAVE INNOCENT BISON! Montana is Ted Turners homeland! He is our HERO here too! Thank You Ted T. The Bison are good guys!
12:48 AM on 02/17/2011
This is marvelous news! Now if we can succeed in an overhaul of the BLM and stop the wild horse roundups (massacres!), we'll actually be making some conscious progress.
10:52 PM on 02/16/2011
How about reining in the non-native cattle that are grazing freely on federal lands? That's the crime. The bison don't infect the cattle. Another example of the Corporate States of American destroying what is truly American.
photo
Citizen13
We call this civilized?
09:32 PM on 02/16/2011
Beautiful bold creatures, weren't they here first?
photo
rodjard
I Update my brain frequently
08:09 PM on 02/16/2011
And have they sewn alphagraze and clover on that land and offered calves to midwest farmers who would love to have fhem. I am sure there is a market for the meat. Are those ranchers that singleminded. I for one am sick of Chicken, Pork, and BEEF AT $6.00 a pound. week in and week out.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Katco
Misogyny: hard to spell, easy to practice
07:34 PM on 02/16/2011
Mods, your holding comments for over 2 hours? Why did my comment get scrubbed? What is happening to HP????