More

BP, ARCO Sued For Alleged Water Contamination From Toxic Nevada Mine

Nevada Mine

SCOTT SONNER   02/15/11 09:45 PM ET   AP

RENO, Nev. — Neighbors of a toxic mine in northern Nevada have filed a class-action lawsuit against BP America and Atlantic Richfield Co. accusing them of intentionally and negligently concealing the extent of the contamination leaking off the abandoned site for decades.

The suit filed in U.S. District Court in Reno on Monday seeks a minimum of $5 million on behalf of at least 100 residents in the rural town of Yerington where the old Anaconda copper mine opened in 1941.

The plaintiffs say the wells they once used for drinking water are polluted with uranium, arsenic and other metals in a plume of groundwater that slowly has migrated off of the site that covers 6-square miles – an area equal to the size of about 3,000 football fields – about 65 miles southeast of Reno.

The lawsuit says that even after whistleblowers started to publicize previously secret records documenting the dangers, the corporations refused to cooperate with state and federal regulators trying to clean up the radioactive and other hazardous waste the past 10 years.

"They destroyed the water supply to this community and now it's time to clean it up. It's time to get the contamination off these people's land and out of their wells," said Steven German, one of the lawyers who filed the lawsuit on behalf of the residents.

"A mother should not have to tell her child they can't turn on the spigot because their water is dangerous. That is not acceptable in this country," he told The Associated Press on Tuesday.

The lawsuit said the companies knew or should have known that their discharge of toxic and hazardous materials would pollute neighboring properties, air, water, groundwater and the surrounding environment. It said they have `intentionally allowed toxic and hazardous substances to enter and remain on" the neighbors' land.

"Despite their knowledge of the serious health and environmental effects associated with exposure to toxic and hazardous substances and despite orders and warnings form health and environmental regulators, (BP and ARCO) intentionally masked the true extent of the contamination, thereby enabling (them) to avoid taking all appropriate steps to properly remediate the toxic and hazardous substances or to mitigate the dangers created by their release, discharge, storage, handling, processing, disposal of and dumping of toxic and hazardous substances," the suit said.

Tom Mueller, a spokesman for BP America, said Tuesday evening that company officials have not had a chance to review the lawsuit and had no immediate comment.

Fueled by demand after World War II, Anaconda produced nearly 1.75 billion pounds of copper from 1952-78 at the mine that runs along U.S. Highway 95 in the Mason Valley, an irrigated agricultural oasis in the area's otherwise largely barren high desert.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has determined over the years that uranium was produced as a byproduct of processing the copper and that the radioactive waste was initially dumped into dirt-bottomed ponds that – unlike modern lined ponds – leaked into the groundwater.

Officials for BP and its subsidiary Atlantic Richfield, which bought Anaconda Copper Co. in 1978, have provided bottled water for free to any residents who want it over the past few years. But they have insisted that uranium naturally occurs in the region's soil and, until recently, they argued there was no way to prove that a half-century of processing metals there was responsible for the contamination.

However, a new wave of EPA testing first reported by The Associated Press in November 2009 found that 79 percent of the wells tested north of mine have dangerous levels of uranium or arsenic or both that make the water unsafe to drink.

"You now have evidence of mine-impacted groundwater," Steve Acree, a highly regarded hydrogeologist for the EPA in Oklahoma brought in to examine the test results, told AP at the time.

One monitoring well a half mile away had levels of uranium more than 10 times the legal drinking water standard. At the mine itself, wells tested as high as 100 times the standard in an area where ore was processed with sulfuric acid and other toxic chemicals in unlined ponds.

Though the health effects of specific levels are not well understood, the EPA says long-term exposure to high levels of uranium in drinking water may cause cancer and damage kidneys.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

RENO, Nev. — Neighbors of a toxic mine in northern Nevada have filed a class-action lawsuit against BP America and Atlantic Richfield Co. accusing them of intentionally and negligently concealin...
RENO, Nev. — Neighbors of a toxic mine in northern Nevada have filed a class-action lawsuit against BP America and Atlantic Richfield Co. accusing them of intentionally and negligently concealin...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 37
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
Almondo
Agnostic Realist Tradevknaught
01:54 AM on 02/18/2011
They probably have their liyars working on pulling a 'Bhopal' maneuver right now.
07:07 AM on 02/18/2011
Yes Men cometh ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theobserver4
progress is a process not an end result
07:55 PM on 02/17/2011
But but but the GOP tells me I can trust big corporations.....I just can't trust the government to ensure I have clean air, land and water. How does this work again right wingers?

Atlas didn't shrug he was poisoned.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alvdh1
02:07 PM on 02/17/2011
This is just another fine example of GOBP being a bad corporate citizen. To those of you who sat on their laurels last November, you get exactly what you don't vote for via apathy. I hope you all wake up before 2012 and vote the Republican scoundrels back out of office. Do you really think they are going to preserve the environmental quality of life gains we have achieved. Not if their corporate masters have any money left after buying the 2010 election via citizens united.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
I DO NOT pity the fool
12:04 PM on 02/17/2011
Why are their hidden threads when so few comments exist? Trying to manipulate public opinion to serve unstated interests?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
I DO NOT pity the fool
11:54 AM on 02/17/2011
BP has killed more people than all the terrorists.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
satanlite
If ur neibor wtchs Fox Nws wtch ur neibor
09:15 AM on 02/17/2011
Those durn job killing regulations strike again!
photo
AbeMartin
The best person fer a job is never a candidate
08:53 AM on 02/17/2011
British Petroleum:  A criminal enterprise in the past.  A criminal enterprise in our present.  A criminal enterprise in the future.

Why would anyone be surprised?
Dogmudgeon
Saepe in Errore, Nunquam in Dubito
02:30 AM on 02/17/2011
Nobody cares until there's radiation involved.

And yet, as dangerous as uncontrolled radiation can be, some of the toxic metals are FAR worse. And their half-life is ... forever.

Interesting.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom95134
11:37 PM on 02/16/2011
At lease most of the people living in the area when the mining was going on knew about the use of the toxic chemicals. If you were a Native American and living anyplace near where the U.S. government was mining pitchblende ore were totally unaware of the hazards associated with the tailings from these mining operations. In many cases, the tailing were heaped in areas where children were exposed to the dust and where Native Americans later built houses.
>>> http://everything2.com/title/Uranium+mining+on+reservations+in+the+southwestern+United+States
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MJinCanada
Safe from zombies until my 2nd cup of coffee
05:21 PM on 02/17/2011
Weren't some of the tailings even used in concrete for a school and housing project on the Navajo Rez?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:20 PM on 02/16/2011
These nasty inhuman corporations have blanketed the land with their refuse and waste.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
undsoweiter
but I know where to look it up
08:20 PM on 02/16/2011
Just seems to me that these guys shouldn't be let out alone.
photo
librainstars
even the smallest things in life make a difference
08:16 PM on 02/16/2011
effects of uranium =kidney toxicity, cancer,http://web.ead.anl.gov/uranium/guide/ucompound/health/index.cfm
Now we did not learn from love canal? Town of Hinkley?That was Chromium 6.
Or the Nevada Test Site?
Quoted out of the story "water are polluted with uranium, arsenic and other metals "
no one imo should be drinking, swimming, bathing, or anything in that water till you know the amounts.
After all these years you would think companys would stop doing this to ppl, children.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Anaxamenes
It's not how big your micro-bio is...
08:06 PM on 02/16/2011
Well, that's one way to get out of paying for the Gulf Oil Spill, poison the rest of the country. Lets get this designated a Superfund site right away, so we can watch the new CEO of BP cry at the bill. That's what you get for not doing it right the first time.

And I don't want to hear about the "but they bought if from the other company, so it's not their fault." They bought it, so they are responsible for it. Though I wouldn't mind it if Superfund sites were able to go after old executives for lax oversight. Make it sting!
09:36 PM on 02/16/2011
OK, so lets say you buy a piece of property to build a house on and discover that there is radioactive fill a few feet under the surface.

Are you now responsible for cleaning up the mess?
10:40 PM on 02/16/2011
Please .... at least don't insult people's intelligence. As if BP doesn't know exactly what they're buying, if they buy something (if they did indeed buy this from another company).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
satanlite
If ur neibor wtchs Fox Nws wtch ur neibor
09:17 AM on 02/17/2011
They have the resources to know exactly what they are buying. The average home owner has to trust the seller and the bank (good luck).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JPETERB
08:06 PM on 02/16/2011
"Small" government means "Big" corporations. Which one does the average American family have a Constitutional right to own control?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plumnelly
09:39 PM on 02/16/2011
Yep, no accounability! Means democracy goes by the wayside and fascism takes over which it starting to move in that direction thanks to our Supreme Court.
09:46 PM on 02/16/2011
Big government is controlled by Big multi-national corporations.

As long as non-persons and non-US citizens are allowed to contribute to political campaigns, nothing will improve. Non-persons are corporations, unions, political action committees, non-government organizations, special interest groups, etc.

ONLY individual, registered voters should be allowed to contribute to political campaigns and the amount they can contribute must be severely limited so that the superrich do not have disproportionate influence.
08:00 PM on 02/16/2011
They have a direct line to the White house. I am sure Obama can squash this for them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
foxencanyon
08:04 PM on 02/16/2011
If he hasn't done it already.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
satanlite
If ur neibor wtchs Fox Nws wtch ur neibor
09:17 AM on 02/17/2011
Indeed. They won't pay more than token charges for this, if that.