More

Obama Administration Revises 'Conscience Clause' Rules: Contraception No Longer Considered Abortion


First Posted: 02/18/11 10:14 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:35 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- (AP) The government has replaced a Bush-era rule that became a flash point in the debate over abortions, clarifying that doctors and nurses have a long-standing federal right not to participate in the procedures.

Federal laws for years have forbidden discrimination against health care professionals who refuse to perform abortions or sterilizations, or to provide referrals for them on religious or moral grounds.

The regulation, instituted in the last days of the Bush administration, was supposed to strengthen those protections by adding a requirement that institutions that receive federal money certify their compliance with the so-called conscience laws, so that money could be cut off if the law wasn't being followed.

That regulation was quickly challenged in federal court by several states and medical organizations, in part over concern that its overly broad wording also could be used to refuse birth control, family planning services and a variety of other services.

The Obama administration announced a year ago that it planned to repeal the regulation, and it did so on Friday after months spent reviewing 300,000 comments from the public on both sides.

In its place is a new rule that retains just the federal conscience protections for abortions and sterilizations, along with a provision that spells out how health workers who feel they were discriminated against can ask the government to enforce that law.

"Strong conscience laws make it clear that health care providers cannot be compelled to perform or assist in an abortion," said a statement from the Department of Health and Human Services. "The rule being issued today builds on these laws by providing a clear enforcement process."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

WASHINGTON -- (AP) The government has replaced a Bush-era rule that became a flash point in the debate over abortions, clarifying that doctors and nurses have a long-standing federal right not to part...
WASHINGTON -- (AP) The government has replaced a Bush-era rule that became a flash point in the debate over abortions, clarifying that doctors and nurses have a long-standing federal right not to part...
Filed by Adam Goldberg  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,288
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (16 total)
  1 of 3  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
ThatsTheTheWayItIs 08:53 AM on 02/19/2011
FRC calls it "discrimination against health care workers who object to participating in abortion"

By this logic: Christian Scientist health care workers should also not be forced to participate in procedures they object to, meaning all of them.

They  have same employment rights all of us have: if you don't like the job, don't take it. There is no constitutional right to make  Read More...
09:50 AM on 03/04/2011
The 2003 Illinois Born-Alive Infants Protection bill (SB 1082) would have passed the Illinois Senate in 2003, if Chairman Obama had not killed it in his committee. This bill defended the proposition, "A live child born as a result of an abortion shall be fully recognized as a human person and accorded immediate protection under the law." Obama voted as Il Senator to allow abortion of live born babies. Research Obama's radical infanticide views.

Obama believes abortion should be legal after live birth. Is it any surprise that he believes abortive contraception’s are not abortion?
11:57 AM on 04/14/2011
So my question is, "How many unwanted children have you adopted today?" Its easy to criticize someone's choices from an ivory tower. Maybe when you stop by planned parenthood and offer to adopt every unwanted child or child of rape without any government subsidies then your opinion might be worth something.

Until then go by a very simple statement, "Don't like abortion? Don't have one!"
09:50 AM on 03/04/2011
Obama believes abortion should be legal after live birth. Is it any surprise that he believes abortive contraception’s are not abortion?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Billyguitar
Disgusted by politics since John Anderson lost. In
03:20 PM on 02/24/2011
Take note, the people who complain he doesn't do what he promises!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:21 PM on 02/23/2011
Ok, definitely late coming to the party... but Why is sterlization considered abortion? That makes absolutely NO sense to me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lisa Shields
Poet & Advocate For Special Needs Children
02:33 PM on 02/23/2011
Thank god.
Under the "old rule", someone who is not part of my life could make the decision to deny me birth control...because it was against THEIR beliefs. That doesn't work. Not for me...not for my daughter.
Not for ANYONE'S daughter.
09:41 AM on 03/04/2011
Sterilization is a better choice for the promiscuous then abortion.
11:59 AM on 04/14/2011
I assume you are sterilized.
Your not??
Well maybe you should keep your nose out of other people crotches then!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TedEjr
Geeky nerd. Or is it nerdy geek?
08:46 PM on 02/22/2011
It is a step down the right road. But it is far, very far, from reaching the destination. More like, the key is now in the car. But the engine is not yet running.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:24 PM on 02/23/2011
Is it like the chicken may have left the coop, but the coop is made of gold and has a 3D TV. And the chicken went to college.
05:11 PM on 02/21/2011
Thank. God.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:19 PM on 02/21/2011
If you dont like driving women, dont become a taxi driver - its part of the job.

If you dont want to learn and are not prepared to administer all necessary health care for women's reproductive systems, do not become a gynecologist.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patchdee
05:07 PM on 02/22/2011
Good analogy and simple enough that even the fundies should be able to understand.
07:35 AM on 02/21/2011
post
07:28 AM on 02/21/2011
Marija
07:34 AM on 02/21/2011
?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joshy X
observer in Weimar Amerika
12:21 AM on 02/21/2011
man Obama spends so much time trying to ensure federal funding for partial birth abortions... karma
03:50 PM on 02/23/2011
Partial birth abortion is a meaningless term. Try to be clear in what you are trying to say. I mean how does you term partial birth abortion relate to either birth contorl or abortion. And have you tried looking after a baby with no brain or no intelligence or various other things which make life after birth unsustainable? Have you ever had a doctor tell you you and or the fertilized egg if it were to go to term would die? Didn't think so.
09:32 PM on 02/20/2011
I think if women are able to choose to get an abortion, then doctors and nurses should be able to choose if they will perform them. If I decided to get an abortion and my doctor did not want to perform one, then I would go to a different doctor.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SirenForSanity
Hi De Hi Hi De Ho Times
11:24 PM on 02/20/2011
You understand that that is how it already works don't you? Now consider you have an ectopic pregnancy, what should you do if you show up in serious condition and you are denied medical care because the attending have a moral issue?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
judiNJ
The Free Market is Not Free
03:25 PM on 02/21/2011
Well, you would probably die. I have had one of those little things and they can be deadly.
08:27 PM on 02/21/2011
As a doctor, you have the capacity to define what medicine it is you practice. If you are part of a hospital or practice that provides those services than you should be willing to perform that service without judgment, granted you have to training to do so. If you don't want to do abortions that you should not choose to be a gynecologist etc. It seems ridiculous that someone shows up and wants a potentially life-saving procedure and that day it just doesn't align with your personal views. Change your line of work or find a hospital or practice which shares your values.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patchdee
05:11 PM on 02/22/2011
Excellent comment. Word of warning.... if you are pregnant DO NOT go to a Catholic hospital or you could find yourself in harm's way.
04:01 PM on 02/20/2011
Barak made the call now the congress needs to defund the program
05:18 PM on 02/20/2011
Bull.........so defunding the program will mean women can't get birth control pills and then have a need for an abortion because the pregnancy rate would increase? Stick-your-head-in-the-sand logic from the right-wing nuts.........the Prez made the right common sense decision for the 21st century..........lets move forward and not backwards to the 18th century.
05:57 PM on 02/20/2011
no they can still go to a pharmacy for their needs since all pharmacies HAVE to sell them and the morning after. Let planned parenthood get their $$ from soros, and Steinem and other libs
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patchdee
05:14 PM on 02/22/2011
What the hell does this mean? It was Bush Junior who gave the receptionists and everyone at a gynecologist's office the power over the patients live ----- under his expanded Conscience Law..... also pharmacists could refuse to fill prescriptions birth control Rx's (wonder if any of them refused to sell condoms?)
06:57 PM on 02/22/2011
yep and barak took them to court in 2009 and forced them to carry all the drugs and they are unable to use the conscience clause, stay up on current events and quit listening to the state run media
03:22 PM on 02/20/2011
All I can say is, it's about time. We can finally put an end to the era of snarky pharmacists denying women Plan B. If your morals get in the way of doing your job, it's time to find a new job.
photo
PatA
Pink is a 4 letter word
11:28 PM on 02/20/2011
megaman3, fanned and faved!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
coveark
Obstructionists, get off the hill !!!
08:14 AM on 02/21/2011
They did not post your comment on my comment above....guesswemustnotoffend dydeeboy.
06:58 PM on 02/22/2011
maybe if the women had morals they wouldn't be there in the 1st place
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MsCanuck
Wife, Mother, New Democrat, Pro-Choice, Atheist
07:42 PM on 02/22/2011
It takes two to tango - stop blaming the women, look at the men's behaviour as well, the day that men wear a condom EVERY time they have sex and take responsibility for their behaviour, is the day they can have a say in a women's contraception, until then butt out.
08:34 PM on 02/22/2011
youdonewrong - maybe if the men had morals - oh - I forgot. Copulation requires a female too. But if she says no and he says yes and she gets pregnant or an std it is her fault. She should have fought harder. Maybe carried a gun and shot him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
junkiebev
A Pyrrhic Victory beats a Flat Loss
10:35 AM on 02/20/2011
If you have a kid at 16 it should be taken away and you should be turned upside down and filled with cement because you’re a menace to society. You might as well just chop off one of your own feet since you’re so determined to make your life ten thousand times harder than it needs to be for absolutely no reason.

If you can afford a kid and are stable enough to have one then have one.

That is literally as complex as the issue is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hob-Goblin
A smile like a Siberian winter
12:58 PM on 02/20/2011
Spoken like someone who has never made a mistake in her entire life, especially as a teenager. I'm always so in awe of such people! :o
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
caesarf
present
03:41 PM on 02/20/2011
Literally-do you know the meaning of this word? I think people who are unable to understand the actual complexity of this issue are a menace to society.
06:59 PM on 02/22/2011
complexity?? keep your legs close