More

New York Times Week In Review Section Being Overhauled

Nyt

First Posted: 02/19/11 09:35 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:35 PM ET

The news and editorial page editors of the New York Times announced Friday that they will completely overhaul the paper's iconic Week in Review section.

In a staff memo, Bill Keller and Andrew Rosenthal said that they aimed to create an "entirely new section" from the paper's current Sunday analysis and opinion section. They called it a "reinvention project that will involve staff from both the newsroom and the editorial department." Keller and Rosenthal wrote that everything about the section is up for grabs--including its name.

The Week in Review section has been a mainstay at the Times since its inception in 1935.

In addition, the Times will expand its online opinion offerings.

Below, read the memo announcing the changes.

To the Staff:

As some of you have heard by now, we have jointly decided to undertake a reinvention of the Week in Review. The Editorial Department will also undertake a big expansion of the Opinion pages online, but more about that later in this note.

This is not just about a new look or a new layout or new features, but the creation of an entirely new section. It also is unusual in that the re-invention project will involve staff from both the newsroom and the editorial department.

That's not exactly a first for us (think of Room for Debate), but it is still somewhat new territory. The new section is not intended to relax the important distinction between news and opinion. Reporters and editors who work in the newsroom will observe the boundary between analysis (which supplies context, explores trends, weighs assertions against evidence) and opinion (which may be partisan or ideological and advocate particular outcomes). But impartial analysis and outright opinion can live side-by-side as long as they are properly labeled.

It's still very early in the process, so we can't tell you exactly what the new section will look like. In fact, we can't even tell you what it will be called. But there is enough to say that we thought we'd bring you all up to date.

We met the other day with a large group of people, including many former WiR editors. We talked about the project, threw around blue-sky ideas and listened carefully to people's comments, suggestions and concerns.

Now we have assembled a much smaller group and we're going to turn it loose to actually design the section and come up with prototypes. That group will report back to us and in a relatively short period, a section will be born.

The group is headed by Trish Hall, the Op-Ed Editor, who will be the overall editor of the new section as well.

We think it is best described as a Sunday commentary section that will feature the rich menu of the best Op-Ed columnists around; our Editorials; some fine analysis and observation from our best writers in the newsroom; the best outside opinion writing (more like the classical Op-Ed pieces); a much expanded and enhanced readers' section (Letters to the Editor on steroids in the 21st century), as well as new kinds of features and new voices and ideas.

This section will physically live primarily in the editorial department, but since we want to preserve a way for reporters and correspondents to write rich analytical pieces on their beats or the stories they are covering, some portion of the staff will remain anchored in the newsroom.

There is no exact timeline for this project, although as usual, we want the goodies as soon as we can get them.

The Week in Review project, by the way, will be done in parallel with, and in some sense as part of, a big expansion of online Opinion. That's an even more nascent project than the Sunday section, but is getting under way. This is a time when opinion is exploding online. That will involve even more voices, video, graphics, art and illustration, more social interaction. More everything.

It's an area in which we have long been a leader, and we're going to continue leading in the future.

Among many other things, we hope the online Opinion expansion will test out our efforts to expand and enhance our readers' involvement in our work.

We welcome suggestions, thoughts, and great ideas for this new venture.

We have always set the standard for smart, challenging, infinitely inventive analysis, opinion and editorial writing. We recently marked the 40th anniversary of Op-Ed. The new section, and the online expansion, are the next big leap.

Bill and Andy


FOLLOW HUFFPOST MEDIA

The news and editorial page editors of the New York Times announced Friday that they will completely overhaul the paper's iconic Week in Review section. In a staff memo, Bill Keller and Andrew Rose...
The news and editorial page editors of the New York Times announced Friday that they will completely overhaul the paper's iconic Week in Review section. In a staff memo, Bill Keller and Andrew Rose...
Filed by Jack Mirkinson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 74
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
kocean1
When this party's over it will start again
08:19 PM on 03/25/2011
Not sure about that $ 15.95 charge, But I love the NYT-good luck with the launch Monday. I'll read my 20 articles and HP-of course.
10:22 AM on 02/23/2011
must be addin a new commy pages
12:19 PM on 02/21/2011
If it ain't broke don't fix it. It sounds like The Times is running scared and I hope what they are doing isn't dumbing down. Of course we should give them the benefit of the doubt, but what they are describing sounds like what they already have. They may have to change their body=paper to digital, but they shouldn't tinker with their content=soul.
08:58 AM on 02/21/2011
It's the only credible newspaper in the country. Carry on NYT.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
06:49 AM on 02/21/2011
Ahhh, the New York Times. ... an iconic MSM paper that "recycles garbage", specially when reporting about the ME events.. It's attempting to regain its "credibility", specially after its unbelievably incompetent reporting about the run-up to the Iraq war...
photo
rel77
I used to be disgusted, now I try to be amused
02:13 AM on 02/21/2011
The Week In Review has always been my favorite section in the Sunday Times, the one I would always read first. I'm not going to get too upset yet, but I have to say that out of all of the sections they could have "revamped", that would have been my last choice. The Week is perfection, in my opinion.
photo
StevieRae
2012 Choice-Oligarchy or a Republic
10:15 AM on 02/21/2011
x2
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:13 PM on 03/25/2011
x3
10:41 PM on 02/20/2011
Ratz.. I was hoping for Page 3 Girls!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sanatule
Positive, polite and professional
09:41 PM on 02/20/2011
That's not the announcement I was waiting for. I'm waiting for them to announce they will begin reporting the news. No more infotainment. No more cheerleading for wars. No more plagiarism. No fair and balanced nonsense. Just to report the news. When and if that happens, the NYT is just another load of you know what. These kind of cosmetic changes are meaningless without a return to serious journalism. When they make that announcement, call me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TFlint
10:20 PM on 02/20/2011
Obviously you are incapable of reading the New York Times.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sanatule
Positive, polite and professional
10:43 PM on 02/21/2011
I can read the NYT. I find reading it kind of dumbs me down. I'm a fan of serious journalism. Sources like Raw Story and Anti-War.com. NYT isn't in that class anymore. Its become like cotton candy. Puffy on the outside and soft in the middle. I'm rooting for it to comeback. Hopefully, it will someday.
photo
StevieRae
2012 Choice-Oligarchy or a Republic
10:16 AM on 02/21/2011
I presume that you find News Corp much more reliable and the beacon of serious journalism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sanatule
Positive, polite and professional
10:31 PM on 02/21/2011
No, NewsCorp is far worse. I read and view news from sources like the BBC, Raw Story,Matt Taibbi, Democracy Now, Seymour Hersh, Truthout, etc... I find it hard to tell the difference between NYT and New York Post. NYT used to be a must read newspaper. Those days have long gone. Their only interested in moving product and corporate profit. Kinda sad, really.
photo
leftLibertarian
reefer+java=groovy
09:13 PM on 02/20/2011
I enjoy reading the Sunday Times while drinking a Bloody Mary.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Rappaport
tired of the con game called "free markets."
07:43 PM on 02/20/2011
When I was growing up, my father loved the Sunday NYT. One of the things that he always said made it special was the Week in Review page. There just wasn't anywhere else in the country to find that quality of writing and thinking on a regular basis.

As someone who is retired from journalism after a 30-year career, I am not at all optimistic that the revamping will make it better. These things rarely do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
judiNJ
The Free Market is Not Free
06:48 PM on 02/20/2011
Well, they might as well pile into the chaos going on now. I will hold my opinion until I see it, but I like the Week In Review as it is. Newsweek just did a HORRENDOUS turnaround into some kind of right wing rag and I cancelled my prescription the same day I received it in the mail. Ugh! One Murdoch is enough. Wait!... did HE buy Newsweek, too?
photo
EmmaNYC
shoes & ships & sealing wax, cabbages & kings
07:24 PM on 02/20/2011
Having subscribed to Newsweek since I was a teenager, I also recently cancelled. The magazine really went downhill very quickly.
06:18 PM on 02/20/2011
The astonishing decline of a once-great newspaper continues. It has been painful to watch the dumbing down of this American institution. Sorta like the US in general I guess. Razzle-dazzle and fat content over substance.
06:09 PM on 02/20/2011
When you become marginalized, reinvent yourself.
04:58 PM on 02/20/2011
It would be nice if they just reported the news on the front page rather than making it their editorial page pretending its news