iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Wisconsin Protests Draw Thousands Of Workers Fighting For Key Union Rights

First Posted: 02/21/11 05:38 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:35 PM ET

MADISON, Wis. -- On Friday, February 11, at the same hour that the world watched the former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak resign his post, the newly appointed Republican Governor of Wisconsin quietly launched a ferocious attack on public sector unions -- and the very notion of organized labor in America.

For nearly fifty years unions have sought to safeguard and advance their rights through a process known as collective bargaining, which is the most powerful tool labor has for peacefully resolving disputes and ensuring workers a voice in negotiations on everything from fair wages to safety conditions and sick leave.

The bill championed by Wisconsin's governor takes dead aim at this process by stripping most state workers of many of their collective bargaining rights. Union leaders have responded uproariously, claiming that the bill effectively guts public unions of their most critical asset in a state that pioneered many of the fundamental fights for worker's rights. Political chaos has ensued on both sides. State Democrats fled the state last week to prevent a vote on the legislation, while many Republican governors -- some who already have similar bills on the table -- watch carefully to see, if the bill succeeds, how they might pass anti-union legislature in their own states.

(Check out a gallery of HuffPost readers' photos from the Wisconsin protests here.)

President Obama called the bill "an assault on unions." On the ground in Wisconsin, the growing crowd of protesters portray their actions as part of a once-in-a generation struggle to shape the dynamic that determines what voice workers will have in the workplace. They feel the eyes of the world upon them. Last Friday as millions swarmed the streets of Egypt in a "Day of Victory" rally, a young man posted a picture on his Facebook page showing a sign reading "EGYPT Supports Wisconsin One World One Pain."

In many statehouses in America, there are heated debates about how to handle mounting deficits and difficult budget cuts. Governor Walker's so-called "Budget Repair Bill" purports to address Wisconsin's $137 million budget shortfall. In addition to removing most collective bargaining rights, Walker's proposal would double the amount state employees pay for health insurance and increase contributions to their pension funds. Republican's say Walker's plan would save the state $30 million over the next three months and $300 million over the next two years. Proponents of the bill say that it is a pragmatic approach to difficult fiscal times.

"I'm just trying to balance my budget," Mr. Walker told the New York Times. "To those who say why didn't I negotiate on this? I don't have anything to negotiate with. We don't have anything to give. Like practically every other state in the country, we're broke. And it's time to pay up."

But labor historians, economists and policy makers say that addressing Wisconsin's deficit is not the full motive of the bill. As they see it, what's really happening is that Walker is seizing on an illusory budget crisis and using it as a battering ram to break public unions.

"It's a symbolically huge stab to see workers rights and mechanisms for conciliation being undone," said labor historian Josh Freeman. "I think [Walker's Bill] is about ideology, generally. There aren't that many worker institutions left in the United States. It's a real effort to take them down. And the budget is an occasion for this."

Indeed, in a conference call with reporters last week, leaders at two of Wisconsin's largest state workers unions -- the Wisconsin Education Association Council and AFSCME -- said that they would concede all of Walker's fiscal demands, if they could keep the right to collective bargaining.

"We want to say loud and clear: it is not about those concessions," said Mary Bell, president of WEAC. "For my members, it's about retaining a voice in their professions."

Walker has rejected this offer. "Doesn't work," he told USA Today. "And the reason, having been a local government official, is we've got 72 counties, 424 school districts, over a thousand municipalities. And like every other state, or nearly every other state across the country, our budget is going to have cuts in aids to local governments."

But union leaders insist that there is always something to bargain over, even if it is only the ability to bargain itself.

"I think what people need to see in this is that it's not just an attack on public service unions. It's really a concerted attack by powerful interests that really want to see working class people be brought down," said Rick Badger, the executive director of AFSCME's Wisconsin 40 council. "Walker claims there's nothing to bargain with. The message we need to get out there is that this could not be further from the truth."

As the crowd builds day by day, the tens of thousands who have showed up to protest Walker's bill claim their actions are much more than a battle over increased health insurance premiums and a cut to their pensions. Those who have gathered for days in increasing numbers in front of the Capitol -- in some cases, through the night, camped out inside the Capitol on sleeping bags and cardboard -- characterize themselves as figures at the heart of the struggle for the future of the American worker.

Other states are closely watching Wisconsin's example.

In Ohio, Republican Senator Shannon Jones proposed a bill which also seeks to eliminate collective bargaining rights for public employees and curtail binding arbitration rules for local governments. Last month, Ohio governor John Kasich said that if employees strike, "they should be fired." In response, last week thousands of protesters gathered in front of the Ohio statehouse.

Indiana is facing protests over a proposed Right to Work bill. Indiana has also proposed a bill which would limit collective bargaining rights for teachers. Union leaders and democrats are preparing for extended fights in both Ohio and Indiana.

"I think other states will be emboldened," says Rebecca Givan, a professor of labor relations at Cornell. "If [Walker's bill] passes there will be a ripple effect and states like Ohio and Indiana will move quickly. And other states will start to think that this is a viable option."


SOLIDARITY AT THE CAPITOL


In Wisconsin, the demonstrations have been peaceful. Yet, Walker has attempted to pit law enforcement against protesters since his first announcement of the bill, which was accompanied by the suggestion that he might call in the National Guard to quell protesters. He told reporters at the press conference that the Guard was "prepared" for "whatever the governor, their commander-in-chief, might call for."

Additionally, in a move that might have further divided Wisconsin state workers, Walker exempted police and firefighters from his bill. Many observed that cops and firefighters tend to vote Republican and this might explain their exclusion. But far from turning on the crowd, Wisconsin police have acted as behind-the-scenes advocates for those opposing the bill in negotiations with state administrators.

The protests have been peaceful, with very few arrests. But on Friday night, according to sources inside the Wisconsin Police Department, the state's Department of Administration wanted to clear the Capitol building where people were camped out, singing, praying, and sharing stories late into the night. Those police assigned to the capitol refused to comply, arguing that as there was absolutely nothing going on and there was no need to act. After a "healthy discussion" (as one police officer put it), the discussion was dropped and those inside the Capitol stayed put.

No group has been more loved at the protests in Madison than the cops and firefighters. Everywhere they go, they are trailed by shouts of thanks and cheers. Day after day, police officers, in their civvies, gathered by the Wisconsin Law Enforcement Memorial carrying signs pledging solidarity.

"This is not about the money," said George Silverwood, a silver-haired retiree with a bright white smile straight out of central casting. He was with the police force for 32 years, deeply involved with union negotiations, and said he can't believe what Walker is proposing.

"I sat at that table and arrived at a contract and saw how well that worked, year after year," Silverwood said. "Walker keeps saying, people shouldn't be shocked. Well, we're shocked. And we're angry."

Jamie Leonard, 35, has been a Wisconsin firefighter for 13 years. He lives a 2-hour drive from Wisconsin, but drove down to join the protests last week and plans to go again this week.

"I went to show support," Leonard said simply. "We need to show that, even if we weren't included, we support the public worker unions. We're with them."

"[Collective bargaining] has been in this state for a long time, and not having that, there are a lot of unknowns," Leonard said. "When you lose something, it's like a nice comfortable blanket. You take that away, and you think: are we just going to be left out in the cold? How will we be treated from here on out? Benefits are one thing but rights are something else. And that's what we're fighting about."

Many police are suspicious of Walker's real motives. Scott Favour, a Madison cop for 19 years exclaimed heatedly, "Governor Walker is not telling the whole story on what he's trying to accomplish. It's about breaking unions."


FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
MADISON, Wis. -- On Friday, February 11, at the same hour that the world watched the former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak resign his post, the newly appointed Republican Governor of Wisconsin quiet...
MADISON, Wis. -- On Friday, February 11, at the same hour that the world watched the former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak resign his post, the newly appointed Republican Governor of Wisconsin quiet...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,069
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (58 total)
09:31 PM on 02/25/2011
I somehow lost the post I was typing, but I can see that most posters are aware why we need unions. If you allow these business people to talk you into getting rid of unions you may live to wring your hands and cry. I was earning 75 cents an hour back in early '50's -- you want to go back there? All workers benefit from Unions, whether or not they belong to it. You will find out how fair employers want to be and how much they care for your well-being. Your forefathers fought & died for fair wages and some of you want to revisit that era, where you will have to be out in the streets fighting like the Libyans and Egyptians are today. Big business is out to cut your legs off.
02:27 PM on 02/24/2011
How this relates to the teachings of Karl Marx is the bill is basically stripping the right for individuals in the unions to bargain over wages or benefits offered for the job they hold. I think this situation is very controversial as well because it’s for the state workers or the public sector which are government agencies or positions. Without the collective bargaining the workers will be oppressed by their providers in the sense that whatever benefits or wages they get will be pre-determined and they will hold no say. In this case it’s seems that the government is essentially the bourgeoisie and the middle class or somewhat upper middle class are becoming the proletariat. I think this is extremely important to pay attention to this matter because I see this as the beginning of the government trying to take over any and all aspects that they can. The proletariat is no longer just the poor and weak that don’t have the means for a better job or education but it’s quickly becoming even those that are well educated and those that hold jobs in the government, the same government that is supposed to be looking out for the interests of the people in this nation rather than taking them from us.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Colin Gregory Bowers
10:54 AM on 02/26/2011
Afc, I think you're right on, until here:

"In this case it’s seems that the government is essentiall­y the bourgeoisi­e and the middle class or somewhat upper middle class are becoming the proletaria­t. I think this is extremely important to pay attention to this matter because I see this as the beginning of the government trying to take over any and all aspects that they can".

This is true in theory, but not in reality, because the opposition isn't the gov't vs the people. It's the upper class vs. the people with the gov't, doing what they always do when it's the Republicans in power, just backing out of the way of the corporate, feudal overlords and failing to protect the *people* from the barons. Yes, the middle-class is being proletarianized, because they're the greatest threat to the really rich. The battle is back to what it was pre-French Revolution: the ancien regime against the peasants, only the peasants used to be the bourgeoisie.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:57 AM on 02/24/2011
Sad that this site refuses to accept the truth that these middle class working men and women in Wisconsin are in fact fighting for the rights of every American worker in this country, not just those fortunate enough to be represented in the workplace with union organizations.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Colin Gregory Bowers
12:02 PM on 02/24/2011
It boils down to whether, when you drive by a "Tea-Party Rally" or the front of the Wisconsin or Ohio state capitols, and recognize yourself in the others you see there. I see 'me' (and my cousin...my grandfather....my sister...my neighbor) in the latter. In the former... well, I can't even describe what I see there. Life on Mars, maybe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zetacplus
Conservatism has failed America
03:20 AM on 02/24/2011
I wonder how many of the protesters voted for Walker? If they voted for him why are they now complaining? Did they not realize that by voting for a republican they were voting against their own interests. Some people have to learn the hard way.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Colin Gregory Bowers
12:04 PM on 02/24/2011
Except when he said "I'm going to cut spending" he didn't specify that he was going to bust the public employees' unions because he was backed by major corporate interests... and then move on to the rest, which is what he would do given the chance. You're right... it's not shocking. But it's more scummy than even typical GOP nonsense usually is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zetacplus
Conservatism has failed America
01:26 AM on 02/25/2011
Any hard working American who votes for a republican deserves what they get. Republicans are well known for only caring about big business, not the average American. I love living in California because we are governed by democrats who fight for the people and the environment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blair C Johnson
This 2 politicalparty game of tag needs to end!
11:21 AM on 03/13/2011
Unfortunately quite a few. That is not the real problem or sad thing. What is though is that the people of Wisconsin are at fault. Here in my district 51 only 20,340 people out of approximately 56,000 turned out to vote. Then statewide only 2.1 million out of 5.6 million turned out to vote. So "They" can claim to have the silent majority, but when I do math 1/4 of a states population is not a majority. Bring on the Recall and let's get Wisconsin back to working together.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
Cut on the bias
12:37 AM on 02/24/2011
When I see these attacks on the right to negotiate pay and benefits, or fighting the minimum wage laws, I think I must be back in time in the old Soviet Union, not the USA. How poor do we have to be to satisfy the millionaire managers and big business? The minimum wage is too much pay now? They may as well just reintroduce actual slavery if people cannot even negotiate their job conditions. I guess the management will just drop whatever crumbs they want to us and we are expected to grovel thankfully while they get million dollar salaries for doing nothing. Try running the country without workers and see how much the managers and legislators produce: that would be about nothing. If we want to lower the deficit look to the hundreds of thousand dollar salaries for legislators who only produce handouts to their corporate sponsors while refusing to pay those who actually get things done. The governor and legislators pay should be dependent on the workers so both salaries rise and fall together. That way they would be inspired to live by the laws they create. They should not make more than double the average worker's salary since they provide no value to the country's economy.
07:23 PM on 02/23/2011
Let's cut to the chase and stop dabbling around the edges. Every protester should be carrying a sign that says "Why Isn't Wall Street in Jail?"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/democracy-now/from-global-financial-cri_b_826823.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:32 AM on 02/24/2011
Because they own the politicians that make the law that control the people so they can be free to exploit them..

A revolution and a dramtic change to the leagle system governing politics..
NO MORE CORPORATE CONTRIBUTIONS AND CONTROL......
03:18 AM on 02/24/2011
Well, I'm afraid we are out of luck on the no more corporate contributions. Once the Supreme Court opened up the floodgates, the game was lost.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zetacplus
Conservatism has failed America
03:21 AM on 02/24/2011
I believe we are due a revolution. America is no longer governed by the people, it's governed by corporate interests.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nypapajoe
12:19 PM on 02/23/2011
"A huge share of the nation's economic growth over the past 30 years has gone to the top one-hundredth of one percent, who now make an average of $27 million per household. The average income for the bottom 90 percent of us? $31,244". Now that the wealthy have employed the republicans to lobby for them we have to unite to end the the demise of our economy and middle class! How much more money or tax breaks do they need to live day to day!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zetacplus
Conservatism has failed America
03:24 AM on 02/24/2011
These companies know they have the power to bring the president to his knees because they can start laying off workers by the thousands and that would make Obama look bad. If you think it's bad now just think how bad it would look with 25% unemployment. Many people are so desperate for work now they will take almost any job at any pay. Those in power love this because it lowers their costs which means more money to buy their yachts and fuel their private planes.
photo
dsq
a vet
10:20 AM on 02/24/2011
Both parties are bought and paid for. Do you hear the dems shouting from the roof tops? Only a very few are telling us the truth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danrothesq
Unrestricted brilliance.
10:32 AM on 02/23/2011
This is not a battle over union rights. This is a battle over wealth. It is government employees versus the public. They want us to pay more taxes to them, period. They want to control what we have to give them. Remember, government employees do not produce anything. They perform a service for us. We have the right to say what we will pay for the service. They do not have the right to dictate to us what they will take from us. The people voted in Wisconsin. That was "collective bargaining". Now the result of that vote. Gov. Walker told the voters ahead of time what he would do. Now he is doing it after they voted for it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
espressobeans
. . . just saying it like it is.
10:58 AM on 02/23/2011
It's a war on workers. It's been waging for some time. People are hopefully starting to pay attention.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SOSTED
02:16 PM on 02/28/2011
You've been drinking the union Koolaid!
01:56 PM on 02/23/2011
I suppose you live on an isolated plot with a private road, a well for water, a 100% solar/wind power system, and your police force is Smith & Wesson. Home schooling is obvious.

WRONG: Power-mad Walker did NOT state that he would decimate public unions rights. He has extracted 100% of financial concessions and will settle for nothing less than union obliteration.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SOSTED
09:44 AM on 02/23/2011
Collective bargaining with a politician is like two wolves and a sheep negotiating what to have for dinner. Both the unions and the politicians win and the taxpayers lose........... There is nothing for the politician or the union to lose. With no skin in the deal both win with support and donation to your re-election campaign while the taxpayer is stuck with the bill. The taxpayer cannot elect to get his government from another government without throwing out the wolves that created the budget mess...............Oh yeah....... That's what they did in Wisconsin.......
Sounds like the Democratic process is working and the Unions don't like Democracy in action.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Damothedevo
05:03 AM on 02/23/2011
Sorry, that last post was at the very least as disjointed as this one will be. The economy, hmm, I'll let Newstopia explain it to you. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIfH0vY2ANA
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Damothedevo
04:46 AM on 02/23/2011
If the myth that the buissness community creats jobs so we shouldn't tax them, because it will destroy the economy, and tax the workers instead, is true. Then they sould not be confused when no one buys thier s, I mean what the f are they doing in those meatings with the cucumber sandwiches? If you don't allow people to earn enough money, they will not have enough money to buy your s, do you not see that?
How did you get so confident? Oh my God! By God I mean the Ground, Sun, Water, and Air. Any one these will f you up, none of them give a s about you, but they are real, and without them this would not be happening.
Jamming a rich person through the arse of a camel, out the other side, and up to heaven. Is heaps harder than what that other guy said.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SOSTED
10:01 AM on 02/23/2011
It is no myth.... small Business creates most jobs........ When you tax a business, they just include the tax into the cost of doing business and the actual taxpayer end up being the consumer of the goods and services of the business. Only an agenda driven fool would not understand that concept......... A business that sells it's product for a higher than market price will eventually have to lower its price to meet the competition's pricing or go out of business. It's pretty simple and basic economics...... A competitor will always try to compete by figuring out a way to undercut the big dogs in the market.............
The consumer pays all taxes on business........................
01:58 PM on 02/23/2011
Problem with theory: (although I may be 'agenda driven fool'). When products are manufactured for export, as so many are today, this generates resources, which would have not come into the fold without business tax. In other words, the taxpayers are funding lower cost for products sold to foreigners… also taxpayers are funding (with your theory) lower cost for products that they may not be able to afford to purchase or simply don’t use by choice. Is that a fair assessment or are you an ‘agenda driven fool’!
photo
Sundalecat
We love Obama!, by an angry White Man
02:25 AM on 02/23/2011
This is why Americans must vote. Never vote when angry, Never vote for anybody who is against your interest. Wisconsin had record low turnout. I didn't get everything I wanted in Obama’s first two years but I got out and voted as Democrat and voted for my governor, congressman and senator. I will say this now.

Republicans care about big business, tax cuts and killing abortion rights. They also care about big Defense and ruining Social Security and Medicare.

Democrats care about the working man and woman, the middleclass and the less fortunate. They care about Unions and they care about a Woman’s right to choose. They care about you!

Look at Detroit if Obama had not bailed them out imagine how many would have been out of work. Remember this when you take my advice and vote in 2012.
08:04 AM on 02/23/2011
YOUR IGNORANCE IS UNBELIEVABLE. Republicans are supported by normal folks who know a real live baby in a womb when they see one, who know high taxes kill the economy, and that freezing social security benefits hurts us older folks. In my field, 25% UNEMPLOYMENT is directly related to his policies. Bush - under 5% unemployment with a deficit 20% as much. It was a Dem Congress who started our decline in 2007 with massive spending.
Our local teachers earn far more than the average worker with extreme benefits and job security in the worst of times. Yet they complain about paying even a tiny amount for healthcare. My Blue Cross went up 30% just now due to Obamacare.

Public sector employees have passed the private sector AND they have advantages NO private sector employee has. Beyond that, many are political payoffs who would not be hired by a private company even for a fraction of what they get.

Democrats care about the less fortunate????? They are stingy with charity and free with everyone else''s money.

Low-cost housing in Philadelphia was stalled for years - under Bush it SOARED. Crime went way down and race relations got a lot better. Now look at the mess. Germany is doing well because they did the opposite of Obama. This man was not ready for prime time, and his radical leftist views have produced the exact same misery they produced for everyone else who had gall enough to try them.

Reality check, please.
photo
Sundalecat
We love Obama!, by an angry White Man
01:50 PM on 02/23/2011
Bush did nothing except put us into this mess.
photo
dsq
a vet
10:30 AM on 02/24/2011
Gee that trickle down theory has worked real well since Pres. Regan, you think? As far as taxes go the wealthy are paying less than they have in 50 yrs. What kool aid are you drinking FOX RED?
02:16 AM on 02/23/2011
where is Bill Clinton. he can negotiate a settlement.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
12:06 AM on 02/23/2011
There are many things the Neofeudalists would like you to forget about Martin Luther King, Jr. Most especially they want you to forget that he died because he dared to name Economic Justice as a Civil Right and was starting to awaken the People--across all spectrums--to the true nature of their mutual oppression.

"Now what are some of the domestic consequences of the war in Vietnam? It made the Great Society a myth and replaced it with a troubled and confused society. The war has strengthened domestic reaction. It has given the extreme right, the anti-labor, anti-Negro, and anti-humanistic forces a weapon of spurious patriotism to galvanize its supporters into reaching for power, right up to the White House. It hopes to use national frustration to take control and restore the America of social insecurity and power for the privileged. When a Hollywood performer, lacking distinction even as an actor [Ronald Reagan], can become a leading war-hawk candidate for the presidency, only the irrationalities induced by a war psychosis can explain such a melancholy turn of events."

Speech to the National Labor Leadership Assembly for Peace Nov. 11, 1967

from Martin Luther King Jr.'s "All Labor Has Dignity" ed. Michael J. Honey

If you haven't read this compilation of Martin's speeches on Economic Justice, you really should. His words have never been more timely. (Especially if you trade the name of one of our current wars for Vietnam.)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danrothesq
Unrestricted brilliance.
10:46 AM on 02/23/2011
What does Martin Luther King have to do with this? This is about money and power. What is economic justice, communism? Who would you rather have rule, the wealthy or the homeless? When the homeless rule, things go down the tubes. Maybe we should replace the current government employees with the homeless. Look at what the government employees in Libya are doing, they are shooting the public. We do not want that here. Government employees have too much power today and must be cut back. I can understand unions in the private sector, but government. The people make no profit on government workers and they produce nothing. Why should we let them take more than anyone else. Pretty soon there will be nothing lett to take. They will kill the goose that laid the golden egg. It is quite enough.
01:41 PM on 02/23/2011
Point---> .


You---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
09:59 PM on 02/25/2011
Get rid of Unions and see how fair employers are going to be (that is unless you're part of the top 2 percent. Union workers may be better paid, but because they are better paid is the reason the rest of us get better compensation. I know what I am talking about because back in the fifties I worked eight hours a day for seventy-five cents an hour. All workers benefit from unions whether or not they belong to one.

VOTERS, BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH AND VOTE FOR. You just may cut your own throat.