More

Israel: Iran Suez Canal Naval Trip Is A Provocation

Iran Suez Canal

MARK LAVIE   02/22/11 09:27 PM ET   AP

JERUSALEM — Two Iranian warships sailed from the Suez Canal into the Mediterranean on Tuesday, the first such trip in at least three decades, eliciting Israeli charges that Tehran is seeking to dominate the Middle East.

The vessels headed toward Syria, but were expected to remain in international waters as they passed the Israeli coast.

The voyage took the frigate Alvand and the supply Kharq close to NATO's southern flank and could further destabilize the Middle East, a region already reeling from an unprecedented wave of anti-government rebellions.

In Tehran, the deputy commander of the Iranian navy said that Iran has "suprised the Zionist regime" with the journey to the Mediterranean.

"The world arrogance (U.S.) should know that the army of the Islamic Republic is fully prepared to defend the holy ideals of the Islamic Republic and this readiness grows day by day," Brigadier-General Abdolrahim Mousavi told the official Iranian news agency IRNA.

In Washington, State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley refused to say whether the transit in and of itself, or the Egyptian decision to allow it, were provocations.

"We will be watching carefully to see where these ships go and the implications of that," he said.

Egypt is the gatekeeper of the strategic canal which links the Red Sea and the Mediterranean.

Egypt's new military rulers, who took power from ousted President Hosni Mubarak on Feb. 11, appeared to have no choice but to allow the passage. An international convention regulating shipping says the canal must be open "to every vessel of commerce or of war."

Iranian warships have not passed through the Suez Canal since 1979.

In sending warships to the Mediterranean now, Iran was asserting itself as a regional power and testing whether Egypt's new rulers will stick to the pro-Western line of the Mubarak government. Some said the voyage also signals that Iran is ready to come to the aid of regional allies, including Syria and Iranian proxies Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu denounced Iran late Tuesday, but he did not refer directly to the two warships.

"Iran seeks to exploit the earthquake" now shaking the region, he said. "It is seeking to bring down democratic reform. It is seeking to prevent it. It is seeking to shut down the lights and create another era of darkness like the one we have in Tehran."

Vice Premier Silvan Shalom accused Iran of trying to dominate the entire region.

"The passage of the Iranian ships is part of the comprehensive struggle that Iran is conducting against the West for domination and control in the Middle East," he told an energy conference. "The objective of the Iranian provocation is to signal to the leaders of the Arab world who the new leader is in the Middle East."

Despite the strong language, Israel was seen as unlikely to take action against the vessels.

Iran and Israel are bitter enemies. Israel considers Iran a threat because of its nuclear program, missile development and frequent references by its leader to Israel's destruction. Iran denies it has nuclear weapons ambitions, but it backs militant anti-Israel groups like Hamas and Hezbollah.

Israeli security officials said that as long as the ships remain in international waters, there is nothing Israel can legally do. They spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue.

The Iranian ships are headed for a training mission in Syria, an arch foe of Israel.

In Damascus, officials at the Iranian Embassy said it would mark the first time in years that Iranian naval vessels dock in a Syrian port. The ships were heading for Latakia, about 350 miles (600 kilometers) from the canal, a voyage of about a day.

The ships paid about $300,000 in fees for the canal passage, according to a maritime agent.

____

Associated Press writers Salah Nasrawi and Maamoun Youssef contributed from Cairo.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

JERUSALEM — Two Iranian warships sailed from the Suez Canal into the Mediterranean on Tuesday, the first such trip in at least three decades, eliciting Israeli charges that Tehran is seeking to ...
JERUSALEM — Two Iranian warships sailed from the Suez Canal into the Mediterranean on Tuesday, the first such trip in at least three decades, eliciting Israeli charges that Tehran is seeking to ...
Filed by Cara Parks  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,374
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (30 total)
11:47 AM on 02/26/2011
I thought this would be a nice addition.

Apparently, Iranians are in Syria, neogating for Naval Base.

http://www.isna.ir/ISNA/NewsView.aspx?ID=News-1723652&Lang=E
09:29 AM on 02/24/2011
"Tehran is seeking to dominate the Middle East." Who has Iran invaded in the last 200yrs? No one. Who has Israel invaded in the last 62yrs? Everyone. Case closed.
01:00 PM on 02/25/2011
Iran has invaded the gaza strip in the form of hamas, and all of lebanon in the form of hezbullah. Iran has even invaded the way certain people think in the form of rhetoric and propaganda throughout the world. Israel wants to invade nobody, but is forced to.
03:04 PM on 02/25/2011
Poor poor victimized Israel ... lol
04:55 AM on 02/27/2011
Wait! ISRAEL was behind the creation of Hamas when they decided to support Islamic organisations among the Palestinians in order to weaken further the secular PLO. Hezbollah is a homegrown movement that has kept the Israeli aggressor out of Lebanon. Iran is doing a great thing for humanity and justice and regional stability with any dollar they give to support it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
azbird
03:48 PM on 02/26/2011
Case is not closed because you say it is. Especially since you got the facts backward.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doctoress
06:55 AM on 02/24/2011
Hey Israel, stay "provoked" until hell freezes over. This is just the beginning.
photo
Stilyagi
Making a board with a bigger nail in it.
01:43 AM on 02/24/2011
"The world arrogance (U.S.) should know that the army of the Islamic Republic is fully prepared to defend the holy ideals of the Islamic Republic and this readiness grows day by day," Brigadier-General Abdolrahim Mousavi told the official Iranian news agency IRNA."

If that isn't an admission to fostering a secret nuclear weapons program, and to being the first nation crazy enough to start a global nuclear war on the basis of their beliefs of an invisible being that sits in the sky somewhere... I don't know what is. And people call Is.lam "the religion of peace"? Right.
01:45 AM on 02/24/2011
That's a one heck of a reach, even for a spin.
01:57 AM on 02/24/2011
That statement was made by the deputy commander of the Iranian navy, and in direct response to comments regarding the transit of two Iranian ships through the Suez Canal.

It had nothing to do with the nuclear energy-development aspirations of Iran.

It had nothing to do with wanting to, or being "crazy enough" to start a "global nuclear war".

I highly doubt that the deputy commander of the navy even has any insight into the Iranian nuclear energy-development program.

And even if he did, I highly doubt that he is authorized to speak about it.

And even if he did, it has nothing to do with religion.

You, "Stilyagi" are an alarmist of the worst sort. You don't even need "evidence" or "facts" in order to run around claiming that the sky is falling.

Please sit down...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HerbTee
Obama in 2012...Liz Warren in 2016.
01:32 PM on 02/24/2011
Very well said Y2K...faved!
photo
Stilyagi
Making a board with a bigger nail in it.
08:06 PM on 02/24/2011
"And even if he did, I highly doubt that he is authorized to speak about it."

You id iot. You totally invented your own arguments and attempted to attribute them to me. Try reading with your glasses on, now. I never said the naval commander was "authorized to speak about his country's nuclear program", or any of the other nonsense you wrote. I was saying he -inadvertently- gave away Iran's nuclear ambitions, without realizing it. If I have to explain to you what I was saying, then you really are not in a position to be commenting on this subject. Go trol l the articles about Portman's sunglasses or something.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlexABC
11:56 PM on 02/23/2011
If this maneuver is the best provocative muscle-flexing that Iran is capable of, I think everyone will be ok. Iran has no ability to operate ships far from its home base. Israel (or the US) could sink any of these ships in a heartbeat. Or they'd sink themselves by mere virtue of not being serviced by adequate supply lines, like the ships in a functional navy are.

This Suez episode resembles the pretentious flag-waving of Russian ships in Venezuela, or Chinese ships struggling to deal with pirates near Aden. It's a symbolic measure whose message is muddled and without actual power to back it up.
12:05 AM on 02/24/2011
With full access to friendly Syrian ports, and travelling with a large supply ship, there is no danger of either one of the ships sinking by themselves.

You know why Israel is upset? Because the thought of an Iranian ship crossing the Suez during Mubarak was unheard of. This is also a nice symbolic move for the Palestinians and Lebanese, after all, the Iranian ships are bigger than anything Israel has floating around in her Navy.
10:13 AM on 02/24/2011
Larger Than Israel LOL I am an ex Intel Officer US Army Retired and you should do your research. Israel has more than enough Naval Power to include Nuclear Tipped Missiles on Subs. At Least 5 ships are much more powerful and larger than Iran has.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HerbTee
Obama in 2012...Liz Warren in 2016.
01:37 PM on 02/24/2011
I am enjoying your posts Magic...fanned and faved!
10:53 PM on 02/23/2011
Iran's use of the Suez Canal is just another sign of the Iranian government's increasing self-confidence. The NY Times notes that the ousting the Taliban in Afghanistan and Saddam Hussein in Iraq, two of Iran’s regional enemies, has increased Iran's influence in the region.

During a ceremony in Iraq where officials from both the US and Iran were present, the Iranian envoy toasted the Americans (nonalcoholic drink), thanking them for removing Saddam and making way for Maliki's Dawa party, funded by Iran. Moreover, Shiites are now control the formerly pro-western government of Lebanon and are gaining ground in Bahrain where they represent 60% of the population. This may be the Middle East's 1989.
photo
Amryxx
politeness rules, but with sharpened edges
10:56 PM on 02/23/2011
From what I can remember, the Berlin Wall fell in 1989. I don't see how this analogy meshes with Iran's increased influence, though.
11:17 PM on 02/23/2011
Iran is projecting influence through religious fundamentalism and its natural ties to the region's Shiites.

China is projecting influence through its check-book.

The United States is still trying to project influence through regional warfare and aircraft carrier battle-groups.

As for Israel, I'm not at all clear on their strategy for projecting influence. They lobby the U.S. administration heavily, whine at every turn, and lose international friends by the bushel..... They have complained loudly about two little Iranian boats transiting the Canal, but other than the United States did anybody else even notice?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
azbird
03:57 PM on 02/26/2011
Well which is it big or little? Just a while back it was posted that they are bigger than anything Israel has now you say two little Irani boats.
photo
Cannonball Taffy O Jones
Khaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan!
10:42 PM on 02/23/2011
At a time when much of the Arab world is demanding freedom and democracy Iran sends a couple of warships on a show of support to one of the most repressive and murderous Arab regimes.
 
Iran, always a day late and a rial short.
11:35 PM on 02/23/2011
Really Taffy? You think Iran is missing an opportunity here?

Hmmmm. Let's check that record again..

The U.S.A. was a staunch ally of Zine El Abidine Ben Ali until the Tunisian people gave him the bum's rush.

The U.S.A. was a staunch ally of Hosni Mubarak until the Egyptian people gave him the bum's rush.

The U.S.A. is a staunch ally of the leaders of both Bahrain and Yemen, and will likely continue to remain so even while their populations work to give them the bum's rush.

The U.S.A. will forever be a staunch ally of King Abdullah, even up to the point that the Saudi people give him the bum's rush.

And you blame Iran for being "a day late"?

Sure..
photo
Cannonball Taffy O Jones
Khaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan!
11:39 PM on 02/23/2011
Why do you presume that I am a supporter or defender of American Middle East policy?
11:56 PM on 02/23/2011
Taffy, you do know that despite your opinion, Bashar Al-Assad is still the most popular Arab leader

http://www1.albawaba.com/news/assad-most-popular-arab-leader
photo
Cannonball Taffy O Jones
Khaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan!
12:06 AM on 02/24/2011
Why doesn't the dictator test his popularity in an open and free election then?
12:13 AM on 02/24/2011
This is most true, "Magic", and Al-Assad has implemented some reforms that the Syrians appreciate (mainly of the economic kind); but it is also true that his administration remains deeply unpopular with the people.

"Nature abhors a void", and I would add "politics" to that equation. It is clear that U.S. influence has taken a huge hit in the region, and its dogmatic support of all things Israel is not going to help it recover. In the meantime, there is a need for a new "Realpolitik" in the region. It might be led by the leaders of the region left standing; it might be influenced by the oil-hungry Chinese; it might be a new form of "non-aligned" movement, with possible influence from India. All hard to say, but I suspect that the "old" order is ending.

Whatever. That stench wafting through the region is the smell of U.S. influence decomposing...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
koroush1336
An human rights activist and totally anti-mullahs,
10:27 PM on 02/23/2011
I guess HP doesn't like my analysis about this mullahs' stupidity!? They are not again posting my comment!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
koroush1336
An human rights activist and totally anti-mullahs,
10:25 PM on 02/23/2011
The only ones who profit from a war are first of all the mullahs and then the war businesses!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
koroush1336
An human rights activist and totally anti-mullahs,
10:16 PM on 02/23/2011
The only purpose of this stupidity on behalf of the mullahs, is to get some kind of CRISIS. They-the mullahs- are about to die for a small "outside crisis" in order to use in the country to suppress the uprisings against them. I mean, every little child is able to see this that the mullahs have nothing to look for in that area! With tow small toy "war ships"?! So what?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doctoress
07:04 AM on 02/24/2011
Mullahs are not stupid. On the contrary, the above comment is stupid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
loOranks
I am the master of my fate; captain of my soul
10:46 AM on 02/24/2011
Mullahs are stupid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
magedfoxx
09:00 PM on 02/23/2011
There is certainly nothing like the sound of Israeli F16's ripping through the sky at 3:30AM. #Gaza
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shingo
09:09 PM on 02/23/2011
Especially if you're pregnant.
photo
Cannonball Taffy O Jones
Khaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan!
10:26 PM on 02/23/2011
The sound of Turkish F-16s dropping cluster bombs on Kurdish villages at 3.30am sounds much worse.
10:38 PM on 02/23/2011
Turkey does bomb the mountain region between Iraq, Turkey and Iran, but give an example of any Kurdish village that was bombed by a Turkish jet, old boy.

Anyway, Israel does this on purpose to both Gaza and Lebanon, high speed, low level flights to terrorise people.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shingo
10:39 PM on 02/23/2011
Surely no worse that Israeli F-16s dropping cluster bombs on Lebanese children.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
DrObvious
dissatisfied 99%er
08:45 PM on 02/23/2011
that's one pricey boat ride.    hope they took some nice pictures, as Iran's freedom of action may be short-lived, given the lack of legitimacy of their current government
09:16 PM on 02/23/2011
Why? because ~5000 people went to streets for 3 hours, a week ago?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ver1tas
Democracy in America: Pay as you go.
12:04 AM on 02/24/2011
It's obviously because the US says so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ver1tas
Democracy in America: Pay as you go.
12:04 AM on 02/24/2011
Oh & Israel of course too.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shingo
01:09 AM on 02/24/2011
"as Iran's freedom of action may be short-live­d, given the lack of legitimacy of their current government "

You mean the one that won a majority at the last elections?
07:47 PM on 02/23/2011
The magnet is located in Megiddo and it is pulling the steel hulls in that direction.
07:31 PM on 02/23/2011
Just sink them
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HerbTee
Obama in 2012...Liz Warren in 2016.
07:41 PM on 02/23/2011
Why?  What have the ships done militarily towards committing hostile action or intent?  What threat do they pose?  Oh, I get it...they're Iranians so their ships don't deserve to sail within international waters like everyone else, is that right?
07:43 PM on 02/23/2011
I love naval battles. "Sink the Bismark" on the History Channel is one of my favorites.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rubiconski
NOTE: I advocate for anti-BSL...
05:17 PM on 02/23/2011
Get over it.....U don't own this World.