iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Transgender Surgery Covered By Growing Number Of U.S. Companies

LISA LEFF   02/21/11 01:31 PM ET   AP

Transgender Surgery

SAN FRANCISCO — When Gina Duncan decided to undergo the medical treatment that would make her a woman, she had plenty to fear. The reactions of her children, her professional colleagues and friends. How her body would respond to hours on the operating table. If, at the end of it, she would look female enough so strangers wouldn't gawk.

What the Orlando mortgage banker didn't have to be anxious about was how she would pay for two of her surgeries. Her employer of 10 years, Wells Fargo, included breast augmentation and genital reconstruction as coverable expenses under its employee health plan. Duncan was told the San Francisco-based bank already had had 16 other employees transition to new genders and assigned a benefits specialist to walk her through the process.

"They had a template in place, and it was surprisingly supporting and mentally encouraging," said Duncan, 55, who four years later still works for Wells Fargo. "So much of what I'd heard involved people who ended up losing their job, losing their family, losing their friends, becoming destitute."

With little fanfare, more and more large corporations, including Coca-Cola, Campbell Soup and Walt Disney, have expanded their insurance coverage to meet the needs of transgender workers. The trend follows a concerted push by transgender rights advocates to get employers and insurers to see sex reassignment the way the American Medical Association does – as a medically indicated rather than an optional procedure.

"We understand people simply get appendicitis, and it is something our community deals with through insurance," said Andre Wilson, who counsels companies on transgender issues as a senior consultant with San Francisco-based Jamison Green & Associates. "That's what we need to understand about transsexualism. Not everybody will be diagnosed with Gender Identity Disorder, and in fact, few people will be. But the people who are diagnosed with it really need treatment."

Among the corporations providing transgender-inclusive health benefits are some leading Wall Street and Main Street brands.

American Express, Kraft Foods, AT&T, Yahoo!, Eastman Kodak, Sears, Morgan Stanley, Price Waterhouse, General Motors and State Farm are among 85 large businesses and law firms that cover the cost of at least one surgery, according to a 2010 survey by the Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest gay rights group.

The number is expected to spike this year, when HRC adds availability of surgery-inclusive medical benefits for transgender employees or transgender dependents to the criteria in its annual corporate diversity report card.

To maintain the coveted 100 percent rating when the next Corporate Equality Index is published in the fall, companies will have to offer at least one insurance plan that covers at least $75,000 worth of surgery and other treatments recommended by a patient's doctor.

"A lot of people are pretty surprised that alongside the cosmetic and experimental treatments that are excluded from mainstream plans, you can see very broad exclusions related to transgender care," said Deena Fidas, associate director of HRC's Workplace Project. "In raising the bar...we are addressing the root cause of the problem."

Stephanie Battaglino, an assistant vice president at New York Life Insurance, has been working with a senior executive at her company to add transgender health benefits to the employee insurance plan. Battaglino, 52, started her transition five years ago, becoming the first New York Life employee to do so openly. To finance her surgeries, which were on a list of procedures not covered by insurance, she borrowed from her 401(k) account.

"I've often said to friends, `My transition at work went really, really smoothly, and if I had to do it again, the only thing I would change would be if I had my surgery covered,'" she said. "To know it was covered and completely reimbursed would have cast everything in a much different light."

New York Life has been open to the changes and expects to have the expanded coverage in place soon, Battaglino said. But that doesn't mean the learning curve has been easy to negotiate.

The company initially was uncomfortable agreeing to $75,000 of allowable coverage, she said. But she said that concern was alleviated when it was explained that only two or three employees would likely need the benefits.

"The big misconception is we are going to go broke and all these transgender people are going to come out of the woodwork asking for gender reassignment surgery," she said.

Once she was diagnosed and decided to seek treatment two years ago, Sara Schnorr, a partner in the Boston law firm of Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge, "poked around" to see if another firm already paid for sex reassignment as part of its group health insurance.

"When you go to work every day, if you are gay or lesbian, you look no different," Schnorr said. "But if you are transgender, you have to make some pretty big changes to your physical appearance. It's not really like you can be stealth about it."

Schnorr decided to stay with the firm where she had worked for 31 years and to come out to her partners. Before she went on leave for her first surgery, which would feminize her facial features, they agreed to secure a rider to the firm's insurance policy that would allow her to be reimbursed for at least genital reconstruction and breast augmentation.

"I was ecstatic," she said. "For me, this is yet another example of how human this law firm is in wanting to take care of its employees."

Some businesses see covering the cost of transgender surgery as not only an important human resources statement, but good business sense.

"Wells Fargo elected to offer this benefit to be competitive as an employer and also to support our comprehensive corporate commitment to diversity," company spokesman Mary Eshet said.

Joanne Herman, the author of "Transgender Explained For Those Who Are Not," said both corporate America and insurers need to understand that genital surgery is not the be-all and end-all in making a person's appearance match the way he or she feels inside.

For men becoming women, undergoing facial reconstruction may be even more important because it will affect how they are perceived and treated in public, Herman said. The same is true for female-to-male transsexuals and breast surgery. Yet standard insurance plans typically dismiss both as cosmetic, even though people with untreated Gender Identity Disorder are at high risk of suicide and those who get treatment become better workers.

"If you are transsexual, living as anything other than that is a very bleak experience. It's amazing how much happier I am, how much more productive, social and involved I am as Joanne," she said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

SAN FRANCISCO — When Gina Duncan decided to undergo the medical treatment that would make her a woman, she had plenty to fear. The reactions of her children, her professional colleagues and friends.
SAN FRANCISCO — When Gina Duncan decided to undergo the medical treatment that would make her a woman, she had plenty to fear. The reactions of her children, her professional colleagues and friends.
Filed by Meghan Neal  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 143
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pete Webb
07:52 PM on 03/07/2011
It is the just and right thing to do for employees. I applaud the US companies that are standing up for Transgender Rights and Inclusion. Corporate America is leading the way for LGBT Equality!
08:30 PM on 02/23/2011
NewsBusters: Disney Will Pay For Mickey Mouse to Become a Minnie?
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2011/02/23/disney-will-pay-mickey-mouse-become-minnie
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Syrlinus
02:00 PM on 02/23/2011
It's great that companies are including this more and more as part of their corporate health care. It would be better if they covered more but this is a start. One thing that has irked me a bit however as a transsexual male (FTM) is that it's near impossible to find the necessary surgeons to do this that are part of the insurance providers network, so you still pay a huge amount out of pocket (I'm looking at nearly 15k potentially for all of mine).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KDMac
It's called sarcasm, Genius.
01:54 PM on 02/23/2011
Wow, those of us who live with the constant pain of TMJD can't get insurance to cover it ("it's cosmetic" -- yeah, right), yet this is. SMH....
09:22 AM on 02/23/2011
I'm not transgendered, but I have several friends who are. According to them, unfortunately many surgeons performing gender-altering/affirming procedures require payment upfront from the individual, which would later be reimbursed by the insurance company. So the person who commented on how this is wonderful for those with high-paying jobs is right. For example, the Starbucks insurance plan covers these procedures, but a barista making minimum wage doesn't make enough money to cover the upfront costs. Those on the lower rungs of the economic ladder just can't win.

However, I'm glad there is a growing list of companies who choose plans that include these procedures. Everyone deserves to be happy and to have the gender of their body match the one they identify as in their mind. Those commenters who "don't get" transsexualism need only to imagine being forced to live with body parts of your opposite gender when you know good and well which one you are in your mind. Alternatively, go watch "Boys Don't Cry." And then tell me he just wanted "cosmetic surgery."

The T in LGBT is still pretty misunderstood, and I hope the perception and support of the trans community by the general populace will keep making positive strides like that of the L, G, and increasingly B, parts of that acronym.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Syrlinus
02:02 PM on 02/23/2011
Beteter yet, watch "southern Comfort", the documentary about the trans man who was refused medical care and died from something that could be resolved easily 99% of the time if treated.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
padrushka
question authority
04:20 AM on 02/23/2011
Kind of a shame when one considers many cos do not cover regular health issues well. catastrophic coverage might be a priority. Cancer coverage or sex change, is there a box to check for which coverage you would rather choose?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bynddrvn5
My Micro-bio is unwritten...
08:54 PM on 02/22/2011
Fantastic news, companies should try to keep their employees healthy and add perks whenever it makes fiscal sense to do so.

For the most part employees just want to feel that they are valued employees and an added perk here and there - goes a long way towards improving morale.

There are many theories on what causes transsexualism but many studies are now pointing to pre-natal hormones. Not to mention that amount of pain and expense that goes into changing your gender, no one would consider changing their gender without careful thought. Some of the theories: http://www.tsroadmap.com/info/transsexualism-causes.html

Finally, I noticed many comments about the breast augmentation. You are arguing about a procedure that will be obsolete in a few years. With regenerative medicine, fat is removed from your body, the stem cells are separated out, and a mixture of cells is injected into the breasts to grow new breast tissue. Pretty cool new procedure.

This doctor is one of the first to preform this procedure, and he goes over some of the medical trials already in progress:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1BYjB8r9DP4
06:00 PM on 02/22/2011
i wonder if my company's healthplans cover trans surgeries. i'm pretty sure they would have covered my hormones. but i'm post-op already... and it's easy enough to go get a new prescription from a family doctor. i actually was able to set my own dosage because i knew more about it anyways.

i was also able to self-identify as transgender on an employment form that i guess was being used to verify equal opportunity hiring or something. i work for some pretty cool people. :3 i feel very lucky as a transwoman to have the job i do with the people i work with.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
metriks
Hillary 2008, 2012, 2016
05:43 PM on 02/22/2011
Ok, I'm sure I'll be stomped on for this, so let me suggest that I am Liberal with an "L" so tall there are lights on it to avoid airplane collisions. I just don't get how this is rational. My reasoning: presently the need/desire/belief - whatever - that leads folks to consider they are in an inappropriate body is thought to be a disorder (psychological dysfunction) that should therefore be addressed. However remember that not so long ago the DSM considered G&L as dysfunctional too... now they do not. I have no problem with anyone electing the surgery. If it helps create a better life/person - awesome. But should I pay for it? If I were in need of counseling, I would only get 20 visits per year, and I have "Cadillac" insurance. If I needed long-term care for psychiatric reasons, my insurance would not cover it and given crackdowns on disability, my guess is I'd pay for it. Most states have constitutionally or otherwise made G&L marriage illegal and DP benefits, on the rare occasions they are offered, are subject to federal/state/local taxes. Seems to me that some of these basic human rights need to be addressed first.

So...always one with the open mind, can someone please explain why this is something I should pay for through general premiums when other rights are still illegal?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dmherb
I don't even know how to read...so...yeah
01:41 AM on 02/23/2011
You can simultaneously attain rights for one group and continue to fight for rights of other groups. We're just not very good at it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
metriks
Hillary 2008, 2012, 2016
09:46 PM on 02/26/2011
Very true, and I believe health care is a right in society. The question becomes then is this considered health care or elective surgery? It is unclear to me what this represents. But if private companies wish to include it, then it's fine by me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
libwingoflibwing
Leftist, Christian, Non-Violent Revolutionary
10:33 PM on 03/05/2011
Because no matter how many rights you have, as a Gay or Lesbian person you can BE a Gay or Lesbian person and love the person you love. Your basic nature is not denied.

But as a Transsexual woman who can't afford surgery I am denied my most basic right to be myself. There is no question this is a medical need I have. But insurance doesn't cover it.

As far as you paying for it. Don't you realize this if every insurance program included this the increase in your premium would be at most a few cents? Aren't you willing to pay a few extra cents in your premium so people like me can actually be ourselves?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bahne
04:24 PM on 02/22/2011
I don't understand why companies are covering plastic surgery of any kind. I sorta understand maybe someone who was disfigured somehow due to fire or some other kind of accident, but transgender and breast augmentation are head scratchers.
10:29 PM on 02/23/2011
Why do you think having a scarified face is grounds for plastic surgery, but somehow having the wrong genitalia is not?
03:49 PM on 02/22/2011
In 1974 I was umarried and pregnant, my insurance would not cover me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dmherb
I don't even know how to read...so...yeah
02:30 AM on 02/23/2011
Lots of things were different 37 years ago.
photo
FTracy3
My micro-bio is as empty as the rest of my life.
01:17 PM on 02/22/2011
Is there a lifetime cap or can you change back if you want?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dmherb
I don't even know how to read...so...yeah
03:39 PM on 02/22/2011
Really?

inb4 do moar research etc.
12:52 PM on 02/22/2011
These cosmetic surgical procedures are covered in England by the National Health Service. They also cover the procedures of all the people that want to change back.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2004/jul/30/health.mentalhealth
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OkieIntellectual
So tired of all the irrational idiots in the world
06:11 PM on 02/22/2011
That's cute, trying to stir up controversy by deliberately referring to the procedures as "cosmetic." I mean, who cares that almost every major medical and psychological professional group in the world agrees that they are medically necessary rather than simply elective cosmetic procedures. Oh no, dn't let facts get in the way of your bigotry and ignorance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dmherb
I don't even know how to read...so...yeah
01:42 AM on 02/23/2011
f&f 144
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sociologyst
12:06 PM on 02/22/2011
This is great news. Small steps like this can make a big difference. Sometimes big companies can actually stand up for the little guy.
11:35 AM on 02/22/2011
As to this causing insurance costs to increase, it has already been shown that these costs are negligable due to the small percentage of people requiring it. As to the $75000 cap, some people are looking at costs of transitioning from male to female. Those costs are completely different than someone transitioning from female to male.

To compare these procedures which the AMA refers to as needed and not cosmetic to abortions simply shows the bigotry of that individual Surgical intervention is needed and the condition is generally accepted to be a congenital condition. Failure to correct, in most cases will lead to deep depression and in some cases suicide (again: to correct tis congenital condition)