More

Facebook Responds To FTC's Privacy Plans

Facebook Privacy Ftc

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 02/23/11 05:27 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:35 PM ET

In its 29-page response to the Federal Trade Commission's proposal for protecting privacy online, Facebook offered one of the most comprehensive looks to date at its stance on privacy and how the company believes the issue will -- and should -- evolve.

While acknowledging that government regulation ought to play a role in safeguarding user information on the Internet, Facebook argued in the response that web companies should be principally self-regulated so as not to stifle innovation. The company said it agreed with the FTC that greater transparency and the option of "context-sensitive privacy protections," or what the FTC had called "privacy by design," were important, but stressed the importance of taking into account individuals' evolving perceptions of privacy.

The Facebook comment argued that the company is obliged by user demand to respect individual privacy. "For Facebook -- like most other online service providers -- getting this balance right is a matter of survival," wrote Michael Richter, Facebook's chief privacy counsel, in the comment. "If Facebook fails to protect the privacy of its users adequately, those users will lose trust in Facebook and will stop using the service."

But Facebook has a long history of inciting user outrage about perceived privacy violations.

Over the past several years, Facebook has repeatedly been the target of criticism when it has instituted privacy policies that make users uncomfortable and which members fear will threaten their personal information.

It has, at times, been tone deaf in recognizing members' privacy expectations. For example, scores of users threatened to quit Facebook after the site unveiled new privacy policies that would enable the social network to collect information on all the Facebook-connected web pages users visited while logged into Facebook.

Facebook spun previous user outcry against its privacy policies into evidence that it has been responsive in "self-correct[ing]" and adjusting to users feedback. Its willingness to change course when confronted with criticism should help the FTC to see that "private-sector efforts are particularly well suited for solving privacy-related problems on the Internet," Facebook argued.

"Facebook's efforts to engage with its users on changes to its privacy policy or information sharing practices are virtually unparalleled in the industry," the company statement said. "We are the only major online service provider that allows users to vote on the changes if comments reach a pre-set threshold ... Time and again, Facebook has shown itself capable of correcting course in response to user feedback and thereby continuing to build trust."

Read the full text of Facebook's comments to the FTC here or below. What do you make of their response?

Facebook emphasized the need to take into account "the way users' expectations shift over time." Have your privacy expectations changed?

Facebook Comments: Preliminary FTC Staff Report on Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

In its 29-page response to the Federal Trade Commission's proposal for protecting privacy online, Facebook offered one of the most comprehensive looks to date at its stance on privacy and how the comp...
In its 29-page response to the Federal Trade Commission's proposal for protecting privacy online, Facebook offered one of the most comprehensive looks to date at its stance on privacy and how the comp...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 50
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ellexmarie
12:53 AM on 02/25/2011
Facebook is truly disgusting, and unfortunately it is so popular that it is difficult to stay in contact with certain people or organizations without using it. I am strongly opposed to Facebook's decision (maybe about a year ago now?) to remove the user's ability to control what information is broadcast in friends' news feeds. If you like a page, your friends get a notification. Leave a comment on a photo, they get another notification. It's ridiculous and does not foster "connections" - it just violates people's privacy and spams them with friends' information that the friend didn't want to broadcast in the first place. Now I remember why I deleted my first Facebook account. I may just have to do the same with my current one and not be as connected to my friends who aren't local to me and don't use email much.
photo
constitutional 1
No ad hominem
04:17 PM on 02/24/2011
In 1994 the FBI decided it needed a surveillance system built into the telephone network to enable it to listen to any conversation with the flip of a switch. Congress obliged by passing the Communication Assistance to Law Enforcement Act (CALEA), forcing the telecoms to rebuild their networks to be "wiretap ready." Seventeen years later, law enforcement is asking to expand CALEA to include the Internet, claiming that its investigative abilities are "going dark" because people are increasingly communicating online.

The parameters of this proposal are very unclear, but some scary ideas have been bandied around.

Expanding CALEA would force companies to re-engineer all of their communications software to have a surveillance back door that could be easily accessed by law enforcement. This back door would apply to every form of peer-to-peer communication; from email, to social networking, to video games. The government would have to get a search warrant to utilize the back door, but imagine a world where the government required every home to be built with cameras and microphones pre-installed. Even knowing they could only be "tapped" after probable cause was established, how comfortable would you be?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:35 AM on 02/24/2011
Facebook continues to be an example of the corporate mentality that says if you have information, and you give it to us, and we can make money from it, then we will find a way to do it. The "Social Network" points our very clearly that the power of Facebook is really is the titillating effect we feel when we know something about someone else that we were perhaps not supposed to know or that was difficult to obtain.
photo
Lahonda
Bynocent Instander
07:51 AM on 02/24/2011
No... good ol' regular privacy is more appropriate than "Facebook privacy." This is ridiculous.
04:34 AM on 02/24/2011
I hate the security on facebook, somebody hacked into mine and stole loads of my stuff. so i got rid of it and never going to get another one.

http://talkinggadget.blogspot.com/
12:12 AM on 02/24/2011
Zuckerbergs monster
Eats privacy for dinner
Digests minutiae

Basho
11:25 PM on 02/23/2011
Ya and could you turn of the security camera's when I rob the bank.
08:31 PM on 02/23/2011
Open a FaceBook account...fill it with all sorts of bogus ga/rbage...then close it.

Open another faceBook account, fill it with all sorts of bogus nonsense...then close it

Open another faceBook account...fill it with bogus c/rap...then close it

Etc.
11:24 PM on 02/23/2011
That is a brilliant idea. Fight fire with fire, LOL.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:31 PM on 02/23/2011
i'll tell you one thing, they published everyone's phone number. if you go under edit friends and click phonebook. voila!

of course this isn't a problem for those who choose their "real" friends. theres the wackos with people they don't know just so it can appear they have friends lol. they should be worried.
08:26 PM on 02/23/2011
Why is this we/asel`s picture on hp every day ?
photo
Lahonda
Bynocent Instander
07:52 AM on 02/24/2011
He's "special."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ICanHasDemocracy
11:17 AM on 02/24/2011
He's a thief and a liar, and a rich one at that. A very anti-social person who created a social network site. Irony.
08:25 PM on 02/23/2011
See the movie "The Social Network!" You facebookers will be scared when you realize EVERYTHING you type is being looked at by him. Look at why he created it. Are facebookers so lonely that they need to brag about their personal lives for everyone to see. I deleted my facebook account. I only registered it and hardly ever went on it. Saw this movie and DELETED the account right away. Tried for about 15 minutes to get rid of it but it would only let me get rid of it if I EXPLAINED why I didn't want it. I'm going back to email. At least then I can choose who I want to read my stuff. Do yourself a favor and see the movie. It is really good!!!!!
08:20 PM on 02/23/2011
I quit facebook because they have no right to own my identity and personal data.
07:49 PM on 02/23/2011
I say everyone create multiple accounts for your name, all with varying information. this way facebook can be as information rich and disambiquated as Wikipedia
07:32 PM on 02/23/2011
Dude really needs to get some sun...
07:27 PM on 02/23/2011
FIX.com, privacy by default. No 3rd parties.. But you need an invite to join... :(