More

Maryland Senate Votes To Approve Gay Marriage Rights

TOM LoBIANCO   02/24/11 09:14 PM ET   AP

ANNAPOLIS, Md. — Same-sex couples in Maryland would have the same full marriage rights as heterosexuals under a bill that cleared the Senate Thursday. If the House of Delegates approves it and the governor signs it, Maryland would be the sixth U.S. state to approve gay marriage.

Opponents, including Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller, D-Calvert, promised that if it does become law that a referendum question would be on the 2012 ballot so voters have the final decision.

One Republican, Sen. Allan Kittleman of Howard, joined 24 Democrats to pass the bill with 21 opposing. A majority of 24 of 47 senators was needed.

Senators amended the bill to include protections for religious groups and institutions to keep them from being forced to participate in gay weddings. The bill would grant the same title and rights to same-sex couples as married straight couples.

If the measure passes the House, Democratic Gov. Martin O'Malley has said he would sign it into law.

Activists watching from the balcony cheered after the Senate voted.

Lisa Polyak, who lost a legal challenge to the Maryland law which defines marriage as between one man and one woman, wiped away tears from her eyes and hugged supporters, including First Lady Katie O'Malley.

"It's only halfway, we have another chamber that we have to work through, we have another hearing to go through tomorrow, and a whole other group of legislators to motivate, hopefully, to treat our families equally," said Polyak, who challenged the state's marriage law with her partner but lost an appeal before the state's highest court in 2007.

The Senate debate Thursday – while hardly vitriolic or heated – was still deeply personal.

The Senate's only openly gay member, Sen. Richard Madaleno, D-Montgomery, told his colleagues that his partner – whom he married 10 years ago – is still a "legal stranger" to him in Maryland.

"This bill is quite simple, it has two parts to it: It reiterates that no religious denomination will ever be required to recognize, perform or celebrate any marriage that is against its beliefs. At the same time, it provides full equality under the law for thousands of same-gender couples in our state, couples like Mark and myself," Madaleno said.

Hawaii approved civil unions for same-sex couples Wednesday, the same day the Obama administration told Congress it would stop opposing legal challenges to the federal law that defines marriage as being between one man and one woman. Illinois legalized civil unions for same-sex couples last month.

Opponents were almost evenly divided between Republican and Democratic Maryland senators.

Kittleman, the lone Republican to vote in favor of the bill, recalled his father's work with the black community during the civil rights movement. Kittleman, who is white, said his father would invite leaders from the NAACP and other civil rights groups to his house when he was growing up in the 1960s.

"We lived in a very white neighborhood, and we'd have the leaders of the African American community coming to our house talking and I would go to my neighbors' later, I'd go see my friends and their parents would come to me and say 'Allan, why do all those black people come to your house?'" Kittleman said.

Granting full marriage rights to same-sex couples might not be the same as the civil rights movement, Kittleman said, but "it's the right thing to do."

But Sen. Joanne Benson said her father – who was a "civil rights warrior" and a friend of Kittleman's father – taught her that marriage can only be between one man and woman.

"My father often talked to us about the importance of marriage," said Benson, D-Prince George's. "One thing he said to us was you get married because one of the most important reasons for marriage is to have children."

Benson was absent during the vote.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
ANNAPOLIS, Md. — Same-sex couples in Maryland would have the same full marriage rights as heterosexuals under a bill that cleared the Senate Thursday. If the House of Delegates approves it and t...
ANNAPOLIS, Md. — Same-sex couples in Maryland would have the same full marriage rights as heterosexuals under a bill that cleared the Senate Thursday. If the House of Delegates approves it and t...
Filed by Adam Goldberg  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 748
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (16 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joelb5000
01:31 PM on 03/01/2011
People get married because they love each other--not too have children. The amazing thing about nature is you can have children whether or not you're married. And, getting married doesn't make the impotent able to have children.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dan Jighter
06:57 PM on 02/27/2011
As a former Maryland resident, I am very proud of my state. Good for the Maryland state government for recognizing gay rights with this vote.

As a current California resident, be vigilant against the Mormons and other like-minded groups. So whatever you need to do to stop them.
10:12 AM on 02/27/2011
Now if only they can get Indiana to follow suit:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdxL9sbiMb0
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Married Gay Pagan Man
05:25 PM on 02/27/2011
Good luck with that bunch of haters. I have lived both there and Arizona and it will be a race to see which one accepts marriage equality last.
09:25 AM on 02/27/2011
The same sex marriage rhetoric is, once again, vapid at best, relying only on emotion rather than emotion and rational thought. Supporting marriage and the need of children to have a mother and a father is not the same as preventing homosexuals the opportunity to love one another.Our desire to love adults who want to live a certain way must be measured against our responsibility to love the children who are being raised in our society. We simply cannot further jeopardize a very large subset of our society in order to demonstrate our love and support for a tiny minority within our society.

I hope the people of Maryland will take the opportunity to vote on this issue, since the citizens of Washington, D.C. were not allowed that right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Married Gay Pagan Man
05:27 PM on 02/27/2011
No I hope the Supreme Court settles this once and for all: no one should be allowed to vote on the civil rights of others. And what a laugh--protect mothers and children. Is that why there are all those deadbeat dads out there? Is that why heterosexuals to the tune of 50% divorce?
Try enforcing laws already on the books before whining about giving people a right that isn't yours to give in the first place!!
09:55 AM on 02/28/2011
I do agree with that more could be done to support a healthy marriage culture. One commenter mentioned a tax deduction for marriage counseling, etc. I hope such aid would be implemented immediately.

We both agree that marriage has been weakened. If marriage has been weakened by liberalized divorce laws, does it make sense to weaken it further by liberalizing marriage laws?

And we all share the same marital rights and restrictions. There is no legal inequality. Even Judge Walker made that clear on the issue of Prop. 8. Only an inequality in one of the qualifications of marriage exists, in Walker's decision, which was the relevant issue of the sexes of the partners.
photo
WheelsOnFire
Fiercely Independent
06:31 PM on 02/27/2011
So, JeremiahA, which of your rights are you willing to put before voters?

Here's a simple fact that you probably missed in your high school civics class -- in this country, citizens do not have the right to vote away the rights of others.

Put another way, do you really think it is possible to put before voters the rights of blacks in this country? Can voters bring back segregation? No. That's because it has been decided that segregation is unconstitutional.

As for children needing a "mother and a father", to be brought up properly, that's the very "emotion rather than rational thought" argument you dismissed at the start of your note (thus, it is hypocritical). Moreover, that's a romantic notion that is undone by the facts. Here are two such facts to consider. Most marriages end in divorce, so most children do not grow up with a mother and a father. Second fact -- an 18-year study of children adopted and raised in gay households actually found that such children grew up better than children in straight households. They were better adjusted and had fewer of the negative attributes found in children raised in straight households. So, the facts do not support your romanticized notions at all. In fact, they contradict them.

So, what excuse will you not try to denigrate and deny equal rights to gays?
10:43 AM on 02/28/2011
What right is being denied by a vote? Certainly not marriage since sexual orientation is not a qualifier for a marriage license. The marriage licensing law applies to each citizen in the same way; everyone is treated exactly alike. If you have a desire to have a new right (a "positive right") to marry someone of the same sex, then the intellectually honest step would be to demonstrate why the other qualifications--age, number of partners, familial relationship, etc.--are unconstitutional while your desire should be recognized as a new right.

Most marriages do not end in divorce. The approximate average rate is 41%-50%, but we would probably would both agree that more needs to be done about this problem.

Since every other study, even those produce by pro-same sex marriage activists, point to a father and a mother providing the best environment for a child, would you please relate the title, year, and name of researchers of the study you are referring to? Someone here once mentioned such a study before but could not provide any other information.

Concerning your last question, homosexual couples have the same rights and privileges as every other pair of unmarried citizens who have deep, loving commitments to each other.

Lastly, I sympathize that this is a very emotional issue for you so I will let you have the last word, if you choose to respond.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Married Gay Pagan Man
04:46 PM on 02/28/2011
Notice that it is only "emotion rather than rational thought" when it involves marriage equality. Children are not necessary to marriage and an opposite sex couple is not necessary to raise a child. I know I probably would have done way better had I had lesbian oe gay parents...I might not have had to spend a lifetime learning to accept myself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Canadian on the border
10:35 PM on 02/26/2011
lol at the quotes from the D-senators at the bottom. Clearly thse people had idiotic fathers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Married Gay Pagan Man
05:29 PM on 02/26/2011
This is good news! Let's hope the haters don't start their "It's not fair...waaaaaah...we want to vote on it...waaaaah!" crap. The bill was passed fairly and squarely and does not deny any their constitutional rights. Nice to see it happen.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:21 PM on 02/26/2011
FINALLY. Maryland "the Free State" has been a little slow to get this accomplished. It will be delayed by the petition to put it on the 2012 ballot but will probably prevail. Why can't this country move beyond the personal decisions of it's citizens and respect the true separation of religion and government? I am really tired of seeing my tax dollars supporting the battles for legislating the religious views of some of the citizens. Everybody gets a civil union recognized by the government both federal and state. It's a contract and should function like a contract. When you get divorced, it's a contract. But if you choose to have a marriage - go see a religious/private entity and have at it. Currently, it's a muddled mess. It just means another distraction from our desparate need to focus on moving the economy forward with real jobs that will steady the middle class. Without a strong middle class, we have no economy and that's a the scary thought not what consenting adults wish to persue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Married Gay Pagan Man
05:32 PM on 02/26/2011
Fanned and faved. I am tired of the religious views of some of the citizenry wanting to inform public -laws. If someone doesn't like same-sex marriage, then don't get involved in one, attend a same-sex marriage....whatever.Yes, haters out there, it really is that simple.

Why is this on the ballot at all. How about we vote on the haters' rights?
08:54 AM on 02/27/2011
Uhh....if your religion beliefs put you in a position to not agree with gay marriage it doesn't make you a "hater". Thats categorically absurd, vitriolic, and uninformed. It's really not that simple. This is obviously an issue that is hard for many communities and divides many families. Your one dimensional overly simplified "mac n' cheese" explanation undermines both the feelings and concerns of people on both sides of the issue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
karaokekoncerts
08:25 AM on 02/26/2011
Senate - we are proud of you. It was a tough decision, but equality MUST win out in the end of America is keep moving closer and closer to a democracy. As I watched the Senate vote unfold, all I could think of was this part of the Maryland state song and how much it should belong to this movement:

"Hark to an exiled son's appeal, Maryland!
My mother State! to thee I kneel, Maryland!
For life and death, for woe and weal,
Thy peerless chivalry reveal,
And gird thy beauteous limbs with steel,
Maryland! My Maryland!"

Yes, Maryland DOES belong to all of us, and all of us - regardless of race, religion, orientation, creed or color - are entitled to the exact same rights and privilages.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ricky Barnes
10:36 PM on 02/25/2011
Anything, like this decision, that serves to increase the level of gross domestic happiness is of far more value than a million new babies. The U.S. seems continually on the brink of civil war these days. Who wants to bring a child into that environment? Better to back away from that edge BEFORE creating new unhappy and reckless human beings to add to the briar patch.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Married Gay Pagan Man
05:33 PM on 02/26/2011
Fanned and faved. AMEN! Why do some people seem to think that happiness is such a bad thing?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LittleMs Random
Liberal. I love Drag Queens. English Citizen.
08:47 PM on 02/25/2011
Yay! This makes me so happy!
07:18 PM on 02/25/2011
As a happily married gay man who managed to get hitched in California (one of some 15,000 couples) I say cheers - onward and upward!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Married Gay Pagan Man
05:30 PM on 02/27/2011
As a happily married gay man who married in Canada, I agree. Fanned and fave.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rsheeran
Beware them both, and all of their degree
06:21 PM on 02/25/2011
Woooo Hoooo! Keep it coming States. It's the right thing to do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnLorenzo
Examine the reasons of your true intent.
06:21 PM on 02/25/2011
It's time, it's time, it's time. The House should do what is morally correct and pass the bill allowing same-sex marriage. This charade has gone on long enough. The injustice must come to an end everywhere.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Angie Tyne 1
I want my disagree button!!
05:52 PM on 02/25/2011
"My father often talked to us about the importance of marriage," said Benson, D-Prince George's. "One thing he said to us was you get married because one of the most important reasons for marriage is to have children."

Yes, because old people and infertile couples never get married.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chester Erickson
(R) moderate
06:49 PM on 02/25/2011
I think it's quite possible that some homosexual couples want to get married so they can have a family and children too... they just need to use alternative methods of acquiring the kids that some heterosexuals have been using for ages.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
EmmaDarian
All in all, I'm loving every rise and fall (RHCP)
08:07 PM on 02/25/2011
I like the following quotation:

"I believe that adopting same-sex marriage would be likely to improve the well-being of gay and lesbian households and their children."

More that the content, with which I agree, I love that the man who said it was David Blankenhorn and he said it while testifying in DEFENSE of Prop 8. Even their own expert witnesses couldn't argue against marriage equality.

Crossing my fingers for Maryland. Whatever happens, it's going to be a long, hard fight, but one well worth it, because in the end, equality will win out.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Angie Tyne 1
I want my disagree button!!
11:45 AM on 02/28/2011
Exactly. I had someone comment on another thread that children would be 'bred' for SS couples as an argument against allowing them to marry. Weird. Like hetero couples don't somehow do the same thing?

Also, that hetero adoptive parents would not be blocked from adopting because all the SS would somehow snap up all the available kids. The poster wanted all kids to be raised by hetero parents. What a shame if all the kids in orphanages and foster care would have a loving home to grow up in, right?

People will come up with some doozies to justify their prejudice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bill J4321
04:56 PM on 02/25/2011
This is a great step. But the National Organization for (Heterosexual only) Marriage will certainly pour millions and millions of catholic dollars into a referendum which will repeal this.

And the voters will indeed vote to repeal it. Even though they have absolutely no authority at all to be voting on the rights afforded to fellow human beings. Haven't we seen this a time or TEN???? Ultimately, the upcoming referendum fight will cost gay organizations MILLIONS of dollars that could have been better spent filing a lawsuit in Maryland. This is how matter of rights are handled. They aren't to be voted on. They belong to each and every individual. LGBT Americans have been made an exemption to this. And only the courts can remedy it. Otherwise, we will have changing civil rights with each and every election. RIghts 'given' followed by rights 'taken.' And that is simply not how these matters are handled for ANY OTHER CITIZENS.

This is why LGBT citizens will never have equal rights until the Supreme Court mandates it. No matter what type of legislation is passed.

Only the courts can secure our rights.
01:12 AM on 02/26/2011
I don't share your pessimism. Maryland is a very blue state. I grew up there and I am honestly surprised it took this long to have this passed. The right wingers will waste their money there for sure, but I think the people of MD will vote yes. All we can do is cross our fingers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bill J4321
05:00 PM on 02/26/2011
But that was my whole point, Kelly.

People should not have to stand around and 'cross thier fingers' for their civil rights as tax-paying Americans. They are guaranteed to every citizen. No finger-crossing is required.

Jeez.