iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Coral Reefs May Be Gone By 2050: Study

Coral Reef

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 02/25/11 08:37 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:35 PM ET

A recent study has found that all of the world's coral reefs could be gone by 2050. If lost, 500 million people's livelihoods worldwide would be threatened.

The World Resources Institute report, "Reefs at Risk Revisited," suggests that by 2030, over 90 percent of coral reefs will be threatened. If action isn't taken soon, nearly all reefs will be threatened by 2050. Jane Lubchenco, administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration states, "Threats on land, along the coast and in the water are converging in a perfect storm of threats to reefs."

The AFP suggests that these threats include overfishing, coastal development, pollution, and climate change. Warming sea temperatures lead to coral bleaching, a stress response where corals expose their white skeletons. In 2005, the Caribbean saw the most extensive coral bleaching event ever recorded, often attributed to rising ocean temperatures. CO2 emissions are also making the oceans more acidic. Because of the rising acidity levels, some scientists claim we will see conditions not witnessed since the period of dinosaurs.

Lauretta Burke, one of the report's lead authors, feels that quick action could help save the reefs. She encourages policymakers to reduce overfishing and cut greenhouse gas emissions. If action is not taken though, millions of people will suffer. Shorelines will lose protection from storms -- a Time Magazine post suggests that up to 90 percent of the energy from wind generated waves is absorbed by reef ecosystems. If reefs are lost, coastal communities will lose a source of food security and tourism.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

A recent study has found that all of the world's coral reefs could be gone by 2050. If lost, 500 million people's livelihoods worldwide would be threatened. The World Resources Institute report...
A recent study has found that all of the world's coral reefs could be gone by 2050. If lost, 500 million people's livelihoods worldwide would be threatened. The World Resources Institute report...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 626
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dragonmaster
08:31 AM on 04/10/2011
CO2 levels at 650ppm by 2050 should decimate coral reefs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
maidenofdforest
Eclectic Ket
11:52 AM on 04/04/2011
I sure hope not! This suggestion simply makes me cringe. *Sigh.*
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeyJaii
Free $$ For Everyone.
09:02 PM on 03/31/2011
The coral reef is really important rather you think so or not. It WILL AFFECT us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
10:15 AM on 03/30/2011
This headline is a patent absurdity. What they mean to say is that most coral reef ecosystems will be greatly affected. Coral will move both north and south, and re-establish itself in new areas. Coral has survived many catastrophic extinction events, and will continue to do so. What is at issue is whether reef ecosystems will remain intact over the nex few centuries, and whether communities that rely on them will be able to continue to do so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeWebster
Always happy.
10:51 PM on 04/19/2011
Certainly the existing coral reefs are going to die, and coral will need to migrate, perhaps even down in the water column. In the mean time, as you say, the extremely diverse and important ecosystems around existing coral reefs will be decimated.
03:19 AM on 03/03/2011
meanwhile back in the real world,
sea surface temperature has cooled over the past decade.
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadsst2gl/from:2001/to:2012/plot/hadsst2gl/from:2001/to:2012/trend
ubrew12
that crazy uncle from Amarcord
04:35 PM on 03/26/2011
cherry pick. Oceans have been warming for 40 years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
10:15 AM on 03/30/2011
Not in the least.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jasmine Tokuda
02:06 PM on 03/01/2011
I used to live in the Caribbean back in the 1980's. David Rockefeller was spending big $$$ for the study of coral reefs on the Island of St. John. to find out why they were dying. This problem was evident back then which makes this news all the more heartbreaking. As long as Dominionist religious fundamentalists keep getting elected, they will support industry in polluting to help bring their "Messiah" a little sooner. What can "WE" do? Learn how to lighten our individual carbon footprints. If enough of us change our behavior, we can help change the outcomes. You don't have to go vegan, but making animal protein a less prominent part of your diet, and walking, biking, and using public transit can help, as well as improving your individual health outcome.
photo
tooncesrocks
my micro bio is empty
08:29 AM on 03/01/2011
I think we're going to do it... we are actually going to do it...

...we will just keep going on until we destroy ourselves...
the forces of money and greed overpower everything...

p.s. a special thank you to Obama for letting energy & petrochemical companies exempt themselves from the clean water act. Way to go OBAMA!!!! YEAH BABY!!! Thanks for that!
photo
Cory111
Life is truly good...
08:51 AM on 03/01/2011
Your posts seem to be coming from a rather young person. I also note a bit of unjustified anger. We sit in the comforts of our homes with a full belly, nice and warm and complain. Like many out here there is a lot of “they are doing this” rather then what you are doing. We are the consumers that use the products manufactured by the companies you are complaining about. It’s like blaming the Cartels for selling us drugs rather then talking about the consumers.
Tell us about your “personal” efforts to help out. I’ve gone back over many of your previous posts and there is nothing that tells me you are “physically” contributing anything but who knows.
By the way, Obama will be reelected.
photo
tooncesrocks
my micro bio is empty
08:20 AM on 03/01/2011
"A recent study has found that all of the world's coral reefs could be gone by 2050. If lost, 500 million people's livelihoods worldwide would be threatened."

...let's change that to: "if lost, humans will have officially proven that the do not deserve a place on the planet earth"
03:45 PM on 02/28/2011
This is horrible! For more info on how you can reduce the impact of urbanization on our ecosystems, take a look at this video http://ecomobility.tv/2011/02/28/reducin-impact-urbanization-biodiversity/
photo
MadAs
Tuned-in science editor
12:58 AM on 02/28/2011
In keeping with tonight's Oscars, which Bit_h gets your worst-dressed vote?

Mine: Mother Earth along with her visionless, suicidal designer, Homosapiens.
photo
BluePhantom2
The Blacksmith & the Artist reflected in their art
08:48 PM on 02/27/2011
Amazing that these folks were abe to look at all the reefs in the world identify that they were shrinking and determine a date range for destruction. Wonder if they took into account that reefs grow and that there are on and off seasone for their growth. Or is this just good selling points for their particular agenda?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chrisd3
Excelsior!
10:10 PM on 02/27/2011
I believe it is likely that the scientists who studied this are aware of any seasonal patterns. They're probably also aware that's it's often dark at night and light during the day.
photo
MadAs
Tuned-in science editor
01:27 AM on 02/28/2011
You gotta give ol Blue a break, he comes from the arctic circle where the dark-light photoperiod does not create a feeling of stability.

Just ask Blue about sea ice and coral and he'll get confused: "Sea ice? What sea ice? And Alaskan coral is doing just fine below 90 feet."
photo
MadAs
Tuned-in science editor
01:18 AM on 02/28/2011
And deer populations grow -- google up the Kaibab deer story or maybe why the passenger pigeon became extinct or more broadly why species that cannot move are especially vulnerable to an environment they cannot move from.

But to me what is most amazing is that "folks [such as yourself] were able to look at all the reefs in the world and identify" that there is no problem there at all, "just [as] good selling points for [your] particular agenda" -- dollas, dollas and mo dollas and to h_ll with my kids and yours.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AdamWest1313
Hardcore Agnostic
03:39 AM on 02/28/2011
And they didn't even need to go through years of education to do so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AdamWest1313
Hardcore Agnostic
03:39 AM on 02/28/2011
That comment is supposed to be agreeing with you btw lol.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tribilin219
A Proud progressive, and for the Green party,one o
08:00 PM on 02/27/2011
They'll be gone sooner then that if the Republicans have their way!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FernandoRuiz
02:58 PM on 02/27/2011
Totally irrelevant but I thought it was interesting. A GOP inquiry started by notorious anti-science Senator James Inhofe finds no evidence that climate scientists misused data. Once again, Republicans are WRONG and they persist in delusions:

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/02/25/gop-inquiry-produces-no-evidence-that-climate-scientists-misused-data/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeWebster
Always happy.
10:57 PM on 04/19/2011
And let us not forget the Wegman report that he commisioned against the Michael Mann hockey stick, which has now been shown to be plagiarised. The fact that it was a valueless political hack job was already obvious, given it's disagreement with the multiple other independant temperature reconstructions which despite using different methodologies and data sources, all came up with a hockey stick.
photo
Toddynho
I needs proof read more!
01:21 PM on 02/27/2011
" If lost, 500 million people's livelihoods worldwide would be threatened."

Well, forgive me for being a tad insensitive, but people losing their " livelihoods" isn't as important to me as losing an ecosystem. You can retrain for another job, replacing ecosystems is a tad more problematic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oxjr
07:50 PM on 02/27/2011
I think by livelihoods they mean fishing and by fishing they mean food - so that 500 million affected are part of the ecosystem.
photo
Toddynho
I needs proof read more!
05:36 AM on 02/28/2011
Although I do understand what you are getting at, I'm not a big fan of this ilk of ideation. They're giving coral reefs human value only, when in fact I'm not really concerned about that human value. Whether we eat fish or not or others make a living from catching and selling fish is of little importance in the greater "ecological" scheme of things. I understand that to get through to some people about the importance of specific areas we need to apply an anthropocentric or a utilitarian criteria, but it's a faulty system given we need to see these things in their own intrinsic value and not simply their worth to us, and " the economy" .

Certainly, the argument can be made that now workers are artificially part of certain ecosystem, but I find this argument rather specious and the sooner we rid ourselves of this philosophy of " only that which benefits us has value", the better for our environment.
photo
tooncesrocks
my micro bio is empty
08:25 AM on 03/01/2011
no... people are not part of any ecosystem anymore...

they exploit ecoxystems... and when you eat an orange grown on another continent... tell me how you are "part" of an ecosystem.