More

Iran Forced To Unload Fuel From Nuclear Facility

ALI AKBAR DAREINI   02/26/11 08:04 PM ET   AP

Nuclear Iran

TEHRAN, Iran — In a major setback to Iran's nuclear program, technicians will have to unload fuel from the country's first atomic power plant because of an unspecified safety concern, a senior government official said.

The vague explanation raised questions about whether the mysterious computer worm known as Stuxnet might have caused more damage at the Bushehr plant than previously acknowledged. Other explanations are possible for unloading the fuel rods from the reactor core of the newly completed plant, including routine technical difficulties.

While the exact reason behind the fuel's removal is unclear, the admission is seen as a major embarrassment for Tehran because it has touted Bushehr – Iran's first atomic power plant – as its showcase nuclear facility and sees it as a source of national pride. When the Islamic Republic began loading the fuel just four months ago, Iranian officials celebrated the achievement.

Iran's envoy to the U.N. nuclear monitoring agency in Vienna said that Russia, which provided the fuel and helped construct the Bushehr plant, had demanded the fuel be taken out.

"Upon a demand from Russia, which is responsible for completing the Bushehr nuclear power plant, fuel assemblies from the core of the reactor will be unloaded for a period of time to carry out tests and take technical measurements," the semiofficial ISNA news agency quoted Ali Asghar Soltanieh as saying. "After the tests are conducted, (the fuel) will be placed in the core of the reactor once again."

"Iran always gives priority to the safety of the plant based on highest global standards," Soltanieh added.

Calls to the Russian nuclear agency Rosatom for comment were not answered Saturday afternoon.

The spokesman of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran said the fuel unloading was nothing unusual.

"It's a kind of technical inspection and to obtain confidence about the safety of the reactor," Hamid Khadem Qaemi told the official IRNA news agency. He accused foreign media of blowing the issue out of proportion.

The Bushehr plant is not among the aspects of Iran's nuclear program that are of top concern to the international community and is not directly subject to sanctions. It has international approval and is supervised by the U.N.'s nuclear monitoring agency, the International Atomic Energy Agency.

In a report released Friday about Iran's nuclear program, the IAEA said that Tehran informed the agency on Wednesday that it would have to unload the fuel rods. The agency said it and Tehran have agreed on the "necessary safeguards measures."

A senior international official familiar with Iran's nuclear program said the IAEA had no further details. He said unloading and reloading fuel assemblies is not unusual before any reactor startup. The official asked for anonymity because his information was confidential.

Soltanieh and other officials have not specified why the fuel had to be unloaded, but Iranian officials denied any link to the Stuxnet computer virus.

"Stuxnet has had no effect on the control systems at the Bushehr nuclear power plant," Nasser Rastkhah, a senior official in charge of nuclear security, told the official IRNA news agency.

Foreign intelligence reports have said the control systems at Bushehr were penetrated by the malware – malicious software designed to infiltrate computer systems – but Iran has all along maintained that Stuxnet was only found on several laptops belonging to plant employees and didn't affect the facility's control systems.

Some computer experts believe Stuxnet was the work of Israel or the United States, two nations convinced that Iran wants to turn nuclear fuel into weapons-grade uranium.

The Islamic Republic is reluctant to acknowledge setbacks to its nuclear activities, which it says are aimed at generating energy but are under U.N. sanctions because of concerns they could be channeled toward making weapons. Only after outside revelations that its enrichment program was temporarily disrupted late last year by Stuxnet did Iranian officials acknowledge the incident.

The startup of the Bushehr power plant, a project completed with Russian help but beset by years of delays, would deliver Iran the central stated goal of its atomic work – the generation of nuclear power.

But the inauguration of the facility has been delayed for years. Iran said when it began inserting the fuel rods in October that the 1,000-megawatt light-water reactor would begin pumping electricity to Iranian cities by December. But it pushed back the timing to February, citing a "small leak" and other unspecified reasons.

The Bushehr plant itself is not among the West's main worries because safeguards are in place to ensure that the spent fuel will be returned to Russia and cannot be diverted to weapons making.

The United States and some of its allies believe the Bushehr plant is part of a civil energy program that Iran is using as cover for a covert program to develop a nuclear weapons capability. Iran denies the accusation.

The Bushehr project dates back to 1974, when Iran's U.S.-backed Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi contracted with the German company Siemens to build the reactor. The company withdrew from the project after the 1979 Islamic Revolution toppled the shah and brought hard-line clerics to power.

In 1992, Iran signed a $1 billion deal with Russia to complete the project and work began in 1995.

Under the contract, Bushehr was originally scheduled to come on stream in July 1999 but the startup has been delayed repeatedly by construction and supply glitches.

___

Associated Press writer George Jahn contributed to this report from Vienna.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

TEHRAN, Iran — In a major setback to Iran's nuclear program, technicians will have to unload fuel from the country's first atomic power plant because of an unspecified safety concern, a senior g...
TEHRAN, Iran — In a major setback to Iran's nuclear program, technicians will have to unload fuel from the country's first atomic power plant because of an unspecified safety concern, a senior g...
Filed by Hunter Stuart  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 629
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
08:21 AM on 02/28/2011
See? You can slow them down without bombing the shit out of them! Funny, since this story broke, as well as the demonstrations story that has yet to find much in the way of willing American journalists who will cover it (or media establishments that will allow coverage), I haven't seen any "Bolton Says Bombing Iran and Murdering Women and Children Is The ONLY WAY" stories. Oh well, that just leaves more room in the WSJ and Washington Post for a Kristol/Pawlenty/Buchanan/Gingrich/Some other right wing hack "opinion" column.
09:14 AM on 02/28/2011
First of all, this is a power plant that is fully legit under NPT, and even the article says so, and this is routine despite the sensational headline. Second, according to the IAEA report that just came out, LEU production is constant and steady. Perhaps, you guys should hire better nerd programmers to do the job right next time.
photo
babybecks
"because I am involved in Mankind;"
09:47 AM on 02/28/2011
Perhaps not American, but we did see a few Wikileaks docs that suggested Israel was itching for an altercation along those lines.

WikiLeaks cables: Don't trust Israel on Iran
http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/12/02/wikileaks_israel_on_iran
photo
butchcliff
The future is unwritten
07:07 AM on 02/28/2011
So things not going well for Iran. Tough _itties
07:22 AM on 02/28/2011
The West is perfectly content to let Iran be run by bumbling theocrats. Certainly they and their proxies can cause problems, but basically Iran is a dysfunctional regional power. Not nice for the secular and educated Iranians, but that is the way it is.
12:53 AM on 02/28/2011
This is all a game to the westernized powers. Iran cannot work on WMDs and get attacked by the west or they can work on WMDs and the west will attack them for building WMDs. Truth is they can easily eliminate the powers in Iran. This is just a money making enterprise for USA corps and the protection of Israel for the powers behind the US throne.
09:16 AM on 02/28/2011
It's neither. West can't attack them even if they were working on WMDs, and according to IAEA and NIE, they are not even working on WMDs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
loOranks
I am the master of my fate; captain of my soul
10:32 AM on 03/17/2011
Are you sure?
"Malaysian police said they have seized dismantled equipment that were meant for producing a weapon of mass destruction, including nuclear warheads, from a vessel in the country's major port, reported Xinhua.

The equipment was found in two containers on a Malaysian-registered vessel bound for Iran."

http://www.cargonewsasia.com/secured/article.aspx?id=3&article=25220
12:14 AM on 02/28/2011
Just a darn crying shame! LOL!
08:27 PM on 02/27/2011
Thanks barak for your leadership on this issue Iran has backed down due to yours and Hilary's pressure
photo
babybecks
"because I am involved in Mankind;"
10:22 PM on 02/27/2011
He needs to be a man! Start some w a r s for God's sake!
photo
ken607
nothing clean about coal nothing natural about gas
08:51 AM on 02/28/2011
it takes abigger man to not start wars.
photo
rodjard
I Update my brain frequently
05:55 PM on 02/27/2011
BIG HEADLINE AND THEN A NON-STORY
photo
Amryxx
politeness rules, but with sharpened edges
06:02 PM on 02/27/2011
But if the headline is not "big", how can it entice us to read it? "Iran performs what might be routine maintenance" is hardly news.
06:46 PM on 02/27/2011
Over the past couple of days, there were about half a dozen good stories came out including the IAEA report that once again certified none divergence of nuclear material to a weapon program, 1st Iranian supercomputer, and for our Israeli and bomb Iran crowd, a new Anti-ship ballistic missile and an agreement between Iran and Syria for joint naval programs and an Iranian port on the med. All more exciting topics than this one.
04:57 AM on 02/28/2011
We don't need the story -- we just need to see the words "Iran" "force" and "nuke" in big friendly letters to tell us what to think.

And we don't want to be distracted by anything that might suggest that the country has any political or intellectual figures of any calibre that are not cut from the same cloth as MA:

“Two of Iran's main opposition leaders [Hossein Mousavi and Mahdi Karroubi] and their wives are said to be in grave danger after security forces apparently abducted them from their homes, where they were under house arrest. ... The two had been under house arrest since calling for a rally on 14 February in solidarity with the uprising in Egypt.
A further call for the release of the two opposition leaders came yesterday from the former Iranian President Mohammad Khatami... also a reformist, [who] has himself come under attack from hard-liners but remains popular in Iran since his presidency, which ran from from 1997 to 2005.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/iran-reformers-abducted-by-security-forces-2227555.html
05:43 PM on 02/27/2011
It's patently absurd to even ask whether the Stuxnet could have caused this...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carbon Forteetoo
Not enough characters to say anything clev
04:18 PM on 02/27/2011
Seems that Israel has a second team of super-nerd virus programmers. Cool! Better than bombing.
photo
Amryxx
politeness rules, but with sharpened edges
04:20 PM on 02/27/2011
I don't think anyone had claimed responsibility for this.
04:34 PM on 02/27/2011
that can have severe unintended consequences for the US....or maybe that is the point ?
photo
MelissaGoldman
One moment in time--RIP Whitney
04:10 PM on 02/27/2011
LOL...this is why you don't let kids play with matches!
And if it's unsafe by russian standards then all I can say is, I'm sorry and please give me a moment to stop laughing my you know what off....
12:55 AM on 02/28/2011
Instead of laughing you should be a more godly and caring human being, american.
07:17 AM on 02/28/2011
Definitely not more godly....the world has too many such nutters.
photo
Amryxx
politeness rules, but with sharpened edges
04:02 PM on 02/27/2011
Meh. Better delays and embarrassments than having another Chernobyl.

But I'm actually very surprised - all the noise, sanctions, etc., and they haven't even started the reactor yet?
04:21 PM on 02/27/2011
A routine maintenance procedure that is common with almost every new reactor start up only becomes news with sensational headlines when it involves Iran. Don't give this a second thought.
04:01 PM on 02/27/2011
There goes our only hope to stop global warming.
01:09 PM on 02/27/2011
This is not a very significant event- perhaps a minor setback to a legal, peaceful civilian energy program, in compliance with both the NPT and the IAEA inspection protocols.

There is no evidence that fuel is being diverted for weapons grade enrichment, nor is there any real evidence that an Iranian nuclear weapons program exists.

So, any triumphal crowing by USRAEL at this point really only serves to illustrate that it, not, Iran who has suffered the real setbacks in the region, namely, through the loss of their chief ally-Hosni Mubarak, and the ongoing unrest among the Shiites in Bahrain and Yemen, and which may well encroach upon their Saudi satraps as well.

The Stuxnet Virus has been outdone by the viral spread of freedom and democracy.
01:13 PM on 02/27/2011
Nuclear fuel can't be converted into weapon program. These Uranium pellets go through a process that converts them from UF6 to U3O8 to UO2 to make a hard chip, and they have very low U235 content.
01:17 PM on 02/27/2011
You're correct. I should have written that there is no evidence of diversion of materials for diversion. Even more proof that it's a civilian program.
01:43 PM on 02/27/2011
Of course Iran has 300+ tons of UF6.....that's plenty for many, many bombs, if you know what you are doing. I still don't understand why there are so many apologists for this regime, but I guess that is just my problem for not seeing the beauty in theocracies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BeamMeUpScottie
None of the Above should be on every US ballot.
01:17 PM on 02/27/2011
Is that you Mahmoud?.
01:19 PM on 02/27/2011
Another winner with a lot to contribute ;)
01:21 PM on 02/27/2011
No, Avigdor.
photo
Dead Che
Reunite Pangea!
12:56 PM on 02/27/2011
More likely the result of that good old Russki engineering. Thank you Атомстройэкспорт.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fred Ricardo
The white hat, Truth, Justices and theAmerican way
01:04 PM on 02/27/2011
If we were not so stuck on stupid with lack of nuclear plants in America and so one sided with Israel it could be Americans working on that Iran Nuclear plant.

Don't look now but when it was Americans out in the world building things, it is now Russia, Japan, India and Korea using what they learned from us and making money.
06:49 PM on 02/27/2011
India is buying Russian reactors, in fact the same model that Iran bought, and the world leader in nuclear energy is now France.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:51 PM on 02/27/2011
If this famous worm disables Iran's nuclear thrust by screwing up
the speeds of centrifuges, I'm all for it. If it extends to misreading
the parameters of an operating nuclear plant, whatever its state
of development, finished or under constructions, then that is
unconscionable, a war crime, a crime against the planet.

Surely the usual suspects have not designed a worm that would
do that, cause a meltdown.

Surely.
01:21 PM on 02/27/2011
Even attacking a civilian and IAEA safeguarded and monitored nuclear facility should be considered a malicious and unwarranted act of sabotage at the least.
12:33 PM on 02/28/2011
I have a question for you.  What do you consider an Iranian plot (by an Iranian national with alleged strong implications to the regime) to assassinate an Iranian-American (citizen of the US) IN the United States?  With all the rhetoric of Isreal (supposedly) injecting the virus being an act of sabotage "at the least"... I wonder how such an assassination would be defined? 
photo
Amryxx
politeness rules, but with sharpened edges
04:20 PM on 02/27/2011
The problem here is, "is it okay to sabotage the industrial facilities of sovereign states?" What if Iran decides to throw a spanner into Lockheed-Martin? What if said sabotage causes an explosion, or an industrial accident?

"then that is unconscion­able, a war crime, a crime against the planet."

I don't even understand where this sentence comes from. "Building a nuclear power plant" is not a crime. Ecologically, there are concerns, but I don't think you're addressing that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hatrickpenry
stepping on academia nuts
12:21 PM on 02/27/2011
Great, so they haul it off to the 'other' facility and finish making their toys?
photo
Le Facteur 99
Jeremiah was right.
12:58 PM on 02/27/2011
You've got more unsubstantiated conspiracies. Must be tough waking up in the morning.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hatrickpenry
stepping on academia nuts
01:04 PM on 02/27/2011
A very distinct possibility. A little paperwork SNAFU and a few pounds don't make it back.
Empires have fallen using far less clandestine methods.