iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

South Dakota Senate Passes Bill Requiring 72 Hour Wait Before Abortion

CHET BROKAW   03/ 2/11 09:33 PM ET   AP

PIERRE, S.D. — The South Dakota Senate voted Wednesday to require women to wait 72 hours before they can have abortions and to submit to counseling about why they shouldn't go through with the procedures.

The state Senate voted 21-13 in favor of the legislation, sending it to Republican Gov. Dennis Daugaard for approval. Daugaard, who generally opposes abortion rights, declined to tell The Associated Press if he intends to sign the bill.

"I haven't looked at it," he said, adding that he had not studied the bill earlier because of the possibility it could be amended.

About half the states, including South Dakota, make women wait 24 hours before going through with an abortion. But the 72-hour wait would be the longest in the nation, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research group that supports abortion rights.

Under the new guidelines, a woman would have to undergo counseling at one of several state-approved "pregnancy help centers," all of which seek to persuade women not to have abortions. No other state has such a requirement, according to the American Civil Liberties Union of South Dakota.

Sen. Al Novstrup, R-Aberdeen, the legislation's main sponsor in the state Senate, said it would better protect women from being pressured into having abortions and better inform them of other options. He contends that women get little counseling at the Planned Parenthood clinic in Sioux Falls – the only place women can get non-emergency abortions in South Dakota – and that women only see a doctor once the procedure is performed.

"Defend the right of women to be informed and know the risk before they go forward," Novstrup said during the floor debate before the vote.

Opponents of the legislation contend it would place an undue burden on abortion seekers, violating their rights by interfering with their access to medical care, and is meant to make an already difficult choice even more so. They also predict that if signed into law, the new abortion guidelines will be challenged in court and will ultimately get overturned.

"If we send this bill out, it will not do what you want it to. This bill provides legs only to the courtroom." Republican state Sen. Joni Cutler, of Sioux Falls, warned her colleagues before they voted.

The South Dakota Campaign for Healthy Families, a group that supports abortion rights, might join a court challenge or refer the measure to a statewide vote Daugaard signs it into law, said Elaine Roberts, its co-chair.

Republican Sen. Deb Peters, of Hartford, said before the vote that she was troubled that women seeking abortions would have to visit pregnancy help centers.

"This bill inserts a stranger between a woman and her medical doctor," Peters said.

Leslie Unruh, the president and founder of the Alpha Center pregnancy help agency in Sioux Falls, which would be one of those approved by the state, said she thinks the bill is needed to protect women. "Women will be safer in South Dakota," said Unrah.

The South Dakota Legislature passed two measures in the past decade that would have banned nearly all abortions in attempts to generate court battles seeking to overturn the Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion, but voters statewide rejected those bills in 2006 and 2008.

___

Associated Press writer Nomaan Merchant contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
PIERRE, S.D. — The South Dakota Senate voted Wednesday to require women to wait 72 hours before they can have abortions and to submit to counseling about why they shouldn't go through with the p...
PIERRE, S.D. — The South Dakota Senate voted Wednesday to require women to wait 72 hours before they can have abortions and to submit to counseling about why they shouldn't go through with the p...
Filed by Adam Goldberg  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,604
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (48 total)
04:07 AM on 03/23/2011
There is no more precious gift that God gave the world than babys. He even sent His son Jesus to earth as a baby. Artificial birth control in any form is morally unaceptable, since the possibilty of a baby must always be open during each maritial act. In no case is abortion ever acceptable. Even in the case of rape, God works in mysterious ways and loves all babys wanted or not by the mother.
01:10 AM on 03/04/2011
Other than being an unqualified religious fanatic, what is this person doing placing themselves between the doctor and their patient? At a time of high unemployment, why have the morality police be given access to the most private personal reproductive choices of South Dakota mothers so they may impose their repressive restrictive tyrannical veiwpoint on total strangers and what is the primary purpose for this invasive requirement written by men: compulsory pregnancy?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnJudy
09:27 PM on 03/03/2011
Any woman supporting the GOP should be required to wear a burkha. Any man supporting the GOP is an oxymoron. Real men don't force women to have kids against their will.
07:30 AM on 03/04/2011
or walk away when she's pregnant ...
iridium53
Semper Fi
09:27 PM on 03/03/2011
What a great idea for schlokumentary!

The submissive women of South Dakota...

Gotta write this up...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bythesea
Cook and golfer
08:13 PM on 03/03/2011
South Dakota is in the dark ages. Get a grip. Quit trying to control women.
photo
ProgressivesLoveAmerica
Former disciple of Mises, Hayek & Milton Friedman
05:27 PM on 03/03/2011
When it comes to a woman's right to choose, anti-choice advocates have deal with the fact that abortion is a legal medical procedure. I don't know if anybody remembers the story that made the news about the woman who twittered about her miscarriage. It was controversial because it was a very personal thing to twitter.

However, she expressed some outrage (and rightfully so) over the fact that Wisconsin has a Three-Week hoop-jump to clear just to terminate a pregnancy. The real debate should have been whether or not it's morally right, ethical, or even legal to force a woman to drag-out her ordeal over 72 hours or a staggering THREE WEEKS!

Since anti-choice advotes have to contend with the fact that abortion is legal, they simply to make it an ever more dangerous & humiliating experience for a woman already going through a difficult moment in her life. It's truly disgusting.

The saddest part is that, when you look at statistics on abortion, the people who try to shame a woman with judgmental tactics almost always end up having to be hypocrites on the issue.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
johnb123
All I ask..just be reasonable....do things my way
07:04 PM on 03/03/2011
So you favor ending the baby's life  for the convience of the mother, at the moment.  You don't want any attempt made to convince the mother to keep the baby. How sad.
07:23 PM on 03/03/2011
The thing that always gets me about AntiAbortion pundits, where is the rage over all of the fertalized eggs a women passes from her body during her monthly cycle? You guys are aware it's happens fairly frequently.. an Egg gets fertalized, but far to close to the cycle period, and her body simply washes it away..

Come on! Why aren't you campaigning to save them too! We should be holding women accountable for every fertalized egg which leaves their body! That's what you want right? That's what GOD wants right?
photo
leftparadise
Go ahead with your own life, leave me alone.
08:04 AM on 03/04/2011
no, I favor assuming that a woman has thought long and hard about this decision before she seeks out medical assistance. I favor letting the doctor and the woman decide what is best for her, not politicians, religious groups, etc. If you have to "convince" a woman to continue her preganancy - how good of a mother is she going to be ???? And if its a baby at 9 weeks or 18 weeks or conception - then you adopt it and carry it to term - unil you can take over care of it, it's not a "baby"
05:12 PM on 03/03/2011
There is a video on this site called "What Really Happens in South Dakota." In it, State Senator Bill Napoli is asked if he can see any exception, ever, to the new law.

While this is not a direct quote, I am using the words he used. He said that if a woman, a girl, a virgin, a Christian, had been raped, beaten severely, almost to death, AND sodomozed, then she might be too traumatized to raise a child.

Apparently married Jewish women would be expected to be of stronger stuff. This man is scary. Absolutely terrifying.

http://www.bing.com/videos/watch/video/what-really-goes-on-in-south-dakota/97103b30fc8c0b11c7f597103b30fc8c0b11c7f5-510300784147?q=south+dakota+abortion&FROM=LKVR5>1=LKVR5&FORM=LKVR28
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ebert
04:04 PM on 03/03/2011
I just read the bill and it seems to set up an actual "Pregnancy Panel" consisting of a state-approved referring physician and a state-approved private counselor. I would also presume some type of law enforcement agent would have to be involved as well to enforce this. Talk about government overreach.
photo
Counterglow
Werner Heisenberg may have been right.
06:38 PM on 03/03/2011
Republicans always favour small government...unless they want a big one to jam their social agenda down everybody's throat.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
johnb123
All I ask..just be reasonable....do things my way
03:59 PM on 03/03/2011
Miscarriage And Abortion Triple Chances Of Future Low Birthweight Babies
 
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071220235518.htm
 
Are the women told this?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
ErnestineBass
No longer a cog in The Machine.
04:27 PM on 03/03/2011
Does Science Daily limit its content to articles previously published in scientific or medical journals, or to those that have been peer reviewed?

The answer is no.

Next.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
johnb123
All I ask..just be reasonable....do things my way
04:38 PM on 03/03/2011
British Medical Journal (2007, December 23). Miscarriage And Abortion Triple Chances Of Future Low Birthweight Babies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lisalulu
I stand for Planned Parenthood.
04:30 PM on 03/03/2011
Gee didn't impact me at all! I seriously doubt the bona fides of this study.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
johnb123
All I ask..just be reasonable....do things my way
04:50 PM on 03/03/2011
British Medical Journal (2007, December 23). Miscarriag­e And Abortion Triple Chances Of Future Low Birthweigh­t Babies.

Not that the facts would change your mind.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lisalulu
I stand for Planned Parenthood.
03:59 PM on 03/03/2011
Anyone up for a trip to Pierre to visit the governor? I will drive.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janetshusb
05:09 PM on 03/03/2011
If you want to have an impact on law making the time to show up is during the legislative hearings not after the law has been passed. (spoken from sad experience)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lisalulu
I stand for Planned Parenthood.
10:21 AM on 03/04/2011
The governor still has not signed off on it was my thought.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:27 PM on 03/03/2011
Hey baggers,counseling costs money.Whos gonna pay for it Jesus?..like the wars?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
ErnestineBass
No longer a cog in The Machine.
04:00 PM on 03/03/2011
I know...their hypocrisy knows no bounds.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janetshusb
05:11 PM on 03/03/2011
Your uterus is their boundary.
marilyn 63
LEVEL ONE NETWORKER
10:27 PM on 03/04/2011
and its always a man. a Right wing man. love the fetus but hate the child.always jumping into a wedge issues instead of helping the country function they come right in to office with culture wars to keep our heads turned . what about jobs? as soon as it was announced the jobs picked up for February the republicans quickly tried to take credit. like their stinking tax cut for millionaires helped make jobs. why did people elect republicans? they just pit people against each other and bring the country down and nothing gets done. 2012 whatever it takes vote Democrats every where. and our country cant take the tea-GOP's culture wars and not fixing the country of what they broke..
photo
ProgressivesLoveAmerica
Former disciple of Mises, Hayek & Milton Friedman
03:08 PM on 03/03/2011
It's little moves like this 72 hour waiting period that are meant to end a woman's right to choose but not so much end the need for an abortion. If Republicans were more pro-life & not just pro-birth, they'd enact health care & employment reforms that would make prenatal health care affordable & easily accessible & they'd guarantee all women 1 year maternity leave. But that would be something France does & we certainly don't want to be so pro-life as to be slandered "socialists" now would we?

No!

Instead Republicans focus on fetishizing the things a woman does with her body in the most intimate & private of circumstances. Out of this fetishization comes the push to restrict safe, humane, and legal access to reporductive health care. It starts with little stunts like a 72 hour waiting period, but it will end in back-alley abortions. Women don't want to be humiliated for seeking a medical procedure and, let's face facts: The 72 hour waiting period is meant to HUMILIATE a woman into NOT choosing to terminate the pregnancy.

So, out of a desire to not be humiliated by a waiting period or sexually harassed by fundamentalist "protesters," one could imagine women seeking the back-alley option out of desperation to preserve her right to privacy. At least women who are affluent & fortunate enough can choose to go out-of-state. But, it's sickening that going out of state even NEEDS to be an option.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
ErnestineBass
No longer a cog in The Machine.
03:22 PM on 03/03/2011
Well said, my friend. F&F
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lisalulu
I stand for Planned Parenthood.
02:34 PM on 03/03/2011
How come pro-birthers only want to adopt babies not children in foster care? Oh yes lets be even clearer - white babies?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janetshusb
02:34 PM on 03/03/2011
"Leslie Unruh, the president and founder of the Alpha Center pregnancy help agency in Sioux Falls, which would be one of those approved by the state, said she thinks the bill is needed to protect women. "Women will be safer in South Dakota," said Unrah."

Protection???? Safer?????

Women need protection all right: against South Dakota laws.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lisalulu
I stand for Planned Parenthood.
02:46 PM on 03/03/2011
We also need protection from Sen. John Thune and newbie Congresswoman Noem - both pro-birthers. Thune is particularly hateful: voted down SChips - health insurance for poor kids.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
maigrey
No GUT no glory!
07:03 PM on 03/03/2011
That's always puzzled me. They like the kids when they are in utero, but once that head pops out it's a whole 'nother story. Pro-birthers please explain yourselves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ebert
02:20 PM on 03/03/2011
How are they going to implement this? Does the counseling have to take place within 72 hours before the appointment or at least 72 hours prior? Do you have to prove you have an abortion appointment to receive counseling? Does the counseling "certificate" expire? What if I'm a sexually active young woman who might want to have an abortion someday so I just get the counseling and keep the certificate until I need it? Would you then have to prove you're pregnant to receive the counseling? Would I be forced to submit to a pregnancy test or prove that I'm sexually active to receive this counseling? I have some many questions.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
johnb123
All I ask..just be reasonable....do things my way
03:31 PM on 03/03/2011
For awhile pro life women would go to Planned Parenthood for pregnancy tests, just to drain them of money. I thought that was a good idea.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lisalulu
I stand for Planned Parenthood.
04:01 PM on 03/03/2011
Don't hurt yourself.