More

Women's Rising Status Leads To More Smoking

Women Smoking

First Posted: 03/02/11 12:24 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:35 PM ET

Millions of women in developing countries risk disease and early death in the coming decades as their rising economic and political status leads them to smoke more, researchers said on Tuesday.

An analysis in 74 countries found that men are five times more likely to smoke than women in countries with lower rates of female empowerment, such as China, Indonesia, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Uganda.

In countries with relatively high female empowerment, such as Australia, Canada, Norway, Sweden and the United States, this gap is small and women smoke almost as much as men do.

Douglas Bettcher, director of the World Health Organization (WHO) tobacco free initiative, said the findings showed the need for authorities to act quickly to curb smoking rates among women, particularly in poorer countries.

"The tobacco epidemic is still in its early stages in many countries but is expected to worsen," he said in a statement with the study, which was published in the WHO Bulletin.

"Strong tobacco control measures such as bans on tobacco advertising are needed to prevent the tobacco industry from targeting women."

Tobacco kills up to half its users and is described by the WHO as "one of the biggest public health threats the world has ever faced." The annual death toll linked to tobacco is more than five million, experts say, and could rise beyond eight million by 2030 unless action is taken to control smoking.

The study estimated that men smoke nearly five times as much as women worldwide, but the ratios of female-to-male smoking prevalence rates vary dramatically.

In China, for example, 61 percent of men are reported to be current smokers, compared with 4.2 percent of women, while in many rich nations roughly equal numbers of men and women smoke.

Women's empowerment is measured by the United Nations Development Program using data such as representation in parliament, voting rights and comparisons of male and female income.

"Our study makes a strong case for implementing gender-specific tobacco control activities ... such as more higher tobacco taxes, more prominent graphic health warnings, smoke-free laws, and advertising and promotion bans," said Geoffrey Fong from the University of Waterloo in Ontario, Canada, who led Tuesday's study.

His coauthor Sara Hitchman said authorities should look closely at "the ways in which the tobacco industry is capitalizing on societal changes to target women, such as marketing cigarettes to women as a symbol of emancipation."

The two authors also said a useful step could be to monitor how price and tax measures affect uptake of smoking among women in countries where tobacco is not yet widely used by them.

"Further research into patterns of uptake could help governments take more effective action and reduce adoption rates for smoking among women in the future," said Hitchman.

SOURCE: bit.ly/gqvYGV World Health Organization Bulletin, online February 28, 2011.

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

Millions of women in developing countries risk disease and early death in the coming decades as their rising economic and political status leads them to smoke more, researchers said on Tuesday. An ...
Millions of women in developing countries risk disease and early death in the coming decades as their rising economic and political status leads them to smoke more, researchers said on Tuesday. An ...
Filed by Meghan Neal  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:27 AM on 03/05/2011
undertake detailed research of the impact of selected programs on women's empowerment, the mechanisms through which this occurs and the constraints.
http://flawlesseffect.net/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
junkiebev
A Pyrrhic Victory beats a Flat Loss
05:44 PM on 03/03/2011
nicotine is a drug which is roughly as bad for you as caffeine - it just has the world's worst delivery mechanism
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gemini68
03:26 PM on 03/04/2011
Do you have scientific data to support this? Can you provide a link?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gemini68
03:34 PM on 03/04/2011
So- I looked it up myself and nicotine is actually used as a bug spray- and bug sprays are dangerous to ingest. So I don't quite know how that compares to caffeine. Which IS actually digestible by humans.
05:19 PM on 03/03/2011
I dont smoke, but of course any gender who is more stressed will be the one smoking. Women have to be in charge and regulate everything so yea def understand why they are smoking their heads off. Lmao dnt get mad now guys...
01:38 PM on 03/03/2011
Why not some regulations on Laser repair? http://fraxellaser.se
02:32 AM on 03/03/2011
We all have our choices.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ezzy666
11:47 PM on 03/02/2011
This female chose to start smoking in order to look older. I kept hearing how smoking makes your face age. It didn't work. It also deters losers from hitting on me at the bar (I smoke cloves) Looking at the pros and cons, this female will keep on smoking.
12:04 AM on 03/03/2011
Allow me to be lucky 13.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cylixdemas
10:03 PM on 03/03/2011
Smoke for ten more years...
06:40 PM on 03/02/2011
just how stupid do you have to be to smoke in this day and age when we have the scientific evidence of what it does to your body?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andres64
Religion is a sectually transmitted disease.
08:55 PM on 03/02/2011
Bagger stupid?
10:30 AM on 03/04/2011
The very same thing could be said about a number of retardedly prolific lifestyle choices. Eating fast food, not exercising, etc.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gemini68
03:35 PM on 03/04/2011
I would not compare not exercising to smoking. As cardio can be accomplished in a number of daily activities. Smoking involves consciously ingesting 4,000 chemical PER cigarette.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:49 PM on 03/02/2011
If only women didn't look so sexy smoking it would probably curb the amount of female smokers. Come on you smoking ladies. You need to stop being so sexy when you smoke. Ugly it up a little so young girls will not want to look like you and copy you.
09:19 AM on 03/03/2011
To each his own. But in my opinion there is NOTHING SEXY about a woman pulling smoke up her nostrils. Or engulfed in a smoke cloud of her recent exhalation while standing at the bar.

There is nothing sexy about kissing a smoker. Nothing sexy about smelling it in her hair, on her clothes, in her car, or in her home. Lastly, (despite what everyone else in the world seems to think) there's nothing sexy about a broken, hoarse, cigarette voice or that near-coughing laugh.

Just my opinion, and I know I am in the minority. But I just don't get the attraction that so many people think it looks sexy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:05 AM on 03/03/2011
So ladies, as I was saying and as swilliams888 pointed out that, regardless of his personal opinion which he points out is in the minority, women just need to quit looking so sexy when they smoke. At least dial it back a bit so the next generation of girls will not be encouraged to take up smoking.
Thank you ladies, and thank you for your opinion as well swilliams888. You helped make the point that many find smoking sexy though some are thankfully immune to its wily affectations.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cylixdemas
10:04 PM on 03/03/2011
More men, thank you think, find smoking woman unattractive.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:33 PM on 03/04/2011
How do you know how many men I think find women unattractive?

Look, if you keep denying that women who are smoking are being too sexy when they do it, then we will never convince them to stop being so sexy and generations of young girls will have to pay for it when they too start looking sexy when they smoke.

You're not being part of the solution man; you're being part of the problem. You can't fix a problem until you can admit that there is one, and you guys just keep ignoring the huge problem that women are causing by being so sexy when they are smoking. When will the insanity stop?
02:21 PM on 03/02/2011
At this hour in history most adults are well-informed about the perils and risks of smoking. Those who choose to smoke have made an informed choice along with tacit acceptance of the consequences that flow from such choice. I only feel bad for young children of smoking parents---children who have neither choice nor freedom from their parents' secondhand smoke and increased incidence of respiratory illnesses.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fnygy
It seems my micro bio is empty. Hmmm...
03:36 PM on 03/02/2011
Most people start smoking before they're adults and are addicted by the time they really able to make an "informed" choice. Also, children who grow up with smokers are more likely to smoke themselves, possibly because they're already addicted via the second hand exposure.

Also, societies bear the brunt of the health care costs of smokers so it does, indeed, affect non-smokers, too.

In my opinion, it should be illegal to advertise cigarettes.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gemini68
03:36 PM on 03/04/2011
I don't know if it is tacit acceptance as the majority will get sick and will look to insurance companies and their fellow tax payer to foot the bill of for their "tacit acceptance"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
avg american
It's about jobs, jobs, jobs...
01:41 PM on 03/02/2011
Smoking anesthetizes your emotions, making it temporarily easier to deal with momentary situations.

When smokers smoke together, they bond together. They confide with each other. I cannot tell you how many times I got critical job information by smoking a cigarette with my supervisors and peers that I would have missed had I not smoked.

Smoking is a socially bonding activity that in some workplaces is necessary for job survival. Once you are addicted though, you are addicted.

I agree with SarNobz that our government can do better at making cigarettes safer in the interim especially since our supreme courts will not hold tobacco companies accountable for the damages that they cause.
02:04 PM on 03/02/2011
Albeit, your right to smoke, except Cannabis, is great. I'm happy for you, but as a drug, according to the NIDA, it is also the #1 killer of American to date, alcohol being second, legal drugs, then illegal drugs excluding Cannabis, and asprin, all have a degree of possible death, excluding Cannabis. Cannabis deaths in 8,000 years of use, ZERO. In Texas, we have voter initiative on tobacco and alcohol, all except Cannabis. Texas has no voter initiative on Drugs, except alcohol and tobacco, which are voted on in every place in Texas. If that's not a double standard, I don't know what one is.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gemini68
03:38 PM on 03/04/2011
Actually you are wrong. Studies have shown that smoking does not in fact anesthetize or calm. A study was done on smokers using brain scans. They found that when someone lit a cigarette and smoked their brain waves went off the charts- neurons firing everywhere. The person who didn't smokes brain was far calmer than the smokers.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
avg american
It's about jobs, jobs, jobs...
05:02 PM on 03/04/2011
Actually, respectfully, I'm right.
Even if the links below didn't support me, my 10 years of smoking street credit says it's true. Sorry.
http://ezinearticles.com/?The-Relationship-Between-Your-Mood-and-Smoking---Endorphins&id=1325086
http://www.chacha.com/question/does-smoking-cigarettes-release-endorphins
12:58 PM on 03/02/2011
Here's an idea. How about the government interferes a tad more and makes cigarettes safer for everyone to smoke? They could demand the bad chemicals be removed or SOMETHING. I mean, obviously the smokers of 2011 are perfectly aware that smoking is bad. So they're not going to stop. So why try to "control" smoking?? I'd pay for a safer cigarette!!!
DrSnuggles
You label me and I'll label you
02:39 PM on 03/02/2011
Cigarettes are as safe to smoke as the tobacco companies can make them. Obviously, they are soulless, cold and profit driven corporations. But no corporation wants it's customers to stop using their product; which many do through death, illness or preemptive health concerns. It just makes business sense to make cigarettes as addictive as possible AND as healthy as possible.

Not defending cigarettes here, inhaling any form of smoke is terrible for you regardless. Just saying that organizations like 'thetruth' are lying to you. Think about it, 'thetruth' is actually funded by the cigarette companies, by court order. They are obviously the craziest anti-smoking organization that could be found because in the land of public opinion 'crazy = less reliable'. So when they say "Oh no, there's formaldehyde in cigarettes!!!" the cigarette companies can calmly point out that the small amount of formaldehyde in cigarettes actually ends up improving the quality of the burn and decreasing the amount of carbon monoxide vs. carbon dioxide - in other words it makes them healthier (SIC) to smoke.

Conclusion, cigarette companies are evil, very very evil and guilty millions of times over of voluntary manslaughter BUT not of negligent homicide or murder.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fnygy
It seems my micro bio is empty. Hmmm...
03:43 PM on 03/02/2011
It's well documented that cigarette companies do put chemicals in their products to "improve the burn" - that is, to burn FASTER so smokers smoke more. They also toy with ingredients that make them MORE addictive. Read "Ashes to Ashes" the history of the tobacco industry, if you don't believe me. The companies know their customers will die (as all company's customers do) so they look for YOUNG customers to replace them. "Thetruth" campaign has proven effective at curbing young smokers, which is why the tobacco companies have tried myriad ways to defund it.

As for being "willingly guilty of manslaughter millions of times over" -- that's the very definition of murder. Cigarettes, used as intended, cause sickness and death.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gemini68
03:40 PM on 03/04/2011
You're kidding right? A safer cigarette is like asking for a safer gun. And inhalation of smoke is bad for you- regardless of how many chemicals are added or not added to it. The lungs weren't made to inhale smoke. Cigars are technically safer than cigarettes because of less chemicals and yet their is still a high rate of throat, mouth and tongue cancer from them.