iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Diabetes Can Shorten Life By 6 Years, New Research Finds

By STEPHANIE NANO   03/02/11 08:09 PM ET EST  AP

NEW YORK -- A 50-year-old with diabetes dies six years sooner than someone without the disease, and not just from a heart attack or a stroke, new research suggests.

The large international effort to measure diabetes' toll found the disease also raises the risk of dying prematurely from a host of other ailments, even breast cancer and pneumonia.

"It's quite a wide sweep of conditions," said Dr. John Danesh of Cambridge University in Britain, who led the team of researchers. While most people think of heart problems, diabetes surprisingly "appears to be associated with a much broader range of health implications than previously suspected."

Putting the six years lost in context, he said, long-term smoking shortens life by 10 years.

The analysis used pooled medical information for 820,900 people from nearly 100 studies done mostly in Europe and North America. The results are published in Thursday's New England Journal of Medicine.

Diabetes, the seventh leading cause of death in the U.S., affects about 26 million Americans, or 8 percent, including 7 million who haven't been diagnosed. Most in the study were thought to have the most common kind – Type 2 – which occurs when the body makes too little insulin or cannot use what it does make to regulate blood sugar.

High blood sugar can damage nerves and blood vessels, and is a major cause of heart disease.

The new research didn't include those who had heart disease when they were first enrolled. Participants were followed on average for 13 1/2 years, and there more than 123,000 deaths. Overall, death rates from various causes were higher for those with diabetes than those without.

The researchers took into account other risk factors that could influence the results: age, gender, smoking and weight. Type 2 diabetes is tied to obesity. They found that those with diabetes had double the risk of dying from a heart attack or stroke, compared to those without the disorder. But they also found that diabetics had a 25 percent higher risk of dying from cancer and were more likely to die from a variety of illnesses including infections, lung and kidney disease as well as falls.

Exactly how diabetes raises those risks isn't clear, but in the case of infections, it could be that diabetes weakens the immune system, the researchers said. Diabetes can cause vision problems and loss of feeling in the legs, which may be the reason for falls, they said.

Danesh said one intriguing finding was a higher risk of suicide in those with diabetes. Other research has linked diabetes with depression, he noted.

The results are "another reason to try to normalize blood glucose in people who have diabetes," through diet, exercise and medication, said Dr. Alvin Powers, a diabetes specialist at Vanderbilt University. "There have been smaller studies that hinted at this but nothing where a study of this size looked at so many different outcomes."

Danesh and his colleagues also estimated diabetes' effect on life expectancy. They calculated that a 50-year-old diabetic without heart disease dies about six years earlier than someone without the disease, with 40 percent of the difference due to cancer and conditions other than heart disease.

"It underscores the need to prevent diabetes," Danesh said.

Previous studies have shown a possible link between diabetes and cancer. The new paper tied some, but not all, cancers; the increased risk ranged from 25 percent for breast cancer to double for liver cancer. Danesh said people with diabetes should get age-appropriate cancer screenings.

Last year, a joint report from the American Diabetes Association and the American Cancer Society looked at the issue and said that it wasn't clear whether any connection was direct, indirect or perhaps because the two disorders share common risk factors, like obesity.

The new research squares with that report's conclusion that "there's a lot more we need to understand about diabetes and the link to cancer," said one of the authors, Dr. Richard Bergenstal of the International Diabetes Center at Park Nicollet in Minneapolis. He is a former president of the diabetes group.

While adding to the evidence, the study doesn't answer the question of why, he said.

"Diabetes is a serious condition. We often don't quite think about it quite that way," Bergenstal said.

___

Online:

Diabetes information: and

Links:


New England Journal of Medicine: http://www.nejm.org

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

Filed by Meghan Neal  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 87
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TWeissMA
http://www.disabilitymessage.com
12:57 PM on 03/09/2011
Salba - The Perfect Dietary Supplement? (For people with type II diabetes)

http://www.disabled-world.com/medical/supplements/salba.php
05:37 AM on 03/16/2011
Salba is just a trade name for chia seed. and much more expensive
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TWeissMA
http://www.disabilitymessage.com
12:54 PM on 03/09/2011
People with type II diabetes - SALBA, and plenty of it; as well as fiber, whole grains and more of it. The, 'Holy Grail,' we need...
photo
Sandman911
Self employed gun toting Bible thumper.
11:18 PM on 03/07/2011
Investors Business Daily poll.
Percentage of patients diagnosed with Diabetes who recieved treatment within six months.
United States 93%
England 15%
Canada 40%

Percentage of of seniors needing hip replacements who recieved it within six months.
United States 90%
England 15%
Canada 43%

Number of MRI scanners per million patients.
United States 71
England 14
Canada 18

Percentage of seniors who say they are in excellent health.
United States 18%
England 2%
Canada 6%
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
katmeyster
We don't have a spending problem.
04:10 PM on 03/04/2011
And this will continue to be the case as long as the ADA continues to advise patients and doctors that they can eat carbohydrates. Diabetics can maintain normal blood glucose levels and A1C with less medication and insulin if they stop with the carbs. Maintaining normal levels should help prevent the complications and the life-shortening. In fact all of us could be a lot healthier if we didn't have unregulated insulin. But you won't hear about this from the mainstream because the grain-based food industry, the medical industrial complex and the pharmaceutical companies would prefer you remain unhealthy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DrP
03:55 PM on 03/05/2011
My family has severe genetic insulin-resistance which we manage with low-carb diets. About a year ago I contacted a pharma co. to complain about their websites encouraging Type IIs to use insulin. Since then, they have been sending a magazine called "Diabetic Cooking." My sister was visiting this week and picked up the latest copy and said" You don't actually make any of the recipes, do you?"
I laughed. She kept paging through it and had the same "fits" that I did when I read it. The general guidelines at the beginning of the book, authored by the nationally -known Marion Nestle, a so-called "nutriitionist." She explains that since sugar doesn't raise blood sugar any more than other carbohydrates, "diabetics" don't need to avoid sugar. She recommends 3 to 4 servings (15 g) of carbs per MEAL. That's more than we can handle in a day. All of the recipes have 20 to 40 grams of carbs per serving and are "low-fat." This is insanity and it is why we have this epidemic. Nothing will change until the medical establishment "gets it" about insulin-resistance and glucose intolerance. There would be no such thing as "Type II Diabetes" (which I refuse to acknowledge as a "disease") if this were understood. If you have insulin-resistance, cut out carbs and blood sugar will normalize.
01:20 PM on 03/06/2011
okay, so when i cut carbs to below, say 60 per day, my brain suffers horribly: i become very very depressed. i would love to go lower than 60-80 but everyone tells me i need 125 at least, to have a healthy brain as it is! i don't eat anyhting with any form of white sugar or the like in it, but i do eat apples, and a few other fruits. i hover around A1c 6.2 and would love to go much lower, and haave steady glucose levels all day below 90-100.

can you comments on this in any way?
05:39 AM on 03/16/2011
There is no need to bash carbs, Processed carbs are the villain, not whole grain and low glycemic carbs. The Okinawans ate 80 percent carbs and diabetes was virtually unknown.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lisa Shields
Poet & Advocate For Special Needs Children
07:31 AM on 03/04/2011
Deep sigh.

And yet more generalization about the most misunderstood disease out there.
I have quite a few diabetics in my life...most of them insulin dependent.
Since I first had to deal with it personally, via a spouse, I have been astounded by the amount of bad info out there. At least one of my diabetic relatives is thin...almost to the point of emaciation. (Myth 1...only overweight, out of shape people get diabetes.)

Losing weight helps you control the disease, but doesn't cure it. There is no "cure".
(Myth 2...I lost 50 pounds and I am not diabetic now.)

As to this...my father in law is just shy of his 85th birthday...his father who did not have diabetes at all made 80. So take all the assumptions with a grain of salt please?

What makes diabetes so tricky is that the long range effects are devastating. Patients can experience loss of fingers and toes, even limbs---but rarely die directly as a result of diabetes. Once the serious side effects manifest, its nearly impossible to turn the disease around.

Bad as this disease is for the people who have it, the toll it takes on those who care for them is also substantive....and it is a VERY individual disease, requiring more than one approach to control.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dugmaze
Any man's death diminishes me
07:08 PM on 03/03/2011
"which occurs when the body makes too little insulin or cannot use what it does make to regulate blood sugar."

1) We treat the symptoms of diabetes but do we know specifically what actually causes it?

2) How can gastric bypass surgery eliminate type 2 diabetes within three days?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DrP
11:04 PM on 03/03/2011
Type II Diabetes, as it is called, is actually a symptom of insulin-resistance. The body does make too little insulin as it says above, but cannot use insulin because the cells are resistance to insulin and won't take in glucose to use as fuel. That causes high levels of glucose in the blood, the pancreas shoots out more insulin, and the high insulin and blood sugar levels cause inflammation and thus the host of associated health problems. The cause of this is that we are not evolved to handle the enormous amount of carbohydrate in the modern diet. This cycle can be reversed by eliminating most dietary carbohydrate and eating a diet high in fat and moderate protein. Get rid of all grains, starches, and sugars and eat meat, full-fat dairy, eggs, and lots of green, non-starchy veggies and this so-called "disease" would be virtually eliminated. It's worked for my family (and we saw our grandfather and father die from horrible complications of "diabetes" because the medical establishment was then ( and mostly still is) clueless about how to prevent this completely preventable tragedy.
05:44 AM on 03/16/2011
We are not evolved to eat all these PROCESSED carbs. Okinawans ate over 80 percent carbs with virtually no diabetes.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DrP
11:06 PM on 03/03/2011
I expect that the phenomenon of gastric bypass "eliminating type 2 diabetes" has to do with the fact that the patients can't eat much anymore, which means they are reducing their carbohydrate intake. Any reduction in carbohydrate intake will result in lowered blood sugar and insulin levels.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lisa Shields
Poet & Advocate For Special Needs Children
07:37 AM on 03/04/2011
I also question the sanity of suggesting bypass to diabetic patients without long and careful consideration. Gastric bypass puts a significant strain on the kidneys, which are also compromised by diabetes. It is also a surgery that entails a complicated healing process...and the body's ability to heal is ALSO compromised by diabetes.

Gastric Bypasses are being seen as a panacea...but the research and follow up on the patients rarely exceed three years following the surgery. There is a significant number of patients who start gaining back weight after three years...at a time when their kidneys will have been effected irreversibly.

So do the research BEFORE you sign up for something that might leave you in far worse shape, long term.
04:58 PM on 03/03/2011
Great, it sounds like another scam for pharma companies to put a bad drug on the market. Did anyone read that horrible post on the WSj the other day in the op-ed about cancer drugs? Seriously! This guy tore the WSJ to pieces--->http://www.gekkowire.com/?p=7188
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBadExample
Friends call me ‘exampleicious’
04:02 PM on 03/03/2011
Unfortunately, this article won’t scare the people who should be concerned. The reality is not the six years of life lost—most people don’t take that seriously. But bring up the retinopathy and related blindness. The loss of fingers, toes and limbs due to circulatory problems and the burning-out of the capillaries. Point out the pain from neuropathy. And pull back for the larger picture—a large number of American adults in their 40’s and 50’s hobbled by the many malevolent genies loosed by diabetes. These folks are going to end up on SS-Disability and Medicaid and Section 8 (rent vouchers) as they live out the really unpleasant end-game of this disease. Under the circumstances, a six-year premature death penalty may be downright merciful for those who get hit with all the complications.
 
In NYC, one in eight adults are diabetic, and patterns of youthful obesity and lack of physical activity point to ever bigger percentages of disabled people down the road.   The US has failed to treat this as an epidemic that deserves our full attention. And the wellness care that would prevent or delay the worst symptoms are anathema to a health insurance system that gets the best bang for its buck not from preventing the disease, but doing the minimum that’s medically indicated to kick the patient down the road to some other hapless insurance company. We should be treating this as we treat Influenza and polio.
03:24 PM on 03/03/2011
Some diabetic patients report feeling much better overall on gluten free diet. Some diabetic patients report having lower blood sugar and hgA1C on strict gluten free diet for over 3 months. http://www.gluten-free-today.com/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DrP
10:57 PM on 03/03/2011
But they need to go farther and go on a carb-free diet. They feel better on gluten-free because they have eliminated some grains, which is a start.
Eliminate all grains, sugars, and starches, increase dietary fat and eat moderate protein and we could virtually eliminate this so-called "disease," which is completely preventable and almost completely reversible.
05:46 AM on 03/16/2011
Eat only whole grains, (no "puffed up" cereals), no sugar and exercise and it would be virtually eliminated.
01:41 PM on 03/03/2011
I wish the article mentioned whether this was for people whose blood glucose was under control or not. I was just diagnosed with diabetes--actually my doctor won't diagnose it, even though my A1C was 6.4, because the official cut-off is 6.5. So, according to him I have pre-diabetes. I gave myself the wake up call though that he wouldn't give me. I was the one who asked for the test. I was the one who had to schedule the appointment, at which he admitted he would had never looked at the results if I hadn't forced him to. Anyhow, I have been dieting and kept my blood sugar normal since dieting by eating low glycemic foods (which seems to be the opposite of what the American Diabetes Association recommends). But I don't know if having Type II makes you inherently more at risk for earlier death even when it is under control. I also worry I will have trouble keeping it under control in the long run because I am only 28 now, and I am already at a fairly normal weight. It's not like I have a lot of weight to lose or really clear risk factors for why I have a high A1C. There are people with far worse lifestyles than me who don't have Type II diabetes, so it's not all about lifestyle apparently. It's worrisome and my doctor didn't have many answers.
04:25 PM on 03/03/2011
i can help a little. i have type 2 and am under supervision of an endocrinologist who also teaches in the field at a major university teaching hospital. not a light weight, in other words. here's what i've learned from my endo, or had confirmed:

there are two major authoritative bodies in the field: the american diabetes association and the american association of clinical endocrinologists. they each have two standards for what constitutes diabetes, the AACE's is more stringent. the ada says everything under 7.0 is pre-diabetes, and sometimes they say 6.5. the aace says everything above 6.0 is diabetes. imo, this is the gold standard and what you should go by.

that said, my endocrinologist told me that if you are under 6.5 you are statistically no more likely to develop neuropathy, and other diabetes-related issues, than the general population. and this is where my endo's professional stature comes in: you can trust this bit of information. still, the goal should be under 6.0. it can be done. easily. i did it in 1 year 7.9 to 5.9 with no medication, and i'm sixty.
04:26 PM on 03/03/2011
part 2:
you're right about two things: the ADA recommendations seem nuts. and two, that you're young, and need to keep a good watch on the situation. but your life is not going to be shortened, and it is far from inevitable that you will develop diabetes related issues.

i would get a glucose meter, if i were you, and some test strips. meters are often given for free online, and the strips are around $25 for 50 at amazon. there is no need for a prescription. (your doctor in not diagnosing you is following guidelines/rules in accord with insurance standards.) you should test yourself 90 minutes after dinner, and first thing in the morning. find a glucose chart online, and see what you average out in a week, in a month. (ultra two glucose meters do the averages for you, as i'm sure do others.) try to stay under 110 in the a.m. and no more than 150 in the evening. do not eat carbs 3-4 hours before sleeping.

this is a wonderful meter:
http://www.amazon.com/One-Touch-Ultra-Glucose-Monitoring/dp/B001A66QV0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1299186625&sr=8-1

these are the test strips, the price rises and falls:
http://www.amazon.com/One-Touch-Ultra-Order-Strips/dp/B001AXVF28/ref=sr_1_2?s=hpc&ie=UTF8&qid=1299186689&sr=1-2

.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
alienator
democrats win when republicans talk
01:21 PM on 03/03/2011
6 years?... is that all?... i'm going back to eating bacon and grits.
01:06 PM on 03/03/2011
Diabetis is the most serious illness to dominate today and tomorrow
health risks, as it is the maroding illness of the 21 century
Diabetis is devastating since it brings with it an onset of other illnesses
.........
The modern diet of fast pace is the main culprit, not to mention
the implicit guilt of the food industry that is heavily relying on sugars, starches
salts and all the And / Ors you can stuff in between
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olitenup
12:41 PM on 03/03/2011
My father is 94 years old, and a type 2 diabetic and takes Insulin twice a day. He lives at home, alone and every day goes out for a cigar and lunch. Each lunch and dinner he drinks one glass of red wine.

Our family is from a long line of Type 2 diabetics, and all of my father's siblings had, before their deaths, or now have diabetes, but interestingly enough, none of the 46 grandchildren have it yet.

We grew up in an age before junk food was cheaper than good healthy food, and certainly before all the chemicals now being used on farms existed, and way before anitbiotics were introduced to the
food chain. We were never allowed to languish inside a nice day, and tv was only meant for viewing after dinner and homework.

We seem to have taken leave of our commen sense, in every way. I suggest we turn off computers, WIIs, tvs etc, get the chemicals, antibiotics and big corporations out of our food, and get outside while we still have semi-clean air.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NadineColbert
What Scandal? This is a normal day at Faux News!
12:47 PM on 03/03/2011
Yes! Faved!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
w84it
01:06 PM on 03/03/2011
Well said! F&F
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
takecourage
You are the universe
12:33 PM on 03/03/2011
6? That's if you're lucky (for lack of a better word) and haven't had Type I your entire life. My wife's life has probably been shortened by decades thanks to having Type I since the age of four and the various immune system complications that come along with it.
It sure would be nice if the government would fund stem cell research.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Phoebe917
old hermit who lives in the woods
10:05 AM on 03/04/2011
i hope the best for your wife. i know what Type 1 can do to a person.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
takecourage
You are the universe
01:33 PM on 03/04/2011
Thank you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DrP
04:04 PM on 03/05/2011
I wish that the term "diabetes" would be reserved for Type I. What is called "Type II" is a completely different situation. I don't consider "Type II" to be a disease. It is chronic high blood sugar caused by improper diet in the presence of a genetic condition, insulin-resistance. Since it is not a disease, it should not be treated as one, with medication and medical procedures. It is completely avoidable and almost always reversible with a low-carb diet.
Type I is different story: it is a medical condition requiring insulin and constant medical monitoring. That said, I recommend Dr. Bernstein's books. He has even had great success with real diabetics (Type Is) using carb-restricted diets.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
takecourage
You are the universe
07:14 PM on 03/05/2011
you're so smart
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NadineColbert
What Scandal? This is a normal day at Faux News!
12:17 PM on 03/03/2011
The article did not really give any new revelations. We already know that diabetes causes considerable increases in mortaliy and morbidity.
The increased risk of heart disease, stroke and kidney failure is well known and it is also well known that good control of glucose, lipid levels, exercise and weight control can reduce both morbidity and mortality as well as preventing loss of vision and peripheral vascular disease.

There was no mention of wether the increased deaths from cancer were from increased incidence of cancer or deaths from failure to respond to treatments.
Diabetes causes compromise of immune systems, this could cause complications when a person is undergoing surgery, chemo or radiotherapy resulting in infections leading to early deaths.
It is also possible that the depressed immune system might reduce the resistance to cancers and allow the cancer to become more aggressive.