More

Polls: Key States Support Strengthening National Gun Background-Check System


First Posted: 03/03/11 04:41 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:35 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- Polls conducted in five key states show large majorities in support of closing loopholes in the national background check system for firearm purchases.

In Arizona, Colorado, Indiana, Ohio and Virginia, Democratic and Republican polling firms commissioned by Mayors Against Illegal Guns, a coalition of more than 550 U.S. mayors, found that more than 83 percent of respondents, including more than 75 percent of gun owners, favor requiring that gun purchasers pass a background check. Additionally, more than 82 percent of respondents support requiring those who sell at gun shows to run background checks for all firearm sales.

"Today's polling shows that a strong majority of Republicans, Democrats and Independents support common sense laws that keep guns out of the hands of felons, the mentally ill and chronic drug abusers," said Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) in a statement to The Huffington Post on Wednesday evening. "Americans of all political stripes recognize the need for sensible laws that keep guns away from dangerous people. It's time we fix our gun checks in America."

Schumer introduced a bill Wednesday that would require all gun buyers to undergo a background check and increase penalties for states failing to comply. Modeled after a Mayors Against Illegal Guns proposal, the legislation would also require that states submit a higher percentage of their records on individuals to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System.

The legislation comes almost two months after the shootings in Tucson, Ariz., in which Jared Loughner, who appears to have a history of mental illness and drug abuse, is accused of killing six people and critically wounding 13 others, including Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.), after legally purchasing a Glock 19.

"Two of the most heinous acts of gun violence in the last four years were perpetrated by individuals, who under the law, should have absolutely no access to a gun," Schumer said in a statement announcing the legislation, alluding to Tucson and the 2007 shootings at Virginia Tech. "Despite this fact, lax reporting by states and federal agencies has allowed guns to get into the hands of dangerous individuals with consequences that have been tragic and deadly. This legislation does nothing to impinge upon gun owners' rights, but it does provide greater incentive for reporting individuals who should not have access to guns to a national do-not-sell list."

In the wake of Virginia Tech, Congress passed a law requiring states to share the names of the mentally ill with the national background check system. But almost four years later, more than half of states are not complying with the law, according to a recent review by the Associated Press. Though the submission deadline was in January, nine states haven't supplied any names to the database, while 17 other states have submitted fewer than 25 records, suggesting a woefully incomplete list.

But the outlook for pushing background check reforms through the 112th Congress doesn't look good.

"I think these efforts are long overdue, but, given the strength of the gun lobby and the Republican House, it will be difficult to get passed," Ian Bartrum, professor of constitutional law at Drake Law School, said in an interview with The Huffington Post.

Managed by Momentum Analysis, the polls surveyed 600 registered voters in each of the fives states. Each survey has a margin of error of 4 percent.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Polls conducted in five key states show large majorities in support of closing loopholes in the national background check system for firearm purchases. In Arizona, Colorado, Indiana, Oh...
WASHINGTON -- Polls conducted in five key states show large majorities in support of closing loopholes in the national background check system for firearm purchases. In Arizona, Colorado, Indiana, Oh...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 355
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
11:04 AM on 03/07/2011
Republican and Democrat Polling Firms. Utter BS! Their bipartisan polling firm is 'Momentum Analysis'. Take a few moments and view their website. They suggest you can tell them what message you want your poll to make and then they will custom tailor their questions to fit your agenda.
Sweet.
MAIG is not about taking away your legal guns. Just your illegal ones. Thing is they will do whatever they can to make them illegal first.
photo
TexasTreader
My other dog is a gator
11:07 AM on 03/05/2011
The 2nd Amendment declares the right to personal defense. The 5th Amendment guarantees that our rights are left intact until any one of them is taken through due process. Therefore, if you can provide official identification and that is not linked to any crime whereby you were specifically deprived of your 2nd Amendment right, that is sufficient and ALL that the federal government is entitled to. Any government that attempts to reach past its constitutional authority should be suspect.
photo
Old Jarhead
often tested, always faithful, brothers forever
05:53 PM on 03/05/2011
Hamilton, in Federalist Number 29"

If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no recourse left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual State. In a single State, if the persons intrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair.
photo
Old Jarhead
often tested, always faithful, brothers forever
05:53 PM on 03/05/2011
Apologies, that should be Federalist 28.
photo
TexasTreader
My other dog is a gator
10:59 AM on 03/05/2011
There are enough guns already in the hands of the public that any move to increase background checks is pointless. I honestly can't remember the last time I bought a gun at a retailer. Hang out with enough gun owners and you find people who have one they don't favor. My last purchase was a 12-ga. autoload from a friend who fell in love with breach loaders. Great gun, low price and no paperwork.
11:22 AM on 03/05/2011
Goverment checks citizens to see if they can purchase a gun. DMV's check birth certificates to make sure someone is old enough to drive. Schools check student's paperwork to make sure they are in their district. Can't check to see if a person is in this country legally.
photo
TexasTreader
My other dog is a gator
11:36 AM on 03/05/2011
Yeah, that's a pickle alright.
photo
TexasTreader
My other dog is a gator
11:41 AM on 03/05/2011
In cases where the government refuses to respond to the citizens, what recourse do citizens have but to marshal their own resources and take care of themselves? I don't have a problem with that per se but then government calls US the outlaws. I would LOVE to have officials do their job but I cannot accept criminal enterprise in my community. If they won't handle it, I will. Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6.
08:05 PM on 03/04/2011
We,the pro-gun & NRA backers should be happy that we have to deal with MAIG,
a down to earth realistic org which asks for harmless concessions.

I agree with all the arguments which prove that the anti-gun are wrong...

Yes,caliber doesn't really matter, ( No murder with 50 cal,ever...)
yes,"assault " rifles are not necessarily more lethal than shotguns,
yes,other proposed by MAIG measures are bs & will not work...

BUT we have to give some, so as to get some..
To win the elimination of gun free zones,
the recognition of self defence ( without & with guns ) as a civil rght,
thus ending the no-guns signs in private premises...

Let's accept their silly irrational & not working requests so that we reach our goal..

WHEREVER A POLICE OFFICER CAN GO ARMED,WE CAN GO ARMED...
10:04 PM on 03/04/2011
"BUT we have to give some, so as to get some.."

Bull. After Heller and McDonald, RKBA is on offense. Why would we 'give' anything? There is no need. Its bulldozing time.

"To win the eliminatio­n of gun free zones,..."

As much as I think 'gun free zones' are really 'victim disarmament zones' these aren't going anywhere anytime soon. Heller specifically notes school areas as a 'sensitive area' where guns can be prohibited.

"the recognitio­n of self defense ( without & with guns ) as a civil right,"

Give it a couple more years in court. Semi-autos should be protected in the next couple of years. Large capacity magazines as well. Google Palmer vs District of Columbia. We're already pushing carry outside of the home. Heller already points to an 'immediate' ability to self defense. National CCW reciprocity almost passed last session. Likely to pass this session or within the next few years. Tag the Thune amendment onto a must have legislation (the debt ceiling bill) and its a done deal. Low hanging fruit 1st.

"...thus ending the no-guns signs in private premises..­."

Unlikely. Competing rights. People have the right to not allow guns on their property. We have the choice to find other work, eat and drink at other locations.

"Let's accept their silly irrational & not working requests so that we reach our goal.."

They will never stop. Sorry. I'm in no mood to bargain now that we are winning.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sentinel of the Republic
Government = Unintended Consequences
01:36 AM on 03/05/2011
I think I missed something, I thought you had to have a CPL, which requires a background check, to buy at a gun show. Is that incorrect?

I'm not opposed to putting a few checks on whether someone can buy, but I will never support a database that knows what I have. The less they know about my gear, should they ever decide to attempt disarming the public, the better.
photo
Old Jarhead
often tested, always faithful, brothers forever
09:06 AM on 03/05/2011
Sentinel asked if a CPL was necessary to purchase a firearm at a gun show. The simple answer is no, you need no license. When dealing with an FFL dealer, it is just like you have gone into his store. Fill out the ATF 4473, the dealer accomplishes the NICS background check, pay your money. If dealing with a private seller, there are no restrictions beyond you may not sell to the person if that person is known to you to be a felon or mentally ill. By federal law, you are restricted from calling NICS, and most dealers, if they will do a background check, will charge $100 or more. That is because of the paperwork requirements and permanent storage of the paperwork.
01:51 PM on 03/05/2011
Don'ty be afraid of politicians..

"Should they.."

Who is..."they "?

How can any politician ..disarm 7m carriers or...40m ( / whatever ) owners ..?

Cheer up...
04:51 PM on 03/04/2011
I don't know what you guys are arguing about. This guy is pushing for something the NRA supports. I don't see the issue on this one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
enlightened45
06:42 PM on 03/04/2011
The NRA is for it before they are against it....they make sure to create so many exceptions that any check is useless in application...
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
09:59 PM on 03/04/2011
W e l c o m e   W y o m i n g  !  !  !

Wyoming on Wednesday became the fourth state to allow citizens to carry concealed guns without a permit, with Gov. Matt Mead signing a bill into law as several other states considered similar action.

A n d   t  h e  b e a t  g o e s  on  !  !  !
The law allows state citizens legally entitled to own guns to carry them concealed starting in July.
12:52 PM on 03/07/2011
Such as?
04:01 PM on 03/04/2011
I repeat here the comment I ..regularly make in gun threads...

NRA represents us,the pro -gun people but there is a whole world,another America,
consisted of the non-gun & anti-gun people.

They have rights,concerns,doubts.

We must debate with them,as expressed by MAIG,find solutions,combinations & mutual compromises.

We can concede to anything harmlesss,as long as MAIG is willing to concede to our
desire to eliminate gun free zones & to eastablish gun carry as a civil right,
undeniable in any private property for public/commercial use...

Let the compromise debate between NRA & MAIG begin,for the greater good...
04:18 PM on 03/04/2011
Harry--what is NOT open to debate is that the 2nd amendment protects an INDIVIDUAL right to keep and BEAR firearms for traditionally lawful purposes such as self defense--and YES that includes Glocks, ARs and other semiauto firearms with manufacturer specification magazines by adults who have been convicted of nothing
04:37 PM on 03/04/2011
I don't think we disagree on the basics...

I am just trying for bipartisan centrist solutions & I believe that the pro-gun people should accept harmless & insignificant restrictions
in exchange for the proliferation of our rights...

U win some,u lose some..

We cannot win it all...
04:31 PM on 03/04/2011
I agree though I don't see groups like MAIG trying terribly hard to keep within the policy framework of Keep and Bear. As an example, they'd like to call the 15,000 or so yearly incidents of suicide with gun as "gun violence" (That's half of all gun deaths) and rather than suggest legal avenues for the chronically depressed to store their weapons with a friend until they get help and feel better, they want to ban "high capacity clips" which account for a tiny, tiny, fraction of gun crime and are irrelevant in almost all gun deaths.
photo
relians
the interconnectedness of all things
02:57 PM on 03/04/2011
i like the background check and the removing of loopholes. i really don't think we should publish their identity.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
BuckyJamesDio
This monkey's going to Heaven.
02:39 PM on 03/04/2011
I'm all for background checks - it makes perfect sense to me. Granted, no amount of legislation will keep guns out of the hands of a criminal or unstable person who truly desires one, but it makes the purchase of a gun more difficult for those people.

Also, neither myself nor anyone I know would object to a background check as there is already a waiting period in place, and quite frankly, if you need a gun right away, you should not be allowed to have one. Seriously.
02:01 PM on 03/04/2011
Publishing the names of gun owners? Why do we need to treat law-abiding citizens (the vast, vast majority of gun owners are) like sex offenders?

Yeah, that makes perfect sense. /sarcasm
photo
schotts
Work hard, play harder
03:47 PM on 03/04/2011
Good points. F&F.

and....

I'm proud....to be.... a CSU RAM!!!!
03:30 PM on 03/05/2011
Yeah! Thats what I am talkin about!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sentinel of the Republic
Government = Unintended Consequences
01:43 AM on 03/05/2011
I don't know why they'd want to do that anyway. If you know I'm armed to the teeth and my neighbor isn't, wouldn't you home invade my neighbor instead of me? It sounds like they're inviting tragedy to the homes of the unarmed.
03:31 PM on 03/05/2011
That is another great point. Well said.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VoteLibertarian
Despite your politics, I like you anyway.
11:56 AM on 03/04/2011
this is about the dumbest thing I've read since the last huff article i clicked on..
04:48 PM on 03/04/2011
Nobody's making you read here.
11:06 AM on 03/04/2011
It's obvious that this poll was biased or the pollster wouldn't be advocating for the policy changes in the results as she does in three or so other threads. If she were an honest pollster she would simply collect the data in as unbiased a manner as possible and let those who commissioned her to gather it do with it as they will. This is nothing new in American politics. You create a notion of support for your cause and then you submit it to sympathetic channels who repeat it as often as they can. This is an effort to create momentum where non existed. A media campaign if you will with her being an echo chamber for MAIG.
photo
Sugarmaker
Act like what you do makes a difference, it does
11:10 AM on 03/04/2011
Any political polling company will tell you there is little money in an objective poll.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AndyWright68
Freedom is inevitable!
10:54 AM on 03/04/2011
What a sad joke!

Restricting good people does nothing but empower the evil people. No law is going to prevent those who do not follow laws from getting guns. They only make it more difficult and more expensive for those who do follow laws, the good people.
10:38 AM on 03/04/2011
This is just an entirely ridiculous article and subject. Sure... give out the names and addresses of people that own guns. Ya might as well put an ad in the paper telling Tyrone where to go gun "shopping" real cheap! And what about ones right to privacy? Then what... we publish all names and addresses of people who DON'T own guns so Tyrone knows where to "shop" and is guaranteed not to get shot!

Use your heads people!
11:31 AM on 03/04/2011
My thoughts exactly!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sentinel of the Republic
Government = Unintended Consequences
01:50 AM on 03/05/2011
I think it's more likely "Tyrone" will know which houses are safe to invade. A lot less risk in selling a stolen Xbox than there is selling a stolen AR15. Not to mention getting shot isn't much fun, people with nice collections tend to keep them locked up, and the longer it takes to access said goodies means more time for the police to arrive once the house alarm goes off.
photo
Sugarmaker
Act like what you do makes a difference, it does
10:07 AM on 03/04/2011
"Democratic and Republican polling firms commissioned by Mayors Against Illegal Guns"

We can expect more polls by MIAG, I expect all of them to show support for the MIAG agenda, as does MIAG, who pays only for the results they want.