More

Natural Gas Industry Dumping More Wastewater Into Rivers Than A Year Ago

Fracking Water

DAVID B. CARUSO   03/ 1/11 09:41 PM ET   AP

NEW YORK — Pennsylvania's natural gas drillers are still flushing vast quantities of contaminated wastewater into rivers that supply drinking water, despite major progress by the industry over the past year in curtailing the practice.

Under pressure from environmentalists and state officials, energy companies that have been drilling thousands of gas wells in the state's countryside spent part of 2010 overhauling the way they handle the chemically tainted and sometimes radioactive water that gushes from the ground after a drilling technique known as high-volume hydraulic fracturing, or fracking.

Until the second half of last year, Pennsylvania had been the only state to allow most of this wastewater to be discharged into rivers after only partial treatment. Other states required most or all of the brine to be disposed of by injecting it deep underground.

In recent months, though, the industry has boasted big gains in the amount of well wastewater that is reused, rather than trucked to treatment plants that empty into rivers and streams.

New figures released by Pennsylvania regulators this week confirm many of those claims, showing that for the first time, a majority of well wastewater is now being recycled. But drilling in the vast, gas-rich rock formation known as the Marcellus Shale is growing so explosively that some of those gains are being erased by operators that still send their waste to plants that discharge into rivers.

Of the 10.6 million barrels of wastewater that gushed from the wells in the final six months of 2010, at least 65 percent was recycled, a dramatic increase from previous years, when little or no recycling took place. But the records also show that at least 2.8 million barrels of well wastewater were sent to treatment plants that discharge into rivers and streams.

By comparison, some 3.6 million barrels were sent to those same plants during the 12-month period that ended on June 30. That means that even with the recycling effort ramping up tremendously, more tainted wastewater is being dumped into rivers now than was the case a year ago.

A total of 1,386 new gas wells were drilled in the state last year, up from 768 a year earlier. Thousands more well permits have been approved.

Kathryn Klaber, president and executive director of the Marcellus Shale Coalition, a group that represents gas drillers, said in a statement that huge improvements in the recycling rate should be viewed as a success story.

"Pennsylvania is at the forefront of developing and implementing industry-leading water recycling and reuse technologies aimed at further reducing our environmental footprint. These commonsense advancements are a win-win for the environment, (and) local communities as well as our industry," she said.

Over the past year, most of the biggest drillers in Pennsylvania have moved toward systems in which water is recycled in new well projects. A variety of recycling methods exist, but most involve doing some light treatment of the wastewater, mixing it with fresh water, and then reusing it in the fracturing process. Companies benefit because it cuts down on the amount of fresh water they need.

Seneca Resources Corp., a subsidiary of National Fuel, reported reusing some 5 million barrels in well wastewater in the last 6 months of 2010.

Range Resources Appalachia, one of the first companies to heavily promote recycling as a solution, also eschewed river dumping entirely. Of the 400,000 barrels of wastewater it generated, much went into deep disposal wells. The rest was recycled.

Other big producers, including Chief Oil & Gas, Cabot Oil & Gas and Atlas Energy Inc., which was purchased by the Chevron Corp. in February, reported a mix of disposal options that include both recycling and the wastewater treatment plants that were previously dominant.

Even as it has made changes, the industry has argued that its original practice of sending most wastewater through partial treatment, and then into rivers, posed no danger to the environment or drinking water.

The drilling boom in the Marcellus Shale and other parts of the U.S. has been made possible by innovations in fracking, in which millions of gallons of water laced with sand and chemicals are injected into wells at such high pressure that the rocks split open, unlocking the gas. Some of the water comes gushing back up, polluted with metals like barium and strontium, and sometimes tainted with high levels of radium or benzene.

Pennsylvania has a few plants that specialize in treating wastewater from the oil, coal and gas business, and operators of these facilities say that they are adept at removing many of the worrisome contaminants.

They are unable, however, to remove the salty dissolved solids and chlorides that the wastewater picks up as it travels through the shale beds. There have been concerns about the salt levels rising in some Pennsylvania rivers that supply drinking water.

A smaller amount of wastewater, about 14 percent in the latest state data, is also being sent to municipal sewage plants that lack the ability to remove contaminants as efficiently as some of the treatment facilities that specialize in oil and gas industry waste.

Some environmentalists have also questioned what happens to all the water that is injected into gas wells but never comes back up. Industry experts have argued that the water is contained in rock formations so deep, there is no potential for it to escape and contaminate local groundwater. But opponents of drilling frequently cite examples where residential water wells have suddenly turned foul in areas where new wells had been dug.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

NEW YORK — Pennsylvania's natural gas drillers are still flushing vast quantities of contaminated wastewater into rivers that supply drinking water, despite major progress by the industry over t...
NEW YORK — Pennsylvania's natural gas drillers are still flushing vast quantities of contaminated wastewater into rivers that supply drinking water, despite major progress by the industry over t...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 59
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:14 AM on 03/16/2011
We all need clean air, clean water and safe food to eat.

How can these polluters live with themselves?

Big money, greed and years of deregulation by Republicans........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cosmiCataclysm
06:24 PM on 03/14/2011
"Pennsylvania's natural gas drillers are still flushing vast quantities of contaminated wastewater into rivers that supply drinking water, *DESPITE MAJOR PROGRESS* by the industry OVER THE PAST YEAR IN CURTAILING THE PRACTICE."

Bwoiingggg *** MY BRAIN JUST FRIED ITSELF....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PAGasDriller
09:36 AM on 03/16/2011
it depends on your definition of the word contamination. I'm not trying to go all Bill Clinton on you, but the Marcellus waste water in PA is safe. When they say contaminated, they mean it has a high salt content. They dilute the water significantly, and there are strict restrictions on how much water can be accepted by water treatment plants (no more than 1%). With salty water, the "solution is dilution". If properly diluted the water is no longer contaminated. There are some facilities where water is handled that does not have the ability to handle the trace amounts of mildly radioactive material, but the DEP has been monitoring radiation levels downstream of treatment facilities that are discharging and have found radiation levels to be at or below the norm.
10:33 AM on 03/17/2011
Don't p on my leg and say it's raining.

That water is not safe and neither is frakking. Has everyone lost their freaking minds?
04:22 PM on 03/22/2011
This is definitely a half truth at best. Its true that salt is one contaminate found in the wastewater, but it certainly isn't the only. The shale that gets broken apart during fracking can contain heavy metals (such as arsenic, lead, etc) and radioactive elements. You also failed to mention the chemicals that are pumped into the ground to "soften" the shale (chemicals that have been banned in the EU.) Under current laws, gas driller don't even have to test wastewater for radioactivity! The DEC has found radioactive levels over 250 times the current EPA allowable limit in some of these "only salt" waste waters. Stop lying to these people!
03:39 PM on 03/10/2011
Our most precious resource is WATER, not OIL. This is so backwards it hurts my every being. Drilling for a finite, nonrenewable resource and at the same time poisoning our water supplies. The number one killer in the world is already water borne disease. Do we need to add to that? Corporate greed is polluting our ground and surface water reservoirs at an astounding rate. This story is merely a drop in the pond.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PAGasDriller
09:44 AM on 03/16/2011
You can think gas companies are as greedy as you like, but they're not contaminating water supplies. There are a handful of cases where methane migration has been an issue, but methane is not a health concern and is easily fixed if it happens. I'm not sure what you are basing your statements that the industry is polluting ground and surface water at an astounding rate on... but it's certainly not fact.
10:35 AM on 03/17/2011
Yeah, that is why we are reading an article about water contamination. Because it doesn't exist. Corporations would NEVER pollute. Come on I appreciate you taking up for your employer and all but I doubt you'd want to drink that water you say is so clean.
04:04 PM on 03/22/2011
"but they're not contaminating water supplies"
Well from your username, its not surprising you are defending the natural gas industry. But to flat out lie like that is pretty sad. Would you like me to cite example after example? How about what PG&E did to the town of Hinkley Ca? Hexavalent chromium made its way into the groundwater supplies thanks to PG&E's negligence (unlined evaporation ponds). Not PG&E's fault right? Whatever helps you sleep at night.
07:28 PM on 03/09/2011
The thing that I can't understand is why this issue hasn't got the attention of every so called "Environmental Activist" in the country. I hear about people spending $$ on organizations to promote safe drinking water all over the world, but right here, right now we are facing contamination of drinking water for hundreds of thousands of people in NY, PA, TX, CO, WY, AR where ever this industry is using hydro fracking to extract natural gas. YET the only person i see on the news is Charlie Sheen!
Thousands of people sick from air and water contamination, animals dieing and land so toxic it has no value, yet there isn't but a handful of us fighting this fight.
Pittsburgh, PA was the first to ban fracking in the city, yet they are signing leases and ready to move in all around us. This is the kind of destruction that can be avoided if people would just get active and speak up. We need help and we need it fast. Where is everyone??? Josh Fox has worked tirelessly since his movie "Gasland" was nominated for an Oscar. Yet weeks later when I expected to see some people out in LA or NY come to help us we are still struggling to get the word out. Where is everybody???????
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MysticInd
07:11 PM on 03/10/2011
Yeap you got it; the idiots rule the air waves; sad and very dangerous for us on this planet.
03:24 PM on 03/15/2011
I agree and also Tom Corbett, I feel , needs to be recalled immediately! what he is allowing to happen in his own backyard is despicable! while cutting education budgets, meanwhile the state recieves no money from the gas extractions.. wow! what a sweet deal for the gas co's!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R2D2-51
Flower Power Forever
12:44 PM on 03/07/2011
THE END LITERALLY

Are you willing to accept a level of risk of getting Pancreatic or Liver Cancer at the level of 1 in 10 million, or will 1 in 500,000 suffice. The difference in cost to the profit makers could be 20 million dollars to implement for 500k versus 100 million to achieve 1 in 10 million risk levels, so they will use skewed scientific data unless everyone is savvy on knowing how to digest and critique research methodologies

And thus the selfish corporate profit motives of this completely corrupted former democracy has all but placed you in a position where not only is your financial security being placed at major risk, but you and your families health and welfare is put at risk to the same profit maker forces that changed how our society is governed solely to drive up bottom-line profits that serve only the top 1% of this national disgrace.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PAGasDriller
09:54 AM on 03/16/2011
Here's a "skewed" fact. There has not been a single case of fracking chemicals ending up in underground aquifers in Pennsylvania. NOT A SINGLE ONE. It has never happened before. Tens of thousands of wells drilled, not a single case of contamination. Yet people here would have you believe that EVERY SINGLE WELL THAT IS DRILLED IS CONTAMINATING.

You guys are so far removed from the facts that it's scary. Your blind hatred of the oil companies is scary.
photo
BigRex
We need to talk about your TPS reports.
12:22 PM on 03/18/2011
"DIMOCK, Pa. (AP) — A private consulting firm says it found toxic chemicals in the drinking water of a Pennsylvania community already dealing with methane contamination from natural gas drilling.

Environmental engineer Daniel Farnham said Thursday that his tests, which were verified by three laboratories, found industrial solvents such as toluene and ethylbenzene in "virtually every sample" taken from water wells in Dimock Township, Susquehanna County.

Farnham, who has tested water for both gas interests and for local residents, said it would be impossible to say that the chemicals he found were caused by gas drilling.

The chemicals, at least one of which, ethylbenzene, may cause cancer, are among dozens used to hydraulically fracture shale deposits to unlock natural gas trapped thousands of feet underground. The chemicals are also used in an array of products ranging from paint thinner to gasoline."

http://www.chem.info/News/2010/09/Safety-Report-Fracking-Chemicals-in-PA-Water-Wells/
04:40 PM on 03/22/2011
Blind hatred? I think not. Once again you are the one posting lies and half-truths. Can you explain to me why the residents along the Monongahela River were advised to drink bottled water in 2008? DEP testing showed levels of salts and dissolved minerals that were way above safe limits. I can once again cite many many more examples. This isn't just happening in PA. Its a major issue. The direct cause: FRACKING!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R2D2-51
Flower Power Forever
12:43 PM on 03/07/2011
POST 1

The crux of the problem," cost to risk benefit analysis".

Its central to how Neoliberal Capitalism works--selfishness.

Our oligarch bureaucrats and corporate purveyors of greed versus life affirming investments that demonstrate their love for humanity demonstrates they don't put much value on life itself as shocking as that may sound, but I have known peers that could care less if your child was born with leukemia, a cleft, a malformed club foot/head & spend one extra dime of profit to prevent it by introducing more effective wastewater treatment systems that remove hazardous radioactive nucleotides from your drinking water.

Risk boils down to what policy makers believe is an acceptable risk they can sell you on and that’s purely subjective and differentiated by your own sense of what you’re willing to risk.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blabberator
Who cut the cheese?
09:40 AM on 03/07/2011
Polluting our water will create another mega money-maker for shameless corporations - the water industry. Perhaps there will be a futures market for water and we will pay for it by the gallon. There are already corps that sell water for profit.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
roydoe
roydoe knows all-sometimes
09:35 AM on 03/07/2011
It's all OK because they are making money! F*ck the people and the planet!
Who can stand in the way when there's a dollar to be made?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blabberator
Who cut the cheese?
09:34 AM on 03/07/2011
Carson's book: Silent Spring
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blabberator
Who cut the cheese?
09:33 AM on 03/07/2011
Rachel Carson (remember her anyone) screamed her warning about pollution decades ago. We didn't listen.
photo
PharmaCan
Trying to make sense of it all
09:30 AM on 03/07/2011
It is absolutely amazing that oil companies are allowed to partake in fracking with absolutely no scientific research into the ramifications to the underground environment. This kind of uncontrolled placement of toxic substances in the environment happened before, during the early 2oth century, and we still have numerous "Superfund sites" of toxic waste that remain to be cleaned from that failed experiment.

The area of the earth where fracking is taking place is the natural storage area for much of the water we need to exist. Yet, they are allowed to disrupt those areas with their polluted filth as if there will be no consequences whatsoever. The fact that they are then allowed to further pollute our surface water with whatever toxins they can't leave underground is a sure recipe for disaster. Didn't we learn our lesson from the toxic rivers that were created when factories were allowed to discharge their pollutants into our waterways?

Our entire country is undergoing a repeat of the abuses of the oligarchs that took place 100 years ago, not just with pollution but with everything from the corruption of government to the suppression of the working class.

What is the most disturbing aspect of this entire scenario is that it is so unnecessary. One hundred years ago we didn't have the technology for clean manufacturing or clean energy, today we do.

It is a well establish fact that you can't put toxic substances into the ground without toxic results. We have seen this time and time again just from instances where toxic substances were allowed to leak into the ground. Yet, now we are allowing oil companies to inject toxins into the ground under tremendous pressure and we are told, "Don't worry, it's safe."

It's madness, it really is!
photo
rbenjamin
Rule 5 rules
09:36 AM on 03/07/2011
It's the age old case of "out of sight, out of mind." At least until you can ignite the gas coming out of your kitchen tap. This is how environmental disasters start.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R2D2-51
Flower Power Forever
12:51 PM on 03/07/2011
Its more than madness by any standards its a crime against humanity and planetary life systems that are already in rapid decline as a result of the same profit driven companies who could care less weather your newborn child ends up with leukemia because your wife/Mother to be was drinking contaminated drinking water for years not having any knowledge the water was full of many PPM's of acutely hazardous mutagenic and teratogenic properties that represent a direct threat to your health and welfare.

And if that were not enough we now have a viral pathogen released in our food chain from frankenstein having unleashed it when Monsanto wanted a monopoly for profit motives the worlds seed bank thus food supply.
See

Roundup, GMOs linked to emergence of deadly new pathogen causing spontaneous abortions among animals

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/031473_GMOs_pathogens.html#ixzz1Fw2i3Jhv
http://www.naturalnews.com/031473_GMOs_pathogens.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blabberator
Who cut the cheese?
09:30 AM on 03/07/2011
BAD GAS ! Who do you trust folks? The gas corps? Do you believe that they are protectors of the environment?

Bet their execs get big bonuses while the water goes bad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alafonse
It's definitely a crap-shoot.
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
01:47 AM on 03/07/2011
Glad I moved out of PA. It used to be a natural paradise.

I can see why the Koch brothers are instructing the people they put into office to go after the EPA.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Rockett
11:50 PM on 03/06/2011
Bottle the waste water and make them and their families drink it every day. End of pollution.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Each1Teach1
Ignorance is costly
12:07 AM on 03/07/2011
Amen to that! Steve Rockett, I think I love you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PAGasDriller
09:58 AM on 03/16/2011
Misplaced liberal rage is so adorable.
photo
abbienormal
What hump?
08:44 AM on 03/19/2011
But not as cute as corporate lackeys.
01:02 PM on 03/26/2011
Your backwoods, out-of-date rupublican thinking is what gets this country into mess after mess. Drill baby drill, right? At all costs. Lets just cover up the truth and let our water supplies continue to be poisoned, as these greedy liars continue to fill their pockets.