iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

General Stanley McChrystal On Who Benefits From Middle East Unrest

Stanley Mcchrystal Ted 2011 Middle East

First Posted: 03/05/11 05:08 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:35 PM ET

Amidst the recent turmoil in the Middle East, General Stanley McChrystal, former commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, said the U.S. will benefit from the protest movement in the Arab World, while extremist groups like Al Qaeda will suffer most.

"I'm very excited about it," McChrystal said of the uprisings in the Middle East during a speech at the TED conference. "When I think about the great causes of frustration and extremism, I think [they] often [come] when people don't feel like they have a stake in their own governance. I think the degree to which countries can evolve and let generations feel like they're part of the country and part of the future...helps us in so many ways. I think the big losers are extremist organizations like Al Qaeda because they leverage that frustration."

Al Jazeera director general Wadah Khanfar expressed similar optimism during his own presentation at TED, arguing that the Arab World is celebrating the "beginning of magnificent era."

Yet in the aftermath of the ousting of Hosni Mubarak and Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali, as well as ongoing unrest in Libya, Iraq, and Yemen, little is certain. Many are concerned that new dictatorships could replace the autocratic leaders that previously helmed Egypt and Tunisia.

McChrystal, who retired last summer, outlined in broad terms what the United States should aim to accomplish in Afghanistan, while also noting that the Afghan people "have a tremendous reservoir of goodwill for America."

"I hope that what is happening in Afghanistan is that we're trying to give the Afghan people the chance to craft their own future," he said. "I think that they want us to help them build their future. They don't want us to be their future. They don't want us to stay. They want a helping hand long enough to do it."

His presentation at TED, which received a standing ovation, centered on what he has learned from confronting new leadership challenges presented by new technology, personnel changes, and generational gaps that reshaped his interactions with his forces.

"We had so many changes at the lower levels with technology and tactics and whatnot that suddenly the things that we grew up doing were not what the force was doing anymore," McChrystal explained. "So how [do leaders] stay credible and legitimate when they haven't done what the people they're leading are doing?"

He described the difficulty of having to rely on email, phone calls, and video teleconferencing to command, communicate with, and inspire confidence in a team of people spread across 20 different countries. He also recalled speaking with a young ranger in Afghanistan who said he had been in sixth grade during the 9/11 attacks. Experiences such as these, said McChrystal, "forced me to become a lot more transparent, a lot more willing to listen, and a lot more willing to be reverse mentored from lower -- and yet, you're not all in one room."

He added that this novel set of challenges has helped him to see personal relationships as "more important than ever," serving as the "sinew that hold a force together."

McChrystal also shared the "eternal question" he poses to himself every time he jumps out of a plane: "Why didn't I go into banking?"

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

Amidst the recent turmoil in the Middle East, General Stanley McChrystal, former commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, said the U.S. will benefit from the protest movement in the Arab World, while ...
Amidst the recent turmoil in the Middle East, General Stanley McChrystal, former commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, said the U.S. will benefit from the protest movement in the Arab World, while ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 568
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
06:06 AM on 03/07/2011
Wow… seems like everyone in the U$ political/MIC system just found discovered these regimes they backed for all these decades were tyrannical…..

LMAO
06:11 AM on 03/07/2011
*note to self, must get in habit of proofreading
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ron Battista II
03:42 PM on 03/06/2011
OH, like this guy has anything that needs hearing.
photo
CigarGod
What is your process?
01:14 PM on 03/06/2011
If protests like this happened in the usa and he was in charge, he'd fireon them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fein
Either everybody counts or nobody does.
01:12 PM on 03/06/2011
Bad news. I was optimistic about the uprisings in the Arab world.

But when a Neocon shill like this endorses them, it can only mean that the results will be other U.S. endorsed strongmen possibly even worse than the previous ones.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:07 PM on 03/06/2011
Scarey thought.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
From the Raft
10:40 PM on 03/06/2011
The Neocon are hoping the uprisings give the U.S. an openning for a new war.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fein
Either everybody counts or nobody does.
11:11 AM on 03/07/2011
True.

And there are major mobilizations going on at this time at U.S. military bases.

'Celebrations in Mordor.'
batguano
As Long As Grass Grow, Wind Blow & The Sky Is Blue
08:59 AM on 03/06/2011
A Perfect foil?

The Tunisian revolution happened at blazing-fast speed, & the Egyptian too massive & popular to stop. Western Oligarchs, oil conglomerates, & government enablers, are now in a sweat. In Libya, where Gaddafi has at least a tenuous (& apparently growing) grip on power, ability to buy support & killer mercenaries, use aircraft, & better armaments, the power elite & military have a great opportunity to intentionally dither while the rebels are rubbed-out by the delusional & vicious Gaddafi & hired thugs.

Gates sez “we cannot do this & that” for one possibly specious reason or another. Overt Western intervention may be counterproductive; it will certainly be perceived as totally unacceptable foreign intervention given the history of the West in the ME, even though some in the Libyan opposition are asking for some measure of aid.

The UN is, as usual, tied in knots & impotent: thus the supposed champions of freedom & justice are shown to be either co-opted to the oil conglomerates//MIC & greed over human rights, or just too emasculated & part of the conspiracy of uselessness that empowers the greedy-rich through inaction (or collusion) to steal & waste the Earth’s natural resources at the expense of people, for them to stand-up & actually do something of substance for justice & end the violence. Are Western powers willingly/intentionally allowing Gadaffi to maintain control & thus “stability” (support Israel) through inaction; do they not want to see another truly transformative revolution in North Africa that will
batguano
As Long As Grass Grow, Wind Blow & The Sky Is Blue
09:17 AM on 03/06/2011
Dropped ending;

that will potentially diminish profits, power, & “threaten” Israeli hegemony?
06:09 AM on 03/07/2011
Interesting post BG… Certainly would seem that way.
photo
david5000
Detective & Pilot
08:33 AM on 03/06/2011
For over 70 years, the Brits warned the Americans on the middle east, it's a world on it's own, it has its customs and way, they are not like the western values and why?

Because of Islam that represent the bulk of the population of the middle east .

We add to it the disaster that the western world caused by creating a state inside another state which inflamed the masses and until today, the main goal is the destruction to this creation.

I don't know if it will ever happen, but the western world keep coming back with projects that is worsening the situation until they cause their own economic doom and with it, the possible destruction of their prized work.

If the new generation of regimes that the west is creating is materialized, by design , the oil will reach $200/B and there is nothing the west can do besides pay and go into deep recessions and possibly a multi years depression.

As long as the west has in their pocket a handful of leaders, the flow of the oil would not be affected, but once these friendly leaders are gone, we should expect the 350 million Arabs will march with stones and sticks and destroy the symbol of the western world that was created 60 years ago.
06:20 AM on 03/07/2011
It's already started… The new Prime-minister and foreign minister of 3gypt are both against what is commonly known as "Normalization" with |$rae|….

Good post btw
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tyler James Lee
08:21 AM on 03/06/2011
Why didn't he go into banking? Not much of a general...
10:45 AM on 03/06/2011
really?
You must know nothing of the man and his time in uniform.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tyler James Lee
09:46 PM on 03/06/2011
I know what he did in Afghanistan. But he has the disadvantage of being a general officer. I despise the officer class and especially despise the echelons above reason, the generals...Military bureaucrats don't impress me, no matter how decorative their attire.
07:07 AM on 03/06/2011
We are still fighting wars in 2 third world countries after 8 years. I see no reason to value the opinion of our Leaders who got us into this mess, or continue to believe we can win it (whatever that means). After 3 tries at passing differential calculus I knew when to withdraw.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
proudtohaveserved
09:28 AM on 03/06/2011
you too,old geek? It didn't take me three times, gtwo times did it for me
IndependentGadfly
Oh dear, lost another fan ...
10:53 AM on 03/06/2011
Afghanistan is not differential calculus. It's more art and social science. More right brain than left. And that's where McChrystal and his ilk failed and continue to fail. I worked for these poor deluded souls on my deployment to that miserable place. The COINdasnistas have authored a failed philosophy and have propagated it on our electorate and are making the world more, not less, dangerous.

(disclosure: I aced DE on my first try and have never used it in my work life)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
atexasdem
Pointing out the foolishness of republican voters.
02:42 AM on 03/06/2011
As I read these posts I'm slowly beginning to understand why Palin, Bachman, Beck, Limbaugh, The Tea Party, etc.. find their audience. They have no clue to how the military works, what a soldier goes through or what actually being in combat is like. McCrystal made a mistake and criticized his commander in chief in front of a reporter. It ended his career. That's the price he paid for a moment of stating his honest opinion in front of the wrong person.
That does not over ride his 30 years of service in some of the toughest units and combat in the United States Army. The man spent a career in Special Forces and unconventional warfare. He rose to the top in a field where 99% of you wouldn't last 1/2 a day. You who are not worthy of shining the generals shoes would criticize him? This man rose through the ranks and commanded the best of the best. Special Forces, SEALS, Marine Recon, Delta force. Ask any former combat soldier what that means if you dare. Afterward, go back to your recliner, open another beer, have some more chips and thank god that America has men like this willing to die while making it safe for you to sit in that recliner getting fat while gripping about the job they do..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Virgil Starkwell
dissent w/o resistance is consent.
05:10 AM on 03/06/2011
He disrespected his commander. End of story. He should not be in uniform. And you disrespect the American public painting all of us in a recliner eating potato chips and drinking beer.
10:48 AM on 03/06/2011
He is retired, and the american public is an arm-chair quarter back when it comes to war, politics, and sports. Knowing the theory does not make someone an expert in the execution.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:28 AM on 03/06/2011
Ok, he's a tough guy. But for what? Did he use his toughness for something useful or just to kill people who didn't want to be servants of American corporations? Men like him certainly did a fine job of killing people in Southeast Asia and for what? Today Vietnam is comparatively peaceful and has a modest international economy. China, as we hear every day, more or less owns us thanks to our brilliant political and business leaders. So I guess all that baloney about 'falling dominoes' was, well, insincere.
Since we put Saddam Hussein in power, the generals get only half a point for spending trillions to get him out of power. And let's see, which Afghans launched an unprovoked attack on the United States and now pose such a serious threat to America? Oh, right. None.
It was the Saudis who rammed the planes into the World Trade Center towers, not the Afghans. But wait, McCrystal didn't invade Saudi Arabia just because that country supplied 15 of the 19 hijackers. He was too busy being tough to figure out where to point his highly trained skills.
Maybe he is a great soldier and in some way I haven't heard of, a good guy. Could be. But killing impoverished locals for the greater glory of Exxon, Haliburton and Goldman Sachs ain't my idea of heroism. It's just tough-guy opportunism, and I've seen enough of that.
10:54 AM on 03/06/2011
Such a narrow view.
Saudi Arabia is dealing with(and has been for years) it's own internal strife because of bored, privileged youth who become foot soldiers of extremism.
It is Afghanistan, FATA, North African countries, and HOA where foreign fighters such as the hijackers start their training and then Iraq, Afghanistan, Bahrain, UAE, Indonesia, America, UK, Germany, and Scandinavia where they make their attacks.

He is a tough and brilliant man for doing what his country has asked him to do. In case you want to respond back that YOU didn't ask him to do it, remember that you voted, and by voting you gave your voice to your elected leaders. Kind of like a proxy card as an investor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Horatio Nelson
01:49 AM on 03/06/2011
The craving for democracy is ALWAYS good, General. There is a mathematical idea called "the wisdom of the crowds" that will always support it. Those who seek democracy and ultimately fail serve a higher purpose than resigned acceptance. Resigned acceptance is in its death throes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Arts4u
It's better than a reality show.
10:07 PM on 03/05/2011
According to recent polls only 32% of Afghanistan citizens want the US there. This is mirrored in Libya's desire for no American military intervention. Enough said about our 'nation building' days. There is your transparency.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Happy Clb
01:26 AM on 03/06/2011
they only started nation building very, very late in the game. they allowed (under bush) corruption to run absolutely rampant and invested as little as possible in securing and stabilizing afghanistan.

that's the price we're paying now. this isn't really nation building. it's stabilizing. afghanistan is the worst of the worst case scenarios for nation building, geo-politically, geographically, natural resource-wise, and population.

it is the worst of the worst. the diplomatic community knows better and i think politicians are finally getting a clue.

if you want to look at case studies for nation building and how long it takes to get to democracy, look at s. korea and taiwan as examples - about 40 years... and this was with relatively educated, functional, family unit intact populations.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Arts4u
It's better than a reality show.
10:01 PM on 03/05/2011
"When I think about the great causes of frustration and extremism, I think [they] often [come] when people don't feel like they have a stake in their own governance. I think the degree to which countries can evolve and let generations feel like they're part of the country and part of the future...helps us in so many ways.

Kind of like the income division in the US, huh?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martin Houde
I am no microbe
09:05 PM on 03/05/2011
That's right.

Let the Afghan people get rid of the Karzai clique !

That's not to say give power to the Taliban who are just drug warlords these days. Afghans need help for a civil society. Military to keep the Taliban off, but mostly civilian to build institutions and police than will stand the test of warlords and ignorance.

Now, it's only the former Northern Alliance clique getting billions in aid to rule the country and get unbelievably wealthy through corruption while doing so.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:55 PM on 03/05/2011
This is hilarious. The US was in a position to cashier ALL of these regimes for decades - puppets all. Now that the peoples are themselves attempting to gain their freedom, all those like the General are madly scrambling to recover in the PR world - and it's now completely evident that Arab democracy is NOT what the US is aiming for.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:49 PM on 03/05/2011
Generals need a war.  The MiC needs generals.  The US economy needs MIC.  Dominoes; anyone?
01:34 AM on 03/06/2011
No, the MIC needs the US to have enemies, and the US economy needs to get the MIC put back in its place, not dictating foreign policy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
waldopepper
I'd tell you all about me if you were my friend.
04:40 AM on 03/06/2011
Good post. If I might make one observation.

The US and indeed the world is largely indifferent to what form of government is prevalent in the region. Why? Because the one thing that is sought above all else is stability. This is necessary for the global economy. It is a simple as that. If the people of the region can perform the democratic alchemy and transform their nations into approximations of democracies, then that will be just fine with the US (and the remainder of the world). As long as stability is not threatened, too much.

Additionally, there is a disputed theory that democracies are somehow inherently less warlike than other forms of government. Some even suggest that two democracies have never fought with each other. See here for more on this... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_peace_theory

If this theory is supported (believed in) in Washington, then the US would be perfectly happy to have democracies throughout the region. Because stability would be enhanced by this development. Up until recently, the US has preferred stability to even the risks of change that the region is enduring now. But now that change has come to the region clearly the US and the remainder of the world are making a virtue of a necessity.
photo
HufferDave87
Give me the facts, then I'll decide...
07:41 PM on 03/05/2011
I'm no McChrystal fan, but I do tend to agree with the one quotation:

"I think the degree to which countries can evolve and let generations feel like they're part of the country and part of the future...helps us in so many ways. I think the big losers are extremist organizations like Al Qaeda because they leverage that frustration."

Radical religious groups are sustained by economic and social frustration in many situations.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:51 PM on 03/05/2011
...yes, radical religious groups are sustained by economic and social frustration in many situations;  they are also sustained by the wealthy who use religion to keep the population "in line".  Who was it that said that "religion is the opiate of the masses?"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SPacific
Get a clue, then get a life
03:49 AM on 03/06/2011
Karl Marx
10:57 AM on 03/06/2011
Religion is just one reason, some people just want to watch the world burn.