NYR More

eMail's Binding Power In Publishing Deals

Email

First Posted: 03/07/11 10:53 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:35 PM ET

publishersweekly.com:

In February the New York Times ran a story warning real estate brokers and property owners to pay close attention to the e-mails they send, after a ruling in Manhattan Supreme Court stipulated that e-mail messages carry just as much sway as written documents in negotiations.

Read the whole story: publishersweekly.com

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BOOKS

In February the New York Times ran a story warning real estate brokers and property owners to pay close attention to the e-mails they send, after a ruling in Manhattan Supreme Court stipulated that e-...
In February the New York Times ran a story warning real estate brokers and property owners to pay close attention to the e-mails they send, after a ruling in Manhattan Supreme Court stipulated that e-...
Filed by Zoe Triska  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
SF TKF
Cthulhu thinks you'd make a nice sandwich.
02:11 PM on 03/23/2011
How could they when they don’t contain all of the nitty-gritty details. That’s like saying you can’t back out of buying a house after putting in an offer, no matter what turns up during the inspection. Saying yes to the monetary offer is only the first step in a long process of negotiations, all of which cumulate in a WRITTEN contract.
11:42 AM on 03/07/2011
Here's a solution: produce a contract in a reasonable and timely basis. Finalized publishing contracts take a ridiculous amount of time to get in hand---a fault that lies squarely with the publishers. Publishers produce the contracts. Most contracts are standardized in one way or another, yet I've had contracts take months to appear. The fastest I've had a fully signed contract in hand is something like three months. It shouldn't take a week, but it's a low priority inhouse.

No sympathy.