iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Buddy Roemer Is Fine With State-Sanctioned Gay Marriage, Just Not In His State

Buddy Roemer

First Posted: 03/08/11 05:51 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:35 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- One day after touting his social conservative bona fides during a speech at the Iowa Faith & Freedom Coalition, likely GOP presidential candidate Buddy Roemer showed off what he called his “libertarian” side.

In an interview with The Huffington Post on Tuesday, the former Louisiana governor said that while he personally does not support gay marriage, he believes each U.S. state should be able to make its own decision on the matter.

“I’m a traditionalist in marriage,” Roemer, a self-described “southern Methodist boy,” said. “Here’s as far as I can go: I’m comfortable with the states having this discussion. And I’m all for -- in my extended family, not my wife or kids, but beyond -- cousins, that sort of thing -- we have a gay member. We honor him. He’s a great guy. He moved to California so he would be in a community where he would be more comfortable. And I love living in a country where gays are honored and esteemed, but traditional lives can continue as well.”

So if a state voted to legalize gay marriage or a form of civil unions, you’d be fine with that?

“That’s right,”said Roemer, who has been divorced twice. “[If] I was living in the state or was part of the debate, I would oppose it, I want to make that clear. But that’s why we have 50 states. They’re all a little bit different.”

Roemer is a bit different, too. One week after unexpectedly announcing that he’d explore a presidential run, the Louisiana Republican is embracing the role of the dark horse candidate with the freedom to be blunt.

As a firm member of what the media calls the “second tier” of presidential candidates, Roemer's best shot at visibility and viability is to distinguish himself from the rest of that pack, which so far includes the likes of Herman Cain, the founder of Godfather’s Pizza, and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum. But Roemer -- who in 1991 lost a three-way gubernatorial race that included onetime Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard David Duke -- insisted that his candidacy for the White House wasn’t a vanity project.

“I never run a race for the exercise,” Roemer said. “There are issues in my world that I encourage others to solve. And when they don’t solve them, I occasionally step forward myself.”

The problems that Roemer sees are myriad, but his diagnoses aren’t necessarily knee-jerk, ideological ones. His criticism of President Barack Obama's signature health care law, for example, is not that it is an unconstitutional government overreach, as many conservatives claim, but rather that it is a huge giveaway to private industry and special interests.

“It’s a monstrosity,” he said, gearing up to deliver a lengthy list of gripes. Among them: lack of tort reform, failure to apply antitrust laws to insurance companies, sweetheart deals to pharmaceutical companies -- the latter of which was negotiated by another Louisianan, former congressman and PhRMA chief executive Billy Tauzin.

“This is not health care reform. This was written by the special interests," Roemer said. "This was written by the lobbyists. This was written by insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies.”

Minus the pining for tort reform, his critique of the bill sounds more like that of an unfiltered liberal pol than a diehard conservative.

Then there is Afghanistan. While the Republican Party has clearly begun souring on the war, Roemer offers a different brand of skepticism. It’s not about the cost that bother him, because he insists there should be no firm deadlines for troop withdrawals. Rather, he takes issue with the widespread and widely-reported corruption in Afghan President Hamid Karzai's government.

“It’s a tenuous situation,” he says of the war, “and it’s made more so by the corruption of Karzai and his henchmen … It is run by corruption, and we cannot win there with he same strategy that won in Iraq, because at the end of the day, corruption always rules.”

Roemer's political eccentricity is less surprising given that he hasn't held public office in nearly two decades and his political career included a lengthy stint as a Democrat before joining the GOP. But his unconventional views are bound to make his bid for the presidency more difficult. At the Iowa Faith & Freedom Coalition, Roemer repeatedly railed against ethanol subsidies -- a graphic example of government funding that critics call wasteful but is nevertheless cherished by the corn growers of Iowa.

“I’m prepared to lose Iowa, Sam, let me confess that to you,” Roemer said with all the seriousness of someone who thinks he could win that critical caucus were he to simply bite his tongue. Early in his political career, he said, he learned a "powerful" lesson: "If you’re going to bring some bad news, bring it early and explain it.”

In the end, this may be the function that Roemer serves. As the primary campaign descends into its usual circus, someone from that second tier gets to claim the title of truth-teller, as Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) was dubbed in 2008. Paul may well reprise that role in 2012, but until he announces his intentions, Roemer is comfortable, if not eager, to define himself by his sharp elbows.

Thanked for the time spent doing an interview with The Huffington Post, the governor attempted to return the appreciation.

“I’d be glad to stay in touch. You just got to work for a different organization," he quipped. Oh, and one more thing: "Don’t tell anybody we talked, Sam.”

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- One day after touting his social conservative bona fides during a speech at the Iowa Faith & Freedom Coalition, likely GOP presidential candidate Buddy Roemer showed off what he called h...
WASHINGTON -- One day after touting his social conservative bona fides during a speech at the Iowa Faith & Freedom Coalition, likely GOP presidential candidate Buddy Roemer showed off what he called h...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 854
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (23 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
obtusegoose
aka David in the O.C.
06:22 PM on 03/12/2011
"And I’m all for -- in my extended family, not my wife or kids, but beyond -- cousins, that sort of thing -- we have a gay member. We honor him. He’s a great guy. He moved to California so he would be in a community where he would be more comfortable. And I love living in a country where gays are honored and esteemed, but traditional lives can continue as well."
------------------------------
Truly, one of the most homophobic statements I've read in a long time. He's basically saying, "I'm okay with "the queers" as long as they ain't in my family. Thank God, San Francisco will take them all." -- What a stupid, ignorant homophobic bigot. When all of these dinosaurs are dead and buried, the world will be a much better place for everyone.

I love seeing the never-ending parade of conservatives go on and on about the sanctity of marriage, while every single one of them has gotten married and divorced more than once. Yet none of them ever see the hypocrisy in what they're saying.
10:07 PM on 03/09/2011
I'm doing what I can to insure the GOP is stopped with it's manipulation. As for my post earlier if what I said came off as being condescending my apologies, I was not intentionally being insensitive... actually my point was Republithugs not speaking directly to the issues....always using smoke screens.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Querent
I say the things that have to be said.
08:43 PM on 03/09/2011
Who's going to vote for this guy? The "grandpa" vote? It might work, except most of them are under the voting age, and the rest are already committed to Ron Paul. But hey--- here's a candidate that Santorum can beat!
07:16 PM on 03/09/2011
I know this won't be a very popular comment, but lots of people in America don't care about gay marriage. So many issues are more important to the future of the United States like the massive influence of money in Congress, the decline in the quality of public education, the national debt, record home foreclosures, burdensome taxes, how to find/fund new energy sources...the list goes on and on....Roemer spoke well during his IOWA speech and today on NPR and I like his approach, thoughtfulness, honesty, and insistence on not taking PAC money. Gay marriage....is that really an issue over which a well qualified candidate is rejected?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Gay Pagan Man, Living Happily With Husband
07:48 PM on 03/09/2011
When your civil rights are being denied or, in many cases, revoked, let's see how blase you will be. How condescending of you! Most of us fighting for marriage equality are concerned with ALL the issues.
02:12 PM on 03/19/2011
Coming from a man who just so happens to be gay, I suggest you read his comment again. He made a valid point. Gay marriage is inevitable, DOMA is unconstitutional, equal protection under the law is required, states are required (constitutionally) to recognize contracts between individuals taken out across state lines (including marriages). Nothing any Republican can do will prevent marriage equality in the long run.
08:24 PM on 03/09/2011
You have hit it on the head, it is a matter of priorities and what problems have priorities over others. If we do not solve this disastrous economic problem first, nothing else is going to mean much, and I want our government leadership to fix the economy and keep us secure first, everything else falls under those priorities.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YouKnowSteve
Proud Progressive
04:53 PM on 03/09/2011
"I love living in a country where gays are honored and esteemed, but traditional lives can continue as well." Excuse me? Homosexuality has been around since people have been around, and from what we can draw from other species of animals, long before. It's as traditional to our Society as the concept of Love. This is another swipe at calling Homosexuality a "lifestyle choice." Gays and Lesbians don't wish to be honored and esteemed - Hell, they are too busy trying to just be seen as equals. Ridiculous.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Gay Pagan Man, Living Happily With Husband
06:26 PM on 03/09/2011
Fanned and faved! I don't need honor and esteem! I need to be able to be on my husband's health plan at work. I need the 1100+ benefits and protections that federal law bestows upon the legally married. My husband, his family and our friends love and esteem us. I want my full civil rights and I want them NOW!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YouKnowSteve
Proud Progressive
06:37 PM on 03/09/2011
Amen, Ioan - stay strong, don't give up - I stand with you!
04:27 PM on 03/09/2011
I am open to any viable potential candidates at this point in the process and Roemer appears to have the credentials to be taken seriously along with those currently evaluating their chances to win. This country needs a viable candidate to run against Obama to give the American public a real choice between the current administration and a different one that will actually do something substantial to turn our economy around and create badly needed jobs.
03:31 PM on 03/09/2011
For some reason, neither of my two previous comments on this piece have posted. So, sorry if this one represents a duplication:

Don't underestimate former Louisiana Governor Charles "Buddy" Roemer.

He's a Harvard grad (merit, not legacy), successful, passionate, and quick-witted. He's a successful businessman who can more than hold his own on topics ranging from literature to philosophy to political strategy. He doesn't shy away from hard jobs, doesn't mince words, nor suffer fools gladly. And he's a dynamic public speaker.

About the only thing Buddy Roemer has in common with Mike Huckabee and Sara Palin is Republican Party affiliation.

At the very least, Roemer's "candidacy" should serve to shake up the staid and stodgy in the Republican Party, loosen the death-grip the Tea Party and radio hate-mongers have on them, and help to re-align them with...well with reality. He won't be cornered by "gotcha" questions like the one about gay marriage, whether it's coming from the right or the left.

But of course, that's just the opinion of one person who worked in state civil service during his administration, and who has actually had the pleasure of becoming personally acquainted with him in the years since.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ScarlettMocha
The Truth is Relative, relatively speaking
02:52 PM on 03/09/2011
The election of Romer to the highest office in the land would be the equivalent of electing Scott Walker governor of Wisconsin. Anarchy and chaos will follow. His policies will cause an even greater divide in the country. He is ENTIRELY too far to the right for America.

OK all you middle class, mildly education folks - did you learn your lesson with Scott Walker? Don't elect this wingn_t to the presidency. It will NOT work!
03:35 PM on 03/09/2011
Though Roemer is quite the fiscal conservative, he is no Scott Walker. Roemer's political record was that of a moderate pragmatist. He surrounds himself with those who no one in their right mind would call "far right" or "mildly educated".
01:54 PM on 03/09/2011
When will HuffPo interview GOP candidate and short order cook Gary Breugelsnatch from Holdrege, Nebraska?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
bascombe
Send the kids off to die, bleed their country dry.
01:36 PM on 03/09/2011
what the fudge?
01:18 PM on 03/09/2011
If I may be allowed to state what I believe to be precise and historically accurate:

In every category == Bigotry, Divide & Conquer through brainwashing, Destruction of our quality of our life, totalitarianism (and the looting and destruction of the institutions WeThePople pay to protect our interests) To gain Power = for the sake of the Military Industrial Complex (Predatory standards for corporations & Cheap Labor) = In every category The Republicans Gas & Oil Party fits the definition of **Fascism**

Please Wake Up everyone: Every tragedy befallen our nation is rooted in the implementation of Republican ideology. A 30 year march into the arms of IL Duce is in full progress!

And shock doctrine is just a single OLD strategy totalitarians use (and book title of
someone who doesn't even know what pre Reagan NORMAL is).

And 80% of the debt we are in was wracked up by the Republicans!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nowpolitics
President Obama 2012. obamaachievements.org
01:16 PM on 03/09/2011
So, what it will take to get a politician to accept gay marriage is for them to have a family member that is gay, a la Cheneys? Newt Gringich I am looking at you!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:51 PM on 03/09/2011
“Here’s as far as I can go: I’m comfortable with the states having this discussion. And I’m all for -- in my extended family, not my wife or kids, but beyond -- cousins, that sort of thing -- we have a gay member....

Did I understand this correctly, it is okay for a "distant" relative to be gay but not my wife or kids?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Gay Pagan Man, Living Happily With Husband
06:30 PM on 03/09/2011
Fanned and faved. No, I blieve you heard and understood correctly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cwebster
predominantly exasperated
12:28 AM on 03/10/2011
You got it...it's fine to be gay...as long as you are just a distant relative, living at a distance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nowpolitics
President Obama 2012. obamaachievements.org
01:14 PM on 03/09/2011
QUOTE:
“I’d be glad to stay in touch. You just got to work for a different organization," he quipped. Oh, and one more thing: "Don’t tell anybody we talked, Sam.”

But you told anyway. How dare you, Sam?
01:08 PM on 03/09/2011
You know maybe just maybe we should realize that one country means exactly that not 50 different versions....or maybe we should go ahead and just do the inevitable and split into 2 or 3 countries.
12:52 PM on 03/09/2011
I fell to see how a persons sexual preference has anything to do with the current economic problem this country is faced with. What I'm really interested in is the creation of jobs and how the government intends to handle big corporations, wall street, oil company's and big banks getting a pass at the expense of the middle class. I want someone to tell me that they intend to balance the budget on the backs of the one's that actually broke it. Nothing but a bunch of hypocrites and liars!!!!