iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Roadmap 2050: EU Plans To Cut Emissions By 80 Percent

Energy Efficency

By ARTHUR MAX   03/ 8/11 11:46 AM ET   AP

AMSTERDAM -- The European Union needs to double its efforts to boost energy efficiency in order to cut greenhouse gases, partly by producing better household appliances, renovating public buildings and private homes, and driving improved cars, the EU executive said in a plan adopted Tuesday.

The European Commission said the EU can cut greenhouse gases 25 percent below 1990 levels by 2020, surpassing its own 20 percent target, through an efficiency campaign in transportation, construction and agriculture.

"The good news is we don't need to wait for technological breakthroughs," said European climate commissioner Connie Hedegaard, because existing technologies are enough. "We need to start the transition toward a competitive low carbon economy now," she said in a statement.

The overall goal is to cut emissions 80 percent by 2050. The plan, released in Strasbourg, France, sets milestones of 40 percent by 2030 and 60 percent by 2040.

The plan, called Roadmap 2050, is to be presented to the European Parliament and member states for drawing up appropriate legislation.

Environmentalists criticized the commission for refusing to revise the overall emissions target for 2020 from 20 percent to 30 percent below its level in 1990. The EU has said it will only raise that target as part of an international agreement requiring other industrial countries to radically reduce emissions.

"It's a bit disappointing the commission hasn't come out with a 30 percent greenhouse gas target. All the analysis shows it's very cheap, it's the kind of thing we can do," said Sanjeev Kumar of the environmental group E3G.

"The Commission's paper shows that the case for a 30 percent EU carbon target has never been stronger," said Joris den Blanken of Greenpeace.

The plan envisions investments of euro270 billion a year, or 1.5 percent of the EU's economic output, but said most or all of that would be recovered through lower oil and gas imports. Over the next 40 years, fuel costs could fall by euro175 billion to euro320 billion a year, the commission said, but without action those bills will more than double.

Even with that increase in spending, the EU would lag behind China, India and Korea in terms of green investment, it said.

The plan calls for a tightening of Europe's cap and trade scheme, under which companies have limits on the amount of greenhouse gases they emit. They can buy extra credits if they exceed their limit from companies that emit less than allowed.

The commission did not say by how much they would lower the ceiling, leaving that question open for discussion among the 27 member states. But the provision for issuing fewer pollution permits "makes the whole proposal a different ball game to what we had on the table a week ago," Kumar told The Associated Press.

But a business group objected that the plan, especially its proposed reduction of pollution allowances, increased uncertainty.

"To improve predictability, it is essential not to disrupt the EU climate and energy policy framework already in place for 2020," said Business Europe. Further action on climate change should be matched by the EU's trading partners, it said.

The commission said at the current rate the EU will improve its energy efficiency by 9 percent by 2020, less than half its target, and listed a series of actions by governments and citizens to lift that rate.

It proposed that 3 percent of all public buildings a year should be refurbished. Energy companies can help consumers reduce consumption by installing double glazing. Energy labels on appliances help customers decide which refrigerator, freezer or washing machine to buy and encourages manufacturers to make better household equipment, it said.

By 2050 power generation could become carbon-free through the use of renewable energy like wind and solar, by capturing and burying carbon dioxide emitted by power plants and by increasing reliance on nuclear energy, the plan said.

The plan anticipates a bonus in the creation of up to 1.5 million new jobs. "Renewable energy has a strong track record in job creation. In just five years, the renewable industry increased its work force from 230 000 to 550 000," it said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

AMSTERDAM -- The European Union needs to double its efforts to boost energy efficiency in order to cut greenhouse gases, partly by producing better household appliances, renovating public buildings an...
AMSTERDAM -- The European Union needs to double its efforts to boost energy efficiency in order to cut greenhouse gases, partly by producing better household appliances, renovating public buildings an...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 151
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
John Mainstream
I'm a Clinton Democrat that is now an independent.
04:04 PM on 04/22/2011
$5/gal gas ensures that more Americans will buy more fuel efficient cars and trucks.
07:53 AM on 04/26/2011
I wish. But the reality is as soon as gas drops back down to the $3/gal level Americans will forget how much they were paying and simply find excuses as to why they need their 8 passenger Navigator for their 3 person household.

Its all about having the cojones to do what's right and unfortunately we lost our cojones after WWII.
04:20 AM on 04/05/2011
I also believe that we have to do a lot more here in the US. Having lived in Europe for quite a while, I must say that most Central Europeans have a completely different attitude to energy and future generations. On the other hand, I'm pleased to see first steps being taken here as well. Siemens USA, for instance, have just launched a new campaign called 'sustainable cities' http://www.usa.siemens.com/sustainablecities/index.html the website is quite resourceful and provides a link to the Green City Index. Similar trends can be seen with GE or ABB. I guess we're moving into the right direction...Slowly but surely.
02:55 PM on 03/29/2011
I love how this article briefly mentions that nuclear is part of the equation in the EU's goal of energy reduction. Or that the article failed to mention that the same report calls for the elimination of automobiles in cities by the year 2050. Found that article on the BBC site via Drudge. Don't get me wrong I'm all for further development on wind and solar. But I'm not naive to think that they are the silver bullet to our energy needs. We need to keep all options on the table which includes nuclear, domestic oil, natural gas, clean coal technology, etc. to keep up with our energy needs and to further refine clean energy... lost my train of thought. Anyways, that's my two cents for what its worth. Let the bashing begin.
03:50 PM on 03/16/2011
I was just in Spain and without having any intention of looking for it, I saw so wind turbines absolutely everywhere and the big Abengoa power towers outside Seville. It was like science fiction. Correction. It was like the 21st century, and it was enthralling to realize some countries are actually in it.

I had meant to drive all over the place to take photos of the white hill towns. Instead, I almost ko'd our rental car driving down a dirt road trying to get a primo shot of the Abengoa facility, and I came home also with dozens pictures of wind turbines. I can tell you, renewable technology is alive and well and thriving, and it's going to be pretty stupid and irresponsible if it powers the first-world without us.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:23 PM on 03/19/2011
So when are the US going to enter the 21st century?
07:18 PM on 03/12/2011
It takes about 80 fans (300' in the air and subject to all weather conditions) to replace one turbine in a climate controlled building. I think maintenance on these fans will present a definite challenge in the future.
03:45 PM on 03/16/2011
At this point I think many of us would be quite happy maintaining wind turbines as opposed to being the Homer Simpsons of nuclear power plants or a bunch of coal miners. I'm not really worried at this point at being hit in the head by a fan which bolts came loose.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:50 PM on 03/16/2011
co-sign.
07:14 PM on 03/12/2011
It appears the "bloom-box" technology may have merit for us. The possibility of on on-site power plant is interesting.
photo
MikeDu
Both salubrious and lugubrious concurrently.
11:53 AM on 03/12/2011
The EU reductions should be more than offest by the wave of new Tea Party coal fired plants in the U.S. with all that nasty 'socialist' EPA air cleaning stuff removed. Heck, they'd probably build a few extra  plants just to emit extra CO2 for spite!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PAGasDriller
12:49 PM on 03/13/2011
i love just downwind of two of the dirtiest coal fired plants in the country, you don't have to tell me about coal fired plants. Let's switch over to natural gas, we have more here than any other country and its emissions are WAY below that of coal plants.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:25 PM on 03/19/2011
Peak Natural Gas is already behind us. Do you want to bet on a dead horse?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
babyboomerorig
Finally, it's spring!
11:17 AM on 03/12/2011
We are such sissies....."it makes too much noise"...."it's ugly"....."it'll kill some birds".....and all the time encouraging fracking, coal and oil emissions. Are we stupid or what?

We are already 30 years behind Europe on alternative energies and now they're going to be at 80% alternative energy in just 40 years?

And in that 40 years, we'll be 100 years behind the rest of the world because of big oil business running our country. They never think of the greater good, just their bank accounts. IMHO, they'll have huge butts from carrying all that money in their back pockets and the country will be so poluted that nobody will want to live here.
07:11 PM on 03/12/2011
It's a shame you don't have one close by to prove you're no girly-man, boomer.
05:54 AM on 03/12/2011
Maybe the GOP should go to France or Germany. High speed rail and great food and energy efficiency. Holy moly that sounds socialist, Batman.
FaceReality2
Democracy in the U.S. is an illusion
11:25 AM on 03/12/2011
And health care for everyone for almost half the U.S. cost per capita. And a much happier citizenry according to all studies.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:28 PM on 03/19/2011
And much higher taxes to the rich. Can't have that.
Oh and an educated electorate that doesn't buy BS so it doesn't elect representatives who are bad for their interests.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
exile
01:56 AM on 03/12/2011
soon the usa will be a 3rd country
talking about finding another planet
like mars to move to and live the good life

the rest of the world says
good ridence azzholias
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:30 AM on 03/12/2011
A clear indication that two world wars did irreparable damage to the gene pool.
03:56 PM on 03/16/2011
Absolutely. That's why the U.S. is rapidly plummeting under second-world status.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Austintatious
08:19 PM on 03/11/2011
And the United States of America finds itself not only near last in the pack genuinely addressing human induced climate change but headed backwards, forced in that direction by the radical, right wing Republican party and the vested interests of the big, international corporations, but aided and abetted by Barack Obama and the congressional Dems. A perfect storm of ignorance, corruption and cowardice.

This country must have a new political party to fight these corrupt cowards or the American idea will soon be a thing of the past. End of story!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:29 PM on 03/19/2011
Amen. Where's the Green party?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Austintatious
10:47 PM on 03/19/2011
you have the right idea. thanks for responding
05:04 PM on 03/11/2011
It may not be perfect, but it sure as hell is a step in the right direction. Get on it America! Take this as a cue to do something, ANYTHING. I feel like we are just sitting around doing nothing.
03:58 PM on 03/16/2011
We are sitting around doing nothing, and today the House put their stamp of approval on it by deciding to deny global warming by taking a vote on it. Like, "take that, Science!!!!!!!"
04:07 PM on 03/16/2011
Absurd!!!!!!!!!!!! Let's start rounding people up and high-tailing out of the US. I'm getting sick of it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
Cut on the bias
09:10 AM on 03/11/2011
It is good to see action from the EU on cleaning up the energy production. Projects of wind power and solar installations are proving to be worthwhile investments. There should be greater investment in truly clean energy of wind, solar, and water turbines. There are some trial installations of under water turbines that are adding more clean and quiet electric generation and use of these devises will increase in coming years. I hate to see money spent on nuclear power and efforts to clean up coal use. Those dirty, mining intensive and dangerous technologies produce more trouble than they are worth. We should concentrate on installing replacements for dirty power.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
OntheBorder
Part of the 53% that carries the Liberal weight
06:51 AM on 03/11/2011
As good as the EU sounds, this program really amounts to corporate welfare to benefit EU firms like Alstom, Seimens, RR and others……will it really help….hard to tell.
BTW…for the folks complaining about the US, there are hundreds of power projects, many of them renewable energy that are currently being hung out to dry by draconian regulatory practices.

Or the NIMBY mentality......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
Cut on the bias
09:15 AM on 03/11/2011
I like to encourage companies that are building clean power products, like Seimens and GE, for example. They do produce other objectionable products and are heavily invested in dirty power, but give then credit for expanding into clean energy and hopefully the market will show the advantages to clean power and fuel free operation, and allow the company to move in the direction of more clean power production.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
OntheBorder
Part of the 53% that carries the Liberal weight
09:35 AM on 03/11/2011
Yeah..I hear you, but I have worked for or with GE (energy division) Siemens (Gas Turbines) and Alstom.

They are not encouraged by anything but the ability to make money, they see the ability to make a profit long term, that is their encouragement.....they do nothing for the good of mankind, they are driven by profit as their invertors demand.
FaceReality2
Democracy in the U.S. is an illusion
11:28 AM on 03/12/2011
"renewable energy [projects] that are currently being hung out to dry by draconian regulatory practices."

Examples and links please.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
OntheBorder
Part of the 53% that carries the Liberal weight
12:25 PM on 03/12/2011
The consulting engineers I work with have mentioned several solar projects in S. Cal and AZ. A turkey manure burning plant (bio mass) in New Hampshire has an issue with funding and permits.

I don't really follow them much until there are signed contracts.