More

Duncan: 82 Percent Of US Schools May Be Labeled 'Failing' Under No Child Left Behind Policies

Failing Schools

CHRISTINE ARMARIO   03/ 9/11 07:29 PM ET   AP

The number of schools labeled as "failing" under the nation's No Child Left Behind Act could skyrocket dramatically this year, Education Secretary Arne Duncan said Wednesday.

The Department of Education estimates the percentage of schools not meeting yearly targets for their students' proficiency in in math and reading could jump from 37 to 82 percent as states raise standards in attempts to satisfy the law's mandates.

The 2002 law requires states to set targets aimed at having all students proficient in math and reading by 2014, a standard now viewed as wildly unrealistic.

"No Child Left Behind is broken and we need to fix it now," Duncan said in a statement. "This law has created a thousand ways for schools to fail and very few ways to help them succeed."

Duncan presented the figures at a House education and work force committee hearing, in urging lawmakers to rewrite the Bush-era act. Both Republicans and Democrats agree the law needs to be reformed, though they disagree on issues revolving around the federal role of education and how to turn around failing schools.

A surge in schools not meeting annual growth targets could have various implications. The most severe consequences – interventions that could include closure or replacing staff – would be reserved for those schools where students have been failing to improve for several consecutive years.

Duncan said the law has done well in shining a light on achievement gaps among minority and low-income students, as well as those who are still learning English or have disabilities. But he said the law is loose on goals and narrow on how schools achieve them.

"We should get out of the business of labeling schools as failures and create a new law that is fair and flexible, and focused on the schools and students most at risk," Duncan said.

Russ Whitehurst, director of the Brown Center on Education Policy at the Brookings Institute, said some states and districts have dug themselves into a hole by expected greater gains in the final years.

"The reality is coming home that you can't essentially demonstrate very little progress for ten years and then expect all of your progress to occur in the last two or three years," Whitehurst said.

He said some states believed improvement would accelerate as students advanced, creating a "snowball effect," while others put off the heavy lifting to avoid the consequences.

Daria Hall, Education Trust's K-12 policy director, said it was also important to distinguish between schools that don't meet the annual growth benchmark for one year, versus those who have failed to do so for two consecutive years and are labeled as being "in need of improvement."

Both distinctions could mean vastly different outcomes in terms of how many schools are subject to which interventions. The Department of Education was not able to provide data breaking down how many of the 82 percent would be failing to meet yearly goals for one year, versus consecutive years.

Hall said there are many ways states can meet their annual achievement benchmarks, and questioned whether the 82 percent figure took them all into consideration. Amy Wilkins, Education Trust's vice president for government affairs and communications, also noted that schools which are struggling are given various options – contesting Duncan's assessment that the law is tight on means and loose on goals.

"There is an objective finish line with annual finish line targets for everybody," Wilkins said.

Paul Manna, a professor focusing on education policy at the College of William & Mary, noted that while there are specified goals, what is considered "proficient" in math and reading varies by state.

He said the rising number of schools not meeting the benchmarks could become unmanageable.

"There's no way given the resources, the personnel available, to do what would be required, that they'd be able to do it," Manna said.

___

Associated Press writer Dorie Turner contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

The number of schools labeled as "failing" under the nation's No Child Left Behind Act could skyrocket dramatically this year, Education Secretary Arne Duncan said Wednesday. The Department of Educat...
The number of schools labeled as "failing" under the nation's No Child Left Behind Act could skyrocket dramatically this year, Education Secretary Arne Duncan said Wednesday. The Department of Educat...
Filed by Erica Liepmann  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 758
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jesse Wright
03:46 PM on 03/17/2011
Part of the problem here is the 'I say, you do' rule. You can't just tell schools they need to improve by setting goals and then give them no means to get there. By re-evaluating the funding (i.e. equal funding for all), schools will be on more of a equal line and be better able to hit targets, but with spending cuts schools are finding it hard to function, let alone succeed. Another problem is that schools need to stop their reliance on standardized testing. You can't compare every kid in America to one test, different students have different writing and reading abilities and as a result test differently. In addition, it's been proved that standardized testing is becoming big-business for those involved and the only ones winning in that situation is the writers and scorers of the test. The only things children are learning is how to regurgitate. Serious education reform is needed quickly while the government sits aside and casts judgement on the whole system.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
El Chingaso
Fighting for mental superiority...
11:40 AM on 03/16/2011
This is more alarmist BS from Washington. Bureaucrats out there just sit around and make up crises.. to justify their six-figure salaries. (Especially since 9/11.)

Yes, Mildred, the sky "isn't" falling.
photo
StinkyBush
Meet the new boss Same as the old boss
01:47 PM on 03/15/2011
Arne Duncan is a failure. I don't even need to give him a test to figure that out.
12:49 AM on 03/15/2011
Duncan is a bad guy and on education Obama is a Judas
09:24 PM on 03/14/2011
Students tend not to take seriously things in which they have no ownership. Why should they exert themselves? Their grades are unaffected. Their school will look bad? Get serious. School spirit in most high schools is a thing of the past.

Some things need to change with our "high stakes" testing. At present, the "high stakes" are only taken seriously by teachers and administrators. While elementary school children are easily influenced to take such things seriously, middle and high school students not so much.

Until a "you break it, you bought it" is built into tests such as this, upper level students will never take things seriously. In Texas, only 11th grade tests (and 12th grade if the test wasn't passed first time around) are really taken seriously in high school, and only then because a diploma is finally at stake. I've even had 9th and 10th grade students absolutely refuse to take the test...some to the point of throwing their pencils at the proctor. These students don't give a care. Why should they? No pass, no play...nope. Affect their credits...nope.

NCLB...why should a student care?

Nope, if you want to effect a change that will show up in standardized tests, you're going to have to move to REAL high stakes testing...ala the UK, China, a multitude of other countries.

But be very sure you want what goes along with that scenario.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hugoal
Google Santorum
11:51 AM on 03/14/2011
NCLB goals will never be achieved if parents are not doing their jobs at home.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
broui
No d#%& cat. No d#%& cradle.
11:14 AM on 03/14/2011
By what metric?

The school at which I teach has been labelled a failing school for 8 straight years.

Mind you, we've seen state test scores improvements each year, a graduation rate increase, post high school education enrollment increase, scholarships increase, and a decrease in discipline incididents. Attendence is even up over these years.

By nearly every metric we've improved each year.

But one year we'll not make AYP with ELL, the next it'll be Special Ed, the following it'll be parent involvement...

ONE category can hang a school and put them into the "failing" category.

Nonsense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
insidious
Socialist Progressive Liberal Independent Feminist
11:08 PM on 03/11/2011
I've been teaching for 12 years and I knew when NCLB was passed that its goals would be unattainable to many schools withing a short amount of time. In the course of my teaching career I've seen public schools become privatized and "for profit". It's disgusting! Not only will I need my teaching certificate, but also a business degree: fascism at it's best!
02:29 PM on 03/11/2011
The Chicago schools weren't good enough for our president's children, and yet Chicago's former superintendent--Duncan, who's never even taught--is good enough to oversee the Department of Education.

Funny how that works.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MKWaters esq
10:24 PM on 03/11/2011
Duncan is a trust fund baby fraud - he is only in the cabinet to play b-ball with Obama. Duncan wants charter schools not public schools. His stance on charter schools as Secretary of Education is demoralizing for public school teachers...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
laborgrunt
03:31 AM on 03/11/2011
Arne Duncan would make GWB proud.
photo
uniquindividual
I'm unique and so are you
06:46 PM on 03/10/2011
Are all of the firemen in a community vilified when a building burns down?

Is a lawyer incompetent if they don't win all of their cases?

Do all recruits make it through basic training? (If they don't is the army a failure?)

But somehow teachers and schools are responsible for the variance in personality, nurturing and intelligwence that is a reality of human existence?

Universal proficiency of challenging standards as required by the No Child Left Behind law (NCLB) is scientifically impossible.

And has been prooven so...

http://transformeducation.blogspot.com/2007/02/references-for-rebuking-2014s-100.html

Aditionally, STUDENTS OFTEN DON'T EVEN TRY ON THESE TESTS AT THE HIGHSCHOOL LEVEL, yet NCLB makes their score the determinant that defines the professional future of every teacher administrator and clerical employee on a school campus.

Think about that... The school is held accountable, but there is no accountability placed on the students.
photo
poeticjustice4all
Past = Prologue
10:42 AM on 03/11/2011
Its been thought about for centuries. Humankind isn't just now discovering the dynamics of the teacher-student relationship.
photo
uniquindividual
I'm unique and so are you
08:05 PM on 03/11/2011
Huh?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Oakland
05:53 PM on 03/10/2011
Somebody needs to teach this guy statistics. Maybe a teacher could him out. Oh wait, the fool fired them all.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:30 PM on 03/10/2011
NCLB and the flawed reasoning that created it are imploding, not the schools. 82% of schools have not failed, NCLB has failed 82% of schools, if not more. It is time for change, not more of the same through charters and flawed teacher accountability schemes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Oakland
05:53 PM on 03/10/2011
Duncan can't do math with his shoes on.
photo
EmmaNYC
shoes & ships & sealing wax, cabbages & kings
04:03 PM on 03/10/2011
What? Only 82%? Has Duncan ran out of cronies who can privatize the schools and turn them into for-profit ventures?
02:49 PM on 03/10/2011
Statistically a target aimed at having all students proficient in math and reading by 2014 is impossible as long as standardized tests are used to determine success. The bell curve doesn't allow it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
laborgrunt
03:31 AM on 03/11/2011
You hit the nail right on the head. This is a total set up of the whole public education system.