iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

The Price Of Protecting High-Risk Pregnancies About To Go Through The Roof

MIKE STOBBE   03/ 9/11 07:00 PM ET   AP

Makena Drug

ATLANTA — The price of preventing preterm labor is about to go through the roof. A drug for high-risk pregnant women has cost about $10 to $20 per injection. Next week, the price shoots up to $1,500 a dose, meaning the total cost during a pregnancy could be as much as $30,000.

That's because the drug, a form of progesterone given as a weekly shot, has been made cheaply for years, mixed in special pharmacies that custom-compound treatments that are not federally approved.

But recently, KV Pharmaceutical of suburban St.Louis won government approval to exclusively sell the drug, known as Makena (Mah-KEE'-Nah). The March of Dimes and many obstetricians supported that because it means quality will be more consistent and it will be easier to get.

None of them anticipated the dramatic price hike, though – especially since most of the cost for development and research was shouldered by others in the past.

"That's a huge increase for something that can't be costing them that much to make. For crying out loud, this is about making money," said Dr. Roger Snow, deputy medical director for Massachusetts' Medicaid program.

"I've never seen anything as outrageous as this," said Dr. Arnold Cohen, an obstetrician at Albert Einstein Medical Center in Philadelphia.

"I'm breathless," said Dr. Joanne Armstrong, the head of women's health for Aetna, the Hartford-based national health insurer.

Doctors say the price hike may deter low-income women from getting the drug, leading to more premature births. And it will certainly be a huge financial burden for health insurance companies and government programs that have been paying for it.

The cost is justified to avoid the mental and physical disabilities that can come with very premature births, said KV Pharmaceutical chief executive Gregory J. Divis Jr. The cost of care for a preemie is estimated at $51,000 in the first year alone.

"Makena can help offset some of those costs," Divis told The Associated Press. "These moms deserve the opportunity to have the benefits of an FDA-approved Makena."

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is not involved in setting the price for the drugs it approves.

A KV subsidiary, Ther-Rx Corp., will market the drug. On Tuesday, it announced a patient assistance program designed to help uninsured and low-income women get the drug at little or no cost.

But Snow and others said someone is going to have to pay the higher price. Some of the burden will fall on health insurance companies, which will have to raise premiums or other costs to their other customers. And some will fall on cash-strapped state Medicaid programs, which may be forced to stop paying for the drug or enroll fewer people.

"There's no question they can't afford this," said Matt Salo, executive director of the National Association of Medicaid Directors.

Salo and Snow said they do not know how many state Medicaid programs currently pay for Makena, which as a generic was recommended by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Aetna will continue to pay for the drug, Armstrong said, but it will be an expensive pill to swallow. Aetna currently covers it for about 1,000 women a year, so the new federal endorsement is likely to cost an estimated $30 million more annually.

Makena is a synthetic form of the hormone progesterone that first came on the market more than 50 years ago to treat other problems. Hormone drugs came under fire in the 1970s, following reports they might damage fetuses in early pregnancy. In the 1990s, the early incarnation of Makena was withdrawn from the market.

But the drug got a new life in 2003, with publication of a study that reported it helped prevent early births to women who had a history of spontaneous preterm deliveries.

These very early births produce children who – if they survive – need months of intensive care and often suffer disabilities. The cause of sudden preterm delivery is not understood, but it occurs in black mothers at much higher rates than whites or Hispanics.

The study of women at risk for this condition found that only about 36 percent of those given the progesterone drug had preterm births, compared with 55 percent among those not on the drug.

It's believed the treatment calms the muscles of the uterus, experts said.

There is no good alternative in most cases and in the years following the study, more obstetricians, Medicaid programs and others began prescribing it. By some estimates, about 130,000 women a year might benefit from the drug. Only a fraction of them get it, but the number has been growing steadily.

One success story is Beatrice Diaz, 33, of Chapel Hill, N.C.

During her first pregnancy nine years ago, Diaz unexpectedly went into labor at about 24 weeks. She delivered a son, Garrison, who was so fragile she was not allowed to hold him for a month. Today he is in a wheelchair and has the mental capacity of a 9-month-old.

It was a shock, said Diaz, who at the time was a legal assistant in a prosecutor's office.

"Honestly I thought the only people who had 1-pound babies were crackheads," she said.

When she became pregnant again, her doctor prescribed the progesterone drug, a weekly injection that starts as early as the 16th week and may be given for as much as 20 weeks. She has since had two healthy, full-term baby girls, Hailyn and Alexa.

Diaz said she's not planning to have any more children – and that's a good thing.

"That's an insane amount of money. I don't know what I would do to get the money to afford it," she said.

The Ther-Rx patient assistance program promises free injections or much reduced prices based on income. Uninsured households making less than $100,000 are eligible for a copay of $20 or less.

Ther-Rx and its parent company became involved about three years ago and acquired rights to the drug from a Massachusetts company named Hologic Inc., said Divis, who is also Ther-Rx's president.

To get FDA approval, the company is spending hundreds of millions of dollars in additional research, including an international study involving 1,700 women, Divis said. The FDA last month signed off and gave Makena orphan drug status. That designation ensures Ther-Rx will be the sole source of the drug for seven years.

The March of Dimes, which gets hundreds of thousands of dollars in funding from Ther-Rx, celebrated the approval in a press release, saying if all women eligible for the shots receive them, nearly 10,000 spontaneous premature births could be prevented each year.

"For the first time, we have an FDA-approved treatment to offer women who have delivered a baby too soon, giving them hope that their next child will have a better chance at a healthy start in life," said Dr. Alan Fleischman, the organization's medical director.

As for the cost, he said the drug maker's financial assistance program will ensure no eligible woman is denied the drug due to inability to pay.

Some doctors said they were happy getting the cheaper version from compounding pharmacies, and Aetna's Armstrong said she was unaware of any quality concerns.

Still, doctors will use the Ther-Rx brand, in part because of legal worries.

Not that they have a choice: Last month, KV sent cease-and-desist letters to compounding pharmacies, telling them they could face FDA enforcement actions if they kept making the drug.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

ATLANTA — The price of preventing preterm labor is about to go through the roof. A drug for high-risk pregnant women has cost about $10 to $20 per injection. Next week, the price shoots up to $1...
ATLANTA — The price of preventing preterm labor is about to go through the roof. A drug for high-risk pregnant women has cost about $10 to $20 per injection. Next week, the price shoots up to $1...
Filed by Meghan Neal  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 39
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:43 PM on 03/30/2011
This situation, & the public outcry over it, shed light on a problem most people didn’t know about: the cost of FDA approval.

There are many instances of low-cost, effective drugs made affordably by compounding pharmacies. The trouble starts when a company gets FDA approval and sells the drug at a markup.

This is the case with KV Pharmaceutical.

But there are other cases like this. One of the drugs I write about in my book, “HONEST MEDICINE,” is Low Dose Naltrexone (LDN), used off-label for 25 years by many doctors for autoimmune diseases, such as MS & Lupus. LDN costs $40 a month (maximum) through compounding pharmacies. (Naltrexone was approved in the mid-‘80s by the FDA for drug and alcohol addiction at 10 TIMES THE DOSE.)

The physician who championed LDN’s off-label use for autoimmune diseases was in talks years ago with a drug company to put it through trials for this “new” use. But that company told him that, once they got FDA-approval, they would charge patients (& insurance companies) a huge amount of money. He refused. He simply couldn’t condone patients having to pay so much money for a drug they could get cheaply through compounding pharmacies. So, LDN is still produced by compounding pharmacies, & still costs $40 or less per month.

I am sad that Makena will now cost so much. But I’m glad this horrid practice of price-gouging is getting so much media attention.

Julia Schopick
http://www.HonestMedicine.com
08:21 AM on 03/11/2011
They do this so insurance companies end up paying much more, they can offer it to the poor for regular price, and the only people that end up paying is all of the taxpayers. The poor can get it for $20 until medicaid coverage begings and then all of us end up paying $30,000 dollars through taxes for a drug that should cost 10$. Awesome- sometimes government should stay away
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jharris344
Go Republican!! Go Broke!!
10:50 AM on 03/23/2011
LOL! I think your anger is misplaced (think the drug maker). The government is not allowed to tell this company they can't charge $30K for a drug that costs them $10. So, you need to talk to the drug company and/or be angry with them. Government is staying away.
11:45 PM on 03/10/2011
Do we really take this article at face value? Yes when I read this article I thought "This is shocking" I better get both sides of the story to make an informed decision.
If anyone took the time to go to KV's site at: http://www.kvpharmaceutical.com/ you will see uninsured patients making between 60,000-100,000 dollars will get financial assistance to match a comparable insurance co-pay. Insured patients making less than 100,000 dollars will pay 20 dollars or less per injections.
Those who can afford to pay for it are paying more to cover those who can't. Is a 1500% increase ridiculous? Yes. Am I going to send them an email asking them to explain the price increase? Yes however lets do our due diligence before we start calling our fellow "comment"ors to arms.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MDUB1969
08:14 AM on 03/11/2011
But isn't this part of the problem? In a situation like this, who is really hit the hardest? While everyone will be affected, it's going to be those people in the middle - the ones who are making just enough money to not be considered "hardship cases" but who will be forced to pay more to cover the differences - whether the cost hits them in premiums, co-insurance, or co-pays. The out of pocket costs could be astronomical for those people who are considered "capable" of affording it. I don't think that KVs offer of financial assistance to uninsured patients is much of a concession because, ultimately, someone has to pay.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
cheap politicians for sale
10:28 PM on 03/10/2011
they were also fined on federal and other charges for mislabeling drugs they sold. To increase profit of course.

http://www.stltoday.com/business/local/article_80c7f54a-4b40-11e0-9a58-00127992bc8b.html

and yet the FDA gives them 2 thumbs up

???????
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jharris344
Go Republican!! Go Broke!!
10:52 AM on 03/23/2011
LOL! Exactly what powers do you think the FDA has?
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
cheap politicians for sale
10:13 PM on 03/10/2011
The FDA is the ones who approved KV to manufacture and sell this medication. Now if the FDA knew the price would increase like this, it is their responsibility. If they were lied to, then KV needs to be shut down. Either way, there is no way in hades that any medication that was costing only $15 for years , should cost 1500 because someone gets a monopoly handed to them by the FDA. Its outrageous, and its a great example of why Ivy Greed Capitalist should have nothing to do with medicine, health care, education, utilities, and many more things necessary to life,
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jharris344
Go Republican!! Go Broke!!
10:52 AM on 03/23/2011
LOL! Exactly what powers do you think the FDA has? LOL! Last I remember they were not responsible for fixing the prices of drugs on the market.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jennifer Hoffman
Author and intuitive
09:01 PM on 03/10/2011
This is a case of the FDA, a for profit agency, making unilateral decisions based on who pays the most for the right to produce a drug. We should be concerned here, this could happen to any number of products. What was wrong with allowing compounding pharmacies to continue to make this--they've been doing if for years. This is a huge concern that affects everyone. Maybe not with this drug but once other companies get the idea that they can corner the market on a drug, delivery system, or any medication and then charge outrageous prices for it, they will. And we all lose. The FDA should pull KV Pharmaceutical's right to sell immediately. And we should all write to the CEO:
Gregory J. Divis
KV Pharmaceutical Company
One Corporate Woods Drive
St. Louis, MO 63044
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
cheap politicians for sale
10:14 PM on 03/10/2011
The FDA is the ones who approved KV getting this contract, and approved them to be the ONLY manufacture of this drug. This is not a case for the FDA, this is a case against the FDA
photo
alongst
too often denied to speak
08:35 PM on 03/10/2011
Thus the result of the government deciding it knows better than we do what's good for us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MDUB1969
08:23 PM on 03/10/2011
What is interesting is there are different purposes for compounded progesterone. The progesterone they are referring to is specifically compounded for this use in particular - the support of a well established pregnancy for the prevention of pre-term labor and birth. But compounded progesterone shots are also used to support pregnancy in assisted reproductive treatments like IVF, IUI and to treat menopause. It's also used to bring on ovulation when women have issues with that and with the support of gender reassignment surgery.
Which one of these compounded progesterones will be next?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jennifer Hoffman
Author and intuitive
09:36 PM on 03/10/2011
I agree and I take bio-identical hormones and have nervously been watching the pharmaceutical industry as they are trying to do something similar to corner the market on bio-identicals. My health insurance, interestingly enough, will pay for synthetic hormones but not the compounded ones I take and am very happy with. We should be afraid here and start paying attention or we will all be in the same situation as women who no longer have this available to them at a reasonable cost.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MDUB1969
10:43 PM on 03/10/2011
I think that is somewhat common (or at least I've seen it before) for the insurance companies to cover the non-compounded bio-identicals but not the compounded ones. I am not sure what that is about, but it adds another interesting question - not only are other compounded progesterone meds being threatened, but all of them are. I am watching with you...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
cheap politicians for sale
10:15 PM on 03/10/2011
this is what happens when you allow ivy greed capitalist to control health care and not the gov. ITs all about profit, and not about doing good for the country or its citizens.
07:44 PM on 03/10/2011
That's just plain day light robbery. Surely the bulk of the cost is in research which has already been paid for, rather than the actual manufacture of the drugs.

It is no wonder that natural fertility treatments are going so much popularity and they rightly should.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MDUB1969
08:10 PM on 03/10/2011
Unfortunately, many of those types of treatments are not covered by health insurance at all.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
cheap politicians for sale
10:17 PM on 03/10/2011
they were covered by most insurance and even medicare and medicaid. At least it was still last week when it only cost $15 a dose.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Katy Haun
04:55 PM on 03/10/2011
This needs to have national attention. That will be hard, because of all the other things happening right now, but please everyone, tell whatever media you have in your backyard, and please send this or any other article relating this to the major media outlets. Someone should send it to CBN: imagine their cognitive dissonance when they're caught between naked "capitalism" and saving the life of the child.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
janalyce
11:46 AM on 03/10/2011
Naked corporate greed; this isn't capitalism, it's corporatism, a whole 'nother animal.

I wonder what the right-to-lifers will say about this....."Protect the Unborn" vs "Protect Obscene Corporate Profits." It's going to be a tough call for the right-wing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nomadrdw
Zen Druid
01:45 PM on 03/10/2011
no, it won't be. they will just ignore the entire issue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MDUB1969
08:03 PM on 03/10/2011
You are exactly right.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
cheap politicians for sale
10:19 PM on 03/10/2011
this is a prime example of Ivy Greed Capitalism. You are correct, its not capitalism. This is extreme greed, and its being backed and supported by the FDA and our gov. Just more in a chain of events proving that the ivy greed capitalist tell our political leaders what to do.
nancynancy
Atheist.
08:52 AM on 03/10/2011
Why don't the Republicans just outlaw sex and be done with it? First. they're trying to ban abortions and now they're making medical care for pregnancy so expensive, people will go bankrupt. What a hellhole this country is turning into.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:38 AM on 03/10/2011
What the FDA giveth, cannot the FDA taketh away?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jennifer Hoffman
Author and intuitive
09:37 PM on 03/10/2011
I wonder how much they paid the FDA, which is a for profit agency, to get this. I'd like to see that number.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sandyinalabama
Prejudices are what fools use for reason.
10:32 AM on 03/11/2011
the FDA is not a "for profit" agency.. it is a government agency established in 1906 and receives funding from the federal budget.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MDUB1969
10:12 PM on 03/09/2011
The best this story gets is a mention half way down the Health page? What a travesty in itself.

In the end, it's gonna be the few remaining "middle class" families, who are lucky enough to have some form of health insurance, that will be hit the hardest. They will be making "too much" money to be considered for assistance, but their premiums will go up, and the medicine will likely end up having astronomical out of pocket costs associated with it (assuming it's covered for people with somewhat basic coverage). Of course they'll pay, if they can, in order to prevent pre-term labor - what choice will they have? What pregnant woman wouldn't do whatever it took to bring their pregnancy to term and deliver a healthy baby?
I can tell you as a pregnant woman who has a history of pre-term labor, I'll do whatever it takes. I'm slated to start these very injections in a few weeks...

What a sad, sad commentary on the current state of affairs in our country. This article speaks volumes.