iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Tom Corbett's Proposed Higher-Education Cuts Draw Protests

Tom Corbett Education Cuts

PETER JACKSON   03/10/11 06:19 PM ET   AP

HARRISBURG, Pa. — Pennsylvania's new Republican governor is under fire for proposing the nation's biggest cuts in higher education – more than 50 percent for some universities – while refusing to tax the gas drilling that is fast becoming one of the state's largest industries.

Some critics of Gov. Tom Corbett are frustrated that he won't tap such a rich source of tax revenue when the state is looking at a projected deficit next year of $4 billion.

"This is the most irrational public policy I've ever seen in my life," Democratic state Sen. Daylin Leach said Thursday. "He's supposed to be fighting for Pennsylvania. He's saying that Pennsylvania can't have this money."

Corbett has a long opposed any tax on the gas extracted from the rich deposit known as the Marcellus Shale, and he repeated that stand Tuesday in the same speech in which he outlined the cuts in education. He said a tax would hinder the growth of natural gas drilling in Pennsylvania and prevent the state from becoming the national hub of the industry.

"Let's make Pennsylvania the Texas of the natural gas boom," he urged lawmakers. "I'm determined that Pennsylvania not lose this moment. We have the chance to get it right the first time, the chance to grow our way out of the hard days."

Corbett contends the industry has already plowed billions of dollars into the state, spawned economic booms in some of Pennsylvania's most depressed areas and generated new revenue from the income, sales and other existing taxes. Pennsylvania is the largest gas-producing state without a gas extraction tax.

In the $27.3 billion budget he presented to lawmakers, Corbett proposed slashing spending on higher education by $644 million, including a more than 50 percent reduction for the 18 state-supported universities and colleges, which include Penn State, Pittsburgh and Temple. He also proposed a $1 billion cut for Pennsylvania's public schools.

"Despite state subsidies over the past decades, tuition has continued to increase," the governor said. "If the intent was to keep tuition rates down, it failed. We need to find a new model."

Students, faculty members and administrators are mobilizing to convince lawmakers, many of whom are on their side, that the cuts are unreasonable.

What effect the cuts would have on the campuses remains unclear, although tuition increases are likely and the closing of some of Penn State's 24 satellite campuses is possible, officials said. Penn State has 87,000 students all together.

"Everything is on the table," said Penn State spokeswoman Lisa Powers.

Molly Stieber, 21, president of the University of Pittsburgh's student government, said she expected Corbett would call for modest cuts for higher education because of the state's financial problems, but nothing as radical as he proposed.

"I was completely blindsided. ... Fifty percent was just unprecedented and scary," said Stieber, 21, a junior from Lancaster who is majoring in political science.

Stieber and her Penn State counterpart, Christian Ragland, are urging students and parents to contact their legislators. Plans for protest rallies and a day of student lobbying at the Capitol are in the works, they said.

"Now we're in aggressive mode," said Ragland, 22, a senior from New Jersey majoring in political science.

Corbett, who received nearly $1 million in campaign contributions from donors connected to the gas drilling industry, ran on a pledge not to increase any state taxes or fees. Republicans control both houses of the Legislature, giving Corbett a strong advantage in the budget negotiations that will take place in the coming weeks.

Democratic former Gov. Ed Rendell and leaders of the Senate GOP majority sought to negotiate a compromise on a drilling tax last fall, but the effort failed. Some Democrats are renewing the push this year.

"It's a matter of fairness that these drillers pay," said Rep. Greg Vitali. He said annual revenue from his bill would amount to $200 million this coming year and rise to $430 million by 2015-16.

David Masur, director of the lobbying group PennEnvironment, said a tax would have "zero political fallout," since it would be paid not by ordinary Pennsylvanians but by the drilling companies.

"Where are they going to go?"" he asked. "The gas isn't going anywhere."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
HARRISBURG, Pa. — Pennsylvania's new Republican governor is under fire for proposing the nation's biggest cuts in higher education – more than 50 percent for some universities – whil...
HARRISBURG, Pa. — Pennsylvania's new Republican governor is under fire for proposing the nation's biggest cuts in higher education – more than 50 percent for some universities – whil...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 483
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
07:34 PM on 03/28/2011
I do not support your cuts to public education in Pennsylvania. Find other ways! Education is the foundation on which we educate our citizens. College education needs to be affordable. If your plan goes through, several people I know will have to drop out of school because they can't afford an education. Why not scale back on tax cuts to large corporations. Tax the gas companies! It's an effrontery to take from starving college students!
04:16 PM on 03/29/2011
There is an alternative. You are right, if the governor needs to raise money, he should consider taxing the companies who are drilling for natural gas in Northeast PA. While Corbett insists on cutting education and social service programs, he refuses to ask these companies for any money, even while natural gas drilling is causing groundwater contamination in rural communities. Check out this link in a local paper to see what I'm talking about. http://www.timesleader.com/news/Gov__stands_by_stance_against_drilling_tax_03-29-2011.html#
10:46 AM on 03/28/2011
These cuts to education will have far-reaching consequences, as will the environmental damage done by the gas drilling operations. Corbett is in the news again today refusing to tax the gas companies, and his is the only state without such a tax. This is supposed to bring jobs to an area that has been economically depressed since the end of the coal industry. The people of Northeast PA should remember that when big companies start pulling things out of the ground, locals don't benefit.

A petition has been started to protest these cuts to education:

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/6/Stop-Cuts-To-Education-Budgets/
12:44 PM on 03/15/2011
I'm from Pennsylvania. I'm a college student. I voted for Tom Corbett. I have four words to say to Tom Corbett now: tax the Marcellus Shale.
09:42 PM on 03/13/2011
This is kind of astounding, and I really don't know where to begin. Ultimately, defunding education by avoiding taxes on the cash cow is a huge error. As Masur says, they aren't going to go anywhere--the gas isn't going to go anywhere. It's karma--pay back into the system that rewards you--failure to do so is simply being greedy. It's hard to support that, and it's hard to support elected officials who do.

How much would imposing a light tax impact the industry? I get the feeling that the jobs will remain and the companies will stay, but the profit margin will take a hit, and that's the issue here.

Here's what happens: cuts to higher education budget forces schools to rely on donations, but even then, make cuts in services and raise tuition--which has an impact on the quality of services provided to students and means higher student loans. Rich get richer, poor get poorer--old story and GOP will always side with the latter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mistercoyote
but if I agreed with you we'd both be wrong
10:59 PM on 03/12/2011
I don't think we're gonna need a weatherman to know which way the wind's blowing.

Come on y'all. There's a sleeply off-year election when the dems are ticked at the fearless leader we elected in Washington and decide (brilliantly) not to vote. Meanwhile the Koch Bros and their toadies pour gazillions into electing know-nothing doctrinaire Banana-Republican stooges to the state houses and the governships of a dozen states.

Then ALL at once, as if reading a script, they ALL refuse to tax businesses, ALL give corporations tax breaks for nothing They ALL make draconian cuts to public education
They ALL go nuts to destroy unions They ALL taunt public employees like teachers and cops and librarians, etc etc etc etc. Is this a COINCIDENCE? Or is it a CONSPIRACY?

The question now is how do we fight back--how do we organize--how do we defeat the power of corporate money when we ourselves are poor as church mice. Let's get busy--if we don't take back our country now, it's gone forever.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EmpyPockets
There's No Vaccine for Stupid
07:03 PM on 03/16/2011
Shortly before Lewis Powell was appointed Supreme Court Justice in 1971, Powell was convinced that Nader and the anti-business rebellion he personified had to be turned back. He felt a national campaign was needed. Powell proposed that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, lead it. The purpose would be to encourage "a more balanced view of the country's economic system, corporate power. " Powell outlined his recommendations on the direction to take. The result was the Powell manifesto. (http://old.mediatransparency.org/story.php?storyID=21) Powell's focused on four targets of attack: institutions of higher education, the media; the political establishment -- centers where public opinion, legislation and government policies and agendas were shaped -- and the court system. I had never read the "manifesto" until a I read an article said this was the Koch bros. goal. Read the manifesto then the New Yorkers article on the Koch brothers : ( "http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/08/30/100830fa_fact_mayer )
It appears that they have chosen this is the time for complete corporate takeover. And I have the same question as you, "How do we fight back?
09:40 PM on 03/12/2011
Race to the bottom is defeatist policy. We need to out compete and not allow a brain drain.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheIndependenceParty
Cranky yankee and a rehabilitated ex-Republican
12:23 PM on 03/12/2011
Corporations, from gas blasting shale bombers like we have here in PA, to the Koch Brothers, to the Blackwater mercs have seized control of our government and will have their way with every facet of our lives, bar none.

The Walkers, Corbetts, Daniels and Kasichs of the Norther tier states were ushered into office by unschooled Teabaggers, ... and the more ignorant they can keep Americans by ruining their schools, both public K-12 and Secondary state schools, ... the more likely they can implement the 100 year reign of terror that Rove foretold for their twisted party.
05:37 PM on 03/12/2011
It's well known corporations like to invest in states that tax them Surely,Pennsylvania can employ everyone (even the Liberal Arts Majors) with a job paying much more than the employee is worth. Many folks aren't aware the method of extracting oil from shale was given on a stone tablet to some public employee.and,other public employees collected bottles sold papers and gathered tin foil to raise the capital.Don't be fooled by the Smart People Pennsylvania can be the California of the Mid West if we just stand our ground
Intelligence is the public property.!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheIndependenceParty
Cranky yankee and a rehabilitated ex-Republican
09:17 PM on 03/12/2011
Tried to follow every word, ... but was distracted by the fact that Fracking stopped in Arkansas this week because there were eartyhquakes that even the gas industry believes were caused by fracking.

PA won't be in the MidWest if you wait a thousand years. I think you should toke after hours. I couldn't figure out a word you wrote!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mistercoyote
but if I agreed with you we'd both be wrong
11:02 PM on 03/12/2011
Huh? Wad he say?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
08:02 PM on 03/12/2011
Am I related? Am I in the will? (Wow. Maybe I'm rich. And maybe monkeys...)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheIndependenceParty
Cranky yankee and a rehabilitated ex-Republican
09:18 PM on 03/12/2011
Yep, ... you and your monkeys are rich. Have a great night with them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rob burton
"I will write peace on your wings and you will fly
09:36 AM on 03/12/2011
Simply strategy really , in one sentence, "The dumber the clientele, the easier the con."
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
08:10 PM on 03/12/2011
Noooo....ignorance can be fixed, stupid is forever. You take an ignorant person, give them information(now free, free, FREE! on the internet), and eventually, if they're so inclined, they'll become educated. For that matter, you give someone a 10-year-old encyclopedia set, and they'll likewise become educated, even if the information is somewhat out of date. 

Problem is, people are looking for the marketable skills. And, those keep changing, somewhat. Some are more perennial, like learning construction and architecture, some are more dynamic and perishable, like computer stuff. What do you want to learn, and, more to the point, what's stopping you from learning it? Money? Not anymore. There's free stuff online. But, have ya got what it takes between your ears, to become an academician? Are you mentally fit for the task? And yes, it's a task, real, serious courses of study take WORK, that 4-letter word we all know and love(?). 

Most things that are commonly deemed worthwhile take two things: Time, and money. Higher education requires both. Mainly, though, it takes desire, an inherent willingness to learn, without which the other two are basically wasted.

There's also a question, though, educated, or indoctrinated? Increasingly, people are asking about some aspects of course content, and political activities in the larger sphere of college life. What if you want the education, hold the politics? Well, good luck with that, I think any time you have large-ish congregations of people, you end up with politics like it or not, even if it's just campus politics, but it's something to think about. I also believe that serious students of a given subject can excel at it given the right reference materials, sans instructor, sans classmates, and sans expensive learning environments.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:48 AM on 03/12/2011
I thought big business wanter a highly educated work force. When did that change?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kbeth
Dear Jesus, Save us from the Christians. Amen
12:46 PM on 03/12/2011
They want a complacent, ignorant work force, the education will be for those who deserve it (have rich parents who can afford expensive education.)
05:39 PM on 03/12/2011
DO you really think you need a bachelor's in sociology,or poly sci to wrap burgers?
Javalation
Laughing in a Daydream
07:34 AM on 03/12/2011
It is easier to control the masses when they have little education.
senseandnonsense
Trapeze artist
09:47 AM on 03/12/2011
The South tried that with slave.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mdmccormick
I am tired of this BS
05:29 AM on 03/12/2011
Just another bought and paid for Republican. RICO charges need to be filed for every Republican in office
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
havana62
I've already told you more than I know.
03:07 AM on 03/12/2011
Wanna make a bet that Wisconsin and Pennsylvania vote majority Democrat this year??? Anybody??
senseandnonsense
Trapeze artist
09:48 AM on 03/12/2011
We have a special election for a state senator that dies last month. I'll know the answer to your question very soon.
05:40 PM on 03/12/2011
Sure. But,how do we make the bet.?Who holds the money/? And how long do your UP checks run?
photo
dayzee10
Some people are #%!!*?*# NUTS!!!!!
12:03 AM on 03/12/2011
Since when is sgt Frank Drebin governor?
YOKEL13
Earth may be spherical, but the galaxy is flat
12:00 AM on 03/12/2011
Is it just me, or does this guy resemble Leslie Nielsen?
photo
EdCorner
Now what - more of the same...
11:09 PM on 03/11/2011
Let's see - .01 per cent of the population owns over 90% of the nations wealth. That's about 400 people? We must be a real nusance when we aren't serving. Now get in line and no back talk!!
senseandnonsense
Trapeze artist
09:50 AM on 03/12/2011
We should distinguish the rich who are actually productive members of society and those who are simply rich by accident of birth.