iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Is The Apple Or Pear-Shaped Body Type More Dangerous?

Apple Pear Shaped

First Posted: 03/11/11 02:01 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:40 PM ET

New research is challenging previous medical notions that "apple-shaped" people with more fat around their waist are at higher risk of heart attacks and strokes than "pear-shaped" people with fatter bottoms and hips.

A study of 220,000 people published Friday confirmed that being obese -- having a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or more -- is a major risk factor for heart disease, but found the distribution of fat on the body has no impact on that risk.

"Regardless of how you measure it, being obese is bad for your heart. This study suggests that measuring your waist is no better than calculating your BMI," said Mike Knapton, associate medical director at the British Heart Foundation charity, which part-funded the study.

BMI is widely used by researchers and doctors to determine people's health risks. It is calculated by dividing weight in kilograms by height in meters squared. A person who is 5 feet 5 inches tall has a BMI of 25 and is classified as overweight at 150 pounds (68 kg), and has a BMI of 30 and is classified as obese at 180 pounds (82 kg).

According to researchers writing in The Lancet medical journal, previous studies have suggested that people with "central obesity" -- often described as apple-shaped people -- have a three times greater risk of heart attack than people with general obesity as measured by BMI. But other experts have questioned those findings, so a large international consortium of scientists set out to try and settle the issue.

Their results suggest that while monitoring weight and fat levels may be important to try to get people to change their lifestyles, the best predictors of future heart risk are measures of blood pressure, cholesterol and history of diabetes.

The Lancet study involved taking weight, hip, waist, blood pressure, cholesterol and other key data from more than 220,000 adults -- who had no previous history of heart disease -- and tracking them for almost a decade. During that time, around 14,000 of them had heart attacks or strokes.

John Danesh of Britain's Cambridge University, one of the almost 200 scientists from 17 countries who worked on the study, said the findings showed that "basically, all obesity types are broadly as bad as each other" when it comes to heart health.

Danesh said the findings should help guide medical practice worldwide because at the moment, national and international guidelines provide differing recommendations about the value of assessing obesity levels to predict future heart risk.

"This study very clearly shows that if conventional risk factors (such as blood pressure and cholesterol) have already been measured, then measures of levels of fat add very little," he said in a telephone interview.

Obesity has become a global epidemic, with more than half a billion people, or one in 10 adults worldwide, now considered to be obese -- more than double the number in 1980.

Cardiovascular diseases -- which can lead to heart attacks, strokes and other fatal events -- are the top cause of death worldwide, killing around 17.1 million people a year, according to the World health Organization (WHO).

(Editing by Robert Woodward)

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

New research is challenging previous medical notions that "apple-shaped" people with more fat around their waist are at higher risk of heart attacks and strokes than "pear-shaped" people with fatter...
New research is challenging previous medical notions that "apple-shaped" people with more fat around their waist are at higher risk of heart attacks and strokes than "pear-shaped" people with fatter...
Filed by Nicholas Miriello  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 78
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
11:19 AM on 03/14/2011
I'm pretty sure I've solved this issue - I know which is unhealthier! The one that's overweight and obese from eating donuts, fast food and all other garbage on a regular basis. The one that doesn't exercise and take of their body.The one that maintains their house and car with precision and care but tosses themself in the dumpster. I'm pretty sure that's the one at risk - apple or pear. Hold your applause, I know, Genius right? Give me a break already with this crap. I can hear it already, I'm unhealthy because my genetics dictate that I'm a pear, or an apple. What came first? The donut, or the pear?

www.angrytrainerfitness.com
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Milt Bedingfield
10:14 PM on 03/13/2011
Really good article, it seems recently most have been thinking central obesity is most harmful, this is enlightening. More research is probably needed to be sure.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ninetailedfox
banning people.....so childish
02:21 PM on 03/13/2011
I see a lot of research on overweight people, but none on underweight people. My husband knows two underweight people that died of serious health problems. I dont see any studies on that. This seems like an excuse to be shallow really.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:05 PM on 03/13/2011
More like ignorance and inattention than shallowness.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Crystal Naritai
Statistics are my friend.
05:56 PM on 03/13/2011
There is tons of research. Look at 3rd world countries. In US its anorexia, and mostly in mental health.
In addition many diseases cause underweight problems in adults- but when it comes down to it research on malnutrition stays the same.
j hawkins
No tea for me !
01:49 PM on 03/13/2011
I'm in big trouble..I look like an hour glass !
12:22 PM on 03/13/2011
I find it ironic that fruits are used as representatives of certain body types... wouldn't donuts or napoleons be more apropos?
11:11 AM on 03/13/2011
Why is it ok to give smokers shit when they're smoking but you can't give a fat person shit for eating, or at anytime for that matter. I mean we tax the hell out of cigarettes, we should tax people who are obese more for their food than slim people. Smokers are a drain on our healthcare so we force them to contribute more through taxes, why would it be wrong to do this to fat people?

And why do we have to refer to them as fat people, when smokers are called smokers. Shouldn't the news use the same discourtesy for fat people and call them fatties. It would be absurd, maybe smokers should be refered to as people who smoke.
10:58 AM on 03/13/2011
The Pear-Shaped Body Type was secretly pushed into its favored state of being by a lobby of Dominican women. Now, an unidentified group of citizens from the State of Mississippi is pushing back.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jack Mahoney
Everybody matters or nobody matters. (H. Bosch)
11:05 AM on 03/13/2011
Obscure but nice! Fanned.
Gasparilla
there is no clean coal
10:13 AM on 03/13/2011
Lose weight, get some exercise, end of problem.
photo
FTracy3
My micro-bio is as empty as the rest of my life.
09:57 AM on 03/13/2011
Neither..and in either case you should get that stem thing checked.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Craig 212
Tide goes in, tide goes out.
09:27 AM on 03/13/2011
Neither is healthy. Stop being fat.
08:42 AM on 03/13/2011
*YAWN* another useless piece of imformation that will send tremors in women who have time for this and probably men who care about it too.

Get busy living healthily and you will see that all those will fall by their own accord...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:26 AM on 03/13/2011
Headlines written as questions - gee - I wonder of this too comes up at the top of every Google search?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:08 PM on 03/13/2011
This article does; but HP drops down about 5-6.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pundit Commentator
http://punditcommentator.blogspot.com
03:20 AM on 03/13/2011
What does it mean "fatter bottoms and hips"? I thought bottoms=hips.
01:43 AM on 03/13/2011
I'm shaped like a human. What does that mean?
10:59 AM on 03/13/2011
I think it is good..
11:02 AM on 03/13/2011
It should mean you're slim, not shaped like a hippo.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mansterEZ
searching for secular humanist fact-based truth
01:36 AM on 03/13/2011
Definitely pear shaped unless one has inherited naturally wide hips and a grandiose derriere. Big at the bottom end is very dangerous and most times leads to premature death.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hoobit
GOP/TBs: The USA is Not a game!
01:51 AM on 03/13/2011
{Did you read the article? It isn't the "shape", it's the blood pressure, cholesterol, other health issued --ie diabetes-- that put one person at greater risk than another. It isn't the 'location' of the fat that determines which high-cholesteroled, high-blood-pressured person is 'healthier' than the other high-cholesteroled, high-blood-pressured person; NEITHER is healthy!}
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mansterEZ
searching for secular humanist fact-based truth
02:35 PM on 03/13/2011
Show me someone who is wide at the bottom who doesn't suffer from high cholesterol/blood pressure and diabetes? How much do you know about pancreas and kidney/liver function? Get informed.
11:03 AM on 03/13/2011
Inherited? I believe you mean eaten themselves into wide hips and a big lard butt.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hoobit
GOP/TBs: The USA is Not a game!
12:50 PM on 03/13/2011
Bobotronix: You might want to look up the word: "steatopygia." It's a condition found amongst women of/descended from the Bushman, Hottentot, and Korana; it's characterized by a great accumulation of fat on the buttocks of some women within those groups *irrespective of* their overall size/weight/body fat. It is an inherited trait.