More

Irvine 11 To Court On Disturbance Charges

AMY TAXIN   03/11/11 05:51 PM ET   AP

Irvine 11

SANTA ANA, Calif. — Eleven Muslim students charged with disrupting a speech by the Israeli ambassador to the U.S. at a California university sought Friday to have the district attorney pulled from the case.

Prosecutors illegally obtained search warrants and focused on the religion of the defendants by dubbing the case the "UCI Muslim case," said Dan Mayfield, one of the students' attorneys.

"We are asking the attorney general of the state of California to step in and take over the case," Mayfield said during a news conference after the students' arraignment was postponed until April 15. The courtroom was packed with supporters.

Orange County Deputy District Attorney Dan Wagner said the allegations were not grounds to pull his office from the case.

The students are each charged with one count of misdemeanor conspiracy to disturb a meeting and one count of misdemeanor disturbance of a meeting.

The students were arrested on Feb. 8, 2010, after shouting in protest at a speech at the University of California, Irvine, on U.S.-Israeli security, forcing Ambassador Michael Oren to halt his remarks for 20 minutes.

The case has stoked an intense debate about freedom of speech.

District Attorney Tony Rackauckas filed the charges last month, prompting a public outcry by Muslim and civil rights advocates who say prosecutors were discriminating against students exercising their right to dissent, just as many other college-goers do without punishment.

Prosecutors contend the protest was a premeditated attempt to disrupt Oren's lecture and infringed on the rights of the hundreds of people who had gathered on campus to hear him speak.

"We look forward to the actual evidence coming out," Wagner said. "Anyone who was at the assembly could tell you, the First Amendment rights of the speaker and the audience were being violated clearly by these defendants, and that's the principle on which we are prosecuting this case."

Students and their advocates contend they did nothing wrong and have already been through a rigorous disciplinary process at the university, which revoked the Muslim Student Union's charter for a quarter and placed it on two years of probation.

"These students merely stood up and expressed deeply rooted political dissent in a manner that was peaceful and tempered," said Reem Salahi, one of the students' attorneys.

Eight of the students attended UC Irvine and three were from the nearby campus of the University of California, Riverside.

If convicted, they could face a sentence ranging from probation with community service and fines to up to six months in jail.

Jacqueline Goodman, one of the students' attorneys, said there had been discussions about a possible plea deal but no agreement was reached.

About 150 people packed the courtroom Friday to show support for the defendants, including relatives, community leaders and students.

Ojaala Ahmad, a senator with the student body government at nearby California State University, Long Beach, said her organization had passed a resolution in support of the defendants.

"If we as a student body government don't speak up against it, it could be any one of our students from any of our universities next," she said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST COLLEGE

Filed by Leah Finnegan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 29
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:57 AM on 03/14/2011
pigslamists do their VERY best,,,

to turn any place they are,,,

into "HELL ON EARTH",,,
11:52 PM on 03/13/2011
Watch the video. These thugs are disgusting. UC Irvine used to be an outstanding school. This Muslim Students Association has been a disgrace. They were childish at a lecture by the Ambassador of Israel.

UCI made a huge mistake hiring Erwin Chemerinsky was a huge mistake as dean.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
T4
Entreprenuer and financial consultant
04:04 PM on 03/12/2011
what would be the response iof these students had shouted theheadof a megabanks telling a group how Obama's bailoutsof $3trillion was a great deal for them.
03:52 AM on 03/12/2011
Good. People who conspire to prevent others from speaking need to be punished.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
T4
Entreprenuer and financial consultant
04:07 PM on 03/12/2011
punished - you sound like a parent who likes to strap their children for being "bad". grow up. Preventing others from speaking is what happens in the media all the time. do u live in a total vacumm - define what you mean andhow much you are willin gotpay in additional taxes for the expense of enforcing your conspricies.
10:42 PM on 03/13/2011
T4,
I ask for informational purposes only,but are you a Liberal Arts major?Something is lacking in your ability to critically analyze.
Epilef2000
Cafe Con Leche Party
01:22 AM on 03/12/2011
Are these guys crazy? Freedom of speech does not apply to Israeli issues--its moot case. No one, not even the President of the United States can criticize or even imply that Israel may err on their policies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
T4
Entreprenuer and financial consultant
04:08 PM on 03/12/2011
how right you are - just ask the heads of almost al the megabanks who got billions for bonuses from Obama, and the guy who control the fed, or the almost the entire econ staff, including Treasury of Obama or the heads of allmajor studios and talent agencies - thelist goes on.
Epilef2000
Cafe Con Leche Party
06:51 PM on 03/12/2011
yea...its not to say im a anti- or pro israeli..i am neutral---their policies should closely align in support of american interests ..when they are in contrast..they we must have the power to stand up for taxpayers..and for american rights...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:04 PM on 03/11/2011
I dont think that those students were right in disturbing the speech of this ambassador. However, if mobs of people can stand in front of a Masjid, pound on the walls as people are worshiping and listening to speeches inside, wave israeli flags and tell people to 'go home and beat up your wife', and arent arrested, then comparativly the students should not have been arrested.

...but I guess it is OK to urge Marines to 'hurry the process to paridise' of Muslims, and call it free expression, and disturb the prayers of a man by yelling JESUS JESUS !!!, playing loud music, and throwing crosses in front of him while he is trying to pray.

We cant have two standards of law in a democracy. Of course, someone will attack my comment by comparing it to Saudi Arabia, or other majority Muslim nations that dont have free expression as a rule...but, you are in America, and they dont claim to be a democracy.
12:46 PM on 03/11/2011
You know in these times you can say and really do certain things to the American Muslim community that you can't do to any other group. As an American Muslim I'm troubled by this. However, I digress. Those students really shouldn't have distrupted that speech because that conflicts with the freedom of speech rights of Ambassador Oren.

I think revoking the group's charter goes too far and I think UC Irvine ought to be ashamed.
01:04 PM on 03/11/2011
Yeah... it's a tough call.  It WAS peaceful... that's a fact.  So you might say to yourself... .this is overkill.  But it clearly is against the law.  Their intention WAS to disrupt the meeting.  Our youngest has some friends there and said that it's really tearing the campus up.  It's not like they're clashing in the physical sense but it's pretty evenly mixed reactions.  Irvine is BIG TIME conservative.
photo
morefromLA
A fighting liberal and proud of it
02:58 PM on 03/11/2011
Yeah but it's only for one quarter. It could have been a lot worse. Now "misdemeanor conspiracy," really?
03:28 PM on 03/11/2011
True enough.  I know of fraternities who have been put on probation for longer than that for wild parties. 
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:20 AM on 03/11/2011
Wow. This seems like overkill for a 20-minute, peaceful disturbance. Seems like a free speech issue.
11:38 AM on 03/11/2011
if they wanted to exercise their free speech rights they should have done it outside like everyone else. just look at those loonies from westboro, they protest and dont get arrested because they know how to play the game. when you disrupt a speaker like this it is not free speech.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:01 PM on 03/11/2011
Disrupting the speaker? That happens all the time. Why weren't the just escorted out? What I see is trespassing or public disturbance. Why does it matter who they interrupted? The Supreme Court just affirmed that you can be as offensive as you want to be, in whatever context you like, so long as you are peaceful. Shouting, although loud, is still peaceful. Attacking the speaker, say, would not...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cuzzbuster
04:25 PM on 03/12/2011
Yeah..But you can shout out "liar" at the President during his address to Congress.
12:32 PM on 03/11/2011
I agree! First, the speakers they were attempting to drown out were ,um...Jews And,the students were Muslims.So,on the one hand,the speakers were Jews. Why did anyone think they had a right to be heard in America.And,the protesting students were Muslims.Normally among the quietest,most law abiding of all group-s
An,they were abiding the law here l The Higher Law One of the things tha does make me feel good about being here at HP is the vast outpouring of folks who are upset about the attempted silencing oif those Jews This stands as amn implicit rebuke to critics who snicker at HP and say it's only mindless idiots who rant about Sarah Palin Who knows?
Maybe we'll see a half dozen comments
10:04 AM on 03/11/2011
Why am I not surprised...

Those protesters swearing at the Muslims attending a fund raiser in Orange County were also arrested, right? Especially the elected official threatening them with "an early meeting in Paradise" at the hands of some marines she knows?
01:06 PM on 03/11/2011
I don't know what you're referring to... I've not heard anything about that.  Regardless of how heinous it might be... swearing at someone isn't against the law.  Disrupting free speech is.  And I'm quite certain that if they were actually threatened... someone would have done something about it. 
03:22 PM on 03/11/2011
Amazingly no one did something about it and except for the Daily Show and Aljazeera English no one seems to have picked it up.

http://www.islamophobiatoday.com/2011/03/03/shocking-anti-muslim-hate-video-in-orange-county-california/