iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Japan Earthquake 2011: Nuclear Power Plant Area Evacuated

Japan Earthquake Nuclear Power Plant

MARI YAMAGUCHI and JEFF DONN   03/11/11 11:53 PM ET   AP

TOKYO — Japan declared states of emergency for five nuclear reactors at two power plants after the units lost cooling ability in the aftermath of Friday's powerful earthquake. Thousands of residents were evacuated as workers struggled to get the reactors under control to prevent meltdowns.

Operators at the Fukushima Daiichi plant's Unit 1 scrambled ferociously to tamp down heat and pressure inside the reactor after the 8.9 magnitude quake and the tsunami that followed cut off electricity to the site and disabled emergency generators, knocking out the main cooling system.

Some 3,000 people within two miles (three kilometers) of the plant were urged to leave their homes, but the evacuation zone was more than tripled to 6.2 miles (10 kilometers) after authorities detected eight times the normal radiation levels outside the facility and 1,000 times normal inside Unit 1's control room.

The government declared a state of emergency at the Daiichi unit – the first at a nuclear plant in Japan's history. But hours later, the Tokyo Electric Power Co., which operates the six-reactor Daiichi site in northeastern Japan, announced that it had lost cooling ability at a second reactor there and three units at its nearby Fukushima Daini site.

The government quickly declared states of emergency for those units, too. Nearly 14,000 people living near the two power plants were ordered to evacuate.

Japan's nuclear safety agency said the situation was most dire at Fukushima Daiichi's Unit 1, where pressure had risen to twice what is consider the normal level. The International Atomic Energy Agency said in a statement that diesel generators that normally would have kept cooling systems running at Fukushima Daiichi had been disabled by tsunami flooding.

Officials at the Daiichi facility began venting radioactive vapors from the unit to relieve pressure inside the reactor case. The loss of electricity had delayed that effort for several hours.

Plant workers there labored to cool down the reactor core, but there was no prospect for immediate success. They were temporarily cooling the reactor with a secondary system, but it wasn't working as well as the primary one, according to Yuji Kakizaki, an official at the Japanese nuclear safety agency.

Even once a reactor is shut down, radioactive byproducts give off heat that can ultimately produce volatile hydrogen gas, melt radioactive fuel, or even breach the containment building in a full meltdown belching radioactivity into the surroundings, according to technical and government authorities.

Despite plans for the intentional release of radioactivity, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano said the 40-year-old plant was not leaking radiation.

"With evacuation in place and the ocean-bound wind, we can ensure the safety," Edano said at a televised news conference early Saturday.

It was unclear if the elevation of radioactivity around the reactor was known at the time he spoke.

The outside measurement of radiation at Daiichi was far below the allowed limit for a year, other officials said, reporting that it would take 70 days standing at the gate to reach the yearly limit.

Dr. Irwin Redlener, a pediatrician who runs a disaster preparedness institute at Columbia University, said the reported level of radiation outside the plant would not pose an immediate danger, though it could lift the rate of thyroid cancer in a population over time.

However, he called the reported level inside the plant extraordinarily high, raising a concern about acute health effects. "I would personally absolutely not want to be inside," he said.

While the condition of the reactor cores was of utmost concern, Tokyo Electric Power Co. also warned of power shortages and an "extremely challenging situation in power supply for a while."

The Daiichi site is located in Onahama city, about 170 miles (270 kilometers) northeast of Tokyo. The 460-megawatt Unit 1 began operating in 1971 and is the oldest at the site. It is a boiling water reactor that drives the turbine with radioactive water, unlike pressurized water reactors usually found in the United States. Japanese regulators decided in February to allow it to run another 10 years.

The temperature inside the reactor wasn't reported, but Japanese regulators said it wasn't dropping as quickly as they wanted.

Kakizaki, the safety agency official, said the emergency cooling system is intact and could kick in as a last line of defense. "That's as a last resort, and we have not reached that stage yet," he added.

Defense Ministry official Ippo Maeyama said dozens of troops trained for chemical disasters had been dispatched to the plant in case of a radiation leak, along with four vehicles designed for use in atomic, biological and chemical warfare.

Technical experts said the plant would presumably have hours, but probably not days, to try to stabilize things.

Leonard S. Spector, director of the Washington office of the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, said loss of coolant is the most serious type of accident at a nuclear power plant.

"They are busy trying to get coolant to the core area," said Neil Sheehan, a spokesman for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. "The big thing is trying to get power to the cooling systems."

High-pressure pumps can temporarily cool a reactor in this state with battery power, even when electricity is down, according to Arnold Gundersen, a nuclear engineer who used to work in the U.S. nuclear industry. They can open and close relief valves needed to control pressure. Batteries would go dead within hours but could be replaced.

The IAEA said "mobile electricity supplies" had arrived at the Daiichi plant. It wasn't clear if they were generators or batteries.

It also was not immediately clear how closely the reactor had moved toward dangerous pressure or temperature levels. If temperatures were to keep rising to more than 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit, it could set off a chemical reaction that begins to embrittle the metallic zirconium that sheathes the radioactive uranium fuel.

That reaction releases hydrogen, which can explode when cooling water finally floods back into the reactor. That was also concern for a time during the 1979 Three Mile Island accident in Pennsylvania.

If the reactor temperature keeps reaches around 4,000 degrees, the fuel could melt outright, and the reactor could slump right into the bottom of the containment building in a partial meltdown. Then the crucial question would be whether the building would stay intact.

"The last line of defense is that containment – and that's got to hold," Gundersen said. If it doesn't, the radioactive load inside the reactor can pour out into the surroundings.

The plant is just south of the Miyagi prefecture, which was the region hardest hit by the quake. A fire broke out at another nuclear plant in that area in a turbine building at one of the Onagawa power reactors. Smoke poured from the building, but the fire was put out. Turbine buildings of such boiling water reactors, though separate from the reactor, do contain radioactive water, but at much lower levels than inside the reactor. A water leak was reported in another Onagawa reactor.

No radioactive releases were reported in any of the other affected plants.

As Japan is one of the most seismically active nations in the world, it has strict sets of regulations designed to limit the impact of quakes on nuclear power plants. These standards call for constructing plants on solid bedrock to reduce shaking.

As one of the most seismically active countries in the world, Japan has strict sets of regulations designed to limit the impact of quakes on nuclear power plants. These standards call for building plants on solid bedrock to reduce shaking.

Even so, 10 of Japan's 54 commercial reactors were shut down because of the quake, and Tokyo Electric Power said it had to reduce power generation. Japan gets about 30 percent of its electricity from nuclear power.

___

AP National Writer Jeff Donn reported from Boston.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

TOKYO — Japan declared states of emergency for five nuclear reactors at two power plants after the units lost cooling ability in the aftermath of Friday's powerful earthquake. Thousands of resid...
TOKYO — Japan declared states of emergency for five nuclear reactors at two power plants after the units lost cooling ability in the aftermath of Friday's powerful earthquake. Thousands of resid...
Filed by Cara Parks  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 172
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
RedRat
Ignorance is fixable, stupidty is forever
11:04 PM on 03/12/2011
I am surprised that the Japanese built these reactors so close to a know fault and subduction zone and then not plan for a potential tsunami since most of the coastal cities in Japan have tsunami defenses. The tsunami knocking out the diesel backup generators seems to be a design error on their part. Of course, the whole country is quake prone so there probably are very few places where you can site a reactor. I am surprised that in the building of these reactors that standard risk analyses were not performed. You need to run through "What if scenarios" to see what you can do, which is a standard engineering practice, or at least should be.
photo
karim banned
A fool's mind is at the mercy of his tongue and a
08:43 AM on 03/12/2011
Japan should not be allowed to build nuclear power plants.

IAEA should go over the safety procedures for Japanese nuclear plants.

They should at least tolerate a 10 degree Richter scale earthquake­.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjx-JlwYtyE&feature=player_embedded

Some people say that explosion was due to a natural gas explosion!

I cannot make sense of that. It is completely illogical to have natural gas pipelines near the reactor core. It does not make sense. IMHO this was due to overheating of the core because the cooling system was shut down as a result of the earthquake.

This was a meltdown, might have been a meltdown with limited force, but it was nevertheless a meltdown.
photo
RedRat
Ignorance is fixable, stupidty is forever
11:07 PM on 03/12/2011
Do not jump to conclusions. I don't know what the truth of the matter is in Japan. Natural gas pipelines may well be within the structure to run back up electricity generators, followed by backup from diesel generators. Since none of us know exactly what the layout of these plants might be, let's not get ahead of ourselves and start the lynching party.
photo
karim banned
A fool's mind is at the mercy of his tongue and a
08:31 AM on 03/12/2011
It is crazy that IAEA has allowed Japan to build nuclear power plants, despite so high risk for failure due to earthquake risks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Taymullah
Executive Order 11110
06:53 PM on 03/12/2011
What high risk?

1 Plant with reactors built 40 years ago has a series of failures that perplex staff in terms of cooling solutions. Yet they still got the situation under control with no real exposure...

I mean this isnt the first earthquake in Japan...

Your "High risk of failure" merely conjecture - Please separate falsification from fact.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabinetmaniac
Think for yourself. Question authority.
08:14 AM on 03/12/2011
No Nukes!

This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James I Kirkland
State Paleontologist Utah
06:02 AM on 03/12/2011
Blowing the top of a nuclear reactor is never good,

http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/12/video-of-japanese-nuclear-plant-explosion/
12:59 AM on 03/12/2011
I'm an American working as an English teacher in Koriyama, Fukushima, halfway between Tokyo and Sendai. We're all watching the nuclear situation very closely. Our city is going to start rolling blackouts from 5pm Japan time and will be shutting off the water shortly. The prefecture has opted to use all the "emergency water" that is saved for severe fires to try and cool down the reactor. We haven't seen much on the news here to indicate what has or what what will happen. My co-workers and I are headed back to the evacuation center to soon. If I hear anything else of note before I leave, I'll post it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StephenJK
All your consciousness are belong to us
01:41 AM on 03/12/2011
Thanks for the update. Please be safe and sound.
08:41 AM on 03/12/2011
I taught in English in Koriyama and am worrying about my friends who still live there. Do you have any information on the damage done to traditional Japanese houses in your city? Has there been much damage? Any information about Koriyama would be greatly appreciated.
11:50 PM on 03/12/2011
Amato: I taught in Japan also. I believe we were in Koriyama at the same time. Likewise I am trying to find information about my friends in Koriyama. I am hoping to hear something soon. Great to read this post. It is a small world.
02:38 PM on 03/13/2011
I am from Koriyama, living in NY right now. I've been in touch with my family who live in Shizuka-machi area. Damage in Koriyama is not as bad as what you see on the news coverage. Most of the houses are not damaged, and at least everyone I know did not get hurt. It is very hard to make a phone call and water had been stopped. It seems there is electricity though. Banks and some ATM machines are open, some convenience stores are somewhat operating. You can hear the report from Koriyama on NPR.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2011/03/13/134510288/in-japans-north-evacuees-face-radiation-fears-uncertainty

They started to move people from evacuation area around the nuclear power plant. Koriyama is outside the 20km radius of the plant, probably 50km+ away. People are very concerned with its unstable condition.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ritamary
12:29 AM on 03/12/2011
And some here continue to comment about what a great thing nuclear power is...

We silly tree-hugging, impractical, hysterical libruls would prefer to have clean, green energy. We just don't understand that the energy companies have to find a way to make a profit. With solar panels on every house, each house would become its own little power plant. Now how would the energy companies make a profit that way?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressivePicon86
A 50th state Progressive.
09:56 PM on 03/11/2011
I hope that there isn't a meltdown; Japan cannot become the second Chernobyl. The world needs to get off its nuclear and oil addiction and just rely on energy sources that are less dangerous and don't bring political and economical turmoil. My thoughts are continuously with the people of Japan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim Janssen
defoliate the 1%
10:35 PM on 03/11/2011
Americans better hope that the Japanese nuclear engineers and workers get the fixes in place needed to avert a meltdown, i.e. China Syndrome scenario. If they don't it's quite likely that a dangerous plume of radioactive gas may descend upon the West Coast and from there, inland. That would be a worst case scenario as I heard it described on Rachel Maddow tonight by nuclear experts and scientists.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lulubelle1956
11:46 PM on 03/11/2011
Likely? Definite.
photo
tallen
panem et circenses
10:44 PM on 03/11/2011
Throughout history, energy has been a trade off with safety.

You light a fire in the fireplace to stay warm, and there is the possibility your house burns down.
It would be nice if we had other safer alternatives, but technologically, the world isn't there yet.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lulubelle1956
11:48 PM on 03/11/2011
I think the "historical" analysis to lighting a fire, as though you were a caveman is quaint, but there is no comparison to a fire burning down a house (limited damage, to you), and a meltdown at, or radioactive release from, a nuclear power plant (world-wide damage, increase in cancer rates and deaths, to the world--via--air currents).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
donbrown
A television producer in Hawaii
12:57 PM on 03/12/2011
What is the danger with solar energy or algae to oil production? I don't agree that all energy production is a tradeoff.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Balzac
09:52 PM on 03/11/2011
These are very courageous men who remain at the controls of the nuclear facility. Some very courageous men from Chernobyl died of radiation exposure after doing their duty for their nation.

A guy told me there are actually a few guys in the navy whose job it is to do maintenance tasks to the inside of nuclear containment structures inside a nuclear powered vessel. It reminds me of that scene from Star Trek when Spock goes into the reactor core.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lulubelle1956
11:51 PM on 03/11/2011
Yes, god help them the men and women who are working to contain the problem at now, at least 3, nuclear power plants in Japan that are in danger of meltdown or radiation release.

Unfortunately, this is real, and is not a "Spock" scene from a made up fantasy.

We are not trying to make heroes of a few, but are trying to save many, across the nation of Japan and the world.

Kid, I don't want to raise any alarms, but don't kid yourself about the seriousness of this situation.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Balzac
01:06 AM on 03/12/2011
Did your pointless lecture make you feel better about being helpless? I've got more Japanese soul than you could hope to absorb after spending years in Tokyo.

And I've never even made it outside the airport. My stop in Japan was on the way to China. But that doesn't really matter. Nice try with the grief drama ego harvest. Better luck next time.
08:34 PM on 03/11/2011
Maybe, nuclear power is not such a good idea.
sallysuelee
just one voice among many
09:07 PM on 03/11/2011
there you go.. you and me ..common sense deduction, but money is the deciding factor on these matters... the worse oil spill in our history not even a year ago.. you see, we forget
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lulubelle1956
11:56 PM on 03/11/2011
I didn't forget! BP Gulf Oil Disaster--product of GOP privatization and long term leases.

Japan Nuclear Facility Disaster--product of same "privatization" idea--with same result--public has to hope "private workers" will properly respond (and not flee)--

As opposed to "local, state and federal government workers" like the army, navy, sheriffs, police and auxiliaries, correction officers, court officers and other public service workers who get "drafted" in emergencies--and are paid by the public.

Gee, disasters like this makes one think again about the value of, and benefits paid to those unionized government workers who deal with and don't flee the disasters, eh?
06:05 PM on 03/11/2011
Let me clarify a common misconception- Nuclear energy is not a bad form of energy at all. Most people fear nuclear energy because of disasters that have happened in the past which would warrant concern for the general population. However, the handling of nuclear power plants has become increasingly safe and preventative measures have been put in place for instances such as this one. Some may argue that its the materials worked with that can have a damaging effect, which is true, but again, measures have been put in place to ensure the safety of those who not only work within/near the reactors, but also those who live near it. So my suggestion is that people read up on nuclear energy and educate themselves before passing judgment. It's actually a very beneficial source of electricity. People choose to work and live near reactors. They aren't as bad as one may think they are.
09:41 PM on 03/11/2011
So then, why are they worried about one or more MELT DOWNs? Why have they evacuated thousands of people? Because it's so safe?
10:47 PM on 03/11/2011
It is not a misconception that the Fukushima Daiichi plant is now at about 1,000 times the typical radiation levels right now. It is not a misconception that there is no means of cooling the core right now. It is not a misconception that nobody is able to provide a reliable source of power to the plant to operate the cooling system.

Right now, a discussion of misconceptions has a certain Kafkaesque tone to it. There is a nuclear power plant that has no power, and stands a very good chance of going through an actual meltdown. Shouldn't someone have thought to install solar panels, wind turbines, or an ocean wave system as a backup? Hmm?
11:15 PM on 03/11/2011
You don't understand nuclear power. I was licensed on the same type of containment by the NRC. I would be the one in the control room that gives the orders to do stuff. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. I know work on the grid side of the house vice generation. You don't understand that either when you are throwing out silly suggestions like wind turbines. You could not use this as a backup. It wouldn't be allowed by the regulators. Diesel's are tested and are the best options. And they have redundancies. This was an outrageous situation. They lost stuff that they never should have lost. But guess what, we practice this all the time. They need to keep water on the core. Last I heard, they had 10 feet. They usually operate with about 15 feet. The priority is to get them generators. The core is cooled if they have water on it. Period. Second, pressure needs to be maintained due to it being a saturated system. TMI was a PWR. They behave differently.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lloyd Cata
03:01 PM on 03/11/2011
"Japan's Katrina"....and thank God, Bush & Co. are not in charge!

Japan will certainly handle this with more civility and compassion than was shown during Katrina and now the BP disaster(....that is ongoing and forgotten by US media).
01:55 PM on 03/11/2011
The US also has nuclear reactors along the ocean along active fault-lines in CA. Insanity
03:16 PM on 03/11/2011
agreed and with the energy crisis there is lots of political consensus and money behind it to go back to more nuclear power. This type of power is extremely dangerous and humanity will pay a huge price if we do not smarten up on this issue. We are in the age of massive earth changes due to many reasons and having nuclear power plants all over the earth is playing with fire is one of its most
lethal forms..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:22 PM on 03/11/2011
Also along a big fault in Tennesee.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Max Shaw
My micro-bio is no longer empty.
01:52 PM on 03/11/2011
This is horrifyingly sad and painful to watch..
01:42 PM on 03/11/2011
When the back up generators went down the water in the reactor was just sitting there. The issue we run into is if the fuel rods were exposed as the water began to evaporate. From what I've read the US Air Force in Japan took coolant over to there to add to the system so it should be under control, but I guess we just don't know if the rods were ever exposed.
01:50 PM on 03/11/2011
The reports I see is that there is about 3 meters of water over the core and the core is cooling. The core itself is not much taller than 3 meters (that's about 10 feet for the metric-challenged). The coolant delivery was needed because the water on site has debris because of the quake.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
3Nox
Turns into a hedgehog when messed with
11:06 PM on 03/11/2011
Thank you for this info. We need solid info. Thanks!