More

'Chernobyl Baby' Explains Life In A Fallout Zone

Chernobyl Japan Nuclear

First Posted: 03/17/11 03:33 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:40 PM ET

Nastassia Astrasheuskaya joined Reuters as a correspondent in December 2010. She was born on Aug. 31, 1989, in the Belarussian city of Mogilev, three years after the nuclear disaster at the Ukrainian Chernobyl, 500 km (320 miles) away.

By Nastassia Astrasheuskaya

MOSCOW (Reuters) - I wasn't even born when Chernobyl blew up, but its deadly legacy haunted my childhood.

One girl at my school had six fingers on one hand. My thyroid gland is permanently enlarged and the fear of cancer will never leave me or my family.

It is a fate I would not wish on the Japanese people living in the shadow of the tsunami-damaged Fukushima reactors, and wondering what the effects will be on them.

I was born on August 31, 1989, in the Belarussian city of Mogilev, 500 km (320 miles) from Chernobyl. Mogilev was at the epicenter of the radiation cloud blown toward Belarus after the fire at the Ukrainian nuclear power plant in April 1986.

I didn't experience what happened but I heard my parents speak of it many times.

They didn't know what was happening when this smog hung around for days. There was no official explanation: nothing on television, nothing on the radio, not a word from officials.

Those who did know the truth advised their children to stay indoors. They didn't want to cause panic among the masses who walked the polluted streets unaware of what they were breathing in.

The Soviet government took several days to realize the Chernobyl explosion could not be covered up, even though the outside world knew a major release of radiation had taken place.

When my parents found out about the danger, they had to make quick decisions. My mother and brother were to go to Moscow, which was affected by much less radiation than Mogilev.

My father was to stay in Mogilev and continue working.

Breathing was dangerous, but the family needed money.

"Your brother was five at the time," my mother told me. "We had to take him away."

They packed and left for Moscow to stay with my uncle, Mom's brother. "We stayed there for five months," Mom said. "But then we realized that nothing was going to change any time soon, and we went back to your father."

BIRTH RATE FELL

Emigration was not a viable option then.

I was born three years later.

The birth rate had begun falling steeply because people saw various defects in babies born after the disaster, and did not dare to have children of their own. I went to school with a girl who had arm defects.

It was scary but we got used to it.

As with most people living in Belarus after the accident, my thyroid gland was much bigger than normal. We lived under constant threat of getting thyroid cancer.

Belarus was the country most contaminated by the fallout from Chernobyl, and completely clean areas are still rare.

The water ruined our teeth. We had very specific places where the radiation levels were lower and we could pick mushrooms and berries.

I remember seeing large forest areas fenced off with barbed wire with scary yellow signs reading "radiation danger" everywhere.

My generation, especially those living in regions close to the border with Ukraine, became known as "Children of Chernobyl."

Sympathetic foreigners started organisations to help kids from contaminated areas improve their health.

They would take us away from Belarus to Europe or the U.S. for several weeks each summer so we could fix our teeth, eat healthier food and clean our lungs with fresher air.

Children born today, almost 25 years after the explosion, remain under threat, as will their children and grandchildren, because radiation doesn't disappear that fast.

I know that being exposed to radiation in my childhood, I will always carry its effects in my body and probably pass them on to my children, regardless of where they are born.

But there is nothing I can do now, other than stay away from those fenced forests and fields.

(Editing by Robert Woodward)

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

Nastassia Astrasheuskaya joined Reuters as a correspondent in December 2010. She was born on Aug. 31, 1989, in the Belarussian city of Mogilev, three years after the nuclear disaster at the Ukrainia...
Nastassia Astrasheuskaya joined Reuters as a correspondent in December 2010. She was born on Aug. 31, 1989, in the Belarussian city of Mogilev, three years after the nuclear disaster at the Ukrainia...
Filed by Cara Parks  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:19 AM on 04/27/2011
“When I think of Chernobyl, three words come to mind: radiation, cancer, mutation,” says Max, but when he is asked about Pripyat, where he used to live and where the tragedy unfolded, his features soften into a smile. His thoughts reach back to a deeper horizon, before the accident, when it was easy to fall in love with Pripyat. “Good memories,” he says.

This is part of a photo narrative and interviews with former residents of Pripyat that I've been developing this year. If you are interested in learning more about the city and understanding the city's former glory, this will help. There is also a pdf with over 100 images you can download and share, so we can not forget what happened in Chernobyl 25 years ago. Thanks.

http://smithjan.com/blog/2011/04/27/pripyat-atoms-wake/
11:33 AM on 03/21/2011
There are so many lies about Chernobyl it's almost impossible to have a honest conversation about nuclear energy. Just last week I read in a article that only 65 people died from the meltdown; Well the New York Academy Of Science did a report stating that 'a million people died as a direct result of Chernobyl'. Try telling anyone that a million people died.... There is no truth in this world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ravencalling
My macro-bio is full
10:58 AM on 03/19/2011
Statistics that help to calm the Japanese folks regarding the effects of radiation contamination are nothing more then more propaganda designed to make people support these kinds of technologies. How is it that even one child adversly affected is an okay outcome? Most will never see the real impact, or the personal impact and so can depersonalize and consider it all an acceptable cost. Even living with the fear of this causes health issues. It doesn't have to be radiation.
10:26 PM on 03/18/2011
We host a child from Belarus (Mogilev) each summer just as the writer describes. The first summer she was 8 and this summer she will be 13. She was born with a heart defect (known as Chernobyl Heart). This will probably be the last summer she is allowed to come due to some treaty issues between the US and Belarus.

This child wasn't even born when Chernobyl happened. Her mother was only 6 years old then. Still, the effects stay on.

I look at Japan and worry about thousands of little boys and girls just like her.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hagagaga
My comments are funnier than yours.
06:13 PM on 03/18/2011
This is how you survive in a Fallout zone: watch out for super mutants.
11:54 AM on 03/18/2011
Chernobyl was the worst known about leak in history, true. This is the truth that nuclear fission is unsafe and before we as the collective human race destroy ourselves and the future we must find a better way to produce energy. Unless ofcourse human's are just to ignorant and unmotivated to make the changes needed to save your very own arses!. The fact that America is REFUSING to notate the danger involved with producing this kind of energy in the ring of fire of all places should alarm every American citizen in that this is as a direct message that the bobble heads on top do not give a damn about us. Oh but wait, silly me; all it takes is some soap and water and it washes it away and makes new. Doesn't it?
The Right is Wrong
Voting for the good guys since 1976!
11:06 AM on 03/18/2011
The cost of nuke energy never goes away.

The waste has to be controlled and/or kept in water for thousands of years. Which means the cost of storage continues long after its useful life.
11:40 AM on 03/18/2011
Wrong is sometimes wrong as well.

Instead of getting your science education from left-wing conspiracy theary websites, try a non-partisan science trade publication.

Once the waste cools...measured in months, not thousands of years...it goes into dry storage.

Now, if you really want to help, press your congressional representation to allow the US to begin recycling its nuclear waste...like every other nuclear powered country on the planet does...and all of the material currently in storage would be recycled to the point where the only true waste left over would fit into one Connex box...all of it...one Connex box. Why don't we recycle like every other country on the planet? Politics...NIMBY.
photo
PDinCA
Clarity has reared its ugly head again
12:36 PM on 03/18/2011
If every other country has the waste problem solved, why were there hundreds of tons of waste in the attic of the Fukushima plants?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
hornedcog
Tax Tea Now!
09:06 AM on 03/18/2011
I do not understand having children under the circumstances described. I do not mean to be insensitive, just sober.
11:41 AM on 03/18/2011
Ask the people who continue to breed in famine stricken areas of the globe.
01:26 PM on 03/18/2011
Because people procreate. That's why there's oh... 6 billion and counting?
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
12:42 AM on 03/18/2011
This is the sort of story that people need to be reading before they decide to allow nuclear energy in their community.
11:22 PM on 03/17/2011
We need to revisit the damage that was done at Chernobyl so that the worlds
population has a better understanding of the extent of the damage to lives and the environment.

The risks and cost of nuclear energy is not worth it.

It is time to transition to safe, clean alternative energy. Wind, solar, wave energy,
geothermal and biofuels made from waste, algae or cellulose are the future.

The cost of nuclear energy just went up. The cost for coal and oil (PEAK OIL) is
going up. The cost for wind and solar has come down dramatically in the past two years.

It is time to transition to alternative energy our economic security and national security depend on it.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
efmo
Oh no, my micro-bio is empty!
03:59 PM on 03/17/2011
Contrast this report with the nonsense spewed by Jay Lehr of the Heartland Institute regarding how little actual damage was done by Chernobyl.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:38 AM on 03/18/2011
And Glenn Beck and co faithfully parrot him.
It's no wonder that people panic and don't believe anything any more. There's too many liars everywhere.
acorus
don't be naive
03:42 PM on 03/17/2011
it's the threat that doesn't go away. only thru subterfuge and greed has the industry continued after so many questions remain left unanswered, so many violations, leaks, leaching of containers into soil and groundwater, and still there is no safe way to deal with the waste. we must realize once and for all that this is not tenable in an environment which is our only life support system, ie earth. economics is still our highest priority, and global warming treated as just a conspiracy. when you factor in the inevitable human error, combined with nefarious human intent (terrorism) and then add natural forces such as quakes, etc, nuclear energy is not cheaper, not cleaner, and is not compatible with life on earth
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pamela Lewis
02:58 PM on 03/17/2011
wow.