iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Wave Energy Prototype, 'SeaRay,' Exceeds Expectations (VIDEO)

Wave Energy Power Searay

First Posted: 03/17/11 11:27 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:40 PM ET

From EarthTechling's Caleb Denison:

Add another notch to Oregon’s growing wave power industry. The case for commercialized wave energy is enjoying another surge forward now that Columbia Power Technologies has officially deployed a prototype wave energy device and secured fresh funding from both private and government backers.

Just a few months ago we reported that the Corvallis, Oregon company appeared to be gaining ground in the effort to fund the next phase of its R&D. Now, their protoype device, called SeaRay, is floating in the Puget Sound and sending back performance data for analysis.

“The SeaRay is performing beyond our expectations and tracking well with modeling predictions,” said Reenst Lesemann, CEO of Columbia Power Technologies. “Our task is to demonstrate to utilities and independent power producers that we can help them deliver power predictably, reliably, and at a cost that is competitive. At this stage, we are making this happen in a very rapid and capital-efficient manner.”

According to Columbia Power Technologies, the SeaRay’s design allows it to extract up to twice the energy from ocean waves as other developing technologies. By employing what the company refers to as a “heave and surge” energy capture design, the SeaRay is able to reportedly tap the full energy potential from passing waves. Its design also looks to make it uniquely conditioned to survive a harsh battering about at sea.

Columbia Power Technologies indicated its longer term goal is “to deliver megawatt-scale devices, capable of operating in the widest range of temperate zone coastal load centers around the globe.” To do that, they’ll need funding and, it would seem, they now have it. Though details on how much funding they attained was not disclosed, Columbia Power Technologies did confirm that private backers were on board saying: “…the closing of Columbia Power’s recent private capital signifies excellent validation of the company’s vision and technical development capabilities.”

For those who wonder if there is money to be made from wave power for companies like Columbia, consider this: according to the start up “the world’s oceans are estimated to contain enough practically extractable energy to provide over 6,000 terawatt hours of electricity each year, which is enough to power over 600 million homes and is worth over $900 billion annually.” It looks like there might be gold in them there ocean waves after all.

WATCH:
FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

From EarthTechling's Caleb Denison: Add another notch to Oregon’s growing wave power industry. The case for commercialized wave energy is enjoying another surge forward now that Columbia Pow...
From EarthTechling's Caleb Denison: Add another notch to Oregon’s growing wave power industry. The case for commercialized wave energy is enjoying another surge forward now that Columbia Pow...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 756
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
06:57 AM on 04/30/2011
This new technology allows us to see the problems and make advancements so this can be done on a large scale.

This is a great starting point.

Many people who have other interest such as oil,coal, nuclear etc do not want to see a new technologies that can be improved they want to bury it as in the past.
04:52 PM on 04/26/2011
I think it's a good idea to use the water as a means of gaining wattage; however, I think it would be much more efficient to use wind turbines as it would be much easier to repair and maintain alternative energy machines that are terrestrial.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Carson
01:59 PM on 04/27/2011
my biggest concern is the NIMBY factor-- I have a problem with people like RFK jr and Al Gore bashing every one else for being wasteful while flying around on private jets and opposing the wind farms off Martha's vineyard
10:48 PM on 04/28/2011
Really, that's your biggest issue? Lucky you.
absolument
Debate the policy. But first, LEARN the science.
01:33 PM on 05/06/2011
Your talking point has expired.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/19/cape-wind-first-us-offsho_n_851077.html
photo
maslin
At 6 bn km, it's mostly small stuff.
09:05 PM on 05/12/2011
Wave energy is not nearly as intermittent as wind. I'm not sure if these techs would really even fall under the 'intermittent' category. I haven't looked into them that carefully as yet.

Consider how many power applications need power to be constant or close to constant.

I'd rather see good wave energy than wind.
12:27 PM on 04/26/2011
Wind, solar, wave energy, hydro, geothermal and second generation biofuels made from algae, cellulose and waste are the future.

Nuclear energy gave us Chernobyl and Japan disasters.

Oil gave us the Gulf spill and disaster.

Coal gave us the Massey mine disaster.

Alternative energy is the future of energy.

Waste Management is taking the trash that is delivered to its plant and making both fuel and energy from it. The world produces a lot of trash every day. Converting it into fuel and energy can go a long way toward providing the energy we need.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:38 AM on 04/26/2011
I hate to put a damper on it but that would never make it through a good size storm and they have several of those a year in that area. Also you need to get the power to the shore with a large heavy cable and then a shore station to manage the power conditioning needed to put the output on the grid.

You would need a fleet of these things and be able to put a large tract of ocean off limits to shipping and whales. This looks like a maintenance nightmare when it starts to grow barnacles and gets bent a bit.

It doesn't seem very practicable to me.
photo
mycall8
Spiritual not religious, One Planet, One Humanity
06:51 AM on 04/26/2011
Yeah nice try. Tesla had the solution in the 1890s but then all his research was declared off limits. Thank you JP Morgan.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Aggressive Progressive
My Karma ran over your Dogma.
11:45 PM on 04/26/2011
Well then, it is a good thing you are not in charge of this project.

While some folks see nothing but problems, others see opportunities to create solutions. Nay sayers stand aside. Let the motivated folks move us forward.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:41 AM on 04/28/2011
Well you could invest in this company and make a huge amount of money if your right (and you seem to think you are). I'll short the same company and we will see who is right.
Are you up for it or just talk?
11:10 PM on 04/25/2011
The mid-ocean ridge hotspots, also close to Washington state and many other coastal cities, can produce even more energy...enough for the whole world, and continuously as with this device, and as opposed to solar and wind.
photo
colah
Sometimes I sit & think. Sometimes I just sit.
08:53 PM on 04/25/2011
Next generation designs feature underwater units that can be tethered to harvest ocean currents.
Kewl.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thepostalfeminist
08:52 PM on 04/25/2011
Are the oil companies smart enough to diversity and become energy companies and start investing in alternative energy? Probably, but they are letting someone else to do the early work. Big money will take over once the technology is proven! This is capitalism: energy from wind, sea and sun will soon have a profit margin attached to add wealth to the coffers of the American ruling class.
Javalation
Laughing in a Daydream
08:52 PM on 04/25/2011
In the late 60s I saw a car that an Indiana guy had invented that ran on compressed air. It wasn't very practical since it had two large pontoons of compressed air that ran almost the entire length of the car welded to the sides, blocking the doors. But it was innovative and intriguing.

Several years later, I asked the friend who had taken me to see the car what ever happened to it. He told me that the builder had sold the patents to "Detroit" and had moved away. Made me wonder how many innovative alternative energy ideas have been stifled by those who have made so much money in keeping the oil monopoly in effect.
absolument
Debate the policy. But first, LEARN the science.
01:35 PM on 05/06/2011
I'm skeptical.

My observation is that the U.S. oil companies in particular are only exploring "alternative" scarce commodities, "biofuels," which would be subject to exactly the same financial manipulations and centralized control as things that have to be dug out of the Earth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarkInEugene
A blasphemy a day keeps the deities away.
08:29 PM on 04/25/2011
Marvelous
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mburgh
Come Back Samuel Gompers
07:17 PM on 04/25/2011
The sooner this and other green technologies get going, the better off the world will be.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:50 PM on 04/25/2011
As soon as the "right" people can figure out how to control the profits it might happen. But the oil industry certainly isn't going to take something like this threat lying down..
photo
Lahonda
Bynocent Instander
08:37 PM on 04/25/2011
The question is, why don't THEY begin the transition. Seems like even a rich, cognizant T-Rex must know it's soon to become an extinct dinosaur?

C'mon Exxon, Shell, BP... buck up and gain the advantage! You guys know how the ocean works (or doesn't) as well as anyone!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Madtek
Beam me up Scotty...Scotty...SCOTTY!!!
04:47 PM on 04/25/2011
Did they get the 'fossil fuel industry's' permission?? ...NO??? Well then we can expect this technology patent to be bought and burned! No way are the 'fossils' gonna let this go on...900 billion annually? that is just way too much for anyone NOT associated with 'the fossils' to make AND it's CLEAN ENERGY to boot!!! That really makes 'the fossils' look bad, yep..gotta go!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JayMonaco
06:04 PM on 04/25/2011
Yeah but the fossil fuel industry is just doing that to pursue profits...and we know that the pursuit of profit is the highest and greatest form of human motivation, right? Since what is good for money is always good for the humans?

Riiiight.
06:17 PM on 04/25/2011
I to have noticed a certain reluctance to exploring the solar option. I have not researched it but do know, at least in the past certain countries did great environmental damage,...recycling solar energy equipment/panels (?). It's not just the energy out put to be considered...this might be an answer...I have limitied knowledge but...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fireofenergy
Promote freedom AND science
03:58 PM on 04/25/2011
This is cool, can't put it down, however, I don't understand how the "entire worlds oceans" can only sustain roughly 6,000 terrawatts of capacity.The world uses 18,000. We should concentrate on the renewable that has the most potential - solar, at close to 3 million terrawatt hours!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JayMonaco
06:04 PM on 04/25/2011
Realistically, we could explore them all. If we could focus on something other than immediate money for more than a minute and a half.
06:19 PM on 04/25/2011
I think my answer to youe solar question is displaced...
03:18 PM on 04/25/2011
Very cool...I'm trying to imagine how much energy the tsunami would have produced had there been a way to "harvest" it. As much as the reactors it destroyed?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Texas Aggie
09:28 PM on 04/25/2011
I think that trying to capture the energy of a tsunami is similar to capturing the energy of a lightning strike. A whole lot comes over a very short period of time so that you can't take full advantage of the energy.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
TXfemmom
Grandma with eye on the future
02:37 PM on 04/25/2011
undefined
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ta8ersalid
The End of the GOP Starts in Nov. 2012
01:06 PM on 04/25/2011
You simply build a large platform miles off the coast that collects the energy and pump the energy back to shore.

Noone will never know these things are there and will have minimal effect on nature.

Great Idea!

I just hope the lobbyists, energy companies, government dont try to block this like they do other inventions that keep the energy cartel in business stealing our money.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eggsackley
Organic gardener & growers marketer.
02:55 PM on 04/25/2011
How about all the boats that have to avoid them. I think its great that we are opening up another green energy source, but anything like this takes up space that others might want to use for fishing, recreation, etc. I used to water ski in Puget Sound when I was stationed at McCord AFB. I would sure hate to hit one of those at any speed. And, if you put in too many of them there will be no more waves to run them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JayMonaco
06:05 PM on 04/25/2011
Oh yeah, because water skiing is definitely more important than the nation's energy needs. We might get in the way of some vacationers, and that would be inconvenient. We should just forget all about it.
06:23 PM on 04/25/2011
I noticed when registering for classes at WMU there was a strange pressure to take oceanography related classes vs. biology. Don't know why but it was deffinately there...I was run out of college again so i never got to find out why but somethings up...