NYR More

'Jane Eyre' Movie Rekindles Jane Austen vs. Charlotte Bronte Battle

Jane Eyre Movie

First Posted: 03/18/11 12:25 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:40 PM ET

The Washington Post:

Enough with the empire waistlines, the sparkly dialogue, the pride, the prejudice, the Colin Firth trudging out of the lake again and again on the late-night minithons on A&E. Enough with all that.

The devoted readers of Bonnet Drama have always known that if it came down to it, if someone held a flintlock musket to their heads and demanded an answer, that “I love Jane Austen and the Brontes equally” would not suffice. Sides must be chosen:

You are either a Janeite. Or you are a Charlottan.

Read the whole story: The Washington Post

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BOOKS

Filed by Zoe Triska  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 226
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lev Raphael
Author of "Book Lust!"
03:49 PM on 03/20/2011
This article presents a very limited and cliched view of Austen's work as pretty and vapid. Her work is much darker than that. A book like P&P might seem comic on the surface but is filled with portraits of very nasty people, some unintentionally so. Besides the self-centered Lady de Bourgh, there's the absent, cynical father whose detachment damages his children; the fraud/seducer who will likely ruin a woman's life; the hysterical emotionally abusive mother lost in narcissism. As for lovely drawing rooms? The author's mistaking the filmed versions for the books. Whenever I re-read Austen, I'm always surprised by how little concrete description there is of setting, whether a park or a grand salon. Our reading of her books has become mediated by their on-screen versions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nicholas Rowley
08:07 PM on 03/20/2011
The trouble is satire is often missed by many people, and she was a fantastic satirist. :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nicholas Rowley
11:01 PM on 03/19/2011
The article seems to be pitting Austen against the Brontes not just one of the sisters.
09:19 PM on 03/19/2011
I am a Janeite though I agree with a lot of the other comments that there is really no comparison. Loved Sense and Sensibility, Jane Eyre and Wuthering Heights.
08:59 PM on 03/19/2011
I am neither. I love Austen's Persuasion and Mansfield Park and I love the Brontes all (Anne, Charlotte and Emily) but in the Bonnet wars, there are not just two players. George Eliot and Elizabeth Gaskell (especially her Life of Charlotte Bronte) and Mary Shelley are in there as well. Not to the mention the writers who were the mothers of major Victorian authors like Frances Trollope (mum to Anthony) and Speranza (mum to Oscar Wilde).

Is it this a little silly? I can't imagine armies of Austen and Bronte admirers raising arms (quills, bonnets, bolts of muslin?) because a new version of Jane Eyre just came out five years after the last adaptation. Just for the fun of it, check out Jane Eyrehead with Andrea Martin, Eugene Levy and Joe Flaherty on YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1K4UY6Zqtzo)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LisaLisa1234
09:53 AM on 04/29/2011
I'm currently on page 410 of Daniel Deronda, and it's taking me forever. Without giving anything away, please tell me it's worth finishing. I plan to finish it (I actually have to pretty soon--I have 2 library ebooks yet to read, soon to be due, that I waited a long time for), but I'd like to know there's something to look forward to.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
c-tom
Badges we don't need no stinking badges
12:16 AM on 03/19/2011
Isn't that spelled Charlatan?
11:22 PM on 03/18/2011
I like them both. It depends what mood you are in. I do like Austin's wit, and her male characters consists of 'good' guys as well as 'bad' guys.
10:51 PM on 03/18/2011
If I *had* to choose, it would be Bronte. Any Bronte.

Jane Austin bores me to tears. Her novels are like being trapped into having tea with Great Aunt Biddy the town gossip...for hours and hours.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:41 PM on 03/19/2011
F/F! I totally agree. Austin always seemed so superficial to me.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:19 PM on 03/18/2011
I'd take George Eliot over either.

Wuthering Heights, incidentally, is better than anything by Charlotte Bronte or Austen.
11:25 PM on 03/18/2011
You just demolished a cute construct with two irrefutable points. Middlemarch leaves them all in the dust.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cwebster
predominantly exasperated
04:10 PM on 03/19/2011
That's a matter of personal taste. I couldn't stand Wuthering Heights...I didn't like any of the characters.
04:55 PM on 03/19/2011
I read Brontes in HS and college and preferred Jane Eyre, despite everyone telling me Wuthering Heights was vastly superior. Mean to revisit WH. Also found Great Gatsby less involving than Tender... and others by FSF. Sometimes a gulf lies between thematic heft and the story's appeal, though when the two work together, viz. works by Tolstoy, Dickens and Eliot (and I'd include Franzen), the result is magic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:06 PM on 03/19/2011
It goes without saying that it's personal taste.

Austen does nothing for me. She's the literary equivalent of watching paint dry. Emma was the best of the three Austen books I read. Granted, I read these awhile back and tastes change so I might feel differently today.

Jane Eyre is pretty good but takes 150 pages or so to get going whereas Wuthering Heights had me from page one.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:46 PM on 03/18/2011
First of all, it's a numerically unfair comparison - three against one. The Washington Post article is based on a comparison between Jane Austen and all three Bronte sisters.

It's also unfair because Jane Austen was a generation or two ahead of the Brontes, and a lot of her work looks back to the novel traditions of the 18th Century in a way that the Brontes do not. The Brontes were writing in a culture that had fully absorbed the ideals of the Revolutionary Age, attitudes toward individual rights, and particularly the rights of women, that is such an important feature of their work, attitudes which were 'in the air' when Austen was writing but which were not nearly as influential as the literary traditions that she grew up with.

So it's not like against like. Personally I prefer Jane Austen. She was a master prose-stylist - her writing has a very clean, almost brutal precision. She could have written anything and it would have been worth reading, simply for the way it is written. That's not true of the Brontes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ed438
egoldmidincd.com
09:38 PM on 03/18/2011
Even if Jane lived into the beginning of the 19th Century, the Brontes were of another generation. In other words, Austin was a classicist and Charlotte a romantic.

Apples and oranges and I'm not referring to computers!
11:18 PM on 03/18/2011
Ed; Right on. You know your literature!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
naschkatze
A free man creates himself.
11:41 AM on 03/19/2011
But the question is really about whether one is a classicist or a Romantic. Upper case R on purpose.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mssreader
eat, read, sleep, read and be happy
06:22 PM on 03/21/2011
naschkatze, I would not call the Brontes romantic. Definitely classicist. Jane could be whimsical, full of satire AND romantic.
photo
atretrioeciii
evolution IS creation
09:18 PM on 03/18/2011
I'll take Mary Shelley.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Houston
British and a London resident
10:39 PM on 03/18/2011
Ahh, the dark side of the possible misuse of technology!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
kareemachan
watashi ha tororu ga oroka da to omoi masu。
08:46 PM on 03/18/2011
"The devoted readers of Bonnet Drama have always known that if it came down to it, if someone held a flintlock musket to their heads and demanded an answer, that “I love Jane Austen and the Brontes equally” would not suffice. Sides must be chosen."

No. No, no, no. I DO like them both equally, although if Obama ever makes his time machine available (you know, the one he used to go back in time to tell his parents what to do before he was born), I would dearly love to go back and discuss the ending of 'Villette' with Charlotte. I loved that book, and was quite distressed by the equivocal ending.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alisonv
08:52 AM on 03/19/2011
Just noticed the time machine remark! :-)

Faved for that, even though I'm a devoted Janeite.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
M4dwoman
There's a hole in the bottom of the sea
08:44 PM on 03/18/2011
I pick Andre Norton.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alisonv
08:40 PM on 03/18/2011
Ok, this may be slightly off subject, but is probably the right crowd...

I'm on a BBC series kick. What are some of your favorites? Mine are Foyle's War, Lark Rise to Candleford, North and South, Wives and Daughters, Cranford, Downton Abbey and Jayne Eyre. I'd love to know if I've missed anything great. Thanks!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gladys1963
You should see my macro-bio!
08:57 PM on 03/18/2011
You mentioned some great ones! The recent BBC "Emma" was very good (and on iTunes). The "Jane Eyre" with Toby Stephens is good--OMG, he is SO hot! (He's Dame Maggie Smith's son!)

"The Forsythe Saga" was excellent. And, I particularly loved the updated "Pollyanna"--the little girl was charming without being cloying.
09:14 PM on 03/18/2011
Isn't he lovely? - Stephens, that is. I don't know if if qualifies, but the original Masterpiece Theater production of Pride and Prejudice is still my favorite of all the versions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alisonv
10:01 PM on 03/18/2011
I didn't know that was her son! I love him. Yes...hot, indeed! The North South guy is, too, though his name escapes me at the moment.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
BBinMT
Is this a 5 minute argument or the full half hour?
09:08 PM on 03/18/2011
Male here who's been watching these, too. I don't have cable. I began watching these, which generally air on Sunday nights, and I've found most of them to be quite good. Foyle's War is one of my favorites.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alisonv
10:02 PM on 03/18/2011
I love Michael Kitchens! Don't you love his expressions? I get the dvds from the library. It's something nice that I can watch with my Mom. We don't have the same tastes in movies, generally speaking, but we both love these series.
07:09 PM on 03/19/2011
BB, I don't have cable either as I can't stand tv, American tv that is. I do netflixs though who as all these old goodies and the newer ones as well. The library also carries a good many of them as they seem to be devotees of PBS Masterpiece. I also own a good many of them. I have two versions of Jane Eyre and 12 Jane Austen with several with two versions.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bksrmgk
08:38 PM on 03/18/2011
I am a confirmed Charlotann. I love Austin when I want something light and bright, but Jane Eyre is strength, independence, integrity, and passion. I've not seen the new movie, but of the others, feel the version with Toby Stephens was the best cast--I just ordered the DVD of him in "The Tenant of Wildfell Hall" by Anne Bronte--but the one with Timothy Dalton was most true to the book.
02:13 PM on 03/19/2011
bksrmgk, I love The Tenant of Wildfield Hall. I too like the Eyre book and like the Toby Stephens DVD as he is a great Mr. Rochester with all the passion and grief with his life and and agree that the Timothy Dalton version is true to the book. I won't see the new version. The two here are the best and the new one is not getting good reviews.
01:55 PM on 03/20/2011
Huh? The new one is getting very good reviews (check out Rotten Tomatoes). I saw it yesterday, and it's excellent.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LisaLisa1234
10:08 AM on 04/29/2011
Timothy Dalton spoiled me for all future Mr. Rochesters.