More

Pakistan Cancels U.S.-Afghan Talks After Drone Strike

Raymond Davis Protest

By MUNIR AHMED   03/18/11 09:59 AM ET   AP

ISLAMABAD -- Pakistan pulled out of talks this month with the United States on the future of Afghanistan in protest of an especially deadly American missile attack, the government said Friday, in a sign of rising tensions between the two uneasy allies.

Pakistan's powerful army chief has already criticized Thursday's missile attack on a house close to the Afghan border in a rare personal statement. Intelligence officials say around 36 people – most of them civilians – were killed. A U.S. official familiar with details denied that innocent people were targeted and suggested all the dead were militants or sympathizers.

The relationship was already fraught over the case of an American CIA contractor who shot and killed two Pakistanis but was freed on Wednesday, putting the weak government on the defensive against critics who accused it of selling out to the Americans.

The missile attack added to the heat on the government, which summoned U.S. Ambassador Cameron Munter to protest.

"It is evident that the fundamentals of our relations need to be revisited," the Foreign Ministry said in a statement that did not mention how many civilians were killed. "Pakistan should not be taken for granted nor treated as a client state."

The statement said Pakistan would not attend talks proposed by the United States in Brussels on March 26.

Pakistan had been scheduled to send its deputy foreign minister to the meeting, which was also to include a delegation from Afghanistan, it said.

The U.S. Embassy declined to comment because it was not aware any meeting had been proposed.

An earlier round of the trilateral talks was canceled by the United States in February, apparently in protest of the detention of Raymond Allen Davis, the contractor.

America routinely fires missiles against al-Qaida and Taliban targets close to the Afghan border, and U.S. officials say privately Pakistan assists in some of the strikes. But the program is publicly opposed by Pakistan's government and army because it believes admitting collaborating with America in attacks on its own people would be highly damaging politically.

Davis shot and killed two Pakistanis on Jan. 27 in the eastern city of Lahore and was arrested at the scene.

Washington claimed Davis acted in self-defense and had diplomatic immunity, but Pakistan's government did not accept this. He was released from prison as part of a court deal in which the victims' relatives received $2.3 million in compensation.

Both countries agreed on the "blood money" deal because it meant they could plausibly deny any responsibility for his release. Washington was never likely to allow a CIA contractor to stand trial in Pakistan, while Pakistan's economy is kept afloat with money from America and the International Monetary Fund, meaning Islamabad could not afford to sever its ties with Washington over the affair despite domestic pressure to put him on trial.

There were small demonstrations Friday against the release of Davis in several towns and cities across Pakistan.

The national government in Islamabad and the opposition-led local administration in Lahore have been blasted in the media over the deal. Pakistan's powerful army and the intelligence agencies, which are rarely publicly criticized, have also been attacked. Few believe that releasing Davis would have been possible without their permission and involvement.

Responding to the criticism, Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani said the country had agreed that the Davis case would be decided in the courts. "It is therefore inappropriate to hold any single institution responsible for the final outcome of the case," he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

ISLAMABAD -- Pakistan pulled out of talks this month with the United States on the future of Afghanistan in protest of an especially deadly American missile attack, the government said Friday, in a si...
ISLAMABAD -- Pakistan pulled out of talks this month with the United States on the future of Afghanistan in protest of an especially deadly American missile attack, the government said Friday, in a si...
Filed by Curtis M. Wong  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 72
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
American Air
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
American Air
06:32 AM on 03/21/2011
I am not interested in Pakistan talk anyway Be relentless in our pursuit of PAkistan supported Talibanies, AQ and LeT!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
American Air
10:30 AM on 03/20/2011
Unless Pakistan Army stops working with its Taliban and AQ and LeT, we should be relentless in b0mbing them!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
-PZ-
Amateurs talk tactics, profession­als talk logist
04:46 PM on 03/20/2011
:)

You're not bombing the army; you're bombing villagers...

Unlike the villagers; the army can strike back. And the situation is certainly coming to a head.

Let me clear up the fog you're operating under. The Pakistan army is the sixth largest army in the world. Its got a nuclear arsenal thats probably the fourth largest in the world.

As a nation (Population); Pakistan is 7 times Iraq and 6.X times Afghanistan.

We build our own cruise missiles, strike planes, ships and tanks. While Nazi Germany was 90 million at the time of the second world war; we stand at 175 million.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
-PZ-
Amateurs talk tactics, profession­als talk logist
05:03 PM on 03/20/2011
Pakistan's annual GDP is over 200 billion a year. It is given a measly 2.5 billion a year as a mixture of Aid and Expenses Incurred.

The 2 billion USD windfall comes to about 8 USD per Pakistani per year. This amount is not meant for the people of Pakistan; it is meant for fat cats like the people who helped let raymond davis go...

Pakistan has lived under severe sanctions (After nuke tests); and ask any Pakistani out there. Pakistan works best when it is sanctioned. We tend to start developing our own stuff ourselves. As for the 2 billion per year? Who needs it? We can raise the same by increasing taxes by 1%.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Californiadesi
05:13 PM on 03/20/2011
US can take its AIDES and shove it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
American Air
10:29 AM on 03/20/2011
Pakistan Army colludes with Terr0rists to fight their battle.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
American Air
08:43 AM on 03/20/2011
Pakistan is eviI
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
American Air
10:27 AM on 03/20/2011
Pakistan runs with the hare and hunts with the hound. Thats in their nature to decieve!
08:56 PM on 03/19/2011
Oh, now it is even OK just to kill civilian sympathizers of militants.

The US military and government have shown conclusively that they have no morals and that they completely ignore international law.
05:06 PM on 03/19/2011
Civilians are now called sympathizers what convoluted logic. America cannot continue to go around the world killing people in the name of fighting terrorism and don't expect these people to retaliate.
02:49 PM on 03/19/2011
also a welcome (?) diversion from the bruising Davis sage. If they are serious about honor, self respect, they should stop accepting/begging money from us.
02:40 PM on 03/19/2011
I am curious, did ISI provide the intel for the target? they must be mocking our stupidity, as always playing both sides, the only country (rentier state actually) that negotiates with a gun pointing at their heads. The same old mantra, if u do not support us, the islamic fundamentalist will take over. The only thing they are fixated on is India, and their fantasy of hoisting their flag on Red fort in New Delhi. everything else is secondary, the lives of their citizens is a sacrifice they are willing to pay. Their dream (re)establishing the Caliphate based on Wahabi ideology.
photo
ewldest
I don't care "whose" war it is - end it now
05:47 AM on 03/19/2011
Washington is trying to micromanage Pakistan through bribery and military intimidation.
I can't think of a more certain formula for foeign policy disaster.
This is not the 19th century, the age of empires is over. This is not the 20th century, the age of the US 'policing' the world is over. This is the 21st century, the age of booming populations, increrasing natural disasters resulting from a damaged ecology, economic and political restlessness among people long oppressed and denied their aspirations, and a global economy dominated by China and other nations emerging to the east and to the south.
Washington will have to learn that lesson the hard way, apparently. Sad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
atexasdem
Pointing out the foolishness of republican voters.
02:04 AM on 03/19/2011
"It is evident that the fundamentals of our relations need to be revisited," the Foreign Ministry said
I absolutely agree with him. F*** Pakistan and Afghanistan too. Why do we continue to give them billions of taxpayer dollars and sacrifice hundreds of American lives when they hate us and want to kill us all? It's their country, let them live in their own quagmire. Let's quit giving bales of hundred dollar bills to warlords in the hope that they'll not attack our supply convoys. Let's quit giving billions of taxpayer dollars in bribes, excuse me, "foreign aid" to countries that graciously allows us to kill someone shooting at us.
Get out now. Not two years from now, not next year. Start pulling troops and supplies today. The whole place isn't worth one acre of Nevada desert let alone the fortune in lives and money we're spending there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cornel
wuf wuf
05:26 PM on 03/18/2011
Was to be expected after the ISI / CIA orchestrated release of the mercenary. Bad situation, just got worse.
photo
Whinger
I'm Just Me!
03:50 PM on 03/18/2011
As a matter of principle, Pakistan should refuse to accept any more US dollars....

Instead of transparently false outrage!
04:42 PM on 03/18/2011
As a matter of principle, the US should withdraw all its ''contractors'' from our soil and stop dropping bombs on our civilians!

Instead of translucently factual disdain.....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SGTDBK
you don't much look like a steer to me
04:51 PM on 03/18/2011
Tell your officials that who invite us over to clean up your mess.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
atexasdem
Pointing out the foolishness of republican voters.
02:14 AM on 03/19/2011
I actually agree with you. We should also quit giving billions of dollars or anything else to either Pakistan or Afghanistan. Pakistan is a sovereign nation.So is Afghanistan. What we're doing there is beyond me. The solution is simple. If neither country wants to adhere to international laws and standards simply isolate them diplomatically. No admittance to the US or hopefully any European nation.
Let them live within their own borders however they choose to live. That's what a sovereign nation does. They can have their own rules and laws, that's their right and their decision. I'm all for international isolation but war? Absolutely not.
03:19 PM on 03/18/2011
i wonder why these events keep happening between u.s. and muslim nations ...could it be u.s. is (and has been openly since 11/9/01) at war with is l am???
photo
blindhammer
The future is not what it used to be.
03:27 PM on 03/18/2011
No. It's more about geography than religion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
msbeal
Let no neo-con lie go unchallenged
03:09 PM on 03/18/2011
Get back to me when they announce they won't be taking any more American government checks.
03:21 PM on 03/18/2011
they are forced to take u.s. govt checks---they were threatened with attack in 01 by u.s. "either you let us use your country or we will turn pakistan into a parking lot" i believe was the quote ..

google it

as with most u.s. (a la sodom and gomorrah) your logic is completely twisted
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SGTDBK
you don't much look like a steer to me
03:31 PM on 03/18/2011
That wasn't the quote...and no I don't work for google so provide your own facts.

Once again this backward nation wants to stomp its feet and act upset, let them simmer we are done helping people out of the stone age.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
msbeal
Let no neo-con lie go unchallenged
03:38 PM on 03/18/2011
We threatened to invade a nuclear armed country? You actually believe that?

100 lb weakling countries is more our style.