More

U.S. Claims Libya Is In Violation Of Ceasefire As Military Action Looms

Libya

First Posted: 03/18/11 11:41 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:40 PM ET

March 19, 2011 1:28:37 AM

By Maria Golovnina and Michael Georgy

TRIPOLI, March 19 (Reuters) - The United States accused Muammar Gaddafi of defying international demands for an immediate ceasefire, and France's U.N. envoy predicted military action within hours of an international meeting on Libya on Saturday.

A unilateral ceasefire declared on Friday by the Libyan government appeared to have done little to convince outside powers to hold off on plans for air strikes to force an end to an increasingly bloody civil war.

Residents in the rebel-held western city of Misrata said they faced heavy bombardment on Friday -- a charge the government denied -- while a U.S. official said Gaddafi's forces were still advancing towards the rebels' eastern stronghold Benghazi.

Within hours of President Barack Obama saying the terms of a U.N. resolution meant to end fighting in Libya were non-negotiable, his U.N. envoy, Susan Rice, asked by CNN whether Gaddafi was in violation of these terms, said: "Yes, he is."

Gaddafi said there was no justification for the U.N. resolution.

"This is blatant colonialism. It does not have any justification. This will have serious consequences on the Mediterranean and on Europe," he said in comments reported by Al Jazeera television.

France, which along with Britain has been leading a drive for military intervention, will host a meeting on Saturday on Libya which will be attended by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Arab leaders.

"Tomorrow we will have a summit in Paris with all the major participants in the operations and in the diplomatic effort. So I think it would be a good moment to send the last signal," the French ambassador to the United Nations told BBC's Newsnight.

"So I guess that after this summit, I think that in the coming hours, I think we will go to launch the military intervention," ambassador Gerard Araud said.

Obama made clear any military action would aim to change conditions across Libya -- rather than just in the rebel-held east -- by calling on Gaddafi's forces to pull back from the western cities of Zawiyah and Misrata as well as from the east. "All attacks against civilians must stop," Obama said, a day after the U.N. Security Council passed a resolution authorising international military intervention.

"Gaddafi must stop his troops from advancing on Benghazi, pull them back from Ajdabiya, Misrata and Zawiyah, and establish water, electricity and gas supplies to all areas. Humanitarian assistance must be allowed to reach the people of Libya ...

"Let me be clear, these terms are not negotiable... If Gaddafi does not comply ... the resolution will be enforced through military action."

MISRATA BOMBED, RESIDENTS SAY

A U.S. national security official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, later said the troop movements by Gaddafi's forces towards Benghazi were "purposeful". The assessment was based on official reporting reaching U.S. national security agencies.

It was impossible to contact anyone on the frontline far to the west of Benghazi to find out what was happening. But in Benghazi, rebels dismissed the ceasefire declaration as a ruse.

"He is lying. His troops are advancing. We don't believe what Gaddafi says," said Mohammed Ishmael al-Tajouri, from the rebel coalition in Benghazi. "When he comes to Benghazi he will be fighting. There is no negotiating with Gaddafi."

In Misrata, which like Zawiyah has been left stranded in the west while rebels who had advanced towards them from the east were beaten back by a counter-offensive by Gaddafi forces, residents said they had faced heavy bombardment on Friday.

One doctor said at least 38 people had been killed in the assault launched on Friday morning.

"Gaddafi's forces are bombarding the city with artillery shells and tanks," Dr Khaled Abou Selha told Reuters by satellite phone.

"They are even bombarding ambulances. I saw one little girl with half of her head blown off," he said, crying.

Another doctor, who declined to give his name, said by telephone late on Friday evening, "Now they are on the outskirts of the city. I can still hear bombing from time to time."

In Tripoli the government said there had been no bombing since it announced the ceasefire.

"We have had no bombardment of any kind since the ceasefire was declared," Deputy Foreign Minister Khaled Kaim told journalists when asked about reports of continued government operations in Misrata and other parts of the country.

Kaim said Libya was asking China, Germany, Malta and Turkey to send observers to monitor its adherence to the ceasefire.

French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe said on Friday everything was ready to launch military strikes in Libya.

The United States, after embarking on wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, had insisted it would participate in rather than lead any military action. Obama said the United States would not deploy ground troops in Libya.

Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who was one of the main supporters of the U.S. invasion of Iraq, wrote in The Times newspaper that he welcomed the imposition of a no-fly zone.

"Such a policy will be difficult and upredictable. But it is surely better than watching in real time as the Libyan people's legitimate aspiration for a better form of government and way of life is snuffed out by tanks and planes," he said.

(Additional reporting by a Reuters reporter in Benghazi, Mariam Karouny and Tarek Amara in Tunisia, Louis Charbonneau and Patrick Worsnip at the United Nations, John Irish in Paris and Jodie Ginsberg in London; writing by Myra MacDonald; Editing by Jon Boyle and Michael Roddy)

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

March 19, 2011 1:28:37 AM By Maria Golovnina and Michael Georgy TRIPOLI, March 19 (Reuters) - The United States accused Muammar Gaddafi of defying international demands for an immediate ceas...
March 19, 2011 1:28:37 AM By Maria Golovnina and Michael Georgy TRIPOLI, March 19 (Reuters) - The United States accused Muammar Gaddafi of defying international demands for an immediate ceas...
Filed by Adam Goldberg  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,082
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (25 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CubnKira
10:06 AM on 03/20/2011
Obama's folly. That is what this Libya adventure is. He cannot differentiate this from Iraq or Afgan. In fact, those incursions were more justified tho they didn't work out well.

The Taliban harbored al Qaeda who attacked us at 9/11. We had every right to respond.
Saddam used chemical weapons on his own people, something Gadhafi has never done. He also violated 17 UN Security Resolutions and had torture chambers.

How does this military intervention become justified. It was not in our national interest. At best, it should have been handled by the Arab League. Saudi alone has the most sophisticated weaponry and easily could have handled it. This is now our new albatross.
photo
yoyodyne666
is it friday yet?
05:09 AM on 03/22/2011
But we like like Egypts torture chambers .... and libya is in our corporate interests.
photo
yoyodyne666
is it friday yet?
07:00 AM on 03/20/2011
We just spent approx $83143610 in missles launched at Libya, while at the same time debating in the senate whether or not to cut funds to NPR for a no existant savings of $60000000. If we get rid of NPR we could almost launch another salvo ....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CubnKira
10:14 AM on 03/20/2011
NPR has no relevance to the topic at hand. There are many more worthwhile causes that help more people than NPR which should make it on its own with donations or fold. There is no reason they should get public funding. Now the waste of money on a war that we had no business in, that is relevant.
photo
yoyodyne666
is it friday yet?
05:07 AM on 03/22/2011
I beg to dissagree, NPR is relevant to the subject at hand. My point was they say the budget needs to be fixed and that not funding 60 million to NPR is so super super important they had to make it an emergency, then they go and blow 83+ million in one day bombing libya in an action that very well could have been handled by someone else. And I dissagree with the statement "NPR which should make it on its own with donations or fold." I prefer my radio to be not profit driven and corporate owned, I find it less biased, better reported, and far more intelectually stimulating that way.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:59 PM on 03/19/2011
Would it be inappropriate to refer to the DithererinChief as DIC?

discuss
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
futurejd
01:24 AM on 03/20/2011
Completely. It seems that people forget that we have two wars to finish. Can we finish one candy bar before we open another? Why do we have to play World Police? Obama did the right thing, go through international channels, we can support action, but in no way should the US lead any type of intervention period. It's been awhile since a president actually tried to work with other countries and wanted to ask ques. before bombing people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CubnKira
10:22 AM on 03/20/2011
Your memory is totally inaccurate. At the start of the Iraq war, we had the full backing of 17 UN Resolutions, NATO and about 30 other countries, more than we have this time. Spain, and many other countries withdrew after the Madrid bombing but many were with us at the time.
photo
yoyodyne666
is it friday yet?
06:09 AM on 03/22/2011
If we don't lead then we don't get the spoils, once again we are being conned by big bussiness. This is a coup, that was probably suggested by BP, instigated by the cia (I even read somewhere about a rebel casualty that happed to have an unusually large amout of U.S. dollars in his pocket, hmmmm) and will overtly finished by our military. And promptly cleaned up by Haliburton. Protesters were shot in egypt, no action, protestors were shot in tunisia, # 6 Oil reserve in the world, Light sweet crude at that, gee I wonder what that all adds up too.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:49 PM on 03/19/2011
Why is DearLeader sacrificing US blood and treasure for oil? We are not the world's 911
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omobob
left coast, usa
11:00 PM on 03/19/2011
One last time oil companies are not owned by the US Government. The US Government buys gas on the open market. It is in the interests of the oil companies to increase the price of oil. Using Libyan oil would only drive the price down, "No blood for oil" should be put to rest as gas is $4 at the pump. There is no collusion between the oil companies and the US Government. The Government is the loser in this speculative price war.
photo
yoyodyne666
is it friday yet?
07:02 AM on 03/20/2011
The tax payer and the poor who join the military are the losers, and the corporations who get the government to clear the way for thier profits are the winners.
photo
yoyodyne666
is it friday yet?
06:21 AM on 03/22/2011
One last time, it is blood for Oil. Of course the U.S. does get the oil, the corporations that pull the strings in washington get it, then sell it to the people in the U.S.

"There is no collusion between the oil companies and the US Government­. The Government is the loser in this speculativ­e price war."

Really, lets see who gets the drilling contracts when the dust settles, russian oil men / chineese oil men / brazillian oil men / argentine oil men / Anglo oil men (BP, exxon etc) ..... I'm betting on the last choice. And I'd double down with Haliburton cleaning up the mess, and would even consider Xe getting involved in there somehow.
12:56 PM on 03/19/2011
Oh yeah, the U.S. has claimed a lot of things over the years:

Iraq has WMDs
Students in Grenada are being threatened
We're not in Cambodia
etc., etc.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:50 PM on 03/19/2011
I did not have sex with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
futurejd
01:25 AM on 03/20/2011
How is that even remotely relevant
photo
yoyodyne666
is it friday yet?
07:05 AM on 03/20/2011
Cubans blew up the maine,
Mexicans invaded texas,
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OP3366
12:15 PM on 03/19/2011
Your response is childish. . You got your no fly zone. Would you like a third war instead?

I bet you're so patriotic that you wanted your taxes cut while our young men and women are dying in two other wars and VA aftercare was a mess under Bush.

When they said "Give Till It Hurts" during World War II," what would you have given? What are you giving now? Take the bumper sticker off.
12:09 PM on 03/19/2011
Again, the U.N. and the Westerners are taking charge to aid the Libyan uprising. Majority of Arab nations just watching Khadafi level and kill his fellow libyans just because they no longer want him to rule Libya. I cannot comprehend why the Arab communities allow this tyrant to kill his own people. They are Moslems, Arabs too. If Arab nations despise westerners, they should be ashamed of themselves for doing nothing. In the end, who gets the blame? The west of course. Khadafi has lost his ways and only cure for his disease is the ultimate punishment.
12:03 PM on 03/19/2011
This should be fun to watch, the French of all people are taking aggressive action against Libya, So after Libya takes over France then what??
12:57 PM on 03/19/2011
Gosh, I miss those colonial halcyon days.
photo
TYRANNASAURUS
UGH!....people don't taste good.
11:35 AM on 03/19/2011
Obama Steps Up Rhetoric..... YEAH THATA WORK!

I bet Gaddafi is shaking in his bloody boots.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
EastTraveler
Just a guy who always wants to hear the truth...
11:29 AM on 03/19/2011
He's a handsome "DEVIL" isn't he...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ljkcan
Yes, I am prone to spelling errors
12:30 PM on 03/19/2011
I just felt my coffee rise up.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
justitia
11:26 AM on 03/19/2011
It's interesting the media is quoting only organized partisans in the conflict, either rebels or supporters of Gadafi? Is the situation really that simple? Many of us are so familiar with Gadafi, at least from what the Western media has reported of him, but little is said about the opposition aside from their using the flag of the ousted monarchy, and hence one can infer that the restoration of this hated monarchy, a la Saudi Arabia, is one of its agenda. I believe once the opposition true character is shown, people will become more ambivalent as I am, towards the conflict.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OP3366
12:17 PM on 03/19/2011
A potential slaughter is a potential slaughter. Some of that opposition would like to cut your throat.
Doesn't matter. Gadaffi has threatened to bring madness upon those who opposed him. Women and children, too. And Europe and North Africa is not able to absorb up to a million refugees. That's all that matters at the moment.
AgingLady
laughter is best medicine
11:14 AM on 03/19/2011
Gaddafi is not scared by words. Rhetoric is lost on him.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:12 AM on 03/19/2011
That was just about the shortest ceasefire in history. They broke it while announcing it. UN resolution authorized action is needed right now, they can´t hesitate anymore or get distracted by Gaddafi´s rhetoric which resembles that of the famous Iraqi information minister.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
justitia
11:28 AM on 03/19/2011
Objectivity requires recognizing the duplicity of the UN Security Council, which did not lift a finger in Rwanda.
10:58 AM on 03/19/2011
Gaddafi's forces are being attacked by the French.
10:57 AM on 03/19/2011
Sarkozy just announced the start of military action in Libya.