More

Japan Finds More Types Of Radiation-Tainted Food

Japan Radiation Food

KELLY OLSEN and JOE McDONALD   03/20/11 06:26 PM ET   AP

TOKYO — At a bustling Tokyo supermarket Sunday, wary shoppers avoided one particular bin of spinach.

The produce came from Ibaraki prefecture in the northeast, where radiation was found in spinach grown up to 75 miles (120 kilometers) from the crippled Fukushima nuclear plant. Another bin of spinach – labeled as being from Chiba prefecture, west of Tokyo – was sold out.

"It's a little hard to say this, but I won't buy vegetables from Fukushima and that area," said shopper Yukihiro Sato, 75.

From corner stores to Tokyo's vast Tsukiji fish market, Japanese shoppers picked groceries with care Sunday after the discovery of contamination in spinach and milk fanned fears about the safety of this crowded country's food supply. Trace amounts of radioactive iodine also were found in tap water in Tokyo and elsewhere in Japan.

The anxiety added to the spreading impact of the unfolding nuclear crisis triggered when the March 11 tsunami battered the Fukushima complex, wrecking its cooling system and leading to the release of radioactive material.

On Sunday, the government banned shipments of milk from one area and spinach from another and said it found contamination on two more vegetables – canola and chrysanthemum greens – and in three more prefectures. The Health Ministry also advised a village in Fukushima prefecture not to drink tap water because of radioactive iodine in its supply. It stressed, however, that the amounts remained minuscule and posed no health threat.

There were no signs Sunday of the panic buying that stripped Tokyo supermarkets of food last week. Instead, shoppers scrutinized the source of items and tried to avoid what they worried might be tainted.

Mayumi Mizutani was shopping for bottled water, saying she was worried about the health of her visiting 2-year-old grandchild after a tiny amount of radioactive iodine was found in Tokyo's tap water. She expressed fears that the toddler could possibly get cancer.

"That's why I'm going to use this water as much as possible," she said.

The government said the level of radiation detected on spinach and milk was minuscule and should be no threat to health. Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano said he had received no reports that would require special measures to be taken regarding tap water.

Tainted milk was found 20 miles (30 kilometers) from the plant on Saturday, a local official said. Spinach was collected from six farms between 60 miles (100 kilometers) and 75 miles (120 kilometers) to the south of the reactors.

On Sunday, authorities found contamination at additional farms in Fukushima and on vegetables in Chiba, Gunma and Tochigi prefectures, said Yoshifumi Kaji, director of the health ministry's inspection and safety division. He said it was possible some tainted foods already have been sold.

The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed radiation in some Japanese milk and vegetables was "significantly higher" than levels Japan allows for consumption.

Authorities expect to decide by Tuesday on a comprehensive plan to limit food shipments from affected areas, Kaji said at a news conference.

Farmers and merchants expressed fears of their own that public anxiety might hurt even producers of goods that were free of contamination.

"There will probably be damaging rumors," said farmer Shizuko Kohata, 60, who was evacuated from the town of Futaba, near the Fukushima complex, to a sports arena in Saitama, north of Tokyo.

"I grow things and I'm worried about whether I can make it in the future," Kohata said Saturday.

Chiyoko Kaizuka, who with family members farms spinach, broccoli, onions, rice and other crops on 20 hectares (49 acres) in Ibaraki prefecture northeast of Tokyo, said the combination of earthquakes and fears of radiation have her on edge.

"I don't know what effect the radiation will have, but it's impossible to farm," the 83-year-old Kaizuka said Sunday as she stood along a row of fresh, unpicked spinach that was ready to go but now can't be shipped.

On Sunday, an official of Taiwan's Atomic Energy Council said radiation was detected on fava beans imported from Japan, although in an amount that was too low to harm human health. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he is not authorized to deal with the press.

Japan's food exports are worth about $3.3 billion a year – less than 0.5 percent of its total exports – and seafood makes up 45 percent of that, according to government data.

Experts at the World Health Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization were working Sunday to gather more facts to assess the situation, but an FAO spokesman in Rome said that the picture was not yet clear enough for them to release any specific recommendations.

However, the agencies praised the Japanese government for taking steps to test foods and monitor exports for radiation contamination.

In Tokyo, others said they weren't concerned and put the crisis in perspective with other calamities.

"I experienced the war, so if there is enough food for a day or two, I feel we can get by," said Nagako Mizuno, 73, originally from Iwaki, a city in the quake zone, but has lived in Tokyo for 40 years.

"You can't go on living if you worry about it," she said. "It's all the same if everybody ends up dying. I'm not concerned."

Fears of radioactive contamination hurt sales at the Tsukiji market, a vast maze of aisles where merchants at hundreds of stalls sell tuna, octopus and other fish fresh off the boat. The market was unusually quiet over the weekend, a time when it is normally packed with shoppers and tourists.

Traders have been hit hard by power cuts and an exodus of foreigners, and they worry about long-term damage from public fears over possible contamination of fish stocks.

"The impact would last long, like a decade, because people would not eat fish," said merchant Mamoru Saito, 72.

The market had plenty of fresh fish despite the destruction of much of Japan's northeastern fishing fleet in the tsunami. Whole fish and shellfish were laid out on wooden tables washed by a flow of cold water. Fishmongers sawed slabs of frozen tuna into steaks.

At a restaurant adjacent to the market, sushi chef Hideo Ishigami said the nuclear scare and transportation disruptions due to power cuts have cost him business.

"I have a massive drop in the number of customers," said Ishigami, 72.

___

Associated Press writers Mari Yamaguchi and Elaine Kurtenbach in Tokyo, Debby Wu in Taipei, Taiwan, George Jahn in Vienna, and Margie Mason in Hanoi, Vietnam contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

TOKYO — At a bustling Tokyo supermarket Sunday, wary shoppers avoided one particular bin of spinach. The produce came from Ibaraki prefecture in the northeast, where radiation was found in spin...
TOKYO — At a bustling Tokyo supermarket Sunday, wary shoppers avoided one particular bin of spinach. The produce came from Ibaraki prefecture in the northeast, where radiation was found in spin...
Filed by Alexander Belenky  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 713
  • Pending Comments
  • 1
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Turner
News? I hurt the news.
07:27 PM on 03/22/2011
Are you telling me that these possibly contaminated plants were seeded, grown and harvested all after the Fukushima incident?

I'm very curious to know if baseline testing for radiation in agriculture had been established before the incident, how often those tests were being conducted and when the last tests for these affected areas were performed. I'm not finding any such information in my research. The last I've found said that Japan tests once yearly on random samples.

Being the case, then people are being freaked out on information that has no context. We don't know if these detections are expected variations, if they are going down, if they are going up or what the source of the radiation is. Scientifically, you cannot contain radiation contamination if you do not know its source, its migration, and its level.

Also, people need to chill out about the levels. They are non-lethal in every case so far.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:12 PM on 03/22/2011
To reach the radiation dose limit for a power plant worker, you'd need to drink 2,922 eight-ounce glasses of milk. To raise your lifetime cancer risk by 4 percent, you'd have to drain more than 58,000 glasses of milk. That would take you 160 years, if you drank one 8-ounce glass a day.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/03/22/134746912/radioactive-milk-only-a-danger-after-58-000-glasses
10:25 AM on 03/21/2011
We need to look into Thorium!!
http://energyfromthorium.com/

I will say this, the behavior of the people of japan must be applauded, even in a time of incredible amounts of stress and desparity they stand patiently in line for hours and hours waiting for food and water supplies. They are not running around looting or blaming the government for what happened, just remaining calm and attempting to keep their heads up as best they can. Thank you for showing us that human beings can still be rationale creatures even during the most trying of times.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:09 PM on 03/22/2011
Yeah, you would probably be looting by now, because your one of those bad non-japanese.
strangiato
Ha Ha...Charade You Are
10:24 AM on 03/21/2011
Highest levels found nationally are in South Dakota - 320 cpm in Rapid City and 201 in Pierre. Levels in Colorado are also in the upper 200 range.
strangiato
Ha Ha...Charade You Are
10:12 AM on 03/21/2011
Omaha now reading 170 cpm, Lincoln 108, and Kearney 121.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
bbrecht
"pray for the dead, fight like hell for the liv
09:06 AM on 03/21/2011
Obama plans to spend 36 billion dollars to build 200 new nuclear plants in the US. Even though there is no disposal plan. Like Japan, the US has spent fuel rods piling up on site at active plants because it has no way to dispose of these.

$36 billion dollars!! I wonder how much solar, hydro or wind could be built for that same amount-- and unlike nuclear, solar won't have the long term costs and risks....
strangiato
Ha Ha...Charade You Are
07:44 AM on 03/21/2011
Elevated radiation levels are still being observed in Nebraska. As rain has just past through the center of the country - levels have gone up in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Kansas as well (from a couple times normal to 5 or 6 times). Folks seem to be concerned about radioactive fallout occurring everywhere. That's not essentially how it works. The higher levels of radioactivity are transferred with rain.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:56 AM on 03/21/2011
Do you have links to a source for this. I haven't been able to find it reported anywhere.
strangiato
Ha Ha...Charade You Are
10:08 AM on 03/21/2011
If you look hard enough on the Environmental Protection Agency's various linked sites - you will find a national map that shows effectively real time beta and gamma radiation data spread out all over the continental US and outlying areas including Alaska and Hawaii. The reason I didn't post a direct link is that I don't want to encourage every doofus who has not a clue about what they're looking at to hit the server(s) and knock it out. If you care enough to educate yourself thoroughly about the subject, you will eventually find it. I strongly suggest you start with the davistown website and proceed from there. Having the data is fine but understanding what it means in my view should be a requirement before receiving it.
06:23 AM on 03/21/2011
Link to those those fanning fears and instances:

http://jpquake.wikispaces.com/Journalist+Wall+of+Shame

Please contribute other examples if you wish.
strangiato
Ha Ha...Charade You Are
08:04 AM on 03/21/2011
As long as people remain calm, it is difficult to be too alarmist in the current socio-political environment. People are overwhelmed with just getting by. They don't have the energy to devote this this issue. The issue is serious and it is real. The effects on the environment and our health are well documented. If nothing else, this latest nuclear disaster should tell people that we're running out of places to run to. Radiation is an equal opportunity destroyer. It doesn't care if you're rich or poor, healthy or not. If you doubt this, you can look at the list here to find the nuclear waste dump or accident zone nearest you.

http://www.davistownmuseum.org/cbm/Rad16.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TankGirlz
can we have a "This post is full of suck" button?
06:01 AM on 03/21/2011
Just goes to show, nothing that nature can throw at us that Man can't make 100x worse.
photo
FTracy3
My micro-bio is as empty as the rest of my life.
04:01 PM on 03/21/2011
So far "100X worse" is an exaggeration, thank God. We know thousands have been killed by the quake and Tsunami. We can't say that about the nuclear accident. Yet, anyway.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TankGirlz
can we have a "This post is full of suck" button?
06:46 PM on 03/21/2011
Didn't really meant it to be taken literally :) but with the food supply etc, it remains to be seen. I was musing in general. Oil spills, Hurricanes (response to) we manage to to a pretty good job of messing things up.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:11 PM on 03/22/2011
Oh, I think the state of those reactors qualifies as "hundreds of times worse" now than before the damage. What are you seeing?
barrada nicto
Optimism is necessary.
05:44 AM on 03/21/2011
Radioactive Iodine-129 remains in the environment for millions of years.

Radiation is released by nuclear plants even when they're functioning properly.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:58 AM on 03/21/2011
And it is exactly because I-129 has a 15.7 million year half life that makes its not of concern.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alvdh1
10:59 AM on 03/21/2011
ddpalmerr,

Your words are not very reassuring. Radioactive Iodine-129, if inhaled or ingested, gives off a high alpha particle emission in a very localized region at the cellular level and can be 10-100 time more effective in producing a cancer of similar Rems from more diffuse tissue exposure. See section G, in chapter 2 of the link below. Imagine these alpha particle emissions as neutron bullets on cell organelle and DNA. This is the main reason depleted uranium weapons need to be banned.

http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/PP/#TOC
barrada nicto
Optimism is necessary.
05:33 AM on 03/21/2011
And they want to build lots more nuclear plants in America.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
bbrecht
"pray for the dead, fight like hell for the liv
09:01 AM on 03/21/2011
200 more with 36 billion dollars of public money!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:59 AM on 03/21/2011
Actually that is 36 billion dollars in loan guarentees. Not quite the same thing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:14 PM on 03/22/2011
You couldn't build 10 modern plants for that kind of money. It's just another handout to the energy industry that's used to finance the campaigns life style of their bought-and-paid-for candidates.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brainfire
Gotta out Vote the Krazies, seriously....
03:50 AM on 03/21/2011
Blue Planet fade to black 2011 or fade to Love....http://she­lterbox.or­g/
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
02:18 AM on 03/21/2011
We all need clean air, clean water and safe food to eat.

We need to stop #$%^&*( where we live and eat.
02:14 AM on 03/21/2011
The cost of nuclear power is just too high. We have had the experience of Three Mile Island,
Chernobyl and now the disaster in Japan.

It is time to move to alternative energy. Wind, solar, wave energy, geothermal and second generation biofuels made from algae, waste and cellulose are the future.

Nuclear, oil and coal prices keep going up while cost for wind and solar keep coming down.
02:32 AM on 03/21/2011
Three mile island released minuscule amounts of radiation into the environment. None of it related to one negative health consequence.

Alternate energy is not at a level where it is feasible as a sole means of power generation. Coal will take up any nuclear shutdown slack.

Coal use de-lives anywhere from 30 to over 150 people A DAY low end. All freshwater fish in the US is contaminated with mercury. One in six women of child bearing age has enough mercury in her system should she become pregnant a birth defect is possible from it. Coal is responsible for 40 % of US mercury pollution.
barrada nicto
Optimism is necessary.
05:39 AM on 03/21/2011
We do not know the extent of the Three Mile Island accident. Much of the data was covered up with claims of National Security.

There is evidence that the radiation releases at Three Mile Island sickened many and killed some over time. The nuclear industry is careful to only count immediate deaths. Counts of delayed deaths from exposure would be much more damning.
06:09 AM on 03/21/2011
Diminishing the historical side effects, and the potential consequences as unlikely is a dangerous way to make decisions. And most people on this planet thankfully don't have your opinion on this matter. You don't speak for everyone.
barrada nicto
Optimism is necessary.
04:58 AM on 03/21/2011
Alternative energy is CHEAPER when the external costs are included.