More

Obama Administration: There Are No Current Plans To Ask Congress For Libya Funds

Obama

First Posted: 03/21/11 06:57 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:40 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- Among the features of America’s military involvement in Libyan airspace that has given some lawmakers pause: the cost. At a time when belt-tightening is the domestic political rage, writing checks to help support a no-fly zone half a world away has, for some critics, raised the question of President Barack Obama's budget priorities.

On Monday, National Journal tallied costs from the first day of Libya air strikes, estimating that the launch of more than 100 tomahawk missiles totaled somewhere from $112 million to $168 million. Within that range lie the cuts that House Republicans have proposed to the National Weather Service budget -- money that would be used for, among other things, tsunami-warning systems.

According to administration officials, however, the choice facing the president is not an either/or, since there are no current plans to ask Congress for a supplemental bill to pay for the military intervention in Libya.

"The operation in Libya is being funded with existing resources at this point. We are not planning to request a supplemental at this time,” Office of Management and Budget spokesman Kenneth Baer said Monday.

That seems to indicate the administration's confidence that the military mission will be brief, as White House officials have insisted -- though if historical precedent is any guide, the president could likely secure additional funds for a longer campaign should he press Congress for them. Some lawmakers, however, worry that the no-fly zone, pitched as a mere days-long commitment, will serve as a gateway to a larger military engagement.

Under law, the Defense Department has a great deal of discretion over its funding and the upward adjustment of early cost estimates. Tomahawk missiles, for instance, can be fired without immediately being replaced.

But congressional officials predict that the well on flexible Pentagon funds will run dry at around $1 billion. Beyond that, Congress will have to appropriate more funds.

“We will probably have to do a supplemental this year,” a top House aide said. “Unless they drastically curtail these activities.”

A spokesman for the House Appropriations Committee told The Huffington Post that the committee is in contact with the Pentagon as to what “the expectations and the needs may be” in terms of further involvement in Libya. As of early Monday afternoon, however, the spokesman said the committee had received no response.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Among the features of America’s military involvement in Libyan airspace that has given some lawmakers pause: the cost. At a time when belt-tightening is the domestic political rage, wr...
WASHINGTON -- Among the features of America’s military involvement in Libyan airspace that has given some lawmakers pause: the cost. At a time when belt-tightening is the domestic political rage, wr...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,223
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (34 total)
  1 of 4  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
ColinStevens 07:08 PM on 03/21/2011
I love how some here are comparing this to Iraq. It truly shows how uneducated and uninformed some people are. Bush INVADED a country with thousands of ground troops that wasn't even threatenin­g it's OWN citizens, and that didn't have a revolution going on against its leader - and lied about the reason we were doing it - without getting approval from either the U.N. or the Arab Emirates.

This is a  Read More...
11:10 PM on 03/22/2011
It's possible we are protecting against a genocide but I don't think so. I do know that after Rwanda the world has been hypersensitive about that happening again. Plus a Democrat is in office, and that's when most genocides happen so maybe they are paranoid that it will happen.
I'm not in favor of sending out guys just to stop a civil war.
08:45 PM on 03/22/2011
This bears repeating!

“The president does not have power under the Constituti­on to unilateral­ly authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.’ Now that was Barack Obama who said that on December the 20, 2007.”

Comments...please??
09:21 PM on 03/22/2011
well first of all, its also not 1776. Don't take it the wrong way... I'm a total jeffersonian. I could go on all day about how far we have strayed from our founding principles and how bad it is for us. But the fathers also knew things would change which is why monroe said the constitution should have only "General provisions"
The UN didn't exists back then. NATO, NORAD etc....

The commander in chief is in charge of the military. And in certain circumstance can and should yield that power. The WRP checks that power but even that has clauses that allow the president to act. We have an obligation to the UN security council charter and thats what this is about.

The WRP states that treaties made prior to the enactment of the WRP (which was drafted in 73 but not enacted till the 80's) take precedent. It also states that the president has 60 days AFTER deploying troops to submit a report to congress requesting a declaration of war.

This libya thing is not an act of aggression. We aren't taking territory, we aren't going after its leaders, we are protecting civilians from a murderous dictator. And that is a LEGAL obligation that we have. This is legal and warranted. Its just a shame that we are fights on 3 others front for useless reasons. but that was Obama was it???
09:48 PM on 03/22/2011
Please...not aggression? Tell that to those who are dead. Where does our obligation begin or end? We didn't need a third regardless.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Bike Commuter
logical
11:20 AM on 03/23/2011
This is a typical tactic I see both the right and the left use. They take a statement out of context and try to make it look like it is much more than it actually is.
 
That was a comment in reply to a question specifically about Iran. It was not a complete statement on the overall intricacies of Constitutional separation of powers. It isn't even his entire answer to the question. For example, he talked later in the question about his own proposal to introduce a law (as Senator) stating that the President could not initiate hostiIe acts against Iran without prior approval. If his statement about the Constitution were what you are implying, then his proposed law would not be necessary anyway. In effect, even in his short answer, Obama qualified his opinion as not being absolute.
04:35 PM on 03/22/2011
OBAMA IS PARTICIPATING IN A DECISION BY THE WORLD COURT " THE UNITED NATIONS ", IF HE HAD WENT TO CONGRESS THEY WOULD HAVE DRAGGED THEIR FEET, JUST AS THEY ARE DOING ON THE DECISION BY THE WORLD TO FIGHT GREEN HOUSE GASES. WHILE WAITNG FOR CONGRESS TO ACT, OBAMA WOULD HAVE BEEN ACCUSED BY THESE SAME CONGRESS PEOPLE OF ' NOT CARING ABOUT DICTATORS KILLING THEIR OWN PEOPLE', SO ITS DAMNED IF HE DOES AND DAMNED IF HE DOESN'T. HE IS BEING A WORLD LEADER, NOT A WHIPPING BOY FOR SOME BACKWOODS, HEAD IN THE SAND CONGRESS PEOPLE.
DIDN'T BUSH GO INTO IRAQ BASED ON A LIE, THESE SAME PEOPLE COMPLAING NOW BACKED HIM AND TO DATE, WE HAVE SPENT TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS, WHICH THE COUNTRY NEEDED, LOOKING FOR WMDS WHICH WERE NEVER THERE. ALSO DIDN'T BEN LADEN ATTACK US, SO WHY ATTACK IRAQ, YOU RARLEY HERE ANYONE SAY HIS NAME ANYMORE.
REMEMBER HE IS A MEMBER OF THE SAUDIA ROYAL FAMILY, HE LIVES IN SAUDIA ARABIA FOLKS, NOT IN THE MOUNTAINS.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Bike Commuter
logical
11:22 AM on 03/23/2011
I agree, but how about turning off the caps lock next time.
04:17 PM on 03/22/2011
Well we are between a Barack and a hard place in 2012. I really do not want to vote for Obama again cause he has been a huge disappointment and refuses to fight for the people that voted for him instead caves to the party that lost the 2008 election. Don't get me started on the GOP. This is seriously becoming a "democratic' oligarchy. We just like to rotate our leaders, but the power remains in the same hands.
09:14 PM on 03/22/2011
Look, I'm not going to argue with anyone on their feelings on this. It has been a rough few years to say the least. And I have been very disappointed with BO in my day to day. BUT, he passed comprehensive health care reform after a little over a year, he has drastically improved the world view of our country, he prevented an entire collapse of the economy (Yes, it has been terrible, but we didn't sink, and lots thought we would.. you can only do so much), he has seriously decreased our involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan is a work in progress... and most of that stuff was inherited. Plus there have been a lot of small things. Yes there have been bad things as well. like I said, I have disagreed a lot with him. But in the big picture, after 2 years, its ridiculous for people to accuse him of not having accomplished anything.

I don't know about you, but when I voted for Obama, and I saw the landscape of this country, I knew in my head that I was voting for him for 8 years. And I'm sticking to that despite my day to day hesitations.

The guy HAS accomplished a lot... you just wont find it in mainstream news.
Besides... who else you gonna vote for, palin? lol
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Andrews
How To Absolutely Secure Your Computer
08:29 AM on 03/23/2011
@Stuart Day Yes Stuart OBAMA has accomplished a lot he incresed our debt by 6 trillion dollars in only 2 years. He has made deep cuts in MEDICARE so that now doctors can no longer treat MEDICARE patients. He has started the defunding of ss with a cut of almost 50% in the payroll tax at a time when more baby boomers are becoming near retirement age. The way that OBAMACARE was pushed thru with backroom deals and outright bribes to at least 4 states. There are now over 1000 groups that have applied for and received exemptions to OBAMACARE. He is the laughing stock of Europe and Asia. Dont forget that great trade deal that he got from South Korea, The US got 200 jobs and South Korea got 200k jobs. He has called law abiding citizens "THE ENEMY and CALLED TO PUNISH THEM" He has been declared the most divisional president ever. He has created a ANGRY but PEACEFUL group of citizens called the TEA PARTY. Yes he has accomplished much. Lets not forget that with Charlie Rangels help he allowed GE to get a huge refund when they had a profit of over 14 billion dollars. GE is also a huge job outsourcer. He has been a colossal Failure and just tust like the sentiment was ANTI BUSH he has stirred that up. His party is now looking for someone to oppose him in the primaries
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
LI2USsomemore
my dog has midriff bULGe
03:56 PM on 03/22/2011
I feel like I've been bent over a chair.

(We'll just ask for the money later.) Duh!
03:39 PM on 03/22/2011
This is just one more piece of evidence that proves our government really doesn't care for any of us in this country. It's all about the money money money. Let's fire some more teachers, end NPR's funding and wipe out the EPA but when it comes to pouring cash into military action there is no end in site.

Somebody is making money or going to make money from this bombing.

The older I get the more scared of our government I become.
03:31 PM on 03/22/2011
Maybe, we better ask the right question to begin with here, "If the Obama administration is working for " Change,We can believe in", where exactually does that leave the Nations education system at ?
Has anyone else noticed that when he starts something, He goes on Vacation at taxpayers expense !
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
LI2USsomemore
my dog has midriff bULGe
03:57 PM on 03/22/2011
The change is in the form of nickles, dimes, and quarters.
05:55 PM on 03/22/2011
What happen to those "Bright Shinny Copper Pennies " ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mistinguette Grandison
No. Corporations are NOT people
03:28 PM on 03/22/2011
Can we stop calling Obama a neo-con or a spineless fool? It is such an immature and ignorant response to the entire situation. How about he is just a complex guy who is trying to do the right thing for the moment. I'm in accordance to the idea that we need to get out of Afghanistan and I would love fro this to not escalate into a full out war, but stop rushing into comparing him to GWB. Bush invaded Iraq w/o UN approval with full out ground troops, and lied about weapons of mass destruction. This was something watched on the international level, and it ended up being internationally decided to end up at this point. I see no balance with this criticism at all.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rockskin
03:02 PM on 03/22/2011
Bush never asked congress for permission to make war with Iraq or the rest of the world
03:22 PM on 03/22/2011
Bush has nothing to do with this conversation. This is about Obama's crimes, not his.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mrrobinson2u
Respect for Marriage Act NOW! Repeal DOMA NOW!
04:56 PM on 03/22/2011
Helping civilians protect themselves from an obviously insane dictator...WITH permission from A.E. and the U.N. at their request...NOT based on lies...not quite the same as a crime. He's playing by the rules...he's too smart not to.
photo
saulthesavior
Last guys don't finish nice
02:55 PM on 03/22/2011
Hey...I can't find the story of the U.S. Army “kill team” in Kabul. Where did HuffPo post it, in politics or in big news, or where. You know, the soldiers in Afghanistan that posed for photos not with tortured prisoners but with corpses. Of civilians. Whom they had killed. No mention of this atrocity on the NYTimes web site. Waz up?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Endotoxin
Blast Corps
02:52 PM on 03/22/2011
Drastically curtail these activities.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:45 PM on 03/22/2011
March 20, 2011 07:00 AM
Coalition of Clinton, Rice and Power Swayed Decision to Bomb Libya
http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/coalition-clinton-rice-and-power-sway
"Clinton made the case that U.S. support for a no-fly zone was conditioned on Arab participation and leadership. In Paris Clinton met with her counterparts in town for a meeting of the Group of 8 foreign ministers and with Abdullah bin Zayed, the foreign minister of the United Arab Emirates. Even as she criticized the UAE for its recent decision to send forces to quell a rebellion in Bahrain, Clinton pressed him to send planes to Libya."
02:28 PM on 03/22/2011
So this war's a freebie, eh?

Well, it's about time!
photo
stape45
Spin this!
02:36 PM on 03/22/2011
You might not want to swallow that too quickly.
photo
stape45
Spin this!
02:24 PM on 03/22/2011
I think her bod looked better in her little panty scene in the movie “The Fourth Floor”.
photo
stape45
Spin this!
02:39 PM on 03/22/2011
My page shifted on me while I was heating a slice of pizza. Is it HP or my new installation of Explorer 9? Guess we'll never know. (Or care?)
photo
kewps
My Altered Ego
03:10 PM on 03/22/2011
This sounds a lot more appealing than the thread I'm on now-lol.

Fanned for a most excellent diversion!
02:18 PM on 03/22/2011
BO is using the same playbook as Bush...
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
kewps
My Altered Ego
03:16 PM on 03/22/2011
Yep-a 3rd term, for sure.