More

So, What Is A 'Presidential Exploratory Committee,' Exactly?

Tim Pawlenty

First Posted: 03/23/11 06:10 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:40 PM ET

As you may have already surmised, the process by which ordinary humans run for president is a byzantine one, shrouded in mystery and wonder. For instance, if you walked up to someone on the street and asked them, "Is Mitt Romney running for president of the United States?" you'd probably elicit an affirmative answer. At that point, you could respond by saying, "Bzzzzt! Nuh-uh! He hasn't even technically formed an exploratory committee yet." You know, if you wanted to be a jerk about it.

But that's the nature of the process. Some people start making noises that signify that they might want to be president, and then they start doing things that are loaded with significance to political reporters -- they write a book, they start a PAC, they go to Iowa -- and then one day you hear that Tim Pawlenty has formed a "presidential exploratory committee," which to you, sounds vaguely like some sort of spelunking excursion, but which reporters on the campaign beat assure you is a very big deal.

And so you accept that as a very big deal, and that maybe allows you to understand that Tim Pawlenty is slightly more serious about running for president than everyone who doesn't have a "presidential exploratory committee," and also maybe you get this joke from the 32nd season of "Saturday Night Live":

Chris Matthews: You think [Barack Obama] hates women?

Hillary Clinton: Well, Chris, I think the fact that knowing I'm running for president he would deliberately form an exploratory committee to run himself in the same election, when he has to know he'd be running against me, well, I mean, Jiminy Cricket! At the very least, it shows a certain lack of respect for women.

Chris Matthews: But in fairness to Senator Obama, until today when you've been asked if you were running for president, you've always denied it.

Hillary Clinton: What? [EXPLETIVE] that [DELETED]. He knew I was running for president! [EXPLETIVE] [DELETED]! Is there anyone in the [EXPLETIVE DELETED] country who didn't know I was running for president?! I've been running for president since I was 5! Are you [EXPLETIVE]-tarded? [pause] I'm sorry, Chris. It's just that getting elected president is something I feel passionately about.

Chris Matthews: That really comes through.

But what exactly is a "presidential exploratory committee?" Is it an important distinction in the life of a campaign that signified a significant step forward, or just some part of the overall pageantry of a presidential campaign? As it turns out, it's both!

You see, up until Tuesday, all Tim Pawlenty has done was to "test the waters." He's been trying to determine things like, "When I tell people that I'm considering running for president, do they accept it as a credible thing that might happen on this planet, or do they point and laugh at me?" Once that period is through, he moves to the "exploratory committee" phase, and this actually is a legal distinction defined by the Federal Election Commission:

An individual who merely tests the waters, but does not campaign for office, does not have to register or report as a candidate. Therefore, while a campaign committee files disclosure reports, a testing the waters fund does not have to file reports until the candidacy is established. At this point, all testing the waters activities must be disclosed on the next scheduled FEC report. A testing the waters fund abides by the same contribution limits and prohibitions as a campaign committee. There are activities that indicate that an individual is campaigning and, therefore no longer testing the waters. Among these are:

* Making statements that refer to yourself as a candidate;
* Using advertising to publicize your intention to campaign; or
* Taking action to qualify for the ballot.

If someone is testing the waters and decides not to run, testing the waters activity is not disclosed to the FEC. However, the contribution limits and prohibitions apply whether or not the individual decides to run.

So, when a candidate says they are forming an "exploratory committee," this does not mean that only now are they taking up an exploration of the possibility that they might mount a presidential campaign -- that work is already well underway. It simply means that they are exploring a new relationship with the FEC.

Of course, they are also looking to explore a new relationship with the media. This is all explained very well by NPR's Ron Elving in a December 2006 piece titled, "Declaring for President is a Dance of Seven Veils."

The exploratory committee has been around for decades, and technically it creates a legal shell for a candidate who expects to spend more than $5,000 while contemplating an actual run. Under the rules, exploratory money may be raised without the full disclosure of sources required of true candidates. Only when the candidate drops the exploratory label does the full responsibility of transparency apply.

Candidates use an exploratory committee as not only a transitional phase for their bookkeeping but as an extra claim on media attention. Some of the most skillful handlers like to leak word that their candidate is testing the waters, then leak word that he or she is thinking about forming an exploratory committee. Additional "news" can be made when the same candidate actually forms such a committee and registers with the Federal Election Commission. Yet a fourth round of attention may be generated when the word exploratory gets dropped from the committee filing.

Of course, forming an exploratory committee doesn't necessarily commit a person to actually running for president. Think of it like this: you've been dating a nice lady (the American people) for a long time, and are thinking about settling down (launching a presidential campaign). But first, you arrive at the moment where you have to meet that nice lady's parents (the FEC). And so you arrange some opportunities to interact (file financial disclosure forms), but that doesn't necessarily mean that you'll put a ring on that (officially commit to running for president).

As Elving points out, the "formal announcement" where you finally tell the world that you're in the race for real doesn't come until the "sixth veil." (This is followed by the seventh, in which the candidate issues "the requisite denial of any interest in being nominated for vice president.")

And that's what an "presidential exploratory committee" is, so there's no real need for you to ever make such a big deal about it ever again. Just go on, living your lives.

[Would you like to follow me on Twitter? Because why not? Also, please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com -- learn more about our media monitoring project here.]

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
As you may have already surmised, the process by which ordinary humans run for president is a byzantine one, shrouded in mystery and wonder. For instance, if you walked up to someone on the street an...
As you may have already surmised, the process by which ordinary humans run for president is a byzantine one, shrouded in mystery and wonder. For instance, if you walked up to someone on the street an...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 93
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
06:28 PM on 04/14/2011
I would have thought that an Exploratory Committee was a group of supporters who crawled into the prospective candidate's digestive tract and skull to determine what might be found when the prospective candidate declared and the press and opposition started trying to crawl-in through every available orifice.

http://www.thenewsnation.com/
11:50 AM on 03/24/2011
A way to sucker donors out of $5,000 dollars and to tell them I'll let you kiss my rear end at a later date for some more money.
AgingLady
laughter is best medicine
11:33 AM on 03/24/2011
You all have it covered!!!
photo
camelias and sweet tea
Small drinking village with a shrimping problem
08:26 AM on 03/24/2011
Just a way to pay the mortgage for a while.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
henrypapillon
Mitt--free up the last 9 years' taxes
10:18 PM on 03/23/2011
That is where they bend way over and stick the upper part of their anatomy up the lower part of their anatomy to see if they can see anything.
photo
Cthulhu On Call
As soon as I'm done with my nap, you're all in tro
10:52 PM on 03/23/2011
Damn. Someone's always beating me to my punch lines!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:02 AM on 03/24/2011
don't feel like the lone ranger.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Artanis71
Colbert Super PAC unleashed in 2012
09:01 PM on 03/23/2011
So, What Is A 'Presidential Exploratory Committee,' Exactly? - For Newt and most of them its a way to fleece supporters of money, they all noticed how Newt has had this job of pretending to run for years making big bucks.
photo
camelias and sweet tea
Small drinking village with a shrimping problem
10:18 AM on 03/24/2011
fanned
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JessWonderin
07:58 PM on 03/23/2011
Easy question .... It's a GOP Job Program. Several folks make a VERY good living "running" for things....
08:24 AM on 03/24/2011
Our current President and all our other Democratic candidates went down the exact same road. I am a Democrat, and proud to be one. But, I simply do not understand the comment. There were at least 11 candidates for the Democratic nomination in 2008. Did you feel the same about them?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Katco
Misogyny: hard to spell, easy to practice
07:33 PM on 03/23/2011
Good & Pawlenty... h@ted the taste of that candy and the politician is equally as foul.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vere15
Vero nihil verious (nothing truer than truth)
07:32 PM on 03/23/2011
Exploration - that sounds like a medical health procedure - wonder if it is covered by health care
07:23 PM on 03/23/2011
im still trying to figure out how being a community organizer makes someone qualified to be president!
07:38 PM on 03/23/2011
Don't call us. We'll call you..... Keep pondering.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doodlebug2
Moe. Larry the cheese
08:19 PM on 03/23/2011
and how a drunk became president before him.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
dwright
Religion is man-created.
07:06 PM on 03/23/2011
All this means is that he can raise money and not have to account for what he does with it.
06:50 PM on 03/23/2011
It's a small group of people, usually hired, who try to divine whether potential candidate X stand a snowball's chance in hell of getting elected if he or she decided to jump in the race for real.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Francois Bergeron
seeking sense
06:41 PM on 03/23/2011
sounds anal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
childeharr
Vox populi, vox humbug!
06:37 PM on 03/23/2011
You form an exploratory committee in order to test the media waters. It's a way of saying, I'm running for president without really filling in any paperwork. The most important thing about an exploratory committee is that you get to see the reaction of the media and the general American opinion of you without having to waste your time. If the media and America, at large, considers you a clown or a joke (i.e. Trump and Gingrich), then you should probably save your time and money. However, if the media and America simply consider you boring but legitimate (i.e. Pawlenty), then you may want to start getting your ducks in order. It's early still. Who wants Tim Pawlenty and Haley Barbour yammering hypocrisy this early? They might use up their best stuff before September/October 2011.
photo
sippewissett
We are ALL Americans, not just the noisy few.
06:36 PM on 03/23/2011
I HAVE to share the hilarity of this gaffe by both Pawlenty and Gingrich because they are both off to a flaming start. since the GOP is not noted for being minority-friendly, they both resorted to using stock photos of minorities in their recent foray into the presidential run. Check these out before these two stalwarts correct their opening faux-pas!

* Pawlenty is shown in his ad talking to whites only. How to introduce minorities? Throw in some photos from the Getty photo site. http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-national/liberals-criticize-pawlenty-ad-for-using-stock-images-of-minorities-video

* Gingrich has the same problem with elusive minorities so on his Web site is a photo of minorities waving American flags -- a photo that had already been used on Ted Kennedy's site. Oh, the delicious irony. http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2011/03/03/gingrich-2012-website-uses-kennedy-stock-photo/