More

Pennsylvania Mom Michele Gray Opts Her Children Out Of Standardized Testing

Standardized Testing

First Posted: 03/23/11 10:54 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:40 PM ET

Sunday marked the first day of spring -- the season of rain showers that bring flowers, daylight saving time and standardized testing. Of course, controversy is already abloom.

Inspired by a Huffpost blog by Timothy D. Slekar criticizing standardized testing, Pa. mom Michele Gray decided to take a stand against the testing -- by refusing to allow her two children to participate. As reported by CNN, Gray homeschooled her 9 and 11-year-old sons while the rest of their classmates sat in classrooms, bubbling in answers.

WATCH:


Gray says she objects to the tests because they create unnecessary anxiety, don't accurately measure accomplishments and are "used to punish schools." Her children's school, Park Forest Elementary, was put on "warning" status last year because the school's special education students did not reach the state-required level of progress.

"The more I looked at it, the more outraged I became," Gray told CNN. "This is not something I want to be contributing to (or) something I want my children participating in."

She's not alone -- CNN's American Morning blog reports that a total of nine Park Forest Elementary children have been opted out of the tests by their parents. Slekar, the author of the blog that prompted the movement, will also not allow his 11-year-old son to take the tests this year. In his blog, he mocked the idea that teachers who don't "teach for the test" are bad teachers:

"I never once dreamed about teaching children to score well on tests. So you see, it's all my fault. I was not able to see that I would, one day, become a "crappy" teacher -- a teacher that actually cares deeply about children and the learning process."

Adding to concerns that teaching has become too focused on test scores is new Florida legislature that will link teacher jobs to student standardized test scores -- "merit pay," as it has been termed.

In a blog for the Chicago Tribune, former Florida Governor Jeb Bush touts the new legislature as "landmark legislation that brings common sense reforms to the teaching profession."

He states that under the new law, "all teachers... will be assessed and paid based on their effectiveness in teaching." Meaning that up to half of a teacher's yearly evaluation will be based on his/her students' "knowledge and skills" -- to be determined, of course, by standardized tests.

While many are unhappy with the current state of standardized testing -- as perhaps evidenced by the support of the Obama administration's attempt to overhaul No Child Left Behind -- some say that stopping children from testing is not the way to improve the situation, and may actually hurt the school -- and the students -- instead.

CNN Education Contributor Steve Perry said in an interview that opting out of the tests is not the right thing to do. "It makes the school not meet adequate yearly progress, which then puts it on the list, which is what they're saying they don't want the school to be. They're actually hurting the school in doing this."


FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

Sunday marked the first day of spring -- the season of rain showers that bring flowers, daylight saving time and standardized testing. Of course, controversy is already abloom. Inspired by a Huffpost...
Sunday marked the first day of spring -- the season of rain showers that bring flowers, daylight saving time and standardized testing. Of course, controversy is already abloom. Inspired by a Huffpost...
Filed by Victoria Fine  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 511
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
07:40 AM on 04/01/2011
Not sure my earlier post got through. Schools will not receive financial funding from the government if the standardized test is not given. In other words, our children are being used as pawns! I challenge anyone in favor of these tests to take them yourself!
06:41 PM on 03/30/2011
Schools will not receive financial funding from the government if the standardized test is not given. In other words, our children are merely being used as pawns!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:54 AM on 03/30/2011
For more information read the article by Shaun Johnson Towson University.
Supportive, but Now Leery, of Testing Boycotts
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/shaun-johnson/supportive-but-now-leery-_b_840618.html

Teachers This One Is for You (Timothy Slekar)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/timothy-d-slekar/teachers-this-one-is-for-_b_839658.html
Tara Hunkoff
I could have been Sheila Noyeau
10:26 PM on 03/29/2011
Standardized, customized, the types of tests they throw at my family don't matter. We've all been passing test like these for years for a very simple reason: after dinner, on an unpredictable but frequent basis, the parents in our families asked their children to EXPLAIN what they had learned lately.

If you could not explain the Free Silver Debate, chances were you weren't going to the movies that weekend. If you couldn't define define "taxonomy", cleaning the attic did wonders for your memory.

On the other hand, crafting a cogent defense of one side of a social question or calculating the the height required to achieve 34 mph on a roller coaster given its various friction losses got you that much closer to what you wanted in high school:a nice car and spending money.

In other words, it was Life 101
12:59 PM on 03/29/2011
The problem with asking this of Mr. Perry is that he doesn't have special ed kids in his charter schools. Mark my words, he will no longer be a principal in five years. He is building up his resume to be a education consultant appearing all over the news and making money on the lecture circuit.
12:26 AM on 03/29/2011
I'm curious what this means for the kid though. I briefly read over the article but I wonder if the child has to "make up" the test in some other fashion. Either way, I applaud the Mom for making this decision if she is prepared to equip her child with the tools necessary to succeed while missing out on the test. It's amazing that we seem to believe that our children can be so dynamic and so creative and so individually special but at the same time we test them ONE way. Makes no sense to me. I'm just a cook though, what do I know.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andrew Wojtkowski
Physengrammer (Physicist/Engineer/Programmer)
10:12 AM on 03/29/2011
Who cares about the kid?

This is about a parent asserting her beliefs without significant evidence or reasoning to back it up. Her kids won't get into a good college. They won't get a good career.

What's important here is that she's standing up against standardized testing. Not the children.
01:34 PM on 04/02/2011
I'm sure she cares about her child not being put into a box. Who says the child won't get into a good college? Who says the child has to go to college? Oh and there are NO examples of people that have go have great careers without having performed well on standardized testing. *extreme sarcasm*
03:49 AM on 03/27/2011
It would probably help if non educators would stop making education policy. It is kind of like asking your letter carrier to do the job of your nuclear scientist.
09:22 PM on 03/27/2011
Diffidently, I point out comparing education to quantum electrodynamics is laughable And, I'm aware they laughed at Columbus.But ,they laughed at Bozo the Clown ,too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andrew Wojtkowski
Physengrammer (Physicist/Engineer/Programmer)
10:20 AM on 03/29/2011
Educators shouldn't be writing education policy either. That's like Congress writing the rules of the House and Senate- and we know how well THAT works.

The fact is that even though administrators might be clueless about what tactics are best used to educate and assess education, teachers know just as much. And I don't mean that as a "boo on you" thing. It's not your job, really.

If you're a Math teacher, you're a math expert. Or at least I hope you are. You teach math. Or at least I hope you do. Then, you need to assess how much information is retained.

Here's a vital step that few teachers actually do: From that information, you can determine the weaknesses and strengths of your class. Well, they seem to have multiplication down pat, but most of the class struggles on long division. Maybe I should spend more time on long division and less on multiplication. GOOD teachers do this adaptive cirriculum. Unfortunately, not many do.

What I have seen is teachers having the same cirriculum, every class, every year, for a decade. If educators were all-knowing gods of education, this wouldn't be commonplace as it is now. It's just one example (of hundreds) of things that our teachers are doing wrong, but yet every teachers seems to think they know everything.

The blame lying not on the teachers, but actually on the education (or lack thereof) that they recieved prior to becoming a teacher. Getting an MAT is pathetic.
07:21 PM on 03/29/2011
"If you're a Math teacher, you're a math expert."

I think this is backwards. It SHOULD be "If you're a Math teacher, you're a teaching expert."
03:45 AM on 03/27/2011
I don't have a problem with standardized testing so much, but I do however have a problem with using standardized tests that are used to for other purposes than helping a child. Standardized tests can be used to find gaps in knowledge. The why the question is wrong is important for that child's growth. If all we are doing with the test is comparing the raw score to assess a school or teacher, we miss the whole point.
02:26 PM on 03/25/2011
Two important details to remember here:
Finland, the exemplary school system du jour, doesn't administer a single standardized test until high school graduation.
If parents opt out of tests the school will be dinged because part of our rating for NCLB mandates that 90%+ of the kids are tested. If kids don't show up for school, refuse to complete the tests, or opt out, schools are blamed. If every child who takes the test passes yet only 89% of the school took the test, the school would be rated as failing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:20 PM on 03/25/2011
Actually, I think it would be great if every parent in every state that solely uses tests scores to determine how much they will cut state aid to a district (God knows none are using it as reason to add any money to school financing in this age) would refuse to have their kids tested. It might be the only way to protest the stupidity of state legislators who are letting Glenn Beck and The Kochs guide their state's education agenda.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Angel R1240
Progressive for REAL change
10:41 AM on 03/25/2011
If I had kids I would not let them let these tests because I'm in college now and when I was in school I had to take these tests and all the teachers had to do is "teach to the test" and most of the students would pass the useless test. I graduated high school and now I'm in college, the question is do we need these damn tests?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daniel S1
10:06 AM on 03/25/2011
If I were a teacher giving this test I would just give the kids the answers. The school would get its money, I would keep my job, and the kids would be no less prepared for real life, which is to say not at all. This is just another conservative attak on "intellectualims".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:34 AM on 03/25/2011
and you believe no kid/parent will spill the beans?
photo
maninal2
Without knowledge action is useless
01:46 PM on 03/26/2011
The post points to the absurdity in testing as it exists today. Try adding something.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:41 PM on 03/25/2011
"If I were a teacher giving this test I would just give the kids the answers."

They do, use the Bing seach box above. Search;
"standardized test teachers cheat"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pepimartinez
09:09 AM on 03/25/2011
I remember one thing about my 7th grade English class... the GEPA. I don't remember my teacher's name, what she taught me, or what was on the GEPA, but I know it stood for Grade Eight Proficiency Assessment, and I needed to do well on it.

That's not educating children to be critical thinkers. It's educating them on what a test says they should know.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kcwookie
Well behaved workers seldom prosper.
08:59 AM on 03/25/2011
End Standardized Tests...It will mean the end of society. If we end the test, school districts will have to start educating our kids instead of training them to take the test.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:39 PM on 03/25/2011
As a former teacher, I can tell you that Since 2001, teaching has been no fun. It was the emphasis of NCLB that ruined many teachers ability to put education ahead of test taking skills. In the past few weeks, I have seen 8 students I had in math classes in the early 1970's at funerals or at public events. These men and women are now in their 50's. They've all had successful lives and each went out of their way to talk to me. They so often say what fun they had in my class, usually remembering some add on to the class syllabus that drew them into enjoying the math. It might have been a week long unit on geometric string designs (planned and made on wood with neon bright colored strings -two mentioned they still have theirs, one on his office wall where he tells clients about his 7th grade math teacher) or a one day Algebra activity (not from the text book or anything meeting the guidelines of NCLB) in which the students used a math method to determine the day of the week on which they were born or the card game or a day spent with a card game I developed that they thought was really fun, but which was teaching them how to group things in solving algebraic expressions using the braces, brackets, parenthesis, rules on which procedures take precedence when solving them, etc.) You have got reach them to teach them.
03:39 PM on 03/25/2011
"As a former teacher, I can tell you that Since 2001, teaching has been no fun. "

This. It's become quite stressful, actually.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KJLSanDiego
02:22 PM on 03/28/2011
Testing fatigue sucks, no doubt.
So do some of the content standards.
You'd think a person with a Masters Degree (or close to it) could be trusted with a textbook and their own devices.
04:34 PM on 03/31/2011
Districts and teachers do NOT want standardized testing to continue to run their agenda. We'd LOVE it if we could educate our kids instead of train them to take tests. As a 5th grade teacher I commonly have to assess 10- and 11-year olds as much as 5 times a day. They hate it and so do I. Please express your concerns to those responsible - legislators who made standardized testing the law.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PostModernGuy
08:46 AM on 03/25/2011
Standardized testing (especially any multiple choice testing) demonstrates the student's ability to either logically narrow choices down to a 'correct' answer, or intelligently guess. That goes for this as well as the SATs.
If you really want to see how much a student is learning, give them an essay question, or even a short answer. In that case, they're not just memorizing facts (dates, definitions), but having to learn concepts.
Unfortunately, that's not something that can be implemented in a mass-produced standardized test.
photo
maninal2
Without knowledge action is useless
01:47 PM on 03/26/2011
Corporations specializing in test creation would go out of business so your solution would not be acceptable to the reformers.