iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

London Protests Gather Strength After Massive Budget Cuts Announced

MEERA SELVA and AARON EDWARDS   03/26/11 11:39 PM ET   AP

London Protests Budget Cuts
Back-dropped by Big Ben, demonstrators against the coalition government's spending cuts march in London, Saturday, March 26, 2011. Tens of thousands of mostly peaceful demonstrators streamed into central London on Saturday to march against government budget cuts, with a small breakaway group smashing its way into a bank, breaking windows and spray painting logos on the walls . (AP Photo/Akira Suemori)

LONDON — More than 250,000 people took to London's streets to protest the toughest spending cuts since World War II – one of the largest demonstrations since the Iraq war – as riot police clashed with a small groups. More than 200 people were arrested.

Although most of Saturday's demonstration was peaceful, clashes continued into the night as dozens of protesters pelted officers with bottles and amonia-filled lightbulbs. Groups set several fires and smashed shop windows near tourist landmarks such as Trafalgar Square.

Teachers, nurses, firefighters, public sector workers, students, pensioners and campaign groups all took part in Saturday's mass demonstration.

"They shouldn't be taking money from public services. What have we done to deserve this?" said Alison Foster, a 53-year-old school teacher. "Yes, they are making vicious cuts. That's why I'm marching, to let them know this is wrong."

Britain is facing 80 billion pounds ($130 billion) of public spending cuts from Prime Minister David Cameron's coalition government as it struggles to slash the country's deficit. The government has already raised sales tax, but Britons are bracing for big cuts to public spending that are expected next month.

Treasury chief George Osborne has staked the government's future on tough economic remedies after Britain spent billions bailing out banks. Some half a million public sector jobs will likely be lost, about 18 billion ($28.5 billion) axed from welfare payments and the pension age raised to 66 by 2020.

Commander Bob Broadhurst of the Metropolitan Police confirmed more than 250,000 people had marched peacefully, but said around 500 caused trouble.

Hundreds were arrested and police expected that number to rise. Dozens were injured, and several were admitted to hospitals for a range of problems, including shortness of breath and broken bones. Five police officers were also injured.

The demonstration began in the afternoon. Police said one small group of protesters broke away from the main march, scuffling with police officers and attempting to smash windows on two of London's main shopping streets. Others threw objects at the posh Ritz Hotel in nearby Piccadilly.

The protesters, shouting "Welfare not Warfare!" outnumbered the police. Some attacked police officers with large pieces of wood. A handful of bank branches were damaged when groups threw paint and flares at buildings.

Still, the day's protest otherwise had a carnival feel with music, big screen TVs and performers in Hyde Park, one of London's biggest public gardens.

The TUC, the main umbrella body for British unions, says it believes the cuts will threaten the country's economic recovery, and has urged the government to create new taxes for banks and to close loopholes that allow some companies to pay less tax.

TUC general secretary Brendan Barber said he regretted the sporadic violence.

"I don't think the activities of a few hundred people should take the focus away from the hundreds of thousands of people who have sent a powerful message to the government today," he said. "Ministers should now seriously reconsider their whole strategy after today's demonstration. This has been Middle Britain speaking."

Ed Miliband, leader of the opposition Labour Party, likened the march to the suffragette movement in Britain and the civil rights movement in America. "Our causes may be different but we come together to realize our voice."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

LONDON — More than 250,000 people took to London's streets to protest the toughest spending cuts since World War II – one of the largest demonstrations since the Iraq war – as riot p...
LONDON — More than 250,000 people took to London's streets to protest the toughest spending cuts since World War II – one of the largest demonstrations since the Iraq war – as riot p...
Filed by Hunter Stuart  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7,461
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (87 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AndyWright68
Freedom is inevitable!
12:44 PM on 03/30/2011
Stealing from the wealthy will never fix the problem because theft IS the problem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AndyWright68
Freedom is inevitable!
12:42 PM on 03/30/2011
Why do the people who are dependent on the government to steal money for them so quick to fill the streets when they run out of stolen money?
03:08 PM on 03/28/2011
The one nuance missed in the comparison between the USA and the Europeans, is that they clearly understand they are being given the burden of bailing out the wealthy and the banks by being sold out by their own government. The raising of the retirement age in France was only the tip of the iceberg, not the sole reason for strikes and rioting. The other issue is the Europeans understand how to send a message, and how to hit the wealthy effectively to send that message.
Tax cuts for the already wealthy , without specific conditions ( and auditing for compliance ) for their use is nothing more than corporate welfare and backdoor "socialism" limited to the investor class. Even subsides without auditing and enforcement of compliance is nothing more than welfare to favor a certain class of "welfare kings and queens".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marionette
03:25 PM on 03/28/2011
a little clarification please. 'they' referring to the USA?

and if so, may i actually point out that while most if not all republicans (and a lot of democrats) were upset about the bailout, and still are, it's my understanding that the govt here (USA) is actually poised (if not already) to make a little back from the loans and stock from that bailout. if so, then it helped pay for itself in a manner of speaking..

it was a risky move admittedly, but ultimately turned out to be pretty smart amidst the screams and shouts of 'socialism!' ;)
03:28 PM on 03/28/2011
They referring to the Europeans.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marionette
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marionette
02:44 PM on 03/28/2011
this is only *10* people.. not even mentioning the rest of the billionaires club, and haven't even dipped into the millionaires club.. so let me ask.. would 100 billion go a long way in resolving tax burden issues? or govt shutdowns?

tell me how having to just 'live' on 13 billion dollars would suck? there are folks that work way to hard for the 10k they make now.. it's not all about welfare.. it's about inequity..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marionette
02:31 PM on 03/28/2011
Here's something to check out. if you have a few minutes, indulge me ;)

Suppose you are given an opportunity to 'name your wealth'. In other words, think of *all* the things in your life that you could ever need or want.. No matter how plush, or solid gold etc.

Buying mansions and/or cars/planes etc for all of your living relatives. Think of everything you could possibly want in this life, then add in how much you think you might want to pass on to your family when you die.

how much is that number? 20 million? 50 million? 100 million? 500 million?

here's the question:
At what point does it stop being money or about money, and just becomes a mind boggling series of 0's in an account? Has anyone actually ever taken note on how many 0's there are in 500 million? 500,000,000. ok, still not large enough for you? how about 1 billion? 1,000,000,000. Now look at your own acct. If you're like me, there are not alot of numbers there, but we're managing like i think are alot of folks.

If you asked the top 10 wealthiest folks in the world, each to contribute to their respective home countries or even on a global scale, 10 billion (10,000,000,000) do you realize that the poorest of them would still have over 13.5 billion left (13,500,000,000), collectively 100 billion (100,000,000,000) could be used towards humanitarian aid? tax relief? something.
02:12 PM on 03/28/2011
Fortunately, Cameron's coalition government may be over sooner than we expected.
photo
toltec998
Power concedes nothing without a demand
01:44 PM on 03/28/2011
"The risk and cost of capitalism are socialized. The profits are privatized" Noam Chomsky.
Humanity seeks to correct this inequity.
01:25 PM on 03/28/2011
why do left wing demonstrations so often turn violent?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marionette
01:28 PM on 03/28/2011
stop trolling
photo
toltec998
Power concedes nothing without a demand
01:45 PM on 03/28/2011
The rarely turn violent.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marionette
01:21 PM on 03/28/2011
as i see it, people have 2 choices.. to live amongst and participate in society or to build a log cabin in the mountains and disassociate with society completely.. you cannot be a 'little bit pregnant' about this..

if you choose the former then understand that it's going to be like a marriage, because in many ways it is.. there are times when your partner gives or takes more than you do. rarely is it ever a 50-50 split..

choosing the latter means, that you cannot use *any* societal service..

here's a thought, why not *bolster* the folks responsible for building and mantaining a country.

the ones that *actually* do the work? teachers, firefighters, police, farmers, workers, soldiers etc.. you know, the ones that do the jobs that, and let's be honest, wealthy folks disdain getting their hands dirty doing..

if i haven't made my point clear, it is simply this.. what happens to the 'rich' when there is no one to be 'rich' over? the poor then become poorer or i guess homeless at that stage because of the inequality of tax burden and don't they themselves then become, to varying degrees, middle class, poor and rich? does the cycle start over? doesn't that seem a bit ridiculous?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marionette
01:31 PM on 03/28/2011
lol, we can even call it 'trickle up' economics ;)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
larry putman
pyrgist
12:04 PM on 03/28/2011
Governments are over taxing the private sector throughout the world. I am a middle class private sector person and the public sector is asking too much of us.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marionette
01:26 PM on 03/28/2011
ok, then the question then becomes, how much burden can any one 'class' handle? if you are middle class and are having problems, what do you think the result is going to be for people that make a fraction of what you might make?

doesn't that further perpetuate a 'welfare state'? you can't just say, 'ok, everyone that makes this much move over here and everyone that makes that much move over there, we don't want to associate with you'.. doesn't work like that
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:11 PM on 03/28/2011
The corporate sector is asking too much of the commons and refuses to pay the costs of running a society.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marionette
02:56 PM on 03/28/2011
exactly, agreed ;)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
john262
Elko, Nevada
11:22 AM on 03/28/2011
Oh cry me a river. Drastic cuts are necessary to prevent the UK from going into default which would result in the whole deck of cards crashing down. The proposed cuts are very mild compared to what will happen if they don't get their fiscal house in order. The demonstrators just don't understand economics and have a selfish "I want mine and the rest of you be damned" attitude.
photo
toltec998
Power concedes nothing without a demand
11:39 AM on 03/28/2011
Cry me a river? I believe your understanding of the situation needs to be improved. The "I want mine and the rest of you be damned" attitude is what the rich are saying to everyone else. The rich and powerful corporations are not paying thier share of taxes which is sparking protest like this. Just like in the midwest. When things are out of balance this happens. No one is trying to enrich themselves unfairly except the rich. Then when they need a bailout...this further exaserbates the situation. Who bailes out the middle class and poor?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
john262
Elko, Nevada
12:15 PM on 03/28/2011
So you advocate taking money from one class of people and giving it to another? It's the same old liberal shell game. It has never worked and it won't work now. Taxes in the UK are already too high. Cutting so-called government services is the only answer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cornel
wuf wuf
10:57 AM on 03/28/2011
They might just oust another "Conservative Regime" David Cameron, I guess your days are counted and you'll end like your buddy Harper ! The Jasmine revolution is spreading to the North now !
10:39 AM on 03/28/2011
Since this thread has been hijacked by either a group of nerdy chuckleheads who get their kicks playing nanna-nanna-boo-boo or Koch-head $.03-a-post man-children... I suggest you all take a look at the following huffpost article of an impending Republican/Free Market/Dystopian future:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-kuttner/an-american-industrial-re_b_841182.html

Oh, and I invite all you 'libs' libbity, liberal, liberatti, liberace-lovers, to come on over too...bring all the chuckleheads w/you...should be fun.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lrae2007
10:18 AM on 03/28/2011
These protests will be ignored. Their politicians...the best money can buy; just like ours.
10:46 AM on 03/28/2011
agreed as protests should be ignored
photo
toltec998
Power concedes nothing without a demand
01:46 PM on 03/28/2011
Until your rights are trampled on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cornel
wuf wuf
10:58 AM on 03/28/2011
Only as long as Mr. Molotov has not joined the demonstrators : )
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sam Hassock